Chief Rabbis Concerned Over Lenient Giyur

5

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

.Rishon L’Tzion Rabbi Yitzchak Yosef Shlita and Chief Rabbi David Lau Shlita met with rabbonim affiliated with the Derech Emunah organization to discuss concerns surrounding efforts to relax state giyur. The chief rabbis also held meetings with the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem’s Old City Rabbi Avigdor Nebenzahl Shlita and Rehovot Chief Rabbi Simcha HaCohen Kook Shlita. Heading the Derech Emunah delegation was Rabbi Baruch Efrati Shlita, discussing how they can best combat efforts to pass the bill sponsored by MK Elazar Stern, a bill that would remove the Chief Rabbinate’s exclusive control of state giyur.

Rabbi Efrati said the Chief Rabbinate is the nation’s mezuzah to protect the home and it alone must be responsible for maintaining matters of Yiddishkheit. “Klall Yisrael must turn to this holy institution, which was established by Rav Kook ZT”L, first and foremost the giyur”.

Rav Nebenzahl insisted the Chief Rabbinate alone can control giyur for it must be done in accordance to Halacha and this cannot be accomplished by placing it in the hands of civil service rabbonim around the country.

Rabbi Kook added that rabbonim from the Diaspora have already indicated they will no longer automatically accept converts from Israel is the bill is passed to law. Rabbi Kook was referring to a delegation of London rabbonim and dayanim meeting with Chief Rabbi Lau to express their concerns over the Stern bill. Rabbi Kook added the Chief Rabbinate will not accept the giyur and this reality is true among many rabbonim from the dati leumi camp. He warns that such giyur would split the nation while opening the door for the entry of the Reform Movement, citing some MKs have already stated this openly.

Rabbi Yosef added “There is a rabbi of a certain city who began the entire matter and for whom the bill was sponsored”, which those present understood to be a reference to the head of Tzohar Rabbonim Rabbi David Stav. “He argued with me for an hour as he wishes to convert tens of thousands of children whose parents are gentiles. I asked him how such children can be converted if they live in a Christian home, eat treif, are mechalel Shabbos and have stated on numerous occasions that the attend church. They are being raised to be goyim in all aspects of their life. This is giyur? What a scam but he insisted [it was okay]”.

Rav Yitzchak Yosef added that even those among these children that have been accepted refers to unique b’dieved situations and this cannot clear the way for basing policy on exceptions. Rabbi Yosef warns the rabbonim favoring the bill will not only permit civil service city rabbonim to sit on batei din, but they will include rabbis who have a hashkafa of leniency, and this will chas v’sholom open the door to permit thousands of goyim to enter the camp. He warns they will establish batei din composed of rabbonim who will act contrary to halacha and the traditions of Am Yisrael.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

5 COMMENTS

  1. Can someone please explain something here.
    These Rabbis of whom they concerned about are appointed to their position by the Chief Rabbinate.
    If they are so incompetent, why were they put into that position and why are are they allowed to remain?

  2. To kehath64
    Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater.Many great batei din(Rav Nissim Shlita and the Eidah to name a few)are involved in Geirus.Plenty of yarei shamayim,talmidei chachamim and wonderful people in the Jewish world today are geirim.Halachic marriage advice should be given by Rabbinic leaders.

  3. Any rabbanut conversions start out with a chazaka of it being false and a farce especially considering the Druckman fiasco of fake conversions and false signing if so-called conversions that never occurred and others of open mechalleli shabbosim gentiles being declared Jewish to fit zionisms political goals after they imported hundreds of thousands of Soviet gentiles. Now with Stav trying to worsen what Druckman did it is a never ending saga.

  4. “These Rabbis of whom they concerned about are appointed to their position by the Chief Rabbinate.
    If they are so incompetent, why were they put into that position and why are are they allowed to remain?”

    I was wondering the same thing. Maybe it is the Chief Rabbinate itself that is the problem.

    It is worth noting that never before in the history of Judaism has there been a central conversion authority; local rabbis were always trusted to handle conversions. In this case it is the Chief Rabbinate that has challenged the mesorah.