Search
Close this search box.

Trump’s Idea of ‘Presidential’ Diverges From Past Presidents


trumpDonald Trump, that most unconventional of presidential candidates, last spring pledged that he would act perfectly presidential when the time was right.

“I will be so presidential that you’ll call me and you’ll say, ‘Donald, you have to stop that, it’s too much,'” he promised during a March television interview.

Less than two months from Inauguration Day, there are growing signs that Trump’s idea of what’s presidential may never sync up with past norms — to the delight of some and dismay of others.

The president-elect has kept up his habit of sending unfiltered tweets, directly challenged the First Amendment right to burn the flag and selected a flame-throwing outsider for a top adviser. He’s shown no hesitation to traffic in unsubstantiated rumors, has mixed dealings in business and government, and has flouted diplomatic conventions to make his own suggestion for who should be Britain’s ambassador to the U.S., a job that happens to already be filled. He’s picked numerous fights with individual journalists, disregarded past practices on press access and dabbled in the name-calling that was commonplace during his candidacy.

Trump’s search for Cabinet nominees has played out like a reality TV show, with a number of candidates engaged in unabashed self-promotion while their assets and liabilities are publicly debated by members of the president-elect’s own transition team. (It’s normally a hush-hush process until the unveiling of an appointee). Trump’s tweet that “Fidel Castro is dead!” had none of the diplomatic subtleties normally associated with such an international development.

Is all of this, then, the “new normal” for what to expect from a Trump administration or a reflection of the growing pains associated with any presidential transition?

President Barack Obama, who knows a thing or two about making the big leap to the Oval Office, has expressed hope that the weight of the office will ultimately have a sobering effect on Trump, cautioning people against assuming “the worst.”

“How you campaign isn’t always the same as how you govern,” Obama said in one of a string of recent comments trying to provide some measure of reassurance to those concerned about the next president. “Sometimes when you’re campaigning, you’re trying to stir up passions. When you govern, you actually have reality in front of you, and you have to figure out, ‘How do I make this work.’ ”

Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, a strong conservative and a Trump defender, said of the transition, “You gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet.”

But Thomas Mann, a longtime scholar of government from the Brookings Institution, said that while people can hope for the best, “There’s no reason to take what’s going on with anything other than great uneasiness and caution about the kind of government that is preparing to take control in the United States.”

“To call this the ‘new normal’ is to make light of the seriousness of what’s going on,” Mann said.

Trump has “got to get some discipline,” said New York University’s Paul Light, another scholar of government. “He’s just got to get on this.”

On the matter of Trump’s tweeting, Light said, “If he’s up at 3 a.m. about to tweet, he should start reading something about his agenda instead. He’s under-informed and so is his staff.”

The concerns extend well beyond matters of style.

—Trump’s out-of-the-blue tweet this week that people who burn the flag should face jail time or a loss of citizenship had Republicans stepping forward to defend First Amendment rights.

—His unfounded charges that millions of Americans voted illegally sow distrust in the integrity of the U.S. electoral system.

—On matters of press access, the idea that the whereabouts of the president or president-elect might be unknown in a time of national emergency has troubling implications beyond mere inconvenience for reporters.

And experts on government ethics say that if the president doesn’t sell off his vast business buildings, he’ll be subject to a never-ending string of conflict-of-interest questions that will cast a cloud over his policy actions.

Trump said Wednesday he was drawing up plans to take himself “completely out” of his business operations. But it wasn’t clear if he planned to put his businesses in a blind trust — as presidents have traditionally done — or leave them in his children’s hands.

Polls show Trump’s favorability ratings have ticked up since the election, even if they are still extremely low for an incoming president.

A CNN survey released last week found that Trump’s favorability rating had gone from 36 percent a few weeks before the election to 47 percent 10 days after the vote. A little less than half of Americans said Trump’s actions since the election had made them more confident in his ability to serve as president.

A Quinnipiac poll released last week found that nearly 6 in 10 Americans thought Trump should shut down his personal Twitter account. More than half were concerned that Trump might veto legislation that’s good for the nation if it hurt his business interests.

Trump has offered post-election reassurances that he’ll be “very restrained” in his tweets and more going forward. His actions haven’t always confirmed that.

(AP)



8 Responses

  1. While Obama will go down in history as the worst President the US had, not only will Trump make the US great again but he will be the greatest President the US ever had. So much so, not only will he be in office for 8 years but he will be forced by all to continue for at least another 8 years. MARK MY WORDS!

  2. he has to keep it comin. this is all such great stuff i cant give it up. as for presidential?? who cares! lets have some fun for the next 4 yrs!

  3. There has never been a president who was a celebrity before he went into politics (other than as a famous lawyer or general, most were known as politicians). Reagan was closest, be by the time he ran for president he was long retired from being an actor (and wasn’t well known as an actor – be was better known as the head of the actors’ trade union), and had been a governor for eight years. Trump is radically different than anything we ever saw before.

  4. Obama had no substance he just ran off at the mouth. He’s trying to give wise advice but still knows nothing about anything.
    Trump, on the other hand has been consistently successful and is attacking his first job of cabinet building brilliantly. He’s not afraid to surround himself with smart people while Obama chose academics who also live in lala land.

  5. Come on YWN, we don’t need Trump-baiting articles from you!Most of your readers are solidly behind Trump who we believe will not only at least try to make America Great Again but will also try to make Israel Great Again

  6. There are a number of errors in this article that makes it sound like a Democrat wrote it.

    1) It is not a First Amendment right to burn the flag. Until recently, this right was not included in the First Amendment. Fairly recently, the liberal Supreme Court interpreted the First Amendment to include flag burning. This can be overturned. Trump was only expressing his view (protected under the First Amendment) and wish that the law be changed so as to prosecute flag burners.

    2) Trump did not say that millions of Americans voted illegally. Rather he said that millions voted illegally. This is not conjecture, but fact. A Mexican with an American driver’s license could register and vote in many southern states. The Democrats that were in favour of keeping the border open and kept it open, allowed for this kind of illegality (not approved in the US electoral system) to exist. There were Democratic (it is a disgrace to call them by that name) activists that hacked the system and voted for countless people ahead of time, as posted on Facebook. To date, they have not been arrested.

    3) The idea that the president’s whereabouts be unknown is troubling. However, #1, the idea that the president-elect’s whereabouts are unknown is not at all troubling. He is just taking advantage of his last days of privacy. Secondly, the idea that the president’s whereabouts be unknown is troubling. But that those whereabouts be unknown to the press is not at all troubling as long as it is known to the Secret Service, which is the case in every instance.

    4) The president does not need to sell off anything. He merely needs to divest, to appoint someone else to be owner or CEO. This can be a family member not currently employed by the government, who will then make the decisions while Trump is president. Compare this with the Clinton Foundation that was run by the Clintons, even Hillary Clinton, while she was still in office, clearly a conflict of interest violation, that is being ignored. And to remind the press, Trum can continue to run his businesses up until January 19 without any legal conflict of interest.

    5) The liberal polls were intentionally dishonest during the campaign, which includes CNN. It is astonishing that these kinds of polls are still being quoted, especially here on YWN.

    6) This whole article is one-sided. A real news story would contain both sides of the debate. If the writer is an anti-Trump activist, he would do well to discuss it in advance with someone from the other camp so that he could include points that favour Trump as well.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts