Letter about sheitels

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Letter about sheitels

Viewing 46 posts - 51 through 96 (of 96 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2418530
    Thinking out loud
    Participant

    Men who obsess about women’s clothing, hair, and tznius level need to revisit their own understanding of MALE sexuality and what Hashem expects from each of us.
    Trust me, it is not your Yetzer Tov motivating you… Your Yetzer Hora is masquerading as a tzaddik

    But anyway, there’s FINALLY a book trying to prevent your problem

    From Boys into Men
    Mosaica Press
    By Dr Shloimie Zimmerman
    Forward by Rabbi Aharon Feldman

    Haskamos by many rabbanim

    #2418550
    anso
    Participant

    Men don’t know women and women don’t know men. That’s why there are all these assumptions and theories. Fact one: there is no love and nothing that is connecting women and men now. That’s why You have such a movement like yotzim besheela. Because You lack comfort and mercy.
    Fact two: its called shma Israel. LISTEN to your wife. Like G-d said to Abraham. Nekuda.

    #2418693
    ujm
    Participant

    For the idiots saying it’s the men’s problem and that they should worry about it without regulating women’s dress and behaviors, take up your complaints with Harlem and Chazal, who made and codified the Halacha regulating women’s dress and behaviors, yes, insofar as how they affect men.

    #2418712
    none2.0
    Participant

    Avrum. You seem to be using the pasuk any way you want. It was an _action_ that was done by sotah to embarras the woman. Saying now woman have to cover their hair because a pasuk says something not exactly outright sounds exactly like your using the words to serve an agenda. I can also chop up any sentence and take one word or one letter and make it fit to whatever belief system I have. Talk about making anything serve your own purposes lol. Who’s doing that me or you. I like to read things _in context_ and live in reality. Hi

    #2418716
    none2.0
    Participant

    I’m not saying I don’t appreciate the culture of everything we do but let’s not lie to ourselves about root of where this comes from honesty and truth matter. You want to lie to yourself twist the truth. Call me names. That’s fine

    #2418735
    none2.0
    Participant

    Ujm so?

    #2418750
    none2.0
    Participant

    Alot of things you guys are saying is all _oppinins_ and your opinions of what _you_ would do and believe you should do. Everyone has a very different reason why they do things. a woman that dresses like a, prob feels very comfortable with herself and prob just doesn’t realize what she’s doing. Never having been in the natural market of relationships she prob doesn’t realize how she’s attracting attention cuz she never had to attract attention to secure a partner. Just a thought. The whole attraction thing is to secure a partner _and_ keep a partner

    #2418751
    none2.0
    Participant

    Emesdik even if a married woman is supposed to do this and sapposed to do that your opinion makes sense I’m not negating that but. I think your just projecting your anger at yourself into them. Chill. Thoughts are not action. Second the yester hara problem is more to do with the fact that monogamy isn’t a mans nature. Maybe ask your rav if you can take another wife cuz otherwise it will lead to sin

    #2418754
    none2.0
    Participant

    I’m joking

    #2418755
    none2.0
    Participant

    Ujm so put blinders on when you go out then and don’t be human

    #2418830
    ujm
    Participant

    *Hashem

    #2418831
    HaKatan
    Participant

    Ellie7:
    You wrote:
    “The vibe of the whole letter is placing men’s issues squarely on women’s shoulders. You’re turning women into the bad guy and framing men as poor, innocent bystanders.”

    Not sure how you came to that conclusion. It’s not “good (men) vs. bad (women)”. It’s that some women are doing something improper, regardless of whether or not they realize that it is improper.

    “The way you describe the first type of man, especially-‘The Struggling but Sincere’-made me cringe. Why don’t you think that most women-even in the long, lace sheitals aren’t struggling but sincere? Why do you assume they aren’t trying their best? Why are you viewing them as an evil entity out to get men?”

    Again, he’s not criticizing those women as “bad” and “out to get men”; the women, too, could certainly be “struggling but sincere” and “trying their best”. But, again, he’s raising awareness that those women may not realize that what they are doing is problematic.

    “You can’t blame women for men’s issues. Yes, perhaps in an asifa for women this can be emphasized-without placing responsibility for men on their shoulders. No one bears responsibility for another’s actions. Period.”

    I’m curious from which rabbi or BY school you learned that “hashkafa”. There is actually a straight-out mitzva in the Torah of “Lo saamod al dam raiecha”. According to your “hashkafa”, if you see someone at risk of drowning and you are able to help but choose not to save them from drowning, then that’s perfectly fine. But the Torah says otherwise. In fact, ironically for this discussion, if a man doesn’t save a woman at risk of drowning, then he is called a chassid shoteh.

    There is also “lifnei iver lo sitain michshol”. Etc.

    So, I think this is the crux of your issue. You are claiming that, as a woman, you are entitled to wear any sheitel you want (and you noted that you do wear a sheitel that is more tzanua than some out there) and not be considered wrong for doing so. Even if secular “culture” implies that, liHavdil, the Torah very much disagrees. So, yes, women do need to be aware of what they are doing and the effect of that on men (and other women, too, like being machshil them via peer pressure or negatively affecting their marriages, etc.).

    Please try harder to view this from the Torah’s perspective. That should help with the anger you feel about this issue.

    #2418837

    mazal > Unfortunately it will be very hard for Women to stop wearing these immodest, very natural looking wigs.

    Right, it would be good to have a way for normal people to stay within halocha without extreme difficulties, as too much strictness turns people away.
    I am not seeing any responses to normalize hats again. Nice-looking hats are more affordable and easier for the wearer, and they create an easy marker for who is married.

    #2418938
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    none2.0,

    “You seem to be using the pasuk any way you want.”

    Absolutely not! I only interpret it that way because we have a tradition brought down and codified in the gemara. I’m not going to deviate from that.

    “It was an _action_ that was done by sotah to embarras the woman.”

    And where in the pasuk does it say it was done davka to embarrass the woman? That’s not a plain reading either, it’s an interpretation. And where does this interpretation come from? The same place mine did! So the interesting question is why do you take chazal’s interpretation for the reason her hair is uncovered as an axiom, but reject everything else chazal say about it?

    “I can also chop up any sentence and take one word or one letter and make it fit to whatever belief system I have. Talk about making anything serve your own purposes lol.”

    No you can’t. The rules for interpretation come from our tradition and have strict parameters. For example, a gezeira shava is a way to derive a halacha for one case based on similar or identical words used in a separate, seemingly unrelated case. But we can’t just make up our own gezeira shava. It’s only valid if it has a mesora.

    #2418957
    none2.0
    Participant

    Hakatan can I rephrase what you said. The “Torah” says lifnei eiver so if you see someone drowning you can choose not to save them but the Torah says it’s assur. Here is where you are dead wrong. The Torah codafies right and wrong for us to always remember and hold as torch for all the nations lest they forget morality. But it is _not_ ok to pass by someone while they are drowning and not helping them. It is moraly corrupt and wrong….._thats_ why the Torah says it’s wrong.

    #2418960
    none2.0
    Participant

    The rules come from tradition blah blah. Do you think for yourself. And who made those rules to apply to everyone. I still have a brain and my own thoughts. do you have yours?

    #2418961
    none2.0
    Participant

    You have no idea how liberal your way of thinking sounds. Let’s use for example liberal speak. They use the words “red herring” they say there’s a “specific way” to interpret certain things that if someone is doing XYZ even if it makes perfect sense they are just using a straw man…..you don’t see the pattern your using. There’s a specific “way” to interpret things. What about reading the plain text and understanding it in context. I’m ok with everyone’s interactions but I have my own too. And how do we know who’s is the truth. Not which authority tells me “how” to interpret things but whatever is of sound mind. Does that make sense. Thanks

    #2418972
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    none2.0,

    “The rules come from tradition blah blah. Do you think for yourself.”

    Yup.

    “And who made those rules to apply to everyone.”

    Hashem your G-d and the King of the Universe, who happens to not be what you see in the mirror.

    #2418973
    none2.0
    Participant

    ופרע את ראש האישה can roughly translate to loosen or uncover her heart. You need an authority figure to tell you how your allowed to translate something….sounds like manipulation to me

    #2418974
    none2.0
    Participant

    *hair

    #2418975
    HaKatan
    Participant

    none2.0:
    I thought my phrasing made sense and also don’t understand your rephrasing.
    The Torah says Lo sa’amod…, that you’re forbidden from standing by idly as your “friend”‘s blood is being spilled. Like that hypothetical drowning example.
    Lifnei Iver is an additional concern.

    Not sure what “morals” has to do with this. There is Torah, which is absolute truth, and everything else, which is not. Morals are irrelevant unless they are firmly based on the Torah.

    #2418976
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    none2.0,

    “You have no idea how liberal your way of thinking sounds. Let’s use for example liberal speak. They use the words “red herring” they say there’s a “specific way” to interpret certain things that if someone is doing XYZ even if it makes perfect sense they are just using a straw man…..you don’t see the pattern your using”

    This whole section makes no sense. What are you trying to say? Just a bunch or random stuff you think will bother me?

    “What about reading the plain text and understanding it in context.”

    That’s the very first step of learning. And based on your prior posts, you’re not capable of it.

    “I’m ok with everyone’s interactions but I have my own too.”

    You mean interpretations, and no, you are obviously not ok with everyone’s. Otherwise you wouldn’t be trying to insult me by saying I can’t think for myself, or whatever weird stuff you wrote above.

    “And how do we know who’s is the truth. Not which authority tells me “how” to interpret things but whatever is of sound mind. Does that make sense. Thanks”

    Yeah it makes sense inasmuch as I know what you’re trying to say, but it is stupid. You wrote somewhere that you’re not advocating for moral relativism, but your contention here is the textbook definition of moral relativism.

    #2418984
    GadolHadofi
    Participant

    Joseph,

    What do your multiple wives wear on their heads when you let them out for their very brief monthly outing?

    #2418985
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    none2.0,

    “ופרע את ראש האישה can roughly translate to loosen or uncover her [*hair]. You need an authority figure to tell you how your allowed to translate something….sounds like manipulation to me “

    ראש means head.

    #2419026
    none2.0
    Participant

    Hakatan the Torah is a codified book _of_ morality. Lol truth _is_ morality. You confuse Torah and morality it’s the same thing. It’s a Devine book to teach you right from wrong but also to make you into a nation of specific roles in earth. Please think about it. The way you worded what you said was as if the person himself is sperate from his responsibility from morality and the only reason he does it is cuz the book says it. No, the book says it because he has a responsibility to do it not the other way around. Your using the book as a control method not as a guide for something that’s already inherently what we should be doing with or without the book

    #2419027
    none2.0
    Participant

    Avram how do you know if the meforshim didn’t say it and codify it for you. Who gives you the authority to translate that word for yourself ?

    #2419028
    none2.0
    Participant

    Avram why would I want to bother you? Exactly? I don’t have a reason I’m just telling you the fallacy of your thinking….I’m not capable of it because why? Cuz I don’t conform to your way of interacting things? I wasn’t insulting you. Not intentionally. I think avram your glitching. Moral relativism has nothing to do with reading a simple paragraph in context. You really stretch the truth here. No offense. Finding out what is right and wrong and trying to translate what G-d wrote (in the most simplistic language mind you) is not “moral relativism” lol that’s litterlou reading a book in context without all the holler holler from other people’s translations that take things out of context. Can you translate the word “we” can you translate the word “I” so you can _also_ translate “thou shall not kill” now that we translated all things should we move up a level?

    #2419029
    none2.0
    Participant

    thats the thing avram I believe Hashem ever asks anyone to fallow authority blindly. Because He never designed us that way. It’s not healthy it’s not natural and it’s also dangerous, I bet if the rabanim told you to unalive someone ( well in _that_ situation you’ll suddenly start thinking for yourself, of course cuz that goes against sanity) but, if they somehow found a way to justify unaliving someone using all the lovely manipulations of interpretation and using some pasuk in the Torah to do so, would you still listen to them

    #2419030
    none2.0
    Participant

    And _thats_ what I mean, when I say you need to _filter_ things through your own intellect. Aka _think_ for yourself. You see why? Cuz if you were a blind sheep youd draw a sword for your master. If you didn’t ask yourself if you dont agree with what is said, first, you’d justify things that may actually be wrong. Avram. So again who’s your master, G-d? Who actually respects you as an individual and respects who and what your capable of it man who _alwsys_ seeks to manipulate and control

    #2419045
    none2.0
    Participant

    G-d did not tell you you can’t use your own brain your misconstruing what a human being said a few thousand years ago to what G-d wrote and told Moshe at har Sinai

    #2419133
    emesdik613
    Participant

    The Gadol HaDor Rav Elyashiv zt’l” spoke very harshly against today’s sheitels.
    These are the words of the Rav translated into English (there is a recording of this speech):
    “Even though there’s a dispute among the Poskim whether it’s mutar or ossur to wear a sheitel, if they walk as if their hair is revealed, the way those that are not covering their hair walk, they are violating an issur gamur, it’s mamish, it’s emes like ervah. (the term used in gemara to describe parts of the body that must be covered according to halacha) The issur is as follows: If they walk with a sheitel like the times 100 years ago, then of course this is allowed, even a drop nicer. But, it should not be the way they walk today. All those that walk today, it looks like hair for sure and this is definitely assur, this nobody was mattir.…A woman with the hair of today the way she walks, it’s mamish ervah, it looks like hair, there is no difference, regarding this there is
    no heter…”

    A woman’s hair becomes ervah after marriage, and just like any other body part that is considered ervah, it must be covered and concealed. Wearing someone else’s “ervah” to cover one’s own ervah is making a mockery of this commandment. A wig today is an exact replica of the ervah that is being covered (usually nicer looking), it’s equivalent to a woman wearing a skintight dress with images on it of the body parts that are being covered.

    Some interesting historical facts- the origin of this commandment really comes from Chava. After she sinned because of the snake, she hid her head in shame from doing this sin, and one of her punishments was hair covering (from the Maom Loez). The Torah source from the Sotah having her hair uncovered after she sinned was also an act of shame. The head covering is not meant to be a source of pride and vanity. It is solely meant to increase a married woman’s modesty level in front of other men, which none of the wigs accomplish today.

    #2419136
    emesdik613
    Participant

    Throughout history the wig was always used as a hair replacement to enhance and beautify one’s appearance. Originating in ancient Egypt until today wigs were worn to display status and wealth, to make a fashion statement, and to transform one’s looks. They were used as hair replacements NOT head coverings worn for religious reasons.

    Interesting historical facts about wigs (which demonstrate how they were never used as a modest head covering and should not be today):

    – Wigs first originated in ancient Egypt (Mitzraim).
    – Egyptian men and women shaved their heads bald (because of the high heat and the infestation of lice) and replaced their natural hair with wigs.
    – The Egyptians invented the concept of a wig so they could have the look of hair and experiment with different hair styles (as opposed to using a cloth
    head covering).
    – Wigs became a status symbol. The wealthier Egyptians wore wigs made out of human hair, the lower classes wore wigs made out of animal and
    vegetable fiber.
    – Wigs were used for fashion and beauty and many times were decorated with braids, curls, plaits, and all sorts of ornaments.
    – Both wig making specialists and barbers made the wigs and wig making was considered to be a respectable profession in ancient Egypt. It was one of
    the jobs available to women (like the modern day sheitel macher…).
    – Wigs were scented with fragrant oils and petals or pieces of wood chips such as cinnamon.
    – When wigs were not used, they were kept in special boxes on a stand or in special chests.
    – Wig boxes were found in tombs and the remnants of ancient wig factories have been located.
    – The Egyptians were buried with their wigs because they wanted to appear with beautiful hair in the afterlife.
    – Some of the most famous Egyptian queens were well known for their great beauty (ex: Cleopatra) partly because of their impressive wigs.
    – Wigs were also worn in ancient times in Mesopotamia, Crete, Greece, and Persia.
    – Wigs fell out of fashion and then reappeared in England and France in the 17th century when wigs were worn by men and women (particularly the
    nobility) for status, fashion, and beauty.
    – Today, wigs of all lengths and styles are worn by many celebrities (actresses, singers, models etc…) and they have become a symbol of
    glamour and fashion. They are the ultimate beauty accessory.

    The Jews in ancient Egypt did not copy the dress and hairstyles of the Egyptians and that is one of the reasons why we were redeemed… yet here we are today wearing wigs for “modesty”, the very item that the Egyptians invented for pritzus, and an even nicer and more natural version than they wore! The wigs are angering Hashem and causing the shechina to leave our midst, it is certainly an area that women should be focusing on improving to help us merit a yeshuah from this long and difficult Galus.

    #2419346
    none2.0
    Participant

    Emisdik 13. Tottally appreciate your written word but, too much fear mongering. It’s “assur gamur” “over a lav” relax. You want people to listen to you. Noone cares about fear anymore. It doesn’t stick. Can we talk like adults and actually convince people theres a good reason to do something. Otherwise fear is not going to stick, you see. Free will is sacred and it’s a G-d given right

    #2420502
    emesdik613
    Participant

    None2.0:
    No fear mongering was posted- maybe reread the posts.
    Just educational info and some interesting historical facts, anyone who thinks can recognize that the current wigs are illogical and immodest.

    #2420916
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Years ago most non chasdish (chasdim were the minoirty) did not cover their hair at all. This includes many prestgious rabbnim’s wives. And so this who9le conversation is kind of based on the assumption that we are better than they were. Look at pics of your great grnadmother whether in the lower east side or in Budapest. Most did not cover their hair when married

    #2421079
    none2.0
    Participant

    Illogical and immodest. But that’s your viewpoint whether your wrong or right you cannot change the tide or choices of someone else. I definitely see your point but what will you do. Become the police. Maybe you and your wife shouldn’t do that and that’s it

    #2421589
    none2.0
    Participant

    Emesdik the difference between wearing wigs now and then is that we didn’t take it specifically from their heritage. The Egyptians ate also. Now it’s an avaira too?

    #2422157
    none2.0
    Participant

    The reason also that people find “loopholes” and then do whatever they want is because these things are not real. As in they are not morality or something that actually matters on a deep internal conscience level. Which means that the only way to get an entire population to force themselves to conform to it is through fear. And that’s all people are rebbeling and saying too bad. This is me

    #2422158
    none2.0
    Participant

    _if_ it was something like morality it would be wrong on so many levels but because it’s just something we all collectively believe in and the conform ourselves to, there’s no staying power people naturally just eventually do whatever makes them happy

    #2422389
    ujm
    Participant

    none: You beliebe in none of the Torah? If the Torah tells us what not to do (or what to do), as explained by our Rabbonim, that is an obligation you must follow.

    #2422636
    none2.0
    Participant

    I believe in right and wrong morality common sense principles and also reality and all that _is_ written in the Torah.

    #2422638
    none2.0
    Participant

    The Torah doesn’t just say what not to do. It speaks of what happens to you when you transgress a moral sin. The repercussions of a lifestyle without morality it also says don’t add to my word. Who gave the rabbanim uthority to add to morality and add things that weren’t even written in the plain text. I can also, if I had some agenda, find any explanation for what I believe in by picking random things out of words that were there to. Especially if I convinced people instead of looking at the entire message to miss the firost for the trees

    #2422639
    none2.0
    Participant

    The Torah itself works in exact synchronicity with reality that means it can be scrutinized and it will fit with reality exactly. Rabbinical add on cannot do that therefore it was created not by G-d. But by man. Man cannot and does not have the depth of wisdom that G-d has and it’s much more then what a human being can even begin to understand that’s why it’s so important not to add to the word. Because the word that was written is already perfect. It needs to be read in context without control agendaz

    #2422640
    none2.0
    Participant

    Therefore in real life nobody can force you to anything your only doing it cuz you agree with it that means you have free will even when you think you have to. You don’t have to do anything. Ever it’s up to you to find the truth and to figure out what makes sense not because morality is relative but because we were already driving endowed with some level of discernment. Regardless the whole shaital thing is very nice but again it’s not moral. It’s simply a rule put out by someone who took the letter of the law to some stringent degree and then forced everyone to do something based off a very vague sentence in the Torah. Regardless of how it came to be and whatever it is what I’m saying is that because it’s not a moral thing and our conscience is not activated about it. We naturally act out of rebbelion towards it because it isn’t something we truly believe deep down is moral. Real life and living in real life it’s more about moral right and wrong then religion and people only have energy for one. Not everything else .

    #2422641
    none2.0
    Participant

    I’m talking about human nature sperate from religion. That’s something you cannot change. The point is the Torah itself works with human nature and rabbinical does not

    #2426837
    Decency is Key
    Participant

    After ruminating on this topic for several weeks, I had the opportunity to ask a prominent Rav/Posek about the content of the letter. The answer that I received was that the length and presentation of a shaitel is definitely worth analyzing, but, if a shaitel conforms to the general tznius guidelines in a particular community, it is generally unquestionably mutar. (This Rav was answering me. In my community, most don’t wear ultra long shaitels.) “In general, it’s advisable not to rely on kol koreis presented to the public. They do not qualify as psak halacha. When in doubt, ask a shailah.” He also mentioned that when one sees individuals take on stringencies that don’t reflect in the rest of their avodas hashem we are to be choshed that there is something not kosher going on under the surface and to stay far away.

    This is not to say that women shouldn’t work on being more tznius in general – and it’s smart for us to question what we can do to improve ourselves on a regular basis. However, we need to remember that turning to extremes to solve problems is not the Torah way.

Viewing 46 posts - 51 through 96 (of 96 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.