Fauci’s Fraudulent Fearmongering

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Fauci’s Fraudulent Fearmongering

Viewing 9 posts - 151 through 159 (of 159 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1980128
    n0mesorah
    Participant

    Dear Yserbius,

    1. Why is that my crowd? It is a recurrent theme of this thread, and even more on the other one, that you ascribe opinions and statements on behalf of other posters.

    2. It is unclear to me what a government right is, or if such a thing exists. What is clear is that masks can be mandated. That just happened. And is still happening. I thought you would clarify why masks were mandated, and how such a mandate could have been maintained better.

    3. It seems like you are reflecting the thinking that caused many public health measures to fail. Whatever is implemented, has to be done with a prudent eye toward a uniform application of standards. For example, masks were not pushed immediately in the U.S. so that the hospitals would have enough masks for their employees. There has to be a clear goal for public health. Or else it just wanders in circles. Helping enough not to give up on what is in place. But not solving anything so that the same ineffective policies stay in place.

    4. Almost nobody pays serious attention to Dr. Fauci. Except for some sound bites. Some social and traditional media influencers got involved to normalize the main points of his message. Try to find quotes of him where the person quoting him was not oblivious to the context.

    5. I was trying to let you in on the truth. Dr. Fauci was not going to say that we could discard our masks, until there was data that demonstrated the vaccine working in real time. The chance of the data showing a need to continue to wear masks after the vaccines take effect, was around zero. But still, if never predicts data. It is what made him a star over the last thirty years. And there is on reason for him to make assumptions now.

    6. It appears to me that you are your own public health expert. You advocating for a mask policy without purpose or guidelines. If I am mistake and you do not consider yourself an expert on public health, why are you involved in how others wear or do not wear their mask?

    #1980279
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    Dear @n0mesorah

    1. You have voiced support of users on this thread that have opinions I just described. Hence your crowd.
    2. The government has a right to make laws that are not unjust. A mask mandate during a pandemic is not unjust. I don’t see why that’s such a complicated topic that we need four pages of comments explaining it
    3. I am not, nor do I claim to be, a public health expert. I defer those opinions to the actual public health experts. And public health experts have near unanimously said that people need to wear masks during a pandemic otherwise it puts others at risk. So it upsets me when people don’t wear masks, and it upsets me even more when people deride and belittle the concept of wearing masks, because it puts me and others at risk of catching their COVID. Again I don’t see why you’re making it so complicated.
    #1980309
    n0mesorah
    Participant

    Dear Yserbius,

    It’s nice that we are down to only three points!

    1. My one support was that one question was actually a question. It did have a simple answer, which I subsequently posted. I never endorsed not wearing masks. I am a strong proponent of questioning and defining the benefit.

    2. The Government gets to decide if it’s laws are just or not. Your statements on this part of the topic is so basic that you are not saying anything worth pointing out. Except that you keep trying to reframe it as a right. I disagree with that wholeheartedly.

    3. So let the experts convince them. I think everyone can agree that the messaging in the U.S. on public health was terrible. It still is, and has been for decades. Maybe always. But we thought that at the cmost important times, the system would get it’s act together for the good of the country. Turns out the system is so broken, it could not even pull itself together for it’s own good.

    Now to what I think is the center of this never ending discussion. The function of public health – really the entire public system of government during a pandemic is to defend the critical infrastructure from crumbling, while using what is functioning to overcome the onslaught. The fact is without restraining the citizenry, an epidemic will surely erode and very possibly destroy a government.

    This is something that had to be said. And was paid clearly in the strongest democracies. New Zealand, Australia, Taiwan, Canada, and Paraguay. Once that is out of the way, there are only two questions for public health officials to worry about. 1. What is working? 2. What is coming next? In the U.S. in general and certain communities in particular, the messaging was unclear and they tip-toed around that very necessary point. That left inconsistent compliance. Which made it near impossible to tell what is working. Somehow, masks became the flashpoint for this failure. Hence, people seriously believe that it encroached on their personal freedoms.

    It is known that masks help prevent infection. It was generally assumed in the West that masks do not prevent the flu. This is being reevaluated now. As is almost all the science on viruses. It was assumed all over the East that masks help prevent infection coronavirus and flu. There are different ways to mandate wearing masks. Now that the federal and state governments tried [Aof mostly failed.] their hand, it is up to the local businesses and clergy to follow through. In most of the U.S., mask mandates were only effective at the local level.

    Once some communities partly rejected some health guidelines without any clear reasoning, It is impossible to get back to where things should be. So what are you trying to get at? Putting some masks on some people is not significant. In sum, I think you miss how much personal autonomy there is for the individual when it comes to following public health.

    Personal question, how much increased hand washing have you been doing?

    #1980314
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    @n0mesorah I dunno, I think you’re making things a little too complicated. If we limit the discussion to masks, the public health officials could not possibly have been any clearer (after a rocky start for about a month in 2020). I don’t know why you think they aren’t communicating properly. “Wear a mask”. It’s a pretty simple message. All this narischkeit about government rights and “personal autonomy” just sound like dog-whistles for the pro-death crowd that seem to want to do everything in their power to spread COVID-19 as much as possible.

    How much hand washing have I been doing? More. Much more. I keep hand sanitizer in my car and I usually use it when going in to a public place and coming home from one.

    #1980390
    n0mesorah
    Participant

    Dear Yserbius,

    Congratulations! I think we have arrived at some agreements. While the message has gotten across to you, that is because you put your faith in it. Others have less faith because they did not start with – or quickly lost the trust that you have. All though the messaging does not make an overall difference to you, it does to others. As is evident from the same health officials calling their own efforts unsuccessful. The fact is mask mandates were not evenly used across any large part of the country.

    Now to be fair. The other posters in these discussions have stated that they mask at least in some instances. Since the messaging has resulted with relatively inefficient mask mandates, it is hard to say that they are supposed to be masking more. We were left with unclear guidelines. Is a mask needed in a public playground? How about an outdoor waiting area? When eating out, at what point do we remove our masks? What are the guidelines for asthmatics? What is more important, clean air flow or masks? I could go on for another hundred lines. So once again to be fair. Who is to say that everyone else is wearing their mask too little? Maybe you and I are overdoing it.

    And to clear up the side issues. Government rights was your point. I do not care if what the government did was wrong or not. (Spoiler alert! I think every move was well within the legal limits of goverment power. The Courts struck down some measures because public health officials did not make a clear case. Which comes down to messaging again.) The question is if their overall methods worked. And the answer is not so much. By personal autonomy, I meant that individual mask wearers have the choice of what type, how large, and a lot of other ‘circumstantial deviances’ that the government did not define for them.

    #1980444
    MadeAliyah
    Participant

    Okay @yserbius123 let me explain slowly and clearly.
    When you asked me why speed limits are different than mandatory masking you were obviously asking why I, the pro-choice position have no problem with speed limits. How do I know that? Because why would you ask why speed limits are different than masking in the government’s eyes? They aren’t different in the government’s eyes! They support both!
    So I explained to you that according to me speed limits are “Misuse of public property”. That is my position. You can argue that the reason is flawed, but to say “You are wrong about speed limits… They are to prevent deaths and injuries.”? What do you even mean? That I must accept the government’s reason? Why on earth? This is not even a fallacy, it’s plain false.

    But unfortunately it’s not just once
    You do this all the time.
    You claim that the flu is not comparable to Covid but speed limits are.
    You made claims about the flu that are outright falsehoods.
    You claim that if everyone followed all the rules of the road, lowering speed limits to 10 miles per hour will not save any lives which is just not true.
    You distort my words intentionally.
    You use fallacies like they’re on your bucket list
    You write outright lies.
    You bring arguments that don’t even deserve to be called arguments.
    Then you use words like “narishkeit” and “shtuch” as if yiddish settles it all.
    And then you say that I am throwing a tantrum.
    And then you claim that you have answered all the questions.
    And then whenever I try to end this infinite conversation you once again misquote me and force to correct you so that you can continue to rave about how terrible pro-choice people are.
    You have no argument.
    It’s all “the experts said that we should mask and how dare you not listen”.
    You still cannot explain why when or why death matters to you.
    You are a devout worshiper of “The Experts” and no intelectual dialog can change your mind.
    It’s impossible to argue with someone who has such a lose grip on reality and logic.

    So all I can do is try not to care as you once again try to provoke me into responding by yet again by distorting my posts, then I’ll have to face the I-told-you-so’s of @syag-lchochmo and @daas-yochid. I now see how right they were when they said “Face reality sir, You. Aren’t. Listening.” and “you have illustrated your inability to have a conversation.”.
    If only I would have listened to them sooner.

    #1980474
    n0mesorah
    Participant

    Dear Made Aliyah,

    Even if you would be right about everyone of those arguments, it will not help you one bit in the overall debate. Emergency responses are just different than everyday legislation. All the points you bring in, do nothing to address that. And yes, you can expect a mask mandate for the next flu epidemic.

    #1980666
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    Dear @MadeAliyah Clearly mask mandates have made you very angry. It’s a position I understand, but only to a point. You refuse to acknowledge that the government can mandate something that’s a little extreme when the situation warrants it. You have extreme quasi-libertarian opinions about the limits of government.

    I vehemently disagree with your opinions. The government is not unlimited, but mandating masking during a horrific pandemic is hardly overstepping any bounds. It’s no different than speed limits to protect pedestrians, or laws about firing guns in public.

    That’s all. That’s literally all this thread is about.

    @n0mesorah Glad to see we’re finally on the same page.

    #1981474
    MadeAliyah
    Participant

    Oh so this is all about emergency powers?

    There is no greater case against the idea “emergency powers” than the ones used in this pandemic. Just look and Andrew Cuomo who used his emergency powers and very likely killed more than he saved.

    By the way @yserbius123, you’re absolutely right, I am a libertarian and the crazy thing is I didn’t know that I was until Covid came.

    I guess now would be a good time to start a new thread about the pros and cons of libertarianism, but *yawn* I doubt anyone’s interested.

Viewing 9 posts - 151 through 159 (of 159 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.