Archive for November, 2011

Black (& Blue) Friday Kicks Of Across The U.S.

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Larger — and younger — crowds jammed the nation’s malls and big box stores on Black Friday, as a new generation got in on one of the biggest sales days of the year.

There were big crowds across the country as doors opened Thursday night.

Along with bargain-basement goods, luxury stores at Woodbury Common Premium Outlets in New York were particularly popular, said spokeswoman Michele Rothstein. Lines formed outside of Coach and Gucci as early as 7 p.m. and deals such as an additional 50% everything at Cole Haan drew shoppers from all over, including a strong international contingent and even parents with strollers.

In addition to hoards of first-timers, were also hard-core Black Friday shoppers with carefully devised plans, Rothstein said. “One woman had a color coded map — there was some pretty seriously strategic planning.”

“I don’t see a lot of browsing,” added Jim Fielding, president of Disney Stores. This year’s Black Friday shoppers are “more researched and more prepared, and very budget conscious,” he said.

There were a few violent incidents across the country, including a report of gunfire at the Cross Creek Mall in Fayetteville, N.C. No injuries were reported, according to the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office.

In Myrtle Beach, S.C., police said two people suffered injuries in an apparent armed robbery attempt after they left a Walmart store around 1 a.m. Friday, and police arrested one man after a fight at Walmart a jewelry counter in Kissimmee, Fla.

In Porter Ranch, Calif., 15 people suffered minor injuries at another Walmart store when one customer used pepper spray in an apparent attempt to move people out of line, according to the Los Angeles City Fire Department.

Black Friday, the day after Thanksgiving, typically sets the tone for shopping throughout the holiday season. This year, retailers were eager to get a jump start on the day with earlier-than-ever openings. Toys R Us opened at 9 p.m. Thursday, followed by Wal-Mart at 10 p.m. Then, at midnight, Target, Best Buy, Macy’s, and Kohl’s all opened their doors.

Despite some backlash against such early store openings on Thanksgiving Day, the move seemed to pay off.

Before its opening, an estimated 10,000 people waited outside Macy’s flagship store on Herald Square in New York, according to Macy’s spokesman Jim Sluzewski.

At the Toys R Us flagship store in Times Square a line stretched down the block, mostly for deals on video games.

Some 23% of Americans say they plan to go shopping on Black Friday, up from prior years, according to a CNN/ORC International poll.

Altogether, an estimated 152 million people are expected to shop over Black Friday weekend, up 10% from last year, according to a recent report from industry trade group the National Retail Federation. The largest majority of those shoppers are expected to be 18 to 24, the NRF said.

And even that generous estimate is likely to fall short of the actual number, noted Kathy Grannis, an NRF spokeswoman. Last year, the organization estimated there would be 138 million shoppers over the long weekend, when 212 million actually showed up — a record high.

For those who are sitting this one out, more online deals will roll out on Cyber Monday. Eight-in-10 online retailers will have special promotions then, according to the survey by Shop.org, an online division of the industry group the National Retail Federation.

(Source: CNN)

Vertluch: Parshas Toldos

Friday, November 25th, 2011

‘And Esav said to Yaakov,”Pour into me, now, some of that very red stuff, for I am exhausted”;he was therefore named Edom.’ (25; 30)

One of the many highlights thisweeks parsha discusses, is the story of how Esav sold the rightsof the bechora to Yaakov, for a bowl of lentil soup. If you’llnotice, the above pasuk seems to end off with a very puzzling comment: ‘thereforethey called him Edom…’

The first thought that comes tomind is, just because Esav ate some red lentil soup is a reason for usto refer to him and ‘name him’ Edom (red)? Imagine someonewalking into a pizza shop, ordering pizza and we say ‘and now we shall callhim…pizza! At first glance, it doesn’t seem to make any sense.

Secondly, two pasukim later it says that Yaakovmade the deal with Esav and he sells him the rights to be the bechora.Rashi says that Esav sold it for a bowl of lentil soup. The pasukends and says, ‘…and he ate and drank, and he got up and left; and Esavembarrassed the bechora.’ (25;34)

The seemingly puzzling question is how exactly did Esav‘embarrass’ the bechora? We see later on, in the parsha, when Esavrealizes that Yaakov stole the berachos from him, he was upset.It must be that he knew the value of the bechora, but right now he wasvery hungry so he sold it for a bowl of soup. Sometimes a person does anirrational thing due to hunger. This should be no different. Usually the termembarrassed means that the person doesn’t understand the value of something.But he must have known the value of the bechora or he would’ve notgotten so upset at Yaakov, later on, for stealing the berachos.So what exactly do we mean by saying that Esav ‘embarrassed’ the bechora?

Ramban says that the reason the Torah tellsus that he ate, drank, got up and left is because after he ate everything hewent right back into field to hunt; he went right back where he came from. The loshonthe Ramban uses is ‘Because fools have no other will other than eat,drink and fulfill their desires immediately.’ They’re not concerned withtomorrow. They don’t think about the future’.

Explains the Ramban that this is how Esav embarrassed the bechora.Right after he ate and drank he went back to concerning himself with hispleasures and enjoyment with no regard for tomorrow. The very fact that he canoccupy himself constantly with physical enjoyment and pleasure was howhe was mevaza the bechora.

What the Ramban is telling us is that a person has to have the abilityto see beyond what’s in front of him. Every time a person has a nisayon-beit with money, arayos, or whatever it may be-right now it looks like thegreatest pleasure in the world. One does not see what the repercussions are orwhere these actions may take him. Such a person will never be able to overcomeanything and is considered a fool. A fool only sees what’s directly in front ofhim.

The essence of the bechora-at that point-didn’treally have much of a value. Perhaps he understood the future value of it-forthe avodah-but not its value for that moment. When Esav comes inand he sees Yaakov cooking he couldn’t even see beyond the color of thefood! The first thing that caught his eye was red! He didn’t even bother tolook beyond the superficial element of food; the color! Therefore, we call him Edom.He couldn’t see what was beyond directly in front of him.

Part of being a chacham is being able to seebeyond what’s in front of you. As the mishna in Avos clearlystates, ‘who is a wise man? One who can see ahead (the future).’ Itdoesn’t mean someone who has ruach hakodesh. It means anyone whohas the ability to see beyond what’s directly in front of him is considered awise man; for it is those people who clearly understand the value of themoment.

We should all merit having the title of a chachamand be able to see past our immediate future.

HAVE A GREAT SHABBOS

Rabbi Krakowski: Parshas Toldos

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Yitzchak Avinu feels he is nearing death. Before he passes on, he wants to transmit the Brocho Avrohom Avinu gave to him to Eisav his son. Yitzchok, however, doesn’t simply call Eisav and give him the Brocho. He instead summons him and asks him to prepare a meal. Why doesn’t Yitzchok Avinu just give him the Brocho and be finished with it? Furthermore, Yitzchok tells him “prepare me the meal the way I like it so as to enable my soul to bless you”. This statement has two inherent difficulties: 1) how does Yitzchok’s eating enable him to give Eisav a Brocho? 2) Why does Yitzchok, one of the holiest people to have lived, require Eisav to make the food the way he “loves” it?

The Seforno explains that while Yitzchok may not have understood how bad Eisav was, he nonetheless realized that his son wasn’t a Tzadik. Yitzchok therefore felt the necessity of having Eisav perform Mitzvos so as to enable him to bless his son. By stipulating that Eisav should make it for him the way he loved it, Yitzchok Avinu was adding another dimension to Eisav’s act of Kibud Av – he was making special demands that increased the Mitzva and made it all the more meaningful. The Baal Haturim (and the Medrash) adds that “the way I love it” is a reference to Shechita and all its sub Mitzvos (Kisuy hadam etc.).

Yitzchok Avinu didn’t ask Eisav to go learn a few hours or to do Chessed. Yitzchok Avinu focused on Eisav’s strong points – on his talents. Yitzchok Avinu tried to channel Eisav’s hunting skills to Kibud Av. Yitzchok Avinu understood the only conduit, if any, that could be used in order to have Eisav as part of the Mesorah would be his own talents. Yitzchok understood that Eisav needed to be encouraged and appreciated in order to allow “brocho” to befall him.

While Eisav didn’t end up getting Bircas Avrohom, he did receive a Brocho from Yitzchok Avinu. We well know through our sufferings that Yitzchok’s Brocho to Eisav did materialize.

Fighting with our children will not facilitate Brocho. Only appreciation and encouragement will allow them to flourish. While sometimes children need to be reprimanded and chastised, the overall approach must remain appreciation and encouragement. We must appreciate their talents and we must encourage those talents in such a way that they are translated into Mitzvos.

A very warm Good Shabbos, Rabbi Y. Dov Krakowski

HaRav Zev Leff: Parshas Toldos

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Free WilI or Predestination

And the children clashed within her (Bereishis 25:22).Whenever she passed the entrances to the House of Study of Ever, Yaakov struggled to exit, [whenever] she passed the entrance to houses of idol worship, Esav struggled to exit (Rash) to Bereishis 25:22).

 

The Midrash cited by Rashi requires much study, for it seems to imply that Esav and Yaakov were already fixed in their tendencies to evil and righteousness, respectively, prior to birth. That would seem to contradict the very foundation of Torah: the principle of free will.

The Midrash also seems to contradict another Chazal. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 91b) relates that Rebbe, the descendant of Yaakov, and Antoninus, the descendant of Esav, debated when the yetzer hara enters a person. Rebbe maintained that it enters at conception and Antoninus maintained that it enters at birth. After Antoninus brought Scriptural proof to bolster his opinion, Rebbe acquiesced that it enters only at birth. Yet the Midrash, cited above, seems to attribute a yetzer hara to Esav prior to birth.

Rambam begins Hilchos De’os with a discussion of in-born personality traits and predispositions. For instance, he writes, some people are by nature cruel and others merciful. Yet Rambam in the fifth chapter of Hilchos Teshuvah is emphatic that a person’s nature does not cause him to be righteous or evil, merciful or cruel, wise or foolish, generous or stingy. The choice lies completely in his own hands. Aside from the apparent contradiction with Hilchos De’os, this statement is problematic for another reason. The assertion that wisdom or foolishness is not decreed seems to contradict the Gemara (Niddah 16b), which states clearly that wealth, strength, and intelligence are decreed at conception. Only whether one will be righteous or wicked is not decreed.

Resolution of the problem of in-born traits with individual free will is based on the following premise: While no two people are born with the same exact character traits, and those traits are influenced by many factors – including spiritual forces both prior to and at conception – these traits are not inherently good or bad. They are pareve. A predilection towards anger, for instance, is not necessarily an evil trait. There are situations when anger is required and is the correct response. Similarly, all natural traits and tendencies can be directed in both positive and negative directions. The tendency to shed blood, for instance, can be utilized as a shochet, a mohel, or surgeon, or it can be directed towards crime and murder. Although the character traits are predetermined, their function and control are totally in the hands of the individual. He exercises his free will in utilizing them for good or bad, and suppressing these tendencies when necessary.

Wisdom and intelligence are two distinct realms. One can have the IQ of a genius and act like a fool, and one can lack a high IQ and yet act with wisdom. Although intelligence is largely predetermined, as the Talmud states, whether one acts wisely or foolishly is, as Rambam writes, a function of one’s free will.

There is, however, one point that still needs to be clarified. While it is true that no single character trait or tendency is intrinsically good or bad, there are nevertheless certain traits that are more conducive to righteous conduct and those more prone to evil. A tendency towards anger, for example, is more prone to be abused, since there are more instances where anger is negative than where it is positive. By contrast, a natural tendency towards calmness is more prone to lead one to righteous conduct, since there are more instances where this behavior is positive than not.

Thus the difference in natural tendencies might seem to contain an element of injustice. But three points must be kept in mind. First, every person embodies a myriad of character traits. Though someone may be born with a trait that is predominantly negative, he will almost certainly have other traits that are predominantly positive.

Secondly, Hashem takes into consideration one’s predispositions in determining the situations he will be confronted with in life. Finally, as the Vilna Gaon states, Hashem judges each individual in relation to his specific nature. Hence, a person prone to anger by nature will be judged less harshly if he succumbs to a fit of anger than a person who is by nature calm. Likewise, a person with a predisposition to anger will receive more reward for controlling his anger than a person with a calm disposition.

Considered in this light, the Midrash is not telling us that Yaakov and Esav were acting in a good or evil fashion prior to birth. Rather they displayed tendencies towards either the more spiritual aspects of this world or the more physical. The houses of Torah study represented the epitome of spirituality and those of idolatry the epitome of physicality (idol worship being the deification of physical forces).

Esav and Yaakov ideally represented the partnership necessary to bring this world to perfection-the mastery and perfection of the physical world as a basis for spiritual perfection. Klal Yisrael would need both the Tribe of Yehudah, from whom the kings came and whose role was to master the world and conquer the forces of evil, and the Tribe of Levi from whom the Kohen Gadol came and whose role was to provide spiritual guidance and inspiration.

Chazal tell us that Yaakov and Esav divided Olam Hazeh (this world) and Olam Haba (the World to Come) between themselves; Esav taking the former and Yaakov the latter. This does not mean that Esav divested himself of a share in Olam Haba before birth, but rather that these two embryos had the ultimate potential to control the physical world and the spiritual world respectively. Had Esav used his traits and tendencies properly, he could have become a partner with Yaakov in bringing the world to perfection. Similarly, had Yaakov abused his traits, he could have developed into one who distorted and corrupted spiritual concepts and values.

The example of what the partnership of Yaakov and Esav could have been was epitomized by their descendants Antoninus-the might of Rome conquering the physical world-and Rebbe-the spirituality of Israel directing it toward spiritual values and goals. Nowhere does it state that Esav wanted to serve idolatry, only that he had a tendency towards it; he was just as capable of destroying idolatry and vanquishing the idolaters, as serving and promoting it. His mother Rivkah, says the Sifsei Kohen, deliberately passed by these places of idolatry in order to influence the heathens to renounce their idolatry.

Now we can understand why Yitzchak wanted to give Esav the berachah, and loved Esav the hunter more than Yaakov, the diligent student. Esav deceived Yitzchak into thinking that he could employ his tendencies towards the physical world to conquer the world for Torah and subdue the forces of evil. Yitzchak attributed the differences he noted in Esav’s and Yaakov’s behavior-the fact that Esav did not mention God’s name and acted without proper courtesy -to Esav’s role as the mighty warrior who spoke with force and not finesse. He assumed that Esav was afraid to mention God’s name out of fear that he might forget himself in places to which his mission in life would inevitably bring him where mentioning God’s name is prohibited.

Yitzchak thought that Esav was utilizing his unique traits for the good. True, in less than sublime ways, but that is the role of a king, who has to engage in war and to meet evil head-on to maintain justice in the world. Therefore Yitzchak desired to give the blessings, which were all material in nature, to Esav, who would need them to fulfill his role. Yaakov, he felt, did not need those blessings in the safe confines of the tents of learning.

Only Rivkah saw through the righteous facade of Esav and recognized his deceptive ways-in part because of her familiarity with her own family of frauds and charlatans. She alone was able to expose Esav for what he really was and cause Yitzchak to see that both roles would be the domain of Yaakov-that Yaakov would be the sole progenitor of the future Klal Yisroel. Esav had exercised his free will to channel his tendencies toward evil, thereby disqualifying himself from a position in the future nation.

Toldos should serve as an incentive to us to delve into our own personalities, to better understand our natural tendencies, so that we can develop and channel our unique traits to their most sublime purpose: the perfection of the world through the promotion of Torah and Divine service.

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Toldos

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Vayachp’ru avdei Yitzchok b’nachal vayimt’u sham be’er mayim chaim vayarivu roei Gerar im roei Yitzchok leimor lanu hamayim vayikra shem habe’er Eisek ki his’asku imo vayachp’ru be’er acheres vayarivu gam aleha vayikra sh’ma Sitna vayateik mi’sham vayach’por be’er acheres v’lo ravu aleha vayikra sh’ma Rechovos vayomer ki atah hirchiv Hashem lanu ufarinu ba’aretz (26:19-22)

The Torah relates in what seems to be excruciating detail the story of the various wells dug by Yitzchok and his servants, the names they were called, and how their jealous neighbors repeatedly fought with them to challenge their ownership. As we know that every word in the Torah is carefully measured and is excluded unless absolutely necessary, why does the Torah spend numerous verses relating what seems to be such a mundane and inconsequential event?

The following amazing (and true) story will help us appreciate the answer to this question. Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein tells of a now-happily-married couple whose dating period couldn’t have gone worse. As the boy was returning home from their first date, he was lightly injured in a minor car accident. After he recovered, they went out again. On their second date, the house they were meeting in caught on fire and the girl was taken to the hospital for treatment. Still unfazed, they went out a third time. On that date, they were walking on the sidewalk when a flame which was coming out from a store caught on the girl’s dress.

By this point, the boy had had enough and was ready to accept the Divine “hints” about the potential match. He decided that he didn’t want to go out with this girl again. However, his highly rational parents wouldn’t accept his decision and convinced him to go out one more time. On the fourth date, the car that they were in was involved in an accident, and both of them were lightly injured!

Although everything about the couple’s interactions seemed quite compatible, the boy was shaken and adamant in his refusal to proceed. His father approached Rav Chaim Kanievsky to solicit his opinion about the entire episode. After hearing the incredible story, Rav Chaim said that he didn’t see any rational reason to decline the otherwise compatible match, although he did advise that the couple go out one more time. In light of the opinion of Rav Chaim, the boy agreed to a fifth date, which was indeed incident-free and marked the beginning of a beautiful life together for the happy young couple!

In light of this story, we can now answer our original question about the wells. Rav Aharon Bakst suggests that the Torah relates this episode to teach us the valuable lesson that in spiritual matters, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.” We hear so many miraculous stories of pious Rabbis that we might erroneously assume that if a person is attempting to perform a mitzvah, everything will work out on his initial attempt without any unforeseen delays or obstacles. If it doesn’t, we may despondently conclude that it is a Heavenly sign that this endeavor hasn’t found favor with Hashem and should be abandoned.

To counter this mistaken understanding, the Torah recounts the great lengths to which Yitzchok had to go to successfully locate an uncontested source of fresh water. Our Sages teach (Bava Kamma 82a) that water is a metaphor for Torah. The lesson we can take from here is that there is no room for superstitious despair. If our projects of spiritual growth don’t go the way we would have hoped, we should reexamine them. If they still make sense on their own rational merits, we shouldn’t read ominous signs into an unexpected turn of events, but rather we should redouble our efforts until we succeed.

 

Vayehi ki zaken Yitzchok vatich’hena einav meir’os (27:1)

The Torah records that Yitzchok was blind at the end of his life, which enabled Yaakov to deceive him to receive the blessings that were intended for Eisav. Rashi explains that Yitzchok suffered so much from the wicked, idolatrous practices of Eisav’s wives that he lost his vision. If so, why didn’t their actions have the same effect on Rivkah? The Medrash explains that Rivkah wasn’t impacted as intensely because she was accustomed to seeing idolatry in her father’s house.

The Hadar Z’keinim points out that this Medrash is difficult to understand. The Gemora in Kesuvos (20b) rules that a witness is only permitted to testify about an event for up to 60 years after witnessing it. After that time his testimony is not accepted, since he is presumed to have forgotten the event. Since Rivkah was married for 20 years before having children and Eisav got married when he was 40 (26:34), 60 years had passed since Rivkah left her father’s idolatrous house. Shouldn’t she have forgotten it by now and been equally affected by the wicked actions of her daughters-in-law?

Rav Benzion Brook answers that although a person may no longer consciously remember an event after 60 years have passed, its imprint will remain with him eternally. Even though Rivkah left her father’s house at the tender age of 3, the spiritual impact of her surroundings was permanently etched upon her soul. It was for this reason that Eliezer was so adamant that she return with him immediately, instead of remaining in her parents’ house for another year as was suggested (24:55-56). Eliezer recognized the damage which was being done to Rivkah’s lofty soul on a daily basis, and he insisted that she leave at once to prevent additional, irreparable harm from being done.

Rav Henoch Leibowitz points out that this is even more remarkable in light of the fact that Rivkah rebelled against everything her father stood for. She presumably hated idolatry even more than Yitzchok, for she had been exposed to it and rejected it. We may derive from here that even when one is fighting against negative environs and surroundings, he is nevertheless affected and pulled down by them. This lesson should highlight for us the importance of considering and monitoring the influences to which we allow ourselves and our children to be exposed.

 

Vatomer lo imo alai kil’lascha b’ni ach shema b’koli v’lech kach li (27:13)

The Arizal teaches that Rivkah was a gilgul (reincarnation) of Chava, the first woman. One of the purposes of reincarnation is to give a soul the opportunity to rectify the sins that it committed in an earlier lifetime. In what way did Rivkah correct the sin of Chava and atone for its consequences?

After the serpent convinced Chava to eat from the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge, she immediately gave some to Adam to eat. Rashi explains that she did so out of a fear that after her death, Adam would remain alive and would find another mate. As a result of his sin, Adam was cursed with death and with the pain and difficulty of sustaining himself.

Because Chava ensnared Adam in sin when he listened to her, her descendant Rivkah learned from her mistakes and rectified her sins. In contrast to Chava who caused Adam to eat something forbidden, Rivkah saved Yitzchok from eating from the food that Eisav brought him which was not properly slaughtered, and according to some opinions was dog meat (Targum Yonason ben Uziel 27:31).

Instead of causing Adam to become cursed, Rivkah told Yaakov in our verse not to fear the curse of his father, for she would accept his curse upon herself. Not only was Yaakov not cursed, but Rivkah’s actions enabled him to receive the blessings to which he was rightfully entitled. Additionally, Adam’s special garment was taken by Nimrod after the death of Cain. Eisav took this garment after killing Nimrod, and he gave it to his mother Rivkah for safekeeping. Rivkah returned this garment to Yaakov, its rightful inheritor.

The B’nei Yissachar takes this concept one step further. A number of commentators are bothered by the fact that Yaakov had to resort to such deceit in order to receive his father’s blessings. As the legitimate inheritor of Yitzchok’s spiritual legacy, shouldn’t Yaakov have been able to receive what he deserved in a more straightforward manner?

Citing the Zohar HaKadosh, the B’nei Yissachar explains that Yaakov represented the tikkun (refinement) of Adam and his sins. Yaakov’s arch-nemesis was his wicked twin brother Eisav, who is described by the Torah (25:27) as a “yodeah tzayid” – hunter. The Targum Onkelos renders this phrase “gevar nachshirchon,” hinting that Eisav represented the nachash – serpent. Because the serpent enticed Adam and Chava to sin through tricky, underhanded methods, Yaakov had to rectify its previous triumph by successfully taking the blessings away from Eisav using similarly devious tactics.

 

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.

 

Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1) If Rivkah knew the truth about Eisav’s wickedness, why didn’t she ever insist that he be sent away so as not to negatively influence Yaakov, just as Sorah forcefully sent Yishmael away to protect Yitzchok? (HaEmek Davar, Meged Yosef)

2) When Eliezer originally met Rivkah by the well, the Torah describes her (24:16) as “tovas mareh me’od” – very pretty. When she moved with Yitzchok to Gerar, she is described (26:7) merely as “tovas mareh” – pretty. What happened which caused her to lose a bit of her good looks? (Chizkuni)

3) What legal right did Rivkah have to give Eisav’s precious garments, which he had entrusted to her for safekeeping, to Yaakov (Rashi 27:15) so that Yaakov could trick Yitzchok into thinking that he was really Eisav? (Toras Moshe, Lev Shalom, Chavatzeles HaSharon, Taam V’Daas, HaNosein Imrei Shefer, Ayeles HaShachar, Ma’adanei Asher 5771)

© 2011 by Oizer Alport.

Iran’s Khamenei Presents War Scenarios

Friday, November 25th, 2011

In an unusual step that comes on the heels of Iran’s threats and warnings to the US and Israel over the consequences of a possible strike on its nuclear facilities, the official website of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei published an analysis written by Dr. Amir Mohebian, a senior political commentator.

The article details three possible war scenarios Iran could be faced with if Israel or the US proceed with a strike:

1. An all out war of attrition that would combine aerial and ground forces attack.

2. Limited war as a preparatory action for political proceedings. This would include hitting Iran’s control centers for the purpose of disrupting the stability of the Islamic regime. The best case scenario here would be that war leads to the regime’s fall; the worst case would see Iran surrendering at the negotiating table.

3. A war on specific targets with the aim of destroying the regime’s assault capabilities, especially against the “Zionist regime.”

The Iranian commentator goes on to assess the possibility of likelihood of each scenario. He believes the feasibility of the first option is due, among other things to the fact that “the western countries’ capabilities to carry out such a complex operation are very limited and nearly nonexistent.”

Mohebian also mentioned the upcoming US presidential elections and the fact that the west doesn’t have sufficient intelligence on Iran. In light of these problems Mohebian believes that the chances of an all out war against Iran are close to nothing.

He goes on to point out the main problems of the second and third scenarios: The Iranian regime is prepared for an attack on its centers of power, the Iranian response to such an attack could be unexpected, the attack could turn the regime to an even more extreme path and encourage it to set the Middle East on fire, which would endanger the western world.

Mohebian claims that even the third and most likely scenario has a relatively small likelihood of happening. He notes that the scenario’s execution would be complicated. It would be impossible to attack all of the country’s nuclear facilities due to its size; a limited war could develop into a regional war.

For example, an attack on Bushehr could lead to harsh ecological consequences for the region. Attacking only certain nuclear sites would not lead to a complete shutdown of Iran’s technological nuclear capabilities.

Meanwhile, it would seem that Israel is also preparing for every possible scenario. Yedioth Ahronoth on Friday revealed that “a friendly country” has in the past few weeks secretly sent Israel anti-aircraft Patriot missile batteries that also serve as a missile defense system.

The new battery arrived at the Ashdod Port, the first Patriot missile battery to arrive in Israel in eight years. Nevertheless, the IDF claims there is no connection between the current shipment and recent talk of the possibility of a strike against Iran’s nuclear sites.

(Source: Ynet)

Easy Shabbat Cornish Hens With Roasted Potatoes

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Sarah Harari is know to be a gourmet kosher cook within the Syrian Jewish Community.

I know that any Shabbat recipe from Sarah will go straight onto my Shabbat and Jewish holiday menus!!!

Shabbat Cornish Hens with Roasted Potatoes by Sarah Harari

  • 2 cornish hens, cleaned
  • 3/4 c honey
  • 3/4 cup orange juice
  • 4 cloves of garlic, chopped
  •  1 red onion, chopped .
  • 1/2 cup soy sauce
  • salt and pepper.
  1. Place 2 cornish hens in a roaster.
  2. Mix  all ingredients in a measuring cup and mix well with a fork or emulsion blender.
  3. Pour mixture on top of cornish hens.
  4. Marinating overnight is preferable.
  5. Cook uncovered at 350 for an hour or until top is lacquered and juices run clear.
  6. Roast 2 lbs. of peeled and cubed pototoes in a tray with salt, pepper, paprika, garlic salt, and  oil.
  7. Add the roasted potatoes on bottom of the roaster and heat roasted potatoes together with the  roasted cornish hens for about 45 minutes before serving.

Looking for a chic twist for your Shabbat meal? You’ve come to the right place!

Here at The Jewish Hostess, you can find kosher gourmet recipes, cool ideas for decorating your table, and  ways to get your kids excited to come home to a great meal after school.  I’m always on the lookout for easy, healthy and quick recipes that I can whip up during the week. Here’s modern place that all Jewish women can visit for ideas for chic Shabbat and holiday table settings, weeknight healthy recipes, cool entertaining tips, and easy, healthy snacks for kids. The Jewish Hostess is all about connecting, sharing, and inspiring traditionwith a modern twist. Please share your best easy gourmet recipes, chic tabletop tips, and Jewish holiday ideas. Lets ensure that our families enjoy Jewish living and keep coming back for more!

No-Bake Pumpkin Cake

Friday, November 25th, 2011

3 (8-ounce) packages tofutti cream cheese

½ cup brown sugar

½ cup sugar

1 (15-ounce) can pumpkin

2 tablespoons nondairy creamer

1 teaspoon pumpkin pie spice

1 teaspoon vanilla

28 graham cracker sheets

Powdered sugar

Beat tofutti cream cheese with sugars until smooth and fluffy.  Beat in pumpkin, nondairy creamer, pumpkin pie spice and vanilla.  Lay out graham crackers to cover the bottom of a 9 x 9-inch pan (cut/break to fit).  Gently spread a quarter of the pumpkin mixture over the graham crackers.  Repeat three more times with a layer of graham crackers and another layer of a quarter of the pumpkin mixture.  Cover and chill overnight. Dust with powdered sugar and cut into squares.

By Emuna Braverman and Elizabeth Kurtz, of www.gourmetkoshercooking.com

www.gourmetkoshercooking.com is a new and exciting site where you will find over 900 great kosher recipes – with particular emphasis on ideas for Shabbos and holidays, the best new kosher products, gorgeous table top decor, articles on kosher wine and healthy eating, featured giveaways, travel, cooking with kids and much more. Content is updated weekly so visit us often. Your family will be glad you did!

George W. Bush’s Library Will Have Steel From World Trade Center

Friday, November 25th, 2011

You’d expect George W. Bush’s library to be Texas-sized, and 43’s monument to his eight years as President won’t disappoint when it opens in the spring of 2013.

But a solitary jagged, twisted reminder of New York City’s worst day will unquestionably become the centerpiece of the 43,000 artifacts available for display at the library and its adjoining institute.

The 16.7-foot, 1.85-ton piece of mangled steel isn’t just any relic from America’s hallowed ground — experts say it’s “impact steel,” struck directly by one of the hijacked jets that slammed into the Twin Towers on 9/11.

Engineers who have studied the steel — known as a C-11 panel — say it’s the remnant of a triple-beam and crossbeam section from three upper floors.

“Their analysis shows that it appears this piece of steel was affected by fire before a structural collapse, and that the torques and twists of the steel appear to have been caused by impact versus collapse,” a library official said.

Bush and former First Lady Laura Bush recently were visibly affected when they saw the relic for the first time, according to officials who were there.

“The President and Mrs. Bush were really moved by the sight of the twisted steel, which really for them evoked both the carnage and courage of that day,” Bush spokesman Freddy Ford told the Daily News.

The steel will be on permanent display in the main exhibition hall, anchored in a vertical position. Curators expect it to be a powerful magnet for visitors, who can touch it.

“People have so many emotions of that troubling day that we thought it was critical to the experience to make it accessible,” said Alan Lowe, who runs the library for the National Archives and Records Administration.

Library officials saw the steel last December during a tour of the Port Authority’s Hangar 17 at John F. Kennedy International Airport. The PA enthusiastically agreed to donate the piece to the library, and it arrived in Texas earlier this year.

It will share top billing with another 9/11 icon — the famous bullhorn Bush used when speaking to rescue workers from Ground Zero three days after the attacks. Several other mementos will also be on display, including Bush’s handwritten notes from his first public statement on the tragedy.

The library and institute are the repository for 70 million pieces of paper and 80 terabytes of electronic data, including 200 million emails. A full-scale reproduction of the Bush Oval Office will be featured, and Laura Bush has created a Texas rose garden and a North Texas native prairie.

But they all pale by comparison to an ugly piece of steel salvaged from the moment that changed a nation, a President, and all of us forever.

(Source: NY Daily News)

Prague: World’s Oldest Known Holocaust Survivor, Turns 108

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Prague – Seventy years ago this week, the Nazis began deporting Czech Jews to the garrison town of Terezín (Theresienstadt) in nothern Bohemia; the oldest known survivor of that Gestapo “show camp” — and of the Holocaust — this Friday marks her 108th birthday.

Alice Herz-Sommer was born in Prague on Nov. 26, 1903, along with her twin sister, Mariana. Her family, non-practising Jews, moved in Prague’s cultural circles.

By her mid-teens, Alice was touring as a pianist and met her husband to be, Leopold Sommer, in 1931, marrying him just two weeks later. She gave birth to their son, Raphael, in 1937, two years before, the Germans occupied Czechoslovakia; though most of her family and friends immigrated to Palestine via Romania, including Max Brod (Franz Kafka’s friend and biographer), she stayed in Prague, and, like some 150,000 other Jews, was sent to the ghetto in Terezín.

The Nazis made it into a “show camp” for Red Cross inspections and simultaneously a staging post for tens of thousands of Jewish inmates who were shipped off to their deaths in other camps. It operated for three-and-a-half years, serving as a transit station especially for Czech Jews who were artistically and culturally talented but in reality, it served as a concentration camp for Jews before their deportation to death camps elsewhere in Eastern Europe.

(Source: Czech Position)

Jewish Wedding Traditions Adopted By Non-Jewish Couple

Friday, November 25th, 2011

The following is a Washington Post article:

On a September afternoon, as the strains of Pachelbel’s Canon filled a flower-laden hotel ballroom, Melanie Lo and her father slowly proceeded past family and friends toward a huppah, the Jewish wedding canopy.

Rabbi Kenneth Block stood waiting under the white canopy with Melanie’s husband-to-be, Michael Pezzula. Next to them were a decorated ketubah (a Jewish marriage contract) and a tall, white table that held a wine glass for the Kiddush, a blessing over the wine that would be recited as Melanie, 28, and Michael, 32, drank from the same cup to symbolize the sharing of their life together.

