President Joe Biden said Monday that the “Second Amendment was never absolute” and that, after the Texas elementary school shooting, there may be some bipartisan support to tighten restrictions on the kind of high-powered weapons used by the gunman.
“I think things have gotten so bad that everybody’s getting more rational, at least that’s my hope,” Biden told reporters on the White House lawn after returning to Washington.
His comments came a day after the president traveled to the shattered Texas community of Uvalde, mourning privately for three-plus hours with anguished families grieving for the 19 children and two teachers who died in the shooting. Faced with chants of “do something” as he departed a church service, Biden pledged: “We will.”
As he arrived from Delaware for Memorial Day events, Biden was asked if he’s now more motivated to see new federal limits imposed on firearms.
“I’ve been pretty motivated all along,” he said. “I’m going to continue to push and we’ll see how this goes.”
In Congress, a bipartisan group of senators talked over the weekend to see if they could reach even a modest compromise on gun legislation after a decade of mostly failed efforts. That included encouraging state “red flag” laws to keep guns away from those with mental health problems.
“The Second Amendment was never absolute,” Biden said. “You couldn’t buy a cannon when the Second Amendment was passed. You couldn’t go out and buy a lot of weapons.”
There is nowhere near enough support from congressional Republicans for broader gun measures popular with the public — like a new ban on assault-type weapons or universal background checks on gun purchases. Still, Democratic advocates hope meaningful measures could still pass.
Biden said he’d not spoken to Republicans on the issue “but my guess is … they’re going to have to take a hard look.”
The president also said “it makes no sense to be able to purchase something that can fire up to 300 rounds” and added, “The idea of these high powered weapons, there’s simply no rational basis for it.”
Biden said he had taken some executive actions on guns “but I can’t outlaw a weapon” and can’t “change the background checks.”
He said he didn’t know where congressional negotiations stand, but “there’s realization on the part of rational Republicans” that ”we can’t keep repeating ourselves.”
The president and first lady Jill Biden, whose veteran son Beau died of brain tumor in 2015, attended church near their home in Delaware and visited their son’s grave early Monday morning.
After flying back to the White House, they hosted a Memorial Day breakfast in the East Room with 130 or so members of veteran organizations, military family groups and senior Defense Department and other administration officials.
The couple was later joined by Vice President Kamala Harris, second gentleman Doug Emhoff, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at Arlington National Cemetery to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Solider.
Standing at attention under a cloudless sky in the late-May heat, Biden saluted as taps played, after laying the wreath of red and white roses wrapped in red, white and blue ribbon in front of the tomb.
Biden was set to deliver remarks honoring servicemembers before returning to the White House, where he was to join families in the planting of a magnolia tree on the White House South Lawn in honor of the fallen.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
2 Responses
“Rational” and “Biden” don’t belong in the same sentence.
“The Second Amendment was never absolute,” Biden said. “You couldn’t buy a cannon when the Second Amendment was passed. You couldn’t go out and buy a lot of weapons.”
This is a big fat lie. There were NO weapons that were illegal, including cannons. Anyone who wanted and could afford a cannon could and did buy one, and nobody even thought this unusual, let alone tried to prevent it.
An AR-15 is NOT a “high powered weapon”. Also, I don’t think there are any 300-round magazines; there are 100-round ones, but it’s impossible to fire 100 rounds without jamming. In fact you’re very unlikely to be able to fire more than 40 rounds or so. That’s the reason the standard magazine for an AR-15 is 30 rounds.
And “Red flag” laws are dangerous. First of all, it is wrong to deprive anyone of their constitutional rights without due process of law. So you need a hearing of which the person has notice, and a chance to defend himself. Second, if you adjudge someone to be too dangerous to be allowed to keep his weapons, without so much as notifying him of this, then when the police come to seize his weapons he is likely to defend himself from them, quite legitimately since as far as he knows they must be robbers. Thus you’re just endangering the cops, and the person himself.
To Milhouse: “Rational” and “Milhouse” don’t belong in the same sentence.
What is your source for the statement in your third paragraph? And is there a specific definition of “high powered weapon” that excludes the AR-15? Whether or not an AR-15 is “high powered” is a splitting of hairs (or hares, if that is what you hunt for) that is meaningless in the discussion of gun control.
For a knowledgeable interpretation of the Second Amendment, see an article published in late May by John McWhorter, a professor of linguistics (at New York University, I think) who has particular knowledge about 18th Century English, published in the New York Times.