Election Fraud Allegations: Facts Only Wiki

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Election Fraud Allegations: Facts Only Wiki

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 145 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1927225
    charliehall
    Participant

    realclearpolitics.com polling average was Biden 51.2 percent.
    Actual vote was Biden 51.4 percent.

    #1927234
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“Representatives from PA just had their case to overturn the election rejected by SCOUS. Somehow I doubt that Texas or Rudy trying to go to the Supreme Court will work any better (unless your goal is to also lose in the Supreme Court)”

    Of course they would lose that case!
    From the USA Today:
    “By their one-sentence denial, the justices left intact a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which said the challenge to a state law passed in 2019 came far too late.”

    The Penn. Supreme Court gave a good Ruling.

    From Previous:
    “The Texas AG just filed with the SCOTUS about 4 States changing their election rules during a Pandemic.
    Hopefully Rudy & S. Powell will also join the Suit!”
    In these cases you have a good chance that the SCOTUS will get involved.
    Hopefully they will Overturn the Election in Favor of Trump!

    #1927257
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Below are your non-prophetic words that you posted on 11/22/2020. I guess those Con whatever’s that were pushing these lawsuits don’t play politics or law. Don’t get your Con hopes up that a Con will win the next round of lawsuits. The Safe Harbor date is passed. This election is over.

    “Like I wrote before – we wanted that Pa. Judge (Appointed by Obama) to Decide against us.
    Hopefully the Third circuit will also.
    And we will Win in SCOTUS!
    Those Lib judges play Politics, Not Law.”

    #1927258

    Ens health
    “Representatives from PA just had their case to overturn the
    election rejected by SCOTUS”
    This is a false statement. The scotus denied the request for “emergency injunction relief”. The case is still pending.

    #1927486
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    #1927493
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“Don’t get your Con hopes up that a Con will win the next round of lawsuits.”

    Of course I’m starting to get hopeful.
    The previous lawsuits were a joke.
    Finally we’re getting to some serious ones!
    If the Texas AG doesn’t prevail in overturning the Election, then Rudy or S. Powell Will.
    Get ready to Riot, Mr. Lib!

    #1927629
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    I was pointing out for you to help you remember how you were all going on about the PA lawsuit getting to SCOTUS and how that will accomplish something. Guess what, as you have seemingly come to realize it went no place. Losing in State Court was apparently not a path to success.

    The reason I pointed this out to you, is because you jump from one thing to the next and the moment one thing you thought does not work out you assume the next thing will work out. Just remember the flaws in your thinking when it came to PA did not suddenly go away because Texas is suing or Rudy or S. Powell will sue. Rudy and Powell are bigger clowns then you. They go to court with affidavits that make up nonexistent places and confuse many things. There is a reason why they can’t win, it is because no matter how much the judge might love Trump, they have been given nothing to work with.

    Every State has certified the election and it is clear that Biden has won. Any attempt to overturn this is simply an attempted coup via using the courts. Trump is not looking for the courts to uphold the law, rather he his hoping he will find judges that don’t care about the law and will rule for him. I think losing 50 lawsuits speaks loud enough as to this.

    #1927652
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“I was pointing out for you to help you remember how you were all going on about the PA lawsuit getting to SCOTUS and how that will accomplish something. Guess what, as you have seemingly come to realize it went no place. Losing in State Court was apparently not a path to success”

    And I was pointing to you -“The Penn. Supreme Court gave a good Ruling”, that case really didn’t have a good reason to Overturn it.
    So it won’t have a chance in the SCOTUS.
    The case of Texas, with 18 other States, will have a much better chance of Winning in the SCOTUS!

    #1927717
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    So now the PA case was not a good case.

    Not what you said on 11/22, which I quoted above. You said you will win then.

    Guess what you lost.

    Why would anyone assume your opinion is any more valid now then back on 11/22.

    What are you going to say when the Texas case is tossed? Will you then say that was a bad case but the next case is the real one? This is just getting silly.

    #1927727
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“What are you going to say when the Texas case is tossed? Will you then say that was a bad case but the next case is the real one? This is just getting silly.”

    I posted previously that a Biden Presidency would personally be good for me.
    I need to get rid of my student loans.
    I want Trump to win because he’s has Some Morality, Not like the DemonCrats!

    So what will you do if SCOTUS overturns the Election?!?
    Loot and Burn the Inner Cities, just like them?

    #1927746
    jackk
    Participant

    The whole republican party will be remembered for treasonous behavior in 2020.

    Rush is now openly calling for civil war.

    Trump lost and Biden won.

    No need for hypotheticals.

    The truth is the Democrat’s knew this was going to be his behavior.

    The only thing surprisingly us the behavior of the rest of the republican party.

    #1927819
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – Never saw you address you complete inconsistency on the PA court case. You said you will win at the Supreme Court, yet you lost. You even said when you lost in State court that was part of the plan so you can get to the Supreme Court where you will win. Please explain how you can be so wrong? I may even be willing to discuss Texas and Rioting once you explain how you can be so wrong.

    #1927878
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“Please explain how you can be so wrong? I may even be willing to discuss Texas and Rioting once you explain how you can be so wrong.”

    I’m not like you.
    I didn’t know what that Pa. Case was about.
    I didn’t read the Plantiff’s motion.

    When I looked into it – I posted this:
    “Of course they would lose that case!
    From the USA Today:
    “By their one-sentence denial, the justices left intact a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which said the challenge to a state law passed in 2019 came far too late.”
    The Penn. Supreme Court gave a good Ruling.”

    #1927877
    Health
    Participant

    Oh Jackk -“Trump lost and Biden won.”

    Isn’t it possible that all the Xiatin’s profets know more than you?
    They say Trump will be President for the next 4 years.

    “The whole republican party will be remembered for treasonous behavior in 2020.”

    LOL!
    The whole DemonCrat party will be remembered for Multiple Fraud, trying to get rid of the President.

    #1927895
    er
    Participant

    Re: Health – “I didn’t know what that Pa. Case was about. . . When I looked into it – I posted this:
    Of course they would lose that case!”

    That’s THE point. You make allegations based on not knowing facts. If you were a lawyer and new about standing, qualifications for original jurisdiction, res judicata, and inherent powers of the States, you would be concluding TX has no case here. This should open your mind to the real possibility that your entire political world view has been manipulated and compromised.

    Meanwhile, I am patiently waiting patiently for you to respond to my questions on the previous page. Good Shabbos-

    #1928017
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – So you admit you had no idea what you were talking about when you made your claims about the PA case. I think I can avoid addressing any other points you raise. Btw, did you see the case you claimed was the real case (the Texas case), got the boot? Maybe stop making nonsensical and false claims. It grows old.

    #1928025
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    It’s over they tossed out the case

    #notmypresident!

    #1928054
    charliehall
    Participant

    Texas Republican Party Chairman just called for secession and a new union of seceding states.

    Been there, done that.

    #1928072

    They didn’t toss the case because it lacked merit. Their excuse to toss it was that Texas didn’t have the standing to file it. Trump can, and might file it in his own name. Michigan update: hearing on whether the forensic examination results can be released, is set for Monday 8:30am.

    #1928089
    Health
    Participant

    TVOP – You can’t talk reality to these Libs, even ones that post on YWN!
    They hate Trump so much that they will do anything to make sure that he won’t be President for the Next 4 years.

    Think about this Election – there must have been a Leader that was willing to conspire to all this Fraud.
    It could be someone like Soros.
    Trump is trying to make Sure our Elections will be honest from now on.
    The funniest thing is – how these Libs keep on Denying any Fraud!
    The Cons aren’t like the Libs; must of us use our brains.

    #1928142
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    TVP – I said in all my comments the case would be tossed. How could SCOTUS rule on the merits when all nine justices agreed there was no “judicially cognizable interest” here.

    As to the merits, well we have 50+ cases which Trump’s side has lost that have ruled that there are no merits to Trump’s claims. Those cases have been ruled on by judges of every political stripe, and some appointed by Trump. If 72 million people believe the election has been stolen, it is likely because they have allowed themselves to be duped by a conman. Remind me how much money has Trump raised post-election due to these stolen election claims and how much of that has been used to actually fight the results? Reminds me of the guy who sold the same piece of real estate to multiple investors and pocketed the difference. It is also funny how a self-proclaimed multi-billionaire is asking hardworking American’s for handouts. Trump pays less taxes than his supporters (and as President has not done anything to change that inequity) and on top of that has the audacity to ask for handouts from these folks. It is pathetic. And he said he had a good case, which is obvious now he did not, and he used that claim to rile up supporters to get them to given him money. Seriously, this has got to be the greatest scam of all time. Some thought his Trump University was bad, but this takes the cake.

    #1928168
    jackk
    Participant

    Health,

    Come on. It could be Soros? Maybe it is Putin? Or Saddam Hussein? Or OBL?
    Is this multiple choice?

    There is no evidence of a concerted fraud.
    It doesn’t exist . Because it never happened.

    It’s a complete bubbe maase.
    It is perfect that in this thread there has not been a single fact of fraud.
    It’s almost like it’s a mirage setup by a conman and his band of thieves.

    #1928806
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    #1928872
    Health
    Participant

    Oh Jackk,-“It is perfect that in this thread there has not been a single fact of fraud.”

    I just saw a video with S. Powell – she said e/o knows that there were tons of Fraud.
    And there are 2 types – 1. That are trying to Fool e/o. 2. They are ignorant and believe what anyone tells them.

    Which one are You?!?

    #1928927
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    “Which one are You?!?”

    I’m the type who knows not to take anything Powell says seriously

    #1928960
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq -“I’m the type who knows not to take anything Powell says seriously”

    Is it just Powell & Trump or is it all Conservatives?
    Or is it Anyone who Disagrees with you on any Topic?!?

    #1929138
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    “Is it just Powell & Trump or is it all Conservatives?
    Or is it Anyone who Disagrees with you on any Topic?!?”

    People who, on more than one occasion, have shown that they say things that simply are not true. With particular case for those who say things that are מילתא דעבידא לגלויים.. and again not just once or twice it has to be a pattern.

    Both Trump and Powell fit that bill perfectly

    #1929216

    What has powell said, that you are 100% sure is not true? Whether or not she proved her claims, you seem to be pretty confident she is wrong. Any evidence to back up your confidence?

    #1929227
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq -“People who, on more than one occasion, have shown that they say things that simply are not true.”

    Another lie!
    You argued with me about my SCOTUS case, because you and your Incometent Lawyers couldn’t find it!
    Have you ever told the Truth in a Public Forum, like YWN?!?

    #1929292
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    torah

    she said on more than one occasion that she will be releasing her evidence “soon” proving fraud she said she had evidence that Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, had taken bribes and conspired to orchestrate Trump’s defeat.

    It is past “soon” she hasn’t released all this evidence she lied

    Health
    Thanks for proving my point

    #1929323
    Abba_S
    Participant

    After the 2016 election the Democrats claimed foriegn intervention was the reason that Trump won. They even impeached him and it wasn’t substaniated. Now it’s the Republican’s turn and they are claiming voter fraud. What is the differance? I doubt the courts will get involved at this late date.
    The problem for Biden are:
    A) In the 2020 election in which there was suppose to be a Blue Wave in the senate Democrats only won 2 races and lost 1. Now in Georgia they are going to beat 2 incumbents. Voter fraud is going to be harder this time becuase Trump is not on the ballot and Republican controll the election process.
    B) The Progressives are getting feed up with him and Pelosi. Right now the Democrats have 222 seats with 2 seats undecided one of which in Iowa the state declared the Republican the winner but the democrat is appealing to the House of Represenative to decide who won the election. The other in NY is still in the courts. If 5 Democrats don’t vote yes on their bill it wouldn’t get passed in the House. In the Senate they need to win both run off elections plus have every Democratic Senator vote for their bill in order to get the VP to cast the deciding vote so that the bill can be passed.
    Biden maybe the next president but I am not sure he is going to get anything done

    #1929318
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq -“she said on more than one occasion that she will be releasing her evidence “soon” proving fraud.
    It is past “soon” she hasn’t released all this evidence she lied”

    LOL.
    I never met s/o who is unabashedly on their Lying!
    Her case to SCOTUS hasn’t come up yet!
    Who does she have to prove it to – to you?!?

    “Health
    Thanks for proving my point”

    Again you’re lying!
    You’re trying to tell e/o in CR – that I didn’t have a case.
    As a matter of fact, the Jewish Justice reclused himself because I’m also Jewish.
    How come the Xitian Justices don’t recluse themselves, when an Xitian comes before them?!?

    #1929415
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Abba

    “After the 2016 election the Democrats claimed foriegn intervention was the reason that Trump won”

    Noone (serious) claimed that. ALL (including Trump in rare moments of candor) agree there was foreign intervention in 2016. As to how much of a role that played is impossible to know Noone (serious) claimed it was THE reason he won.

    “hey even impeached him and it wasn’t substaniated. ”

    They impeached him over another matter entirely

    “Now it’s the Republican’s turn and they are claiming voter fraud. What is the differance?”

    the difference is The Republicna attorney general and after 60 court cases several of which presided over by Republicna justices, no evidence of significant fraud was shown.

    #1929418
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    “Who does she have to prove it to – to you?!?”

    she doesnt have to do anything. She isn’t going to the Supreme court. (Of course perhaps secret SCOTUS, but admittedly, I don’t know much about secret SCOTUS. Maybe she will win her imaginary secret SCOTUS case and Trump can be secret President, and we al live happily ever after. Wouldnt that be nice

    Of course if she was serious she would have shown her evidence looong ago As you may know the Electoral college already voted, the votes will be formally counted Jan 6, then Biden gets inaugurated Jan 20.

    Simple question: At what point, if she hasnt released her evidence, would you say “Hmmm maybe she was lying”? Jan 6? Jan 20? Januray 2022 ? 2120? Surely at SOME point if she had something hse’d have shared it. When?

    #1929518

    Ubi
    She has already released the evidence. Open your eyes.
    Most cases have been rejected based on latches a few or standing. Not merit.
    Judges are terrified to actually judge the cases and be forced to “overturn” the election. The most recent case docketed at the scotus includes the forensic audit from michigan, which revealed 68% of ballots sent for adjudication. That number shouldn’t be over .00008%. Clearly fraudulent. Open. Eyes.

    #1929567
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    torah

    she hasnt.
    Yes a bunch of affidavits were released (most that werent pertinent credible or both) . While afidavits are not nothing, my gut tells me you don’t accept affidavits alleging Kavanaugh’s wrongdoing

    At any rate in more than one of her press conferences she alleged she had actual hard evidence of vote tampering which she said she will release “soon”

    She lied .

    Sure you can believe whatever you want and come up with all sorts of contrived distinctions that the court rejected based on “standing” not “merit” as if that is somehow better

    “The most recent case docketed at the scotus”
    name of case please? I cant find it

    ” includes the forensic audit from michigan,”
    This wasnt released by Sidney Powell

    #1929596
    Health
    Participant

    TVOP -“She has already released the evidence. Open your eyes.”

    He can’t.
    Because his whole personality is a Lying Lib DemonCrat!

    #1929597

    Timothy king vs gretchen whitmer.
    Not sure why your confused as to why a court rejecting a case on “standing”, has nothing to do with the legitimacy of the case. Meaning to say, the court rejecting the texas case on “standing” says nothing about the legitimacy of claims. This election could have been obviously stolen, democrats could have admitted they stole it, and scotus still wouldn’t have taken the case.
    ” includes the forensic audit from michigan,”
    “This wasnt released by Sidney Powell”
    Not sure what your point is.

    #1929608
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq -“She isn’t going to the Supreme court. (Of course perhaps secret SCOTUS, but admittedly, I don’t know much about secret SCOTUS. Maybe she will win her imaginary secret SCOTUS case and Trump can be secret President, and we al live happily ever after”

    Why don’t you just Stop your Lying?!?
    No one believes you – except Lib Fools!

    This is from S. Powell twitter:
    “Sidney Powell Flag of United States⭐⭐⭐
    @SidneyPowell1
    ·1h
    The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14!
    Today it FINALLY submitted our #Arizona & #Wisconsin EMERGENCY petitions filed Friday INEXPLICABLY rejected them”
    Then she wrote that the clerk didn’t accept the Petitions on Arizona & Wisconsin.

    #1929627
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    TVP – Powell did not release evidence. The forensic audit results are not worth anything as the person doing them has had trouble with simple facts before. Why anyone would take anything said there seriously is beyond me.

    #1929645
    Health
    Participant

    ENS -“Powell did not release evidence.”

    That’s right.
    She’ll produce evidence to SCOTUS.
    Not to You or any Lib!
    You gotta read all the posts!
    From previous:
    “Her case to SCOTUS hasn’t come up yet!”

    #1929676
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    Not sure Why you copied her Twitter?

    We know she is lying you dont have to keep proving it by posting more of her lies. Maybe she filed in wrong Scotus, she needs secret SCOTUS can you please forward her contact info..

    “She’ll produce evidence to SCOTUS.
    Not to You or any Lib!”

    The clock is ticking, Why would she kep it hidden? Is that how it works in secret Supreme court? In real supreme court there is no “secret evidence”

    #1929675
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    “She’ll produce evidence to SCOTUS.”

    I cant help but notice you havent answered my question.

    Here it is again :

    Simple question: At what point, if she hasnt released her evidence, would you say “Hmmm maybe she was lying”? Jan 6? Jan 20? Januray 2022 ? 2120? Surely at SOME point if she had something hse’d have shared it. When?

    #1929814
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq-“At what point, if she hasnt released her evidence, would you say “Hmmm maybe she was lying”? Jan 6? Jan 20? Januray 2022 ? 2120? Surely at SOME point if she had something hse’d have shared it. When?”
    “Not sure Why you copied her Twitter?
    We know she is lying you dont have to keep proving it by posting more of her lies. Maybe she filed in wrong Scotus, she needs secret SCOTUS”

    Now you know why I posted her Twitter.
    You can’t put the 2 together?!?
    How did you pass H.S.?!?
    Here it is again:
    “The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14!”

    She has plenty of time to submit it to SCOTUS.

    #1929854
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    So to be clear By January 14th, when she hasn’t released her secret evidence, it is fair to call her a liar for saying she has evidence that she will release “soon” ?

    #1929864
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq -“So to be clear By January 14th, when she hasn’t released her secret evidence, it is fair to call her a liar for saying she has evidence that she will release “soon” ?”

    Again – you don’t understand simple English!
    Did you finish H.S.?
    She has until the Court Date.
    The SCOTUS didn’t give a date yet!
    Again:
    “state response not due until JAN 14!”
    Do you know what “State Response” means?!?

    #1929963
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    “Do you know what “State Response” means?!?”

    No

    Her tweets like her claims are gobbledygook. Scotus isnt giving her a date. The only court case she might be involvedi n is the one in which Dominiion may sue her for her baseless allegations.

    So back to my simpel question.

    At what point, if she hasnt released her evidence, would you say “Hmmm maybe she was lying”? Jan 6? Jan 20? Januray 2022 ? 2120? Surely at SOME point if she had something hse’d have shared it. When?

    Please give a date, a milestone anytime marker. Not Cryptic copy/pasted haiku’s from twitter. name calling is fine if it makes it easier for you. I’m just looking for benchmark please. Thanks

    #1930265
    Health
    Participant

    Ubiq – It sounds like you Libs are getting Scared!

    “Do you know what “State Response” means?!?”
    No”

    Of course you don’t!
    You never finished H.S.
    How did you get an advanced degree?
    Who did you Pay off?

    “Scotus isnt giving her a date. Please give a date, a milestone anytime marker.”
    LOL!
    “SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan”
    Then that will be the first time in history – that SCOTUS accepted a petition, but didn’t have a Court case afterwards!

    #1930284
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Halth

    “How did you get an advanced degree?
    Who did you Pay off?”

    Only the finest for me! Trump University!

    Health

    “LOL!”

    I’m glad you enjoyed..
    Date please? Can we settle on Jan 20th?

    “Then that will be the first time in history – that SCOTUS accepted a petition, but didn’t have a Court case afterwards!”
    she’s lying

    “Acc. to S. Powell it will,”
    Yes but again, she’s lying

    ” but her case wasn’t heard yet by SCOTUS!””
    I’t wont be. Unless of course you mean secret SCOTUS

    #1930306
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Supreme Court is not meeting again till Jan 8th. Congress is counting the votes on the 6th. Powell will be broke in a little while once she is sued for libel and defamation.

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 145 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.