Search
Close this search box.

AUDIO: Lib Radio Host: When Will Navy SEALs ‘Drop In’ On George W. Bush?


If you’re looking for a contender for one of the most outrageous things said in the aftermath of Osama bin Laden’s killing, look no further than liberal radio host Mike Malloy who basically suggested that if Bin Laden was killed by a Navy Seal unit then so should former President George W. Bush.

“I have heard some commentators talk about the fact that, all the lives that have been lost in this war on terror, and now the summary execution of the person responsible. But as soon as I heard that, I thought, well, bin Laden really didn’t have anything to do – did he – with Iraq? . . . All the death in Iraq was not caused by bin Laden. The death in Iraq was caused by George W. Bush. Five thousand Americans, tens of thousands permanently damaged and shot to pieces, a million Iraqis dead – that wasn’t bin Laden. That was George Bush. So when does Seal Unit 6, or whatever it’s called, drop in on George Bush? Bush was responsible for a lot more death, innocent death, than bin Laden.”

Will the Secret Service be paying a visit to Malloy’s studio for a little talk about inciting assassins?

 

(Source: MediaITE)



6 Responses

  1. Mr. Malloy,
    Bin Laden might’ve not had much connection with Iraq or Saddam Hussein (who was as vicious as Ghaddafi — the one whom President Obama sought to capture, kill or…), but it was actually an Iraqi detainee that led to Osama bin Laden. (www.newser.com/article/d9mvqrt80/phone-call-by-kuwaiti-courier-led-us-to-bin-ladens-doorstep-capping-a-decade-long-hunt.html) You sound like some people in the “Yeshiva World” who, despite Mr. Panetta’s testimony, will forever blame Bush for everything and deny credit to his courageous and not-so-popular decisions that led to the capture of this gruesome, vicious terrorist. Shame on you!

  2. Gorge Dumb Bush did more to ruin America than any other president. He totally ignored America’s financial problems while looking for weapons of mass destruction to justify his invasion of Iraq and did not find anything. He killed Saddam Hussein, the ruler of Iraq, totally destroying the balance in that country and thereby giving it over to religious crazies. Saddam might have been a tyrannical ruler, but he did not let Islamists have any say in that country. Now America is stuck there; if they pull out the Islamic crazies will take it over and make it into another Iran/Hamas.

  3. 3. I truly think you should check into a hospital because you are suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome. For normal people that would be a problem but as a twisted liberal that fits you fine.

    Your ManChild of a Present (NOT a typo!) has done NOTHING to get the economy going again. He has taken the country on such a hard left turn that we may not recover. It was your almightly Obama that responsible for the collapse in his previous cushy job as a community agitator not to mention his 5 minutes as a senator. Thank God the elections are in 18 months!

    How is that hopey changey thing doing for you?

  4. This “man” deserves to be removed from the air. The liberals
    are destroying everything that made America great

  5. No. 4: Your “criticism” of comment no. 3 is typical – all vitriol, no criticism. And that’s not the most offensive part of your comment.

    The most offensive part of your comment is your reference to the President of the United States as a “manchild.” I do not know whether your formal education took place inside or outside the US. If it took place inside the US, you missed the part of US cultural history in which we learn that one of the ways that African Americans have been demeaned, by their slave masters before emancipation, and by others thereafter, is by infantilization, i.e., depicting African Americans, particularly men, as child-like. There is nothing childish about President Obama (other than his childhood), but you evidently cannot accept the fact that he has had a remarkable level of success in his life, even if you disagree with his political viewpoints, and even if he rose “only” as high as the US Senate.

    And by the way, do you think that it is possible for a liberal to not be twisted? If not, you yourself are … well, never mind.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts