Settlers are RODFIM

@Hakatan,
He was not a Gadol. As the post title states, he is a Rodef.

@Hakatan,

A) Not ONE gadol holds that the 3 oaths are in effect. NOT one!!! Anyone with Daas understands this.

1) the 3 oaths is a nice Medrish. It is not mentioned anywhere in Navi.
2) it was ONLY during the first churban. There were NO Oaths at the second.

Just use your Daas. Name ANYONE that disagrees and then refer back to my first point.

AAQ:
“ideally recognizing what HKB”H has given us (by saying the prayers for the State and IDF per halacha…”
LOL. As per halacha? G-d “gave us” the Holocaust, too. Jews fooled by the Zionist idol prayed for that “State” thinking it would be a good thing, so Hashem answered their prayers and gave it to them instead of bringing Mashiach. But, no, obviously it would be insane to pray for a “State” that is a total and massive rebellion against G-d and that has been hurting His children even more than in the past.

We pray for all Jews to be safe, however G-d chooses to do that, not for that shmad “State”.

@DaMoshe:
Yes, zero Torah authority.
These Zionist lies have been debunked before.
Go ahead and quote your alleged sources.

For example, by Rav Meir Simcha, you’re obviously referring to the letter allegedly from him published only in a “Religious Zionist” periodical, where he actually affirmed the oaths being in force. He simply stated that since the British issued their Balfour Declaration at that time – which they later rescinded, as it happens – and Jews were now permitted by the ruling gentile authorities to move to E”Y – entire non-politically, of course – that it would not be a violation of the oaths (i.e., rebelling against the nations) for Jews to move there. He said nothing about any of the oaths no longer being in force (which would make no sense for numerous reasons, as the Satmar Rav explains and on which there is no dispute).