Report: Dov Hikind Used Office As Employment Agency For Family and Loyalists

16

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

20130709-040738.jpg

Sometimes it pays to be a family member or a relative of an elected official. In this case, it really pays, well the taxpayers money does, to be theson or a friend of Dov Hikind.

Assemblyman Dov Hikind’s two sons are quietly working part time gigs for two other Assembly members, and at the same time getting the help of their dad to land job opportunities for their colleagues in non for profits, the NY Daily News reports.

Since September 2011, Yoni Hikind has earned $12,964 as a legislative aide to Assemblyman Peter Abbate Jr. and Shmuel Hikind pocketed $10,470 as a community liaison for Assemblywoman Rhoda Jacobs , just enough to entitle them with taxpayer-funded healthcare.

Speaking to Reuvan Blau and Glenn Blain, Mr. Hikind bluntly admitted that the state payroll of his colleagues in Albany is partially served to benefit his kids maintain their status as part of his royalty. “I help strangers and certainly don’t discriminate against members of my own family,” said Mr. Hikind, a public servant, representing Borough Park, for the last 32 years.

According to the State’s Legistlative Ethics Commission, “no member of the legislature may participate in any decision to hire, promote, discipline or discharge a relative for any compensated position at, for or within any state agency, public authority or the legislature.” That doesn’t prevent, however, lawmakers to recommend a colleague to hire their kids for some pocket money.

“Sometimes politicians treat public service as the family and friends employment agency,” Russ Haven of the NY Public Interest Research Group told the Daily News.

But Mr. Hikind’s aide to his children doesn’t stop there, according to the investigative report.

Yisroel Tabi, who opened, in September 2009, a non-for-profit Yeshiva called ‘Simchas Chaim’ with Yoni Hikind, quietly started serving as Mr. Hikind’s community liaison. Mr. Tabi served as the yeshivah’s administrator at the same time he received state payroll by Mr. Hikind’s Assembly office.

According to State records, Mr. Tabi got paid $32,052.05 as a community liaison throughout January 2010 to September 2012.

Rabbi Elchonon Schwartz, who was appointed as head of the Yeshiva, hauled in $42,284.08 by Mr. Hikind from March 2011 to September 2012, as a special project coordinator.

“People are always looking for additional work to supplement their jobs,” was Mr. Hikind’s awkward response, noting that Mr. Schwartz simply declined to join his staff again for the summer. In Mr. Hikind’s world, the month of March is the presumed start of the summer.

Reviewing Mr. Hikind’s past, it seems that taxpayers funds were always part of forming his long career. In August of 1997, State Assemblyman Dov Hikind was indicted on charges of stealing Government funds, conspiracy, fraud and embezzlement. The prosecutors claimed that the Assemblyman used government funds from Brooklyn’s largest Jewish community council, COJO, as a kind of private cash reserve for political and personal needs.

According to the NY times, Mr. Hikind was accused in the Federal indictment of receiving at least $40,000 in payoffs from officials at the Council of Jewish Organizations of Boro Park in return for obtaining hundreds of thousands of dollars in state funds for the group and its affiliates. The prosecution charged that officials at the social service group had diverted up to $15,000 of the organization’s funds to pay such expenses as school tuition for Mr. Hikind’s daughter and niece, a trip the Assemblyman and his family took to Israel, a car rental for him and a computer for his office.

Jeff Reznik, Hikind’s chief of staff between 1993 and 1995, testified that Hikind helped him get a job with an affiliate of the Council of Jewish Organizations of Boro Park after he told Hikind his staff salary of about $30,000 per year was insufficient.

In July of 1998 Mr. Hikind was eventually acquitted by the jury, since there was no concrete evidence that Mr. Hikind received the payments with corrupt intent.

12 year later in spring of 2010, Assemblyman Dov Hikind directed up to $30,000 from his campaign account towards his favored City Council candidate Joe Lazar, who ran to replace Simcha Felder’s vacated seat in a special election, in what appears to be coordinated expenditures on Lazar’s behalf to skirt the city’s campaign finance law, according to interviews and campaign finance records, City and State NY reported.

Three years later, Joe Lazar, who lost to David Greenfield, was fined a grand total of $236,774 and forced to repay all of the public funds it received. Mr. Lazar was fined $123,874 for vastly exceeding the CFB’s strict spending limit. The limit for the 2010 special election was $168,000 and Mr. Lazar surpassed that by $41,291.33. More notably, Ross Brakan reported, Mr. Lazar was also fined an additional $20,000 for failing to report expenditures Assemblyman Dov Hikind made through his own campaign committee and his political club, the United New York Democratic Club, on Mr. Lazar’s behalf.

This all leads to the conclusion that Mr. Hikind’s ritual of picking and choosing, granting dividend to his loyalists, with taxpayers-funds, are part of him establishing himself as the Jewish political power-broker, a status recently ruined by the blackface controversy last Purim.

(Jacob Kornbluh – YWN)




16 COMMENTS

  1. It’s called “patronage” and has been a feature of political systems such as ours for centuries. Many argue that its a “feature” rather than “bug” – since the alternative means that the elites control who gets jobs and benefits, and better the elected representatives than the self-selected elites. However in some counties, the elites tend to control the public prosecutor’s office, and use their power to indict their enemies, which is apparently what happened here. Note that the charges of acting illegally in dispensing patronage were brought previously, and Hikind was vindicated.

  2. how ironic this story comes right after the one describing those who made the trek to kever aaron hakohen the ultimate ohev shalom and rodef shalom. cant say the editor doesnt have a sense of humor.

  3. This is the halachah regarding allocating Tzedakah. First comes your own family, then the poor of your own town, then the poor of your land (i.e. the Land of Israel), and after that, whoever needs. (Devarim 15:7 and Sifri)

  4. I don’t get the point of this article at all. I don’t get why what he did is an issue. IT’S NOTHING NEW, WELCOME TO LIFE, where it’s not about what you know, it’s about who you know. Seems to me like the writer just has a lot of personal beef with Hikind. The writer should realize that (a) not the best to degrade other fellow yiddin (b) especially during the 9 days

  5. Yes its patronage.

    Yes, others have done it for a long time.

    Yes, he is legally entitled to hire his mispacha and buddies

    No, its not right and has a stench that wraps around Hikind and other political hacks in city hall and Albany.

    No, it doesn’t assure we have the most qualified individuals on the public payroll.

    No, its not fair to other job seekers who don’t have a daddy, or uncle or whatever who can move them to the front of the line for available jobs.

    Yes, we could do better but not from a career politician like Hikind. The fact that he gets in front of a camera for every new story of interst to the heimeshe community doesn’t make him a good public servant.
    No

  6. I’ve got an even bigger “scoop” ,how about ” George H W Bush helps his son George W. Bush become president”…
    and also ” Bill Clinton uses connections to help wife Hillary Clinton elected senator and presidential candidate…”
    Shocking news indeed…

  7. #10 -“No, its not right and has a stench that wraps around Hikind and other political hacks in city hall and Albany. ”

    Well the is the issue that Mr. Hikind (and all the other frum politicians) can be faulted for consorting with known criminals and scoundrals – and ignoring the halachas expressed multiple places in Pirke Avos (the best known source) warning against such doings — but that’s not the issue.

    I believe in one country they got tired of the politicians, and the police raided the parliament and arrested most of the members for associating with known criminals – but after the next election all they got were a new set of criminals. Perhaps hazal was right in warning us about politicians. Should we send Dov a copy?

  8. With all due respect to Mr. Hikind for the work that he does. One thing is for sure, stories like this do not bring honor to his position or his religion. We deserve elected officials that will act above board and go the extra mile to ensure that such stories do not happen.

    Mr. Hikind’s track record falls below these expectations time and time again. Thirty years ago our talent pool might have been smaller. Today this is far from the case. Mr. Greenfield is one example of how younger individuals can do a fine job for his people. He proved that during Sandy, unlike Hikind who never opened his mouth and was not around.

    Next time we have to vote, these thoughts should provide you with good reason to think twice about voting for the ENTIRE Hikind family.

  9. whats the dov bashing????
    why do u guys always bash him?? say thank you!!
    stop the BS politics!! be a legitimate news source not a jewish national enquirer!!

  10. And let’s not forget Mayor Bloomberg who hired his daughter as his assistant. Or JFK who hired his brother as Attorney General; etc. etc.

    Thankfully, many of our elected officials are able to use their influence to advocate for out of work yidden to city agencies and non-profits. This is the highest form of tzedaka.

    It doesn’t appear that anyone was getting rich on the salaries paid to the individuals mentioned in the article above.