Opponents Attack Johnson’s Character As UK Election Looms

4
Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson gestures as he departs from Hudson Yards, in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019. In a major blow to Johnson, Britain's highest court ruled Tuesday that his decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks in the crucial countdown to the country's Brexit deadline was illegal. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Britain’s opposition parties intensified attacks on Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Thursday with two weeks to go until election day, as polls suggested the U.K. leader’s Conservatives have a substantial lead.

Jo Swinson, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, accused Johnson of spewing serial falsehoods and dragging the office of prime minister “through the mud.”

She said Johnson can’t be trusted because he vowed to lead Britain out of the European Union by Oct. 31 – and didn’t – and said he would never ask the EU to delay Brexit – but did.

“Boris Johnson is not fit to be prime minister not just because he doesn’t care, not just because he lies, but also because he is complicit in stoking division and fear in our communities,” Swinson told supporters during a speech in London.

Johnson has faced questions about his character throughout the campaign. The prime minister has a history of making offensive remarks, including a newspaper column last year in which he compared women who wear face-covering veils to “letter boxes.”

The main opposition Labour Party unearthed an article Johnson wrote in the conservative weekly magazine, The Spectator, in 1995 in which he called the children of single mothers “ill-raised, ignorant, aggressive and illegitimate.”

Johnson accused his opponents of trying to “disinter and distort pieces that are almost 25 years old.”

He has also been accused of dodging scrutiny. He is the only main leader not to have agreed — so far — to a one-on-one interview with BBC journalist Andrew Neil. He has also declined an invitation to take part in a TV debate on climate change Thursday alongside other party leaders.

Broadcaster Channel 4 said Johnson and Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, who also declined to appear, would be represented onstage by melting ice sculptures.

Johnson insisted Thursday that he would do “many, many interviews over the course of the next few days and I’m sure that people are having all sorts of conversations right now about who I’m going to be talking to, when and where, and I look forward to it very much.”

With most polls showing a double-digit lead for the Conservatives, the party is keen not to make waves.

Treasury chief Sajid Javid insisted the party was not complacent and would “go out there and fight for every single vote.”

Labour, meanwhile, is struggling to satisfy supporters who oppose Brexit, as well as those who want to leave the EU.

The party says that if it wins the election it will negotiate a new divorce deal with the EU, then give voters a choice in a new referendum between leaving the bloc on those new terms or remaining.

A respected economic think-tank cast doubt Thursday on the spending pledges of both main parties, Conservatives and Labour, concluding that neither was being honest with voters.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned it was “highly likely” that a Conservative government would end up spending more than the party’s platform implied, while Labour would not be able to deliver on a promise to raise investment and revenue without taxes beyond those already announced on the rich and on big business.

“Neither is a properly credible prospectus,’’ IFS director Paul Johnson said.

Parties court the approval of the IFS, seeking its imprimatur on their spending plans. But the think-tank concluded the promises didn’t match the math.

The IFS analysis outlined the scope of the main parties’ drastically different views of the future, arguing the choice between the Conservatives and Labour could “hardly be starker.’’ With the exception of health, the IFS concluded that if the Conservatives formed the next government, public spending would be 14% lower in 2023-24 than it was when the party took office in 2010.

“No more austerity perhaps, but an awful lot baked in,” the IFS’s Johnson said of the Tories.

Labour on the other hand, would raise both taxes and spending to peacetime highs. The party has pledged a sweeping expansion of the state, including the nationalization of the railways and key utilities.

“Labour would not be able to deliver investment spending increases on the scale they promise,’’ the IFS director said. “The public sector doesn’t have the capacity to ramp up that much, that fast.’’

Britons will vote Dec. 12 to fill all 650 seats in the House of Commons. Johnson wants to secure a majority in the election so he can push through the Brexit divorce deal he negotiated last month with the EU. Under the terms of that deal, the U.K. would leave the EU on Jan. 31 but remain part of the EU’s single market, and bound by the bloc’s rules, until the end of 2020.

(AP)




4 COMMENTS

  1. Hopefully this should be A bit of sunshine daylight for some
    The liberal Democrats
    what makes them Centrist As this article attempts to portray
    regarding Iraq war they were the furthest left of the main parties
    brexit the biggest show of the day they are again farthest left
    on moral issues there are at least as bad as labour if not probably worse

    this is how the media subtly set the goalpost
    They could therefore even allow themselves lose elections because for the long-term the sheeple herd just follow along

  2. Unfortunately it looks like the Remoaners will never allow Brexit to go through. Corbyn will get to be PM and a massive british aliyah will take place.

  3. Take away their British accents and you could swear they sound like exactly like
    CNN, Blitzer, Tapper, Schumer , Shirrt , Mathews with the tingle up his leg and Evilosi. Wait… Here comes Nasal Nadler the Brooklyn Bum… No, I don’t mean the Dodgers.