Trump Uses Profanity In Rant About Haiti & African Nations

14

In bluntly vulgar language, President Donald Trump questioned Thursday why the U.S. would accept more immigrants from Haiti and “(expletive removed) countries” in Africa rather than places like Norway, as he rejected a bipartisan immigration deal, according to people briefed on the extraordinary Oval Office conversation.

Trump’s contemptuous description of an entire continent startled lawmakers in the meeting and immediately revived charges that the president is racist. The White House did not deny his remark but issued a statement saying Trump supports immigration policies that welcome “those who can contribute to our society.”

Trump’s comments came as two senators presented details of a bipartisan compromise that would extend protections against deportation for hundreds of thousands of young immigrants — and also strengthen border protections, as Trump has insisted.

The lawmakers had hoped Trump would back their accord, an agreement among six senators evenly split among Republicans and Democrats, ending a months-long, bitter dispute over protecting the “Dreamers.” But the White House later rejected it, plunging the issue back into uncertainty just eight days before a deadline that threatens a government shutdown.

Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, explained that as part of that deal, a lottery for visas that has benefited people from Africa and other nations would be ended, the sources said, though there could be another way for them to apply. Durbin said people would be allowed to stay in the U.S. who fled here after disasters hit their homes in places including El Salvador, Guatemala and Haiti.

Trump specifically questioned why the U.S. would want to admit more people from Haiti. As for Africa, he asked why more people from “(expletive removed) countries” should be allowed into the U.S., the sources said.

The president suggested that instead, the U.S. should allow more entrants from countries like Norway. Trump met this week with Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

Late Thursday, Trump was pushing for “a Great Wall” and criticizing Democrats’ stance on immigration, highlighting the difficulties for any negotiations.

“The Democrats seem intent on having people and drugs pour into our country from the Southern Border, risking thousands of lives in the process. It is my duty to protect the lives and safety of all Americans,” he said in a late-night tweet. “We must build a Great Wall …”

Asked about the earlier remarks insulting other countries, White House spokesman Raj Shah did not deny them.

“Certain Washington politicians choose to fight for foreign countries, but President Trump will always fight for the American people,” he said.

Trump’s remarks were remarkable even by the standards of a president who has been accused by his foes of racist attitudes and has routinely smashed through public decorum that his modern predecessors have generally embraced.

Trump has claimed without evidence that Barack Obama, the nation’s first black president, wasn’t born in the United States, has said Mexican immigrants were “bringing crime” and were “rapists” and said there were “very fine people on both sides” after violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, left one counter-protester dead.

“Racist,” tweeted Rep. Kathleen Rice, D-N.Y., after Thursday’s story broke. But it wasn’t just Democrats objecting.

Republican Rep. Mia Love of Utah, the daughter of Haitian immigrants, said Trump’s comments were “unkind, divisive, elitist and fly in the face of our nation’s values.” She said, “This behavior is unacceptable from the leader of our nation” and Trump must apologize to the American people “and the nations he so wantonly maligned.”

Trump has called himself the “least racist person that you’ve ever met.” On Friday he plans to sign a proclamation honoring Martin Luther King Day.

Critics also have questioned his mental fitness to serve as president, citing his inability to muster some policy details and his tweets asserting his “nuclear button” is bigger than North Korea’s. He responded to such criticism with a recent tweet calling himself “a very stable genius” who is “like, really smart.”

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly describe the conversation. One said lawmakers in the room were taken aback by Trump’s remarks.

The Trump administration announced late last year that it would end a temporary residency permit program that allowed nearly 60,000 citizens from Haiti to live and work in the United States following a devastating 2010 earthquake.

Trump has spoken positively about Haitians in public. During a 2016 campaign event in Miami, he said “the Haitian people deserve better” and told the audience of Haitian-Americans he wanted to “be your greatest champion, and I will be your champion.”

The agreement that Durbin and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., described to Trump also includes his $1.6 billion request for a first installment on his long-sought border wall, aides familiar with the agreement said. They required anonymity because the agreement is not yet public.

Trump’s request covers 74 miles of border wall as part of a 10-year, $18 billion proposal.

Democrats had long vowed they wouldn’t fund the wall but are accepting the opening request as part of a broader plan that protects from deportation about 800,000 younger immigrants brought to the country as children and now here illegally.

The deal also would include restrictions on a program allowing immigrants to bring some relatives to the U.S.

In an afternoon of drama and confusing developments, four other GOP lawmakers — including hardliners on immigration — were also in Trump’s office for Thursday’s meeting, a development sources said Durbin and Graham did not expect. It was unclear why the four Republicans were there, and the session did not produce the results the two senators were hoping for.

“There has not been a deal reached yet,” said White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders. But she added, “We feel like we’re close.”

Underscoring the hurdles facing the effort, other Republicans also undercut the significance of the deal the half-dozen senators hoped to sell to Trump.

“How do six people bind the other 94 in the Senate? I don’t get that,” said No. 2 Senate Republican John Cornyn of Texas.

Cornyn said the six lawmakers were hoping for a deal and “everyone would fall in line. The president made it clear to me on the phone less than an hour ago that he wasn’t going to do that.”

The six senators have been meeting for months to find a way to revive protections for young immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children and are here illegally. Trump ended the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program last year but has given Congress until March 5 to find a way to keep it alive.

Federal agencies will run out of money and have to shut down if lawmakers don’t pass legislation extending their financing by Jan. 19. Some Democrats are threatening to withhold their votes — which Republicans will need to push that legislation through Congress — unless an immigration accord is reached.

Cornyn said the real work for a bipartisan immigration deal will be achieved by a group of four leading lawmakers — the No. 2 Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate. That group met for the first time this week.

The immigration effort seemed to receive a boost Tuesday when Trump met with two dozen lawmakers and agreed to seek a bipartisan way to resuscitate the program. The group agreed to also include provisions strengthening security — which for Trump means building parts of a wall along the border with Mexico — curbing immigrants’ relatives from coming here and restricting the visa lottery.

Also in Thursday’s Oval Office meeting were House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and GOP Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia. Aides to lawmakers who attended declined to provide comment on Trump’s remarks.

Any immigration deal would face hurdles winning congressional approval.

Many Democrats would oppose providing substantial sums for Trump’s campaign promise to build a wall along the border with Mexico. Many Hispanic and liberal members of the party oppose steps toward curtailing immigration such as ending the visa lottery and restricting the relatives that legal immigrants could bring to the U.S.

Among Republicans, some conservatives are insisting on going further than the steps that Trump has suggested. They want to reduce legal immigration, require employers to verify workers’ citizenship and block federal grants to so-called sanctuary cities that hinder federal anti-immigrant efforts.

(AP)




14 COMMENTS

  1. The problem of terrible African governments isn’t going to be solved by emigration to America (except for those individuals who manage to do it).

  2. The dems are gonna try to milk this for all its worth. Russian collusion, mental stability, inappropriate behavior, blah blah blah, didn’t go anywhere. But the -hole comment about certain countries – well, for the religion of the left this is as sacreligious as it can get. To publicly say so about African countries and Haiti. They’re going to try to present him as a racist par excellence. A neo nazi and nothing less. Watch. And some republicans if not many will squirm and say PC things to distance themselves from him, you know, just in case.
    Only thing is the dems and the leftist media are missing a couple of points and they’re making the same mistake over and over and over again. I guess they’re blinded by their leftist dogma and religion so they can’t use any logic. Firstly, he said WHAT EVERY REGULAR NORMAL AMERICAN THINKS!!! That’s how he got elected and that’s exactly the way the common man perceives what’s going on. And he’s right! No normal American moves to Haiti, Ghana or the Ivory Coast. Either you have some shady business or you’re out of you’re mind. Because it’s exactly as Trump described it. Maybe not the nicest choice of words, but I don’t believe that more than two percent of the country, be that person a politician, doctor, lawyer, construction worker, athlete, etc. would be offended by hearing or would refrain from using such language day in day out. This whole thing is nonsense. What he said was right on target. To the left it’s as sacrelige as can be. It’s just complete disregard for the Politically correct garbage the media tries to inculcate to the public.
    The media is busy with the fringe minorities – the wierder and more unnatural a person’s lifestyle is the more adoration that gets from abc, msnbc, cnn, etc. It’s a religion; no different than the idolworship of the past. It’s cruel, it’s stupid, it’s evil, etc. but the masses don’t get up and stop it.
    The more President Trump stands up for the good of the American people, the more he ignores the evil the left has tried to destory this country with, the more the kindness the G-d bestowed on this country is evident with the election results in Nov. 2016.

  3. The expletive was removed only the first time it was quoted….but was not removed the second time it was quoted. Yeshiva World News, please clean up the article….!

  4. He said that about the countries as a whole NOT the PEOPLE individually!
    “Shittuf”, means “partnership”, and those countries are much different in approach in that regard from the USA.

    Not racism, reality.

  5. why are you so obsessed with every word that trump utters?
    leave him alone! is YWN falling into the trap of the common media?
    We are sick of this already. So he said something inside his office, big deal!

  6. (Expletive removed) is followed in the article by a reference to the expletive. YWN should remove that reference to preserve its presumed editorial policies about such vulgar references.

  7. Um, you guys, hello? You blanked out the first instance of the curse word, but missed out the second. Did anyone at YWN even read the whole article before posting it?

  8. Who cares?! He didn’t say anything racist, simply stated facts using colorful language. Big difference. Media is hand in hand with Dems on a Trump witch hunt and blood libel. Pathetic.

  9. I have to agree with Rand0m3x. Further, as they view the U.S. as racist society persecuting non-Whites, why would they want to come and why would the U.S. want immigrants who come hating the country?