FDA Widens COVID Vaccine Warning Over Rare Heart Inflammation Risk

FILE - An ampoule of the vaccine "Comirnaty" for children from the manufacturer Biontech/Pfizer is pictured in a pharmacy in Duesseldorf, Germany, Dec. 13, 2021. (Marius Becker/dpa via AP, File)

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it has expanded existing warnings on the two leading COVID-19 vaccines about a rare heart side effect mainly seen in young men.

Myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is usually mild, emerged as a complication after the first shots became widely available in 2021. Prescribing information from both Pfizer and Moderna already advises doctors about the issue.

In April, the FDA sent letters to both drugmakers asking them to update and expand the warnings to add more detail about the problem and to cover a larger group of patients. While the FDA can mandate label changes, the process is often more of a negotiation with companies.

Specifically, the new warning lists the risk of myocarditis as 8 cases per 1 million people who got the 2023-2024 COVID shots between the ages of 6 months and 64 years old. The label also notes that the problem has been most common among males ages 12 to 24. The previous label said the problem mostly occurs in 12- to 17-year-olds.

The FDA’s labeling change appears to conflict with some prior findings of scientists elsewhere in the U.S. government.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention previously concluded there was no increased risk of myocarditis detected in government vaccine injury databases for COVID-19 shots dating back to 2022. Officials also noted that cases tend to resolve quickly and are less severe than those associated with COVID-19 infection itself, which can also cause myocarditis.

The FDA announcement came as new vaccine advisers appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. met to debate the continuing use of COVID-19 vaccines for key groups, including pregnant women. It’s the first meeting of the CDC advisory panel since Kennedy abruptly dismissed all 17 members of the group, naming a new panel that includes several members with a history of anti-vaccine statements.

The FDA’s label update is the latest step by officials working under Kennedy to restrict or undercut use of vaccines. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and a top deputy recently restricted annual COVID-19 shots to seniors and other Americans at higher risk from the virus. They’ve also suggested seasonal tweaks to match the latest circulating virus strains are new products that require extra testing.

Outside experts said the new warning is the wrong approach.

“They are right to suggest that we need to consider myocarditis risks associated with the vaccine, but what they propose is exactly the wrong solution,” said Dr. Robert Morris, a public health specialist at the University of Washington. “We should be investigating who is prone to myocarditis to see if we can predict and mitigate that risk.”

Makary and several other FDA officials gained prominence during the pandemic by suggesting the federal government exaggerated the benefits of COVID-19 boosters and downplayed serious side effects, including myocarditis.

Before joining the government, Makary and two of his current FDA deputies wrote a 2022 paper that said mandating booster shots in young people would cause more vaccine-related injuries than prevented hospitalizations from COVID-19 infections. The conclusion contradicted that of many leading vaccine and public health experts at the time, including at the CDC.

(AP)



One Response

  1. Most of the world banned the use of mercury in vaccines in the 80s and 90s. The old Soviet Union evaluated thimerosal, the mercury-based biocide used in vaccines, back in the 50s and concluded that it was too toxic to use in anything intended for humans or animals.

    In the 90s, after Congress forced the three-letter agencies to quantify the mercury used in vaccines, they realized that infants and children were getting quantities of mercury wildly in excess of any exposure standards. An internal CDC study was commissioned by Thomas Verstraeten, a Belgian epidemiologist.

    Verstraeten found that infants given mercury-containing vaccines at birth had at least 7 times more autism than children who were given the shots after age 90 days. His findings were the topic of a secret meeting of federal agencies and vaccine industry representatives at the Simpsonwood Conference Center where Verstraeten’s findings were discussed, and the decision was made to keep the findings secret. A transcript of the meeting was obtained through FOIA.

    A subsequent CDC study was redesigned 5 times, a violation of federal law, until it produced the desired outcome of no statistically significant association between thimerosal exposure and autism.

    Requests for the data sets for the study were unfulfilled, with the CDC claiming the data sets were lost (i.e., the cat ate their homework.) Failure to preserve datasets for a scientific study paid for with federal funds is also illegal. The story of the thimerosal scandal is detailed in “Evidence of Harm” by the late David Kirby.

    Mercury was eventually phased out of single-dose pre-filled syringes but is still used in multi-dose vials and is used to clean vaccine production equipment, resulting in residual contamination in a wide range of injections.

    Mercury is far from the only dangerous ingredient used in vaccines, but the fact it is still in some vaccines when the rest of the world has abandoned it decades ago shows the complete impotence of the three-letter agencies to control the vaccine industry or protect public health.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts