Trump Says He’s Found “An Answer to Autism” — Using Tylenol During Pregnancy

The Trump administration is preparing to deliver a bombshell health announcement Monday: pregnant women should avoid Tylenol, the country’s most widely used pain reliever, over concerns it could raise the risk of autism in children.

Federal health officials will caution against acetaminophen use during pregnancy except in cases of high fever, marking the first time Washington has formally connected the over-the-counter drug to neurodevelopmental disorders. The White House is also expected to highlight leucovorin — a cancer and anemia medication — as a possible treatment for autism, signaling a broader push to reposition how the government addresses the disorder.

President Donald Trump has been previewing the announcement for days, promising supporters over the weekend that “we found an answer to autism” and calling the coming press conference “one of the most important” of his presidency. The rollout follows weeks of speculation stoked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has long made autism research a political centerpiece and vowed to use “gold-standard science” to explain America’s rising autism rates.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that one in 31 U.S. 8-year-olds were diagnosed with autism as of 2022, a steep increase from previous decades. The administration’s pivot toward Tylenol could upend long-standing medical guidance, ignite fierce debate in Congress, and trigger legal and financial consequences for the pharmaceutical industry.

It remains unclear what research the administration will cite. A Mount Sinai study published last month found that prenatal acetaminophen exposure may increase risks of autism and ADHD, but it stopped short of proving causation. “Even a small increase in risk could have major public health implications,” said researcher Dr. Diddier Prada, cautioning that higher-quality studies were more likely to detect links between Tylenol use and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Still, mainstream medical groups have generally advised that acetaminophen remains the safest option for pain and fever during pregnancy when used at recommended doses — making the administration’s announcement a sharp departure from consensus.

The decision to tie a household painkiller to autism carries significant political risk. Trump is moving to stake out territory on a health issue that has long animated activists but divided experts. Kennedy’s high-profile role adds another layer, intertwining the administration’s public health strategy with a figure who has built his brand on skepticism of pharmaceutical orthodoxy.

The unanswered questions may be as consequential as the announcement itself: how regulators will define “risk,” what studies they will rely on, and whether this move signals the start of an aggressive new federal line on autism research and treatment — or a politically charged gamble that could reshape one of America’s most common medical habits.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

2 Responses

  1. The Trump Adminstration, with this announcement about “Autism”, has drifted into “Idiocracy” (The USA 2006) territory. 🤦‍

    RFK Jnr. and POTUS Trump really have no idea what “Autism” is. They are like men with 5 pieces each of a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle who are convinced they have the full picture. Many people on the eve of Rosh Hashanah 5786/September 2025 are now in magical thinking mode. They are desperate for simple answers to big problems. They believe their favourite authority figures they see as trustworthy even if these people have no real knowledge about a problem. (Watch Mike Judge’s film. ⚠)

    This is not the correct forum to explain what I know about “Autism”, suffice to say that by late 1997 I had worked out what it was. Some points:

    (1) The label “Autism” is problematic because it pigeonholes a human health issue into a limiting framework. It pathologizes something that should not be pathologized.

    (2) “Autism” is 100% not caused by vaccines. This is a dumb theory.

    (3) “Autism” is not genetic. i.e. There is no gene that predisposes someone to the condition.

    (4) “Autism” is not caused by Environmental factors like: Pollution, Pesticides, Lead Poisoning, Fluoride etc. It also not caused by a mother taking Tylenol or any other pharmaceutical or recreational drug during her pregnancy.

    (5) The Epigenetic argument for “Autism” is incorrect.

    (6) The idea that there is “A Spectrum of Autism” is problematic because it further straightjackets people into neat, reductionist, non-Holistic paradigm categories. (The danger of “othering” another human being)

    (7) “Autism” is the result of early childhood trauma, most usually repeated CSA, before the age of 8 y.o., most often repressed from waking consciousness later in life.

    (8) Contrary to the CDC’s estimate in 2022, one in 31 U.S. 8-year-olds are not “Autistic”. This pathologizing and pigeonholing is very problematic.

    (9) The Autism Industry has morphed into a multi-Billion dollar monster now. It needs to be slayed via truth.

    (10) Bizrat Hashem, by 2050 the diagnosis of “Autism” will be a thing of the past.

  2. the headline is misleading, and dangerous if the claim is true. The answer to autism – goes the new claim – is NOT using tylenol during pregnancy.

Leave a Reply

Popular Posts