OU Applauds House Passage Of $19 Million In Homeland Security Grants To Jewish Institutions

2

cctv1.jpgToday, the Orthodox Union – the nation’s largest Orthodox Jewish umbrella organization, applauded the House passage of $19 million in security grants to nonprofits, including many Jewish institutions. The House voted on the Homeland Security Appropriations Act Conference Report which included this important tool to help prevent terrorist attacks and protect civilians in case of such attack. This appropriation level is $4 million more than last year, $1 million more than the amount initially legislated by the House of Representatives and higher than the $15 million requested in the President’s budget.

The Orthodox Union has worked since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 with other key partners in the Jewish community, including United Jewish Communities, Jewish federations and concerned elected officials initially to create and now to continue and strengthen the nonprofit grants program. To date, the program, part of DHS’s Urban Area Security Initiative has provided approximately sixty-five million dollars to vulnerable nonprofits, including many in the Jewish community. This year, for the first time, the Obama Administration included the program in their proposed budget. The program awards are risk based on the likelihood of a terrorist attack and/or the targets symbolic or historic value.

Nathan J. Diament, OU Director of Public Policy stated:

The Orthodox Union deeply appreciates this much needed aid to synagogues and other Jewish organizations. In addition to the Obama administration, we are grateful to the Members of Congress who pressed for this program, even in a difficult budget year, and in particular, to Representatives Price, Cantor, Lowey, Serrano and Rogers. We ask for swift passage by the Senate.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)




2 COMMENTS

  1. Ive read comments about many people who say that we shouldn’t vote for a candidate, even though he may be the best candidate for the Jewish community, if he supports certain taboo issues like to’eivah.
    Would those people agree that a bill like the one in this article, which certainly helps many Jewish institutions, be considered a bad thing if theoretically money also went to institutions that we shouldn’t support (institutions that support to’eivah or maybe reform or conservative “Judaism”?)