Search
Close this search box.

Congregation Sues Village of Pomona For Right to Build Rabbinical College of Tartikov


yw logo4.jpgLawyers for the Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov and several Rabbis today filed suit against the Village of Pomona and its representatives for the right to build and operate an educational facility to train rabbinical judges in perhaps the most prominent religious freedom case of its kind yet to be filed.  The complaint was filed at the United States District Court, Southern District of New York courthouse in White Plains.

The action was brought by plaintiffs to redress violations of their civil rights as protected by the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), the Fair Housing Act, and constitutional protections of free speech and freedom of religion.  Lawyers for the Plaintiff include: New York litigator, Paul Savad; Roman Storzer, a First Amendment and RLUIPA expert based in Washington DC and former director of litigation for the renowned Becket Fund for Religious Liberty; and John Stepanovich, a national civil rights lawyer based in Virginia, who successfully brought a similar suit against the Village of Airmont, NY.

The first phase of proposed development plans for the Rabbinical College would include places of worship, educational buildings, and housing for 250 students and their families on a 100-acre site in the Village of Pomona (an additional 30 acres was also purchased as a buffer).  Representatives from the college have asked to meet with village representatives to discuss these plans on numerous occasions, but were rebuffed each time.  By refusing to meet with the Congregation and its representatives, the village left plaintiffs with no option but to seek relief in federal court against the village’s illegal zoning ordinances, which violate every land use provision of RLUIPA, the Fair Housing Act, and a variety of constitutional and other civil rights protections.

“There is a history of discrimination against the Hasidic community here,” said Nanuet-based attorney Paul Savad. “Over the past several years, the Village of Pomona and its Board of Trustees have repeatedly used legislative and administrative means to prevent a variety of Jewish-affiliated institutions from developing this property for religious use.” 

Controversy in Pomona over the proposed Rabbinical College already has altered the outcome of a local election, spurred relentless anti-Hasidic community opposition, and presented squarely the question of whether this Jewish community will be permitted to maintain its religious traditions.

“The Rabbinical College has engaged all the necessary professionals, including architects, engineers, and traffic experts, and has determined the impact on the surrounding community and environment to be minimal,” Savad added. “They deserve the same consideration that any other development would enjoy under village planning code.”

“This is an extreme case, one that brings to mind the civil rights conflicts of the 1960s.  We need to stop the Village of Pomona, and municipalities across the country, from using their zoning power as a tool to control unpopular religious groups,” said attorney Roman Storzer. “RLUIPA supersedes local zoning codes in cases such as this by allowing municipalities to consider plans for the development of religious uses that may otherwise be prohibited outright, like this College.  By denying the Rabbinical College the right to even apply for the necessary permits, while secular colleges or colleges of other religious traditions would be permitted, and even refusing to meet with Congregation representatives, the village has violated the letter and the spirit of the First Amendment and RLUIPA.”  

“Congress passed the Fair Housing Act to protect all citizens from housing discrimination—including religious discrimination,” said attorney John Stepanovich.  “There is no doubt that the Village of Pomona has targeted the Hasidic and Orthodox Jewish citizens who have chosen to live, work or study there by essentially putting up a flashing neon sign saying: You are not welcome here!   The Village has demonstrated a history of blatant discrimination against a segment of the population different from those who hold power within the Village.  The time has come for them to realize that all citizens are entitled to the American Dream of living in any community free of discrimination.”

The Orthodox Jewish mandate of settling disputes in religious courts is an ancient tradition practiced for thousands of years.  The religious tradition of bais din, or rabbinical courts, is central to Orthodox Jewish beliefs, allowing for resolution of civil disputes, issues of marriage, divorce, burial, cultural certification, religious conversion and other matters. 

Today, the Orthodox Jewish population in the United States is approximately 600,000.  Currently, there are only a few bais dins in America staffed with properly certified rabbinical judges who are competent to rule on all four volumes of the Shulchan Aruch (Jewish law).  These courts are extremely overburdened, thus creating the urgent need for the College. As the Orthodox Jewish population continues to grow, the need for dayanim will only increase.

Prior to World War II, dayanim were trained in rabbinical colleges throughout Europe, and every large Jewish community had a bais din.  These dayanim were almost eliminated in World War II as the Nazis exterminated potential rabbinical students. Because of the systematic slaughter of the Jews, only a small fraction of the rabbis survived in Europe after the war, and very few rabbinical courts continued to exist.

The Congregation’s property in Pomona is uniquely suited to meet the needs of rabbinical students and their families. The Orthodox Jewish community within the Town of Ramapo and its villages, including Pomona, has the infrastructure necessary to maintain the practices prescribed by their religious beliefs, including synagogues, kosher food stores, yeshivas and high schools for boys and girls.  The majority of rabbinical students that will be educated at the Rabbinical College will come from Rockland County.



12 Responses

  1. When will you people realize that this is not an anti semetic issue? The village of Pomona has 3000 people. There is only well water as they are not serviced by United Water. These people will not pay any taxes as they claim to be a Yeshiva. If anything only the Yeshiva Building should be exempt and not the peoples houses. They want to come in and destroy what was a beautiful village with no regard to what the current villagers think. You are not talking about 10 families moving in no matter what these lawyers say. They will double the population and than try to vote out anyone who is against them. BTW, I am a local Monsey resident who davens in a Chasideshe Bais Medrash.

  2. If the Pomona shlemazels did not have such prejudices they would see an obvious defense of their position. Tartikov is a modest sized kollel, they have no hundreds of students. This is an unholy alliance between Chaim Shiya Babad the wealthy real estate tycoon (son of the Tartkover Ruf zatzal), and his brother who runs the kolel. Knowing that they would never get permission to build dense townhouse project in such a location they are pretending it is for a yeshiva and will sign up every buyer, be it an almonoh or an am ha’oretz or a ben Torah, as member of the kolel. If the Pomona chevra just investigated whether there is really a big Tartikover kolel they would easily be able to quash the project. ANd that is why the tartikovers hired secular lawyers, because any heimishe lawyer would know how small their kolel really is and it is a delusion.

  3. Some of the people of Pomona may be anti-semites, but there are many frum people living in Pomona who oppose this as well, because of the impact the development will have on the community. There are legitimate arguments on both sides and I wish people would debate the merits without always invoking the term “anti-semitism” to describe opponents of development. It does not help to foster compromise or promote sholom. It also cheapens the use of the term and people don’t pay attention when there are real dangers threatening our people.

  4. wow ephraim, you doven at a Chasideshe Bais Medrash – that makes you the highest qualified person to post here, not! but I guess you were supportive of your Bais Medrash being built and the property being removed from the tax roles.

    flatbusher – guess what we are not wanted in Flatbush, Boro Park, Monsey, Lakewood, Perio, Duluth… it is not a question of being wanted it is a question of are we allowed too.

    I think that post 4 contains Loshon Hora – naming names and labeling there actions as unholy.

  5. papper… so far the only posts shouting anti-semitism are the ones from the Jews against building the Yeshiva… I find it interesting.

  6. mdlevine…

    Read the article. There is an explicit claim that Pomona is specifically targeting Chassidic and Orthodox people. If that is not an accusation of anti-semitism, I don’t know what is.

  7. re-read my post – I said the only “posts” shouting anti-semitism is by the Jews against the Yeshiva.

    when I read the article, I see the Non-Jews assuming that the Lawyers are not Jewish) calling for the rights of Jews to live where want and to practice their religion in accordance with Torah law – yes, know that they are getting paid – but they could have chosen to work for the villages to fight against the establishment of Yeshivas. contrast that to the posts of some Jews against the Yeshiva.

    basically, we have to choose which side we want to be on – the side that supports additional Yeshivas (even in our back yards) or the side that is in opposition to new Yeshivas either because 1) I have mine, you don’t need yours, or 2) enough already, HaShem can’t provide THAT much water (Chas V’Shalom), or 3) the roads can’t handle it, or 4) they are all a bunch of tax cheats looking to get one over on everyone, or 6) anyother valid (or not so valid) reason you can think of, and there may be numerous valid reasons.

    but remember friends our time here is short it is what we do with the trip that counts. when asked do we want to be able to say “I supported building Yeshivas” or “I was opposed to building Yeshivas”

  8. Hey Maitiv,

    Checking how large the Tartikov Kollel in Boro Park presently is has absolutely no bearing in the rights under RLUIPA to build a new College named Tartikov now in Pomona. Even if the present Tartikov has 3 members, they have a right under Federal Law to build a new College for thousands. You have no idea what you’re talking about. As a Federal Constitutional expert I can tell you without any reservation that Chiam Shiya Babad and tartikov will win this case in Fedral Court and the anti-simitim running Pomona will fold like a cheap camera. And, yes, eventually the thousands of Yiddin who will move into Tartikov will exercise their right to vote (I hope that is okay with all Chasidim bashers out there!) and they will elect Board members to the Village of thier choosing. The last time I checked, this was still The United States of America, and that is the way it is supposed to work. So, any goyim, or yiddin who don’t like can either pack their bags and move on to the next anti-semitic village of thier own choosing, or they can welcome these Americans, following the laws of this great country with respect and admiration!

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts