Sen. Marco Rubio, a major player on immigration policy, said Wednesday that there was no chance now of passing a broad overhaul because Republicans have lost trust in President Barack Obama.
The first-term Florida lawmaker, a potential White House contender in 2016, cited GOP concerns about whether the president could be trusted to enforce tough security requirements in the Senate’s bipartisan immigration bill that Rubio helped write.
Rubio said the Obama administration has lost credibility as a result of how it handled the 2012 attack against a U.S. outpost in Libya and accusations that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups.
Rubio said doubts about Obama and his team colored his conversations with lawmakers he had hoped to persuade to back the immigration overhaul, now stalled in the House.
“The central impediment to making progress on this issue was people would say to me, ‘We understand that you put all this security stuff in the bill, but we don’t think it matters and we just don’t think government will enforce the law anyway,'” Rubio told reporters at a breakfast organized by The Wall Street Journal.
“‘You can write whatever you want in that bill. But the federal government will not enforce the law.’ As a result, they will just do the legalization part but they won’t do the enforcement part.”
Rubio said Republicans told him they feared a repeat of President Ronald Reagan’s immigration overhaul that gave about 3 million immigrants legal immigration status without following through with corresponding security improvements.
Rubio said other lawmakers brought up controversies that have dogged the administration and been favorite lines of criticism among conservatives. They includes the rocky rollout of the new health law and the disclosures about surveillance programs conducted by the National Security Agency.
“They pointed to the IRS scandal and the Benghazi stuff and then the NSA revelations and then the ‘Obamacare’ decisions by this administration as evidence of how the government and this administration unilaterally decides which portions of the law to enforce and which ones not to enforce. And that further undermines,” Rubio said.
Conservatives have said Obama used the IRS to go after political enemies’ tax-exempt statuses. IRS workers in a Cincinnati office singled out conservative political groups, such as tea party affiliates, in the spring of 2010 and continued to do so until 2012.
IRS supervisors in Washington oversaw the targeting but there has been no evidence released so far that anyone outside the IRS knew about the targeting or directed it.
As for Benghazi, four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed during the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission on Sept. 11, 2012.
The circumstances of the attack and the administration’s response remain a politically charged subject ahead of the 2014 elections, as well as the 2016 presidential election.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time of the attack, is a possible Democratic presidential contender in 2016.
The administration also has faced scrutiny from members of both parties over NSA spy programs disclosed when former agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked a trove of documents in June.
Finally, the administration has given reprieves to parts of his national health care law, which is sometimes called “Obamacare.” That has led to accusations the administration is willing to ignore the law to curry favor with allies.
Taken together, these issues have sown doubt among lawmakers that Obama could be trusted to enforce strict immigration provisions in the Senate-passed legislation, Rubio said.
House Republicans are meeting this week to consider their next steps on immigration.
Many are pushing a piecemeal approach, with strict security provisions first and a potential path to legal standing to follow later for those immigrants in the country illegally.
“The goal now is to reach a result,” Rubio said. “And reaching a result requires us to be realistic.”