Comments Donald Trump’s running mate JD Vance made in 2021 questioning Vice President Kamala Harris’ leadership because she did not have biological children have resurfaced, testing the young conservative senator in his early days campaigning as part of the Republicans’ presidential ticket.
During Vance’s bid for the Senate from Ohio, he said in a Fox News interview that “we are effectively run in this country via the Democrats,” and referred to them as “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.” He said that included Harris, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat.
“How does it make any sense that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?” Vance asked. Harris became stepmother to two teenagers when she married entertainment lawyer Douglas Emhoff in 2014. And Buttigieg announced he and his partner adopted infant twins in September 2021, more than a month before Vance made those comments.
The clip has started to spread online, with Hillary Clinton sharing it in a Tuesday post on X and adding sarcastically “what a normal, relatable guy who certainly doesn’t hate women having freedoms.”
The Harris campaign contested Vance’s stance, saying “every single American has a stake in this country’s future.”
“Ugly, personal attacks from JD Vance and Donald Trump are in line with their dangerous Project 2025 agenda to ban abortion, decimate our democracy, and gut Social Security,” said James Singer, a Harris campaign spokesman, referring to a policy and personnel plan for a second Trump term that was crafted by a host of former administration officials. Trump has been trying to distance himself from it. Project 2025 says the Department of Health and Human Services should “pursue a robust agenda” to protect “the fundamental right to life.” However, the document contains no proposals to cut Social Security, though the Heritage Foundation that oversaw it has long pushed for changes to the entitlement. The plan outlines a dramatic expansion of presidential power and a plan to fire as many as 50,000 government workers.
Vance’s spokesperson said the Harris campaign is lying about Vance’s views, noting her record is “littered with countless failures and disasters.
“It’s well known that Senator Vance found success in life due in large part to the influence of strong female role models like his grandmother,” spokesperson Taylor Van Kirk said.
The recirculated comment may be a sign of the ticket’s troubles appealing to women voters, and on the issue of reproductive rights. It follows the explosive entrance in the race of Harris, who secured the support of enough delegates to become the official nominee in less than 32 hours after President Joe Biden ended his reelection bid.
It also lays out some of the fears expressed by strategists that Trump took a political risk in picking a running mate who has been in Congress less than two years and is largely untested on a bigger stage. Trump liked Vance’s telegenic qualities and said he reminded him of “a young Abraham Lincoln.”
Vance, 39, is a former Marine and businessman who was first elected to public office in 2022. He wrote the 2016 bestseller “Hillbilly Elegy,” and developed a strong rapport with Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr. and leading MAGA figures with his personal story of growing up in Appalachia in poverty with a mother battling drug addiction could resonate with voters.
In 2021, Vance floated an idea to allow parents to cast ballots on behalf of their children, saying during a speech at the conservative nonprofit Intercollegiate Studies Institute in Virginia that people who don’t have children “don’t have as much of an investment in the future of the country.”
“When you go to the polls in this country as a parent, you should have more power, you should have more of an availability to speak your voice in our democratic republic than people who don’t have kids,” he said.
“Doesn’t this mean that non parents don’t have as much of a voice as parents?” he said critics would then ask. “Doesn’t this mean that parents get a bigger say in how a democracy functions? Yes, absolutely.”
(AP)
11 Responses
House Speaker Johnson today begged his colleagues at the weekly Republican meeting this AM to avoid these king of stupid and vile attacks on Harris based on racist and misogynistic tropes, but I doubt he will have much success since this kind of hyperbole has been made mainstream by Trump and they can’t seem to help themselves. Dems have their own problems with the far-left wing of the party and it will be interesting to see whether any of the squad tries to disrupt Bibi’s speech tomorrow.
Childless people are a significant part of the population, and there is no reason to think they are inherently unlikely to vote Republican. And whether one likes cats, dogs, neither, or both, does not correlate with the red/blue orientation, suggesting that politicians should not take a stand on pet preferences.
When Pete’s two children were born, he took two months’ maternity leave whereupon thousands of travelers were stranded in airports, the air traffic system shut down, and airplanes nearly collided on our runways”
Yes. Pete Buttigieg and his husband Chasten, were so exhausted and drained after having the twins handed to them, that they had to take 2 months off, on the taxpayers dime. 2 sodomites.
So there it is we should try to have more children and that will give us happiness supposedly most of the people that commit suicide didn’t have children
First off, JD is 100% right
Second, “Gadolhadorah” is the kind of loser that needs to sit down.
Pity women have a right to vote.
If you think this video is funny, go watch the old ones in which he talks about Donald Trump.
To YWN
When you wrote “personnel plan”, I assume you meant “personal plan”.
Sam: You and your misogynist, racist and homophobic MAGA chevrah are the primary reason why an election that should be an easy win for Trump is going to become a competitive race. There are enough legit policy differences between Trump/Harris to campaign on issues, and that is what the smart Republicans are begging for, but as noted earlier, there are those who just can’t help themselves, including the two names on the ticket, who will go off script and try to make the election about this nareshkeit and lose some marginal voters in the process.
Census data indicate there are over 23 million single women voters w/o kids who will be just overjoyed to hear the future VP dismiss them as “miserable, childless cat ladies”. I guess that includes frum women who are victims of the shidduch crisis who are also miserable, childless cat ladies”. So should the Dems campaign on not electing a convicted sexual predator married to a former “fashion model” whose fashionless (indeed everythingless” photographs were high-end prtizus.
Just to be clear, its entirely to be expected that VP candidates may hedge their prior policy positions to conform to the guy at the top of the ticket. Whats strange here is that Vance has a long history of video and social media statements where he called Trump a sexual predator, pervasive liar which is why he prone to believe the women accusing Trump of assault, etc. etc. The mods wouldn’t allow some of his comments to be quoted here .
We’ve seen in 2016 and 2020 campaign cycles how Republicans literally degrade themselves and grovel for Trump’s approval by changing not only their policy positions but their prior statements about their personal views of the person.
“misogynist, racist and homophobic”
The Torah is homophobic and I am too!
Doom: If Melania Trump, in her ONLY (non-convention) campaign event thusfar hosted a fundraiser for LogCabin Republicans (aka LGBT Republicans) than it might behoove R’ Vance not to go out of his way to disparage minorities. Aside from homophobia, the Torah also has some thoughts on adultery but apparently that has been lost on the Evangelicals and Christian Nationalists.