In many ways, it looked like a typical Jewish wedding ceremony. Yet neither bride nor groom is Jewish.

The inclusion of so many Jewish traditions in the ceremony uniting Melanie, raised Episcopalian, and Michael, raised Catholic, was their way of making their wedding special, they said.

A Jewish wedding was “a refreshing departure from what everybody that is close to us is used to,” Melanie said.

Drawn to symbols

It all started with the huppah.

Melanie came across a picture of a wedding canopy while she and Michael, who were introduced by friends, were looking through photographs of other ceremonies that had been held at the Washington Marriott at Metro Center. “It was the most beautiful huppah I’ve ever seen,” she said. “I thought, ‘What am I going to do to set up the front of the room? A huppah would be perfect.’ ”

Adding Block to the ceremony also happened by chance after Michael, who was searching for an officiant online, came across Block’s site, rabbionthego.com. He was pleased by Block’s philosophy that a wedding should be about the couple, no matter their faith, sexuality or background. The rabbi even did themed ceremonies, such as a Dr. Seuss wedding.

“I showed Mel the site, and we were like, ‘This guy is awesome!’ ” Michael said.

“So, now, at this point, we have a huppah and a rabbi,” Melanie said. It seemed only natural to add other Jewish elements: the ketubah, the Kiddush, the seven blessings and the breaking of a glass at the end of the ceremony.

What had begun as a question about room decorations had evolved into a way to incorporate meaningful symbols into their wedding and create a more community-centric ceremony. “I’ve . . . been to a Catholic wedding, and they just seem boring. It’s just like church,” Michael said.

The couple considered including some traditional Chinese wedding traditions, such as a tea ceremony, but that would have been primarily for Melanie’s Chinese grandparents. “My parents raised my immediate family and [me] pretty Anglicized,” Melanie said. Besides, she added, a Jewish wedding was neutral territory.

The Pezzulas were already open to Jewish traditions. Michael, a computer software consultant, had been in the Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi, which accepts members of all faiths, at the University of Virginia. Melanie, a technical writer, hadn’t encountered Jewish culture until moving from the South to attend the University of Maryland. She became intrigued and had even considered converting.

The Pezzulas, who now live in Crystal City, say their family and friends were initially puzzled by the wedding plans but came around quickly. The couple consulted books, Block, their wedding planner and Google to incorporate the symbols and traditions. Melanie also turned to a Jewish college friend, Andrea Cohen, for advice. “It was fun teaching her what the huppah symbolized, and I was touched when she said she was painting her own ketubah,” Cohen said.

Block said the Pezzulas aren’t the only non-Jewish couple he has married who have incorporated Jewish customs into their ceremony. “This is a new generation with open minds that sees no one has a monopoly on God,” he said.

But Jonathan Stein, president of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, expressed some concerns. While the practice “speaks to the acceptances of Jews and Jewish traditions in American society,” he said, it might be offensive to Jews who believe that a wedding ceremony signifies the union of two people who intend to establish a Jewish life.”

Stein added, “People incorporate all kinds of rituals into their ceremony. . . . But the question becomes: Do you understand what you’re doing?”

“I hope we didn’t offend anyone,” Melanie said. “It just seemed like a beautiful way to celebrate a marriage.”

Traditions explained

After Melanie took her place next to Michael under the huppah, Block explained the symbolism of the canopy to the predominantly non-Jewish guests, who had also picked up brochures outlining the Jewish traditions.

“This is the home that you two are creating together,” he said. “A house is a house, but a home is a place where family and friends gather.”

Two friends came up to witness the signing of the ketubah, which bore an image of two birds together on a tree branch.

Melanie and Michael recited the vows they had written, exchanged rings and listened to Block read their adaptation of the seven blessings, which included a prayer that they be better together than apart.

At the end of the ceremony, Block placed a glass wrapped in a white cloth on the ground under the huppah. The groom would step on the glass to remind the couple and their guests that love is fragile and must be protected.

Keeping the tone light, Block said, “When the glass is broken, we shout ‘Mazel tov!’ and that means the ceremony is over and the bar is open.”

Michael paused for a second, preparing himself for the moment in the ceremony he had most looked forward to, then stomped on the glass. A resounding boom echoed throughout the hall.

The crowd jumped to its feet and cheered, shouting “Mazel tov!”

(Source: Washington Post)

Same-Gender Marriage Could Bring Shifts In Republican Race

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Republican presidential candidates are joining New Hampshire’s intensifying same-gender marriage debate — whether they like it or not.

State lawmakers plan to take up a measure to repeal the law allowing same-gender couples to wed and a vote is expected at some point in January — the same month as New Hampshire holds the nation’s first Republican presidential primary contest. Already, candidates have been put on the spot over the divisive social issue when most, if not all, would rather be talking about the economy, voters’ No. 1 concern.

The impending focus on sae-gender marriage carries risk for several of White House contenders — including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former businessman Herman Cain — whose inconsistencies on the topic are well documented.

Recent polls have shown former House Speaker Newt Gingrich at or near the top of the field, along with Romney. With a little less than six weeks to go until the lead-off Iowa caucuses, people are listening to the former nemesis of Bill Clinton and would-be challenger to President Barack Obama.

But this issue may cause Gingrich problems. Earlier in the fall, he told an Iowa audience that same-gender marriage is a “temporary aberration” likely to go away because it defies convention. Gingrich, who has been married three times, has a half-sister in a same-gender marriage.

“The truth is that you’re living in a world that no longer exists,” Candace Gingrich-Jones wrote the former speaker in a letter posted on the Huffington Post in 2008: “In other words, stop being a hater, big bro.”

The Republican candidates’ increasingly vocal support for “traditional marriage” also threatens to alienate a growing number of younger Republicans and independents here who support legal recognition of same-gender couples. That note of divisiveness could bode poorly for the eventual Republican challenger to Obama in the general election.

Even so, the Republican candidates aren’t shying away from the topic as they run for the nomination of a party dominated by conservatives and pushed further to the right by the tea party over the last few years.

“As conservatives, we believe in the sanctity of life, we believe in the sanctity of traditional marriage, and I applaud those legislators in New Hampshire who are working to defend marriage between one man and one woman realizing that children need to be raised in a loving home by a mother and a father,” Perry told a New Hampshire audience recently, becoming the latest contender to address gay marriage directly.

Although the issue hasn’t yet become a regular talking point on the campaign trail, most Republican candidates declare support for the effort to repeal the law. And groups like the National Organization for Marriage hope to force the presidential contenders to publicly embrace the repeal.

Romney was the Massachusetts governor when his state legalized same-gender marriage. The Romney administration, as directed by the courts, granted nearly 200 same-gender marriage requests in 2005.

But Romney has reversed himself on whether it should be addressed at the state or federal level.

This past June, he said during a debate that he favors a federal constitutional amendment banning the practice. That’s been his position at least since the beginning of his 2008 presidential bid, when he was the only major Republican candidate to support such an amendment.

But as a Massachusetts Senate candidate back in 1994, Romney told a Boston-area Toeiva newspaper that same-gender marriage is “a state issue as you know — the authorization of marriage on a same-gender basis falls under state jurisdiction.” Aides say it’s unfair to scrutinize

Romney’s position in 1994 — when there was virtually no discussion of a federal amendment. And they suggest Romney’s rivals have far more blatant inconsistencies in recent months.

Both Perry and Cain have drawn conservative criticism for recent comments related to same-gender marriage.

Asked in mid-October whether he supports a federal marriage amendment, Cain told the Christian Broadcasting Network that federal legislation is necessary to protect traditional marriage. That seemed to be a direct contradiction from his statement of just six days earlier, when he told “Meet the Press” host David Gregory that states should be allowed to make up their own minds.

“I wouldn’t seek a constitutional ban for same gender marriage, but I am pro traditional marriage,” Cain told Gregory.

In Perry’s case, the Texas governor says he supports the New Hampshire repeal. But in July he said that New York’s move to legalize same-gender marriage was “fine by me.” A week later, facing social conservative criticism, he walked back the comments.

“It’s fine with me that the state is using their sovereign right to decide an issue. Obviously same-gender marriage is not fine with me,” he said then.

(Source: Fox News)

Orthodox Jewish Synagogue Serves 10th Annual Feast For Harrisburg Firemen & Police Officers

Friday, November 25th, 2011

The following is from the Patriot News:

Sometime around midnight, deep inside Kesher Israel Congregation’s big old South Bend industrial gas stove, the fire went out.

More than 130 pounds of turkey stopped roasting.

About 20 volunteers had spent the evening before Thanksgiving cutting 40 pounds of sweet potatoes, baking dozens of pumpkin pies and plucking stray feathers from the turkeys.

They were preparing for the Orthodox Jewish synagogue’s 10th annual feast for Harrisburg city firemen and police officers.

The tradition began after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.

“Everyone was feeling aware of the sacrifice our firefighters were willing to go through for us,” explained Rabbi Akiva Males. “They said, ‘We’ve got to find some time during the year to thank our local firefighters.’ Everyone felt Thanksgiving was the most appropriate time to do that — a way to really put the ‘thanks’ in Thanksgiving.”

Originally just for city firemen, last year the program was expanded to include city police officers.

“They’re keeping our communities safe. It’s a great way to express our thanks,” said Males.

He is quick to note the idea originated with Rabbi Chaim Schertz and congregation member Mark Powers.

Schertz has since retired.

Powers, a former volunteer fireman and manager of the kosher food program at Franklin & Marshall College, continues to lead the project.

Powers — a stout, no-nonsense presence in the kitchen — was pleased that the 10th anniversary of the feast brought out more volunteers than ever before, but he also knew those old stoves were temperamental.

Around 1 a.m., he went back to check on them, and was glad he did.

He relit the stoves and then settled in for a long night.

There was no way he was going to find himself “birdless” this Thanksgiving.

Powers stayed in the kitchen until 4:30 a.m., when the turkeys’ slow roasting was complete.

He went home, slept for a couple of hours and was back in the kitchen with water boiling and sweet potatoes roasting when the second wave of volunteers arrived just before 9 a.m.

Powers, dressed in his professional whites, coordinated them as they arrived.

Most of the work was already done, he said. “We’re just putting the finishing touches on it.”

Ten slow-roasted kosher turkeys were lined up in pans on the kitchen’s stainless steel island.

A number of them had been donated by the Giant Foods store on Linglestown Road.

Beth Voystock and Jack Ogun helped Powers cut apart the birds and separate the white and dark meat into portions.

Powers kept an eye on his help, and instructed them how to do better.

“At home you do things your own way,” said Voystock. “Here, I want to do it the professional way.”

One of the unintended benefits of helping in the kitchen, noted Rabbi Males, is learning tricks of the trade from a professional chef.

“Last year, my wife learned to carve a turkey from Mark,” he said.

As the noon hour approached, the feast came together.

The aroma of sweet potatoes filled the kitchen.

Pound after pound of broccoli was dropped into swift boiling water.

Pies and dinner rolls and cranberry sauce were packed for transport.

By noon, everything was on its way to the men and women who leave their families at home on Thanksgiving to be where they are needed if a fire — or a fight — breaks out anywhere in the city.

“It’s a great thank you,” said Battalion Chief Jeff Snyder as firefighters at Fire Station No. 1 on North Sixth Street received plates heaped with food.

Some of the members of Kesher Israel Congregation sat down with them to eat.

“We’re here away from our families,” said Snyder. “We have the opportunity to have some fellowship with [the congregation]. It’s just a good feeling. We really appreciate it.”

Across town at Police Headquarters on Walnut Street, there was no convivial atmosphere.

Officers came in now and then, and ate alone or in pairs.

“Our officers are going from call to call to call, and they’re jumping in here between calls,” explained Sgt. Kelly Wetzel. “It’s very difficult for them to get a good meal in, anyway.”

That doesn’t mean the feast was any less appreciated.

“Our officers really do not get a lot of public accolades and positive outreach toward us,” Wetzel said. “Usually when we’re dealing with people, bad things are happening to them or they’re doing bad things.

“This is a very considerate gesture,” he said. “It’s a very nice thing for them to do.”

As Powers watched the firefighters sit down to eat, he considered the program he began 10 years ago and counted the blessings.

“I’m happy we are able to do it,” he said. “I’m happy it’s continuing. I’m pleased we have so many volunteers. I’m pleased they haven’t forgotten the people who are protecting us. I’m pleased to say we haven’t forgotten. It’s real gratifying.”

But his work was not yet done.

“I have to go home and make my own turkey,” he said. “I’ve got company coming.”

(Source: PennLive)

Conservative Students To Apologize To Obama For Burning Effigy

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

Students at St Andrews University in Scotland will reportedly write a letter of apology to President Obama after an incident last week in which they burned  him in effigy.

The incident occurred the evening of Nov. 18, when members of the university’s conservative student association burned images of Obama on a beach bonfire, according to local news reports.

On Thursday, Matthew Marshall, president of St Andrews Conservative and Unionist Association, told the press that the incident was “undoubtedly stupid” and “deeply regretted.”

Marshall was reportedly made aware of the university’s concerns surrounding the matter, and pledged that the society would write to Obama to apologize.

“The U.S. and President Obama are important allies of the United Kingdom and, on behalf of the whole association, I apologize unreservedly,” he said, as reported by The Telegraph.

“This is undoubtedly a stupid act and it is deeply regretted by all of us in the St Andrews Conservative Association,” Marshall added. “I will make sure this never happens again.”

The university led an inquiry into the incident. While critical of the conservative association’s actions, St Andrews determined that they were not intentionally racist.

“The University of St Andrews holds a firm belief in the value of political debate and free expression but we expect our students to always treat others with respect,” a university spokesman told the press in Great Britain.

“The burning of any figure in effigy is an act of violence and intolerance and has no place in our modern, international university,” he added.

(Source: The Hill)

$5,000 for a Shabbos with the Rebbe

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

Seeking to extricate its mosdos from the fiscal abyss, the Chernobyl chassidus is offering a Shabbos with the rebbe shlita in a private facility at the cost of $5,000 a person. The special Shabbos Parshas Toldos is limited to 30 people who can afford this and wish to take part, adding it will take place in Tzfat.

According to a Chadrei Chareidim report, each of the participants will during the course of Shabbos have private time with the rebbe, during which time they will receive a bracha and have an opportunity to consult with him.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

AT&T Withdraws FCC Application For Big Merger With T-Mobile

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

AT&T announced on Thursday that it withdrew its application with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to buy T-Mobile, but the company said it had not given up on completing the $39 billion deal.

The move is in response to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s announcement on Tuesday that he would seek an administrative hearing to review the deal, saying he was not convinced it would benefit the public.

In a statement, AT&T said it was withdrawing its application to focus on fighting the Justice Department’s lawsuit, which alleges the merger would violate antitrust law by stifling competition in the wireless market. That case is scheduled to go to trial in February.

An FCC hearing would be before an administrative law judge, would resemble a trial and could take months to complete. The full commission would then vote on whether to block the deal.

By withdrawing its application, AT&T triggers a $4 billion breakup fee that it had agreed to pay to T-Mobile’s parent company, Deutsche Telekom. The fee is $3 billion in cash and $1 billion in spectrum assets.

“AT&T Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG are continuing to pursue the sale of Deutsche Telekom’s U.S. wireless assets to AT&T and are taking this step to facilitate the consideration of all options at the FCC and to focus their continuing efforts on obtaining antitrust clearance for the transaction from the Department of Justice either through the litigation pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia… or alternate means,” AT&T announced in a statement. “As soon as practical, AT&T Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG intend to seek the necessary FCC approval.”

But consumer advocacy groups who oppose the deal said the move shows AT&T has all but given up on buying T-Mobile.

Gigi Sohn, president of advocacy group Public Knowledge, said AT&T’s chances of completing the deal are “almost gone.”

Andrew Schwartzman, policy director of law firm Media Access Project, called the move an “act of desperation.”

(Source: The Hill)

Toldos Aaron Rebbe Calls For Tefilos In Light Of Dire Financial Situation

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

Last week, before the Toldos Aaron Rebbe Shlita left for North America, he spoke with chassidim explaining that for him, this is a trip to ‘golus’, but he excepts Hashem’s decree with love, realizing this is what must be.

The rebbe explained that the financial situation of mosdos is critical, calling upon chassidim to daven for his success during his fundraising mission abroad, where he will be spending Shabbos in different communities and attending many functions in the hope of raising badly-needed funds.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

Puzzle As NYPD Tix-Fix Prober Retires

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

The internal-affairs honcho who headed the NYPD’s explosive ticket-fix investigation filed for retirement yesterday, The Post has learned.

Internal Affairs Bureau Deputy Inspector John McDermott, 46 — in charge of a probe that led to the indictment last month of 16 cops for crimes including official misconduct and conspiracy — earned $146,364 in 2010, records show.

“People don’t understand why now,” one puzzled source told The Post. “It doesn’t make sense.”

The shocking ticket-fix case is far from over, insiders note, and McDermott’s participation will be crucial.

As The Post reported last May, McDermott himself allegedly arranged for a speeding ticket to disappear. The NYPD denied the accusation.

A woman answering the phone at McDermott’s home last night declined to comment.

(Source: NY Post)

Ed Koch Hopes For Michael Bloomberg Presidential Run

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

The former New York City mayor — who said in September that he’s “on board” with Barack Obama’s reelection campaign — tells Maggie in our story on the homepage that he hopes Michael Bloomberg will enter the 2012 race:

Koch – a Democrat who endorsed George W. Bush in 2004 and has backed Obama for reelection – said he believes Bloomberg should mount a presidential bid to address the “lack of leadership” in Washington.

“I believe there is a major chance of a third party winning and I would like to see him pursue it for 2012,” Koch said. “What I believe he offers is independence and money to finance a campaign and to be president.”

Bloomberg has ruled out a campaign about as definitively as possible, but as we write in our piece, he’s also moving to reclaim the sensible-D.C.-outsider niche in national politics that he has used to substantial effect in the past.

(Source: Politico)

Tourism Heating Up In Israel This Winter

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

The Ministry of Tourism has increased its marketing efforts worldwide in preparation of the winter season in the United States, Canada and Brazil, investing over 10 million NIS. The winter campaign, totaling 40 million NIS, is aimed at continuing existing marketing efforts while promoting Israel this season as an attractive tourism destination to potential tourists. The annual marketing budget for 2011 is 260 million NIS.

The winter campaign in America includes advertising in print media as well as trade publications, industry magazines, billboard advertising, radio and television advertising campaigns and various internet and social media initiatives. Advertising will focus on attracting tourists from destination countries in America including the United States, Canada and Brazil. Within the framework of the winter campaign, Israel will be presented as a destination offering various forms of activities, leisure and entertainment, as well as the central positioning of Israel as the Holy Land with Jerusalem at its center.

The campaign is aimed at those seeking a vacation with elements of religion, history and culture, highlighting various sites in Israel such as Jerusalem, the Dead Sea, Tel Aviv and Eilat, as well as sites in the Galilee and the Negev. The campaign is also aimed at other various groups including religious and niche tourism such as gourmet wine, spa, extreme sports and more.

Additional marketing efforts include working with the local tourism industries to promote Israel in fairs and seminars, public relations activities, recruiting new tour operators and expanding existing local marketing sources, expanding flight capacities and more.

Minister of Tourism, Stas Misezhnikov: “The Fall-Winter season is the most attractive time of year for tourism to Israel and the Israel Government Tourism Offices abroad are maximizing resources in order to increase demand. The stability of incoming tourism to Israel, despite regional and international economic and political events, is a significant achievement, serving as an important economic anchor for the economy providing sources of income, employment and a positive image for Israel abroad.”

Since the beginning of the year and through October, 2.8 million visitors arrived in Israel, 600,000 from the United States, Canada and Brazil (approximately half a million from the United States alone – the largest source country for incoming tourism to Israel).

Revenue from incoming tourism (not including domestic or outbound tourism) since the beginning of the year through October, has reached 12 billion NIS – a 10% increase compared to the same period last year (not including flights(

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)