Search
Close this search box.

Rubashkin Admits Mistakes, Denies Crimes


srubash.jpgThe following article is from The Des Moines Register: Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin insisted today that he never intentionally violated federal fraud or immigration laws as the head of an eastern Iowa kosher meat plant, but acknowledged that he “made mistakes.”

The former top executive at Agriprocessors Inc. attributed his plant’s questionable financial practices to his own oversights or actions by other employees. He said he was “trying hard to comply with the law” at the plant, but he grew visibly annoyed when grilled by a federal prosecutor.

“I made mistakes,” he said. “I’m a human being. I took the information people gave me and sort of went with it without really drilling down to see if it was for real or not.”

Rubashkin’s statements came during his 91-count financial-fraud trial in Sioux Falls, S.D. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to charges of bank-, mail-, and wire-fraud, money-laundering and ignoring an order to pay cattle providers in the time mandated by law.

The trial comes more than a year after federal agents raided the Postville slaughterhouse and detained 389 illegal immigrants. The plant slipped into bankruptcy, and prosecutors say further investigation by a court-appointed trustee unearthed evidence of a massive fraud scheme.

Rubashkin told jurors he never read the agreement for a $35 million credit line to the plant, which he signed.

The revolving loan from First Bank Business Capital is a major component of the alleged fraud scheme. Former Agriprocessors employees have testified that Rubashkin told a customer service worker to falsify sales invoices to collect larger advances.

Assistant U.S. Attorney C.J. Williams confronted him about a statement he allegedly made to Elizabeth Billmeyer, the plant’s human resources director. Billmeyer testified last week that she warned Rubashkin about illegal immigrants working the plant. She said Rubashkin told her: “It’s my company, and I’ll run it the way I want.”
“Did you say that?” Williams asked.

On the stand, Rubashkin shook his head and said he was offended.
“First of all, Agriprocessors is not my company,” he said. “I don’t talk like that. I never, ever made a statement like that. It’s not me.”

Defense lawyers have argued that Rubashkin’s father, Aaron, was the company’s sole owner while Sholom Rubashkin handled day-to-day operations.

Williams asked Rubashkin about $1.5 million in customer checks deposited to Citizens State Bank in eastern Iowa. Executives with First Bank Business Capital, the plant’s lender, testified last month that the money should have gone to a different bank in Decorah, which would then route the money to them.

Rubashkin frowned. “You’re not giving a clear picture to the jury,” he said.

Williams replied: “If your counsel wants to ask you a question, sir, he can do it. I need you to answer mine.”

Defense lawyer Guy Cook walked Rubashkin through his upbringing in the Crown Heights neighborhood in Brooklyn, then asked about his family and faith as a Hasidic Jew. Prosecutors objected to the narrative nine times in the first 25 minutes of testimony.

Rubashkin spoke in rapid-fire bursts, and veered off subject several times as attorneys grilled him. Williams at one point asked Rubashkin the same question four times.

Rubashkin also likened himself to a “pioneer of the West” who helped build a strong Chabad Lubavitch Jewish community his northeast Iowa town.

“In the beginning, it was quite a task to get one or two people to come there, and someone to teach,” he said.

(Source: Des Moines Register)



4 Responses

  1. I doubt there is a single owner of a company as large as Agriprocessors, both Jewish an non-Jewish, that isnt guilty of very similar deeds to the same degree. They’d have to lock up all owners of multi-million dollar industries if they check every detail with a fine tooth comb.

  2. Anonymous, your statement is simply not true accross the board as you state. Large companies have compliance officers and even compliance departments that are charged with making sure the company is in compliance with government regulations and internal policies. Auditing for this is, and correcting processes that may cause noncompliance is a normal business practice.

  3. wow – this is quite an admission on his part. Ignorance is not an excuse not to follow the law. And in this case it doesnt’ matter who else also doesn’t follow the law. Rubashkin is the one on trial.

  4. He is not innocent just beacuse he is frum, just because he gave tzedakah. He is also not innocent just because others might have done the same things as him. He is innocent if he did not committ the crimes.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts