Senator John Fetterman has once again demonstrated his staunch support for Israel by openly berating Vice President Kamala Harris’ suggestion that there may be “consequences” for Israel if it launches an assault on Rafah, a stronghold of the terrorist group Hamas.
“We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake,” Harris told ABC’s This Week. “I have studied the maps – there’s nowhere for those folks to go. And we’re looking at about a million and a half people in Rafah who are there because they were told to go there.”
When asked if there would be consequences for Israel if it moves on Rafah, Harris replied, “I am ruling out nothing.”
Fetterman blasted Harris’ stance, stating, “Hard disagree. Israel has the right to prosecute Hamas to surrender or to be eliminated. Hamas owns every innocent death for their cowardice hiding behind Palestinian lives.”
Fetterman has emerged as one of Israel’s strongest allies in the Senate since the Oct. 7 massacre. Meanwhile, relations between President Biden’s administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government continue to deteriorate. Netanyahu has vowed to invade Rafah, with or without U.S. approval.
(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
7 Responses
My respect is growing for him day by day….and I’m glad he is so crazy and large!He could say anything he wants and nobody will encourage him to change his stance!
Harbeh shluchim lamakom!
Strange times we are living in when Fettterman is the voice of reason and Chucky Schumer can’t even see what’s going on even with his glasses on the rim of his nose. Additionally, Kamala claims that she has “studied” the maps. She might want to study Spanish, she was last seen clapping along in Puerto Rico to a chant in Spanish against her thinking it was a salsa tune.
Bless this man. Truly the biggest and fastest 180 I’ve seen in politics in a very long time.
A substantial portion of the Democratic peace are super doves (going back to their opposition to the Vietnam War, where they snatched defeat from the jaws victory, an accomplishment duplicated by Biden in Afghanistan), and that overlaps with a substantial body of “progressive” anti-Semites. The Democrats also have a substantial portion who are not anti-Semites, and are ideologically derived from the likes of Harry Truman and John Kennedy. Without both groups, the Democrats chances of winning a national election are much reduced. Schumer, as a national leader, has to see to it that the party is appealing to both factions, which does require skillful talking out of both sides of his mouth without getting caught.
If his republican rival would of won, Dr Oz, I think he would of been bad on the side of Israel. Just goes to show you never know who is better to vote for.
As a jew, shumer can’t be loyal you Israel.
He be called a dual loyalist.
The goyim can do anything they want