Is That Bourbon Really Kosher?


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Rabbi Yair Hoffman for

Welcome back 1950’s. Although most of us don’t really admit it, regarding a number of products, our great-grandparents (or grandparents depending upon how old the reader is) relied heavily on ingredient lists to determine what was kosher or not.

Times, of course, have changed and now, most people only consume products with reliable hechsherim– at least in regard to most areas.  But, shockingly enough, the one area where we are still in the 1950’s mindset is alcohol.  Dubious alcohols are found in our shuls, at our weddings, our frum-owned kosher liquor stores, and in our liquor cabinets at home.

In this column, the focus will be only upon bourbon – but there are others that need to be addressed as well.  We will also discuss some of the heterim – but it should be known that most Poskim do not allow use of these heterim as will be discussed.


Many people assume that bourbons are kosher because of the famous WCBIIA question.  (WCBIIA stands for “What could be in it already”) The answer to WCBIIA is – plenty.  On account of Jewish ownership of many distilleries – there is a problem of Chomez Sh’avar alav Hapesach – that the Bourbons while they were developing and forming – were under Jewish ownership over Passover and were not sold.


Before we get to the nature of the halachic problem – let’s get some background into Bourbon.

Bourbon, of course, is America’s native alcoholic drink by law, no different than Tequila is legally native to Mexico.  The Bourbon law was passed in Congress in 1964.  Bourbon is a type of whiskey, but it’s alcoholic content must be made out of at least 51% corn. Most distilleries make it from 65% to 75% corn, however.

Legally, nothing may be added to bourbon during the distillation except for water.  The flavor, therefore, comes only from the charred oak barrels.  When Wild Turkey wanted to add honey to their Bourbon – they had to name it, “Wild Turkey Liqueur” and then renamed it again to “American Honey.”  Jack Daniels wanted to filter their bourbon through maple charcoal for flavor.  They had to call it Tennessee Whiskey – not bourbon. 95% of Bourbon is made in Kentucky.

The law is also that the barrels must be entirely new – never used for anything else.  So there is no yayin nesach of sherry casks issues. It is also a legal requirement that Bourbon must be aged in the barrel for two years.


The three largest bourbon distilleries in Kentucky are 1] Jim Beam, 2] Heaven Hill, and 3] Buffalo Trace.  Jim Bean is not Jewish owned, – but the latter two are.  There are perhaps four or five other smaller distilleries that are also Jewish owned – and only a handful of people are keeping tabs on it.   The CRC had been working with Buffalo Trace in 2010 to produce a line of Kosher Bourbon.  In 2020, they made available a kosher line. Buffalo Trace is owned by the Goldring family.

According to an interview given by Rabbi Litvin a Chabad Rabbi who lives in Kentucky there are about four or five distilleries in Kentucky that are Jewish owned.  The problem is that just like in other industries – there are something called “jobbers” – where a label actually has it manufactured in a different plant. Heaven Hill is owned by Jews, and actually manufactures over 3000 products.

Barton is one of the distilleries that allows jobbers, so to speak, it is Jewish owned, and does not take care of the chometz issues.  New Riff Distillery actually used to sell their Chometz, but forgot to do so this year.  There is another company that is Jewish owned called Southern, which is being sold perhaps, thus creating possible complications.  There is Lux as well, which is a Jewish owned company.

Heaven Hill, a distillery that is Jewish owned, has the labels for Evan Williams, Elijah Craig, Larceny, and William Heaven Hill – and even more.  The CRC has a three-tiered list regarding bourbons: Not recommended (3), Certified (23), and Approved (30).  They write that certified is, of course, preferable to approved.  Other Kashrus agencies and organizations also have lists where Approved is one of the categories – even though there is no hechsher per se.

The problems are that the underlying issues of Chometz Sh’avar alav haPesach are so rapidly changing that the Approved list (which we will call – List #3) is often wrong, or misused and quite, quite, often –  outdated.  The outdated nature of things is just passed along from year to year.  Below are the three lists of the CRC.

Not Recommended

  1. Trader Joe’s – Kentucky Bourbon Straight Whiskey
  2. Wild Turkey – American Honey Sting
  3. Woodford Reserve – Frosty Four Wood


  1. Black Dirt Distillery – Bourbon Star K*
  2. Buffalo Trace – Kosher Bourbon Rye
  3. Buffalo Trace – Kosher Bourbon Wheat
  4. CH Distillery – CH Straight Bourbon Whiskey
  5. Dead Drop – Bourbon
  6. Jim Beam – Apple
  7. Jim Beam – Honey
  8. Jim Beam – Kentucky Fire OU
  9. Jim Beam – Maple OU
  10. Jim Beam – Peach OU
  11. Jim Beam – Red Stag Black Cherry OU
  12. Jim Beam – Red Stag Hardcore Cider OU
  13. Jim Beam – Red Stag Honey Tea OU
  14. Jim Beam – Red Stag Spiced OU
  15. Jim Beam – Vanilla OU
  16. Journeyman Distillery – Feather Bone Bourbon
  17. Koval – Bourbon OU*
  18. Laws – Four Grain Straight Bourbon
  19. Laws – Straight Corn Whiskey –Bottled in Bond
  20. Laws – Two Grain Straight Bourbon Whiskey
  21. Lion’s Pride – Bourbon OU*
  22. The Josephs Brau Brewing Company -Heller Bock
  23. The Josephs Brau Brewing Company -Hofbrau Bock


  1. Baker’s – Unflavored
  2. Basil Hayden’s – Unflavored
  3. Black Maple Hill – Unflavored
  4. Bookers – Unflavored Bourbon
  5. Elijah Craig – Unflavored
  6. Evan Williams – Unflavored
  7. Four Roses – Unflavored
  8. Heaven Hill – Unflavored
  9. Hirsch – Unflavored
  10. Jim Beam – Black
  11. Jim Beam – Devil’s Cut
  12. Jim Beam – Signature Craft – 12 years
  13. Jim Beam – Unflavored
  14. Knob Creek – Unflavored
  15. Larceny – Unflavored
  16. Maker’s 46 – Unflavored
  17. Maker’s Mark – Unflavored
  18. Michter’s – Unflavored
  19. Noah’s Mill – Unflavored
  20. Old Crow – Unflavored
  21. Old Fitzgerald – Unflavored
  22. Old Grand-Dad – Unflavored
  23. Old Pogue – Unflavored
  24. Parker’s – Unflavored
  25. Prichard’s – Unflavored
  26. Rhetoric – Bourbon
  27. Rowans Creek – Unflavored
  28. Wild Turkey Bourbon – Unflavored
  29. Willett – Unflavored
  30. Woodford Reserve – Unflavored



There is a rationale to be lenient to allow the drinking of these spirits, but in this author’s opinion it is not something that we probably should NOT be doing.  The Mishna Brura (449:5) cites a view that when there is a doubt, one may eat Safaik Chometz Sh’avar alav haPesach.  It is, however, a debate among the Poskim.  Many Poskim have, however, ruled that when there is a need – one can rely on the lenient view.

It could be that the slight research that the Kashrus agencies have done in regard to list #3 – can at least be qualified as a “Safek” – a doubt, in as far as the afore-mentioned Mishna Brurah (in 449:5) is concerned.


There is also a debate among the Poskim as to the nature of a Jew who is not observant.  It is possible that, according to some Poskim the prohibition of Chometz Sh’avar Alav HaPesach, a Rabbinic prohibition, may not have been enacted on someone who has thrown off Torah Judaism.

Both the Mishna Brurah (OC 347:7) and the Vilna Gaon (YD 151:7) reject this view, but it very well could be the view of the Shach in YD (151:6).  The Dagul Mervavah understands this Shach as permitting a Rabbinic violation when this is the case. Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l (Igros Moshe YD Vol. I #72) writes that one may rely on the Dagul Mervavah’s reading of the Shach only in conjunction with another factor.


Perhaps one could combine both of the above issues in what is known as the snifin approach to Halachic rulings.  In that approach, multiple mitigating halachic factors and even minority opinions, are combined to create a heter.  It is also interesting to note that there is a great debate as to the nature of the snifin approach as well.  May we also include minority halachic opinions that have been out and out dismissed by the Poskim?  Or may we only include views that are actually correct, it is just that the more stringent approach has been adopted?


There is another debate between the Rashba and the Noda BiYehuda of which most people are unaware.  It pertains to the issue of Bitul B’Shishim, something becoming nullified in a 60 to 1 ratio.

The debate can be called,  “Ikro Kach” and it refers to an item where it is normally part of the process of production. If this is the case, the concept of bitul of the non-kosher ingredient does not apply according to the Rashba. The Noda BiYehuda (Mahadura Tanina #56), however permits it.

What do we do?  The custom is to follow the Rashba (See Bais Yoseph YD 134 and Mogain Avrohom OC 446) when we have a kosher infrastructure in place, but when we are new to an area, we follow the lenient view of the Noda BiYehudah (Melamed L’ho’il Vol. II #29).

Many people used to rely on the Noda BiYehudah’s view in the 40’s and 50’s. Nowadays, however, we no longer rely on this view because we consider the United States as an area where we have an infrastructure. Few people rely on the Noda BiYehudah’s view in the United States nowadays, except perhaps in regard to non-kosher wine casks.


In this author’s view, it is time to finally say goodbye to the 1950’s. There are enough bourbons and whiskeys that are supervised so that we can consider ourselves as having an infrastructure.  It would also be a benefit to the kashrus agencies to let go of this leniency.  It will also put more pressure on the companies to seek truly kosher supervision.  This is, of course, the author’s suggestion and should be a question that is posed to our own shul Rabbonim, Poskim, and Kashrus agencies.  The author did consult with a number of Rabbonim and Poskim, however.


The author may be reached at [email protected]


  1. A fact that was not elaborated: “alcoholic content must be made out of at least 51% corn. Most distilleries make it from 65% to 75% corn”

    Meaning, the majority of the burboun is NOT made from chometz but rather corn (which is considered at most kitniyus).

    Although the remaining ingredients MIGHT be chometz, which is not nullified during pessach, however after pessach the rules of nullification apply.

    Chometz after pessach is a rabbinical prohibition, and the mixture of possible chometz would at most require rabbinical nullification (because it is already Biblically nullified since by law there MUST be at least 51% content from corn and most use 65-75% corn).

    Hence it is a “double Rabbinics” (“trei d’rabbonon”) and a sofek (if the remaining ingredients were chometz) at that.

    Even though there is a debate among poskim if Safaik Chometz Sh’avar alav haPesach is prohibited, here there is a Biblical nullification of the sofek chaometz!

    It is a shame that this point, although eluded to, was not elaborated.

    Likewise, when discussing the issue of “Ikro Kach” (an item where it is normally part of the process of production) – a glaring omission is if this issue applies to Rabbinically prohibited non-kosher ingredients (such as chometz sh’avar haPesach). in other words, even the Rashba that prohibits “Ikro Kach”, would he hold this stringent opinion also on Rabbinicalyl prohibited additions?

    I write this not to criticize but to add to the discussion and hope the learned rabbi will comment a reply as he graced me in the past.

  2. This “problem” with bourbon is old news and was covered on this site back in 2010:

    “The AKO Executive Committee has reason to believe that there are large liquor companies in the United States which may be owned in whole or part by Jews. They are concerned that such companies may not have arranged for the sale of their chametz (mechiras chametz) during Pesach.”

  3. Has Heaven been sending messages to the Kiddush Clubs (or their wives)?

    On Jul 3, 2019 – Fire Destroys Jim Beam Warehouse Filled With Bourbon Barrels:

    A year earlier, almost to the day, on July 5, 2018 – Bourbon Disaster: 1792 Whiskey Storage Warehouse Collapses In Kentucky:

    It must be because we women need to improve on tznius – so just say l’chaim to that on 18-year-old scotch aged in wine barrels (sarcasm)! Only if you rely on the heterim to drink it and get carried home from the kiddush club, if you rely on the eruv.

  4. Left out of the discussion is that whiskeys (or Bourbons) are only derived from chometz but do not contain the actual chometz and might not be considered chometz sheovar al hapesach at all. This is why the heter of mechiras chometz was introduced initially for alcoholic drinks. This leniency was actually put into general practice for alcohol and should have been incorporated into the discussion.

  5. silentmoishe – you are mistaken and confused.

    Whisky is chometz gommur, not a ta’ru’vos of chamentz. By analogy, a cake has chometz 0 flour in its ingredients, plus many other ingredients like eggs, sugar, oil etc which are not chometz, yet the cake is chometz gommur.

    There may be a leniency applicable when the chometz is less than 50% of the total ingredients in the product, such as certain vodka where the chometz alcohol is watered down, but this does not apply to whisky or bourbon.