Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“What is my mistake?”
Not hiring a lawyer, maybe thats why you lost your case. (Of course the other possibility is it never happned)
“That’s true, but you if you asked them for a favor and didn’t pay them, it’s very likely!”
thats not a normla way of thinking. normal people do favors for free. Ive been educating you for a few weeks and in the past about other topics with out even hint of charging. I get that things are tight, but penny-pinching your friends is not a normal way to go about things. I do hope things turn around for you soon.
“I’m willing to help you find my court case for free!”{
Amazing!
“It’s self explanatory especially for a genius like you!!!”
I thought you used to think I’m smart but not anymore.
At any rate ok here are my law school guesses:
University of the Punjab.
University of the West Indies
University of Pretoria
“Here’s another freebie from me: I took the case to SCOTUS ProSe, no lawyer!”
Ah, maybe that was your mistake?
“Well maybe maybe your “real” friends are incompetent like you?!?”
All of them? seems unlikely
“I’m not your friend!”
Ok now you hurt my feelings. Clealry we are friends, weve been having a great > 2 week conversation. how can you say that?
“But this what I’ll do for you – I didn’t check all law schools – I wasn’t interested – but the ones I know about – if you list 3 at a time – I’ll say yes – one is there – or No it’s not!”
I dont get it. What am I guessing?
“Then this topic will be fun!”
Oh its fun alreaDY. bUT i’D liek you to have fun too. so help me help you. Friend!
“I’ll say yes – one is there – or No it’s not!”
One what is where?
“Sure you did! You can’t be that senile that you don’t even remember the post from a few lines ago!”
care to point it out? (I wont hold my breath, no worries)
:What is a lie? “
There are dozens in this thread alone. The one I was reffering to here was:
“Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law”
I admitted no such thing, you are lying (again)
“Did you forget to take your Aricept today?!?”
I forgot if I forgot to take it.
“The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!””
Lol at what point it was. It was about dozens of things
“Really – so if any of your lines is a smidgen true,”
I’m not sure what you are referring to. What lines?
“it wouldn’t have gone past the first federal court! It would have been thrown out as frivolous!”
Yeah um, this is awkard but it didnt. MAybe youre case gt thrown out but your lawyer told you he was going to the supreme court just to take you for a ride. And when you asked him why there was nio mention of this case anywhere he told you not all SCOTUS decisions are public? If so he lied and took you for a ride. sorry
“I once thought you were smart!”
Hmmmm Really? Or is this another one of your lies?
“I know some of the posters here hang onto your every word – like it’s from Har Sinai!
Stop manipulating them!”
Mine or the mods? I hope it isnt mine. Frnakly Im embarrased at how absurd this thread has gotten. The only reason im continuing is at this point I think “ubiquitin” has lost any modicum of respect he may have had, so I might as well continue this enjoyable conversation.
“Btw, I really want to thank you, because I haven’t searched for my court case in a long time, but because of you I did it again.
And I found out they study it in law schools!”
yeah um Trump University isnt a law school
“Too bad your (make believe) friends don’t go to the famous ones!!!”
You have that backwards. My make believe friends are experts in your make believe case. ITs my real friends who cant find it.
Incidentally what search term did you use to find it. I’d love to find it. No not for money, just in the spirit of friendship
Obviously.
Of course should do your best to hustle (as should the fellow pulling out).
Lol Golfer, I see you too want the last word
“Close the thread after you post this post.”
Though I dont get why this bothers anyone.
Granted its one of the stranger threads in this forum , but the title offers plenty warning.
If it bothered the mods (And while I do appreciate the forum, I dont see why it should bother any mod all they need to do is skim the posts all of which have been posted already several times), they know they can close it. Why mix in?
Thanks mod 29.
Oy more lies 🙁
” Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law”
Ive admited no such thing. This too is a lie.
All I was adding is that earlier while I did not know when it was amended I found it now.
On the other hand you had said the supreme court amended it (wrong thats not what the court does), after your case (wrong you claim your case was 2006 this was in 1972 which in the real world is before 2006, though perhaps the world of secret supreme court, time works differently).
Of course you also didnt know what gave the court the right to interpret the law. SO I find it amusing when you claim someone else is lacking in knowledge on the subject.
“The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!”
This discussion was about 30 different things. And yes OVer the course of >200 posts Ive educated you somehwat on the subject and you have hopefully learnt a few things along the way (like the role of the court for example) We were Mostly focusing on how you so obviously make things up and think you are fooling anyone.
“Next time, remind me, when I see one your SN’s to stay far away.”
Nooo but we were having so much fun, and youve learnt so much. And besides , sigh I’ll probably forget to remind you becasue of my senility
“That’s right you don’t know anything, except molecule and macromolecule!”
Ah but I also knew mRNA was a nucleic acid which you didnt know. and of course I ve taught you much about how the legal system works including the role of the court and that there is no such thing as secret supreme court cases. And finaly I also know that your Case never took place
“FYI, there is no secret court, just something that you made up in your delusion!”
I made up?
“Stop talking to yourself!”
Cant its part of my condition
“I’m not interested in trying to explain it, because it’s a waste of time!”
good.
“You nothing about EMS protocols, your words, not mine!”
Yes Ive said that many times, and neither due you. However our discussion there wasnt about eMS protocols. It was about whether you made them up or not. and since you couldnt provide the source. IT is rather clear that you made them up
“I’m sure you have to go now, because it’s supper time in the nursing home!”
Oyyyyy supper was at 4:30 Ive been having so much fun with you I completely forgot. Or maybe its my senility
BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court as you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly
BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court ass you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly
“They are not all available for any imbecile to find!”
Wrong, you are confusing secret supreme court with the US supreme court.
“That’s what I keep telling you, but you’re too stubborn to listen!”
Just becasue you keep saying it doesnt make it true. It was a lie 6 pages ago and is still a lie.
“This line is the clincher! You posted previously that you nothing about EMS protocols!”
Still true. I dont, and neither do you. Driving around an access-a-ride doesnt make you knowledgeable about EMS protocols
” So why don’t you admit this with MVA’S?!?”
. the discussion was whether there existed a difference between 1 and 2 car MVA’s. You claimed there was a difference but couldnt source it. I said I do not know, but it sounded strange. however once iot became clear that no such protocol existed, You dont have to know about protocols to know that when you made up that it existed you were lying. (You addmited this at one point in th thread, but were spewing so much nonsense you forgot you addmited it, much like you forgot that you agreed with the US suprme court in your “case”)
“No you won’t!”
Yet another lie from Health.
“Didn’t your Mommy ever teach you Not to lie?!?”
she did, but Im senile so I forgot. Remember?
“I’m not interested in two old Shofars,”
Ah but these unicorns have 3 horns each so it is 6 shofars for your imaginary case!!!!!! (one exclamatiion for each shofar!!!!!!)
“Regarding the court it is black and white, and you and your buddies are incompetent! Actually at this point I really don’t think you asked any real lawyers!”
you dont need to eb a lwayer to find a SCOTUS case. HAvent we been over this. You may not know this, but SCOTUS is the highest court in the land. They hear (relatively) few cases and they are readily available and easily searchable
“As far as MVA’S, you yourself admitted that you don’t know EMS protocols.”
Yes, and you admitted and retracted that you made that one up.
“As far as biology goes, I admitted I made a mistake.”
Amazing! I know how hard that was for you Im so proud. Though my point was why I enjoyed discussing it. Once you admitted you made it up I stopped discussing it (you continued by mixing in this thread saying I “never” admit when wrong)
“When are you going to admit your two mistakes regarding SCOTUS & MVA’s?!?”
The second I find the case you claim exists or the EMS protocol you claimed existed.
“Your posts are getting more ridiculous as time goes on; actually they’re pathological!”
Agreed. but not for the reason you think.
“I already told you if you really had real lawyers try to find it, get different ones!”
I tried that already.
“Yes, you do because you don’t know what’s posted and what’s not!”
all SCOTUS cases are published. Secret supreme court cases arent a real thing.
“I never have met such a haughty person as you!”
you should meet this guy :
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/organic-chemistry-and-or-a-and-p/page/2#post-625518
“And btw, my offer still stands – for 2 million dollars, you’ll have my whole court case!
As does mine, 2 unicorns for the case
“Does anybody other than the two participants read this thread any more?”
I hope not (aside from the mods). The title offers plenty of warning.
As for the mods. Thanks for your time and patience. I guess I never thought of it from your perspective. If it poses a burden I’m done. I assumed these posts just required a quick skimming, as other than an insult here and there it is a pretty pareve discussion.
Regardless, thanks for letting me have some fun
Or maybe they’re both actually enjoying it and it’s keeping them from stressing about other stuff? Can you two perhaps enlighten us?
Gladly! I find it fascinating when someone can be so clearly wrong yet insist he is right. Those are strangely my favorite discussions. A discussion about say, Hillary vs Trump isnt as clear cut (if we are being honest. Both have plusses and minuses. If we are being honest it is a bit subjective as to who is “better” even if you are sure you are right,there is room for doubt and healthy disagreement.
however something black and white like whether a Supreme court decision took place, whether there is a difference in existing protocols between number of cars involved in MVA and management of pt, or whether mRNA is a macro-molecule. It amazes me that people can actually argue about it.
Its why I enjoy listening to talk radio. So much of what they say is demonstrably false, but it doesnt matter they are so sure of themselves and they need to fill air-time so they spew nonsense. I find it fascinating.
Though admittedly. my fascination with this thread as worn off, and at this point it is mostly just pathologic as I seem to have trouble just letting it go.
“At this point you definitely don’t want it to be true!”
Not quite At this point Ive realized it doesnt matter anymore what I want or how long I look. I simply doesnt exist. Think of a guy who spends time looking for the Loch ness monster after looking for a while and turning up empty he gives up .It would be nice if the monster suddenly showed itself even if he couldnt find it, since at least he didnt waste time on something nonexistent.
At this point it is far more likely that the loch ness monster exists than your court case.
“my point to you is you put so much invested that I’m in the wrong regarding my SCOTUS case, you’ll never admit it!”
You expect me to admit im wrong when I and several lawyers and law students cant find it? Does that make sense?
” But good luck on finding it!”
Ill pass,My search is complete. Ive skimmed all cases from 2006 I can state with more certainty than the loch ness monster not existing, that your case doesnt exist.
“My advice to you is to change the lawyers (liars) you’ve been using so far!”
Lol! I tried that.
Besides, you dont need lawyers to find a supreme court case. Especially when you narrow down the year
“That I had Court case that went to the US Supreme Court!!!”
You dont make any sense. Why would that bother me? (You had asked “Why does the truth bother you so much?!?”) I want it to be true. I have been trying to get hints from you to get you to help me find it, I asked friends to help, I skimmed through all cases from the year you claimed the decision was handed down in an effort to find it. I have spent an embarrassing amount of time searching for it and an even more embarrassing amount of time discussing it with you. Why would it bother me if the case existed? IT would have been a success on my part. sadly after exhausting all of the above, the case simply doesn’t exist. Real SCOTUS cases aren’t this hard to find. We arent talking about some obscure court. The supreme court is the highest court in this country (at this point i the conversation I cant be sure you know that), cases they decide are not secret.
I still hope I turn out to be wrong, it means I wouldn’t have wasted my time and this interesting court decision actually took place. Sadly though I am now certain that this isnt the case.
” You should stop posting to me pretending that you’re an imbecile!”
Hey, thats not nice rmeber I’m senile! (I guess I’m not the only one…)
“You knew exactly what I meant & what I was referring to, when I said “never”!”
i’m still not sure. you said it several times, and claimed that you havent said it. Can I sometimes be wrong or not?
“You’re too chicken to bite!!!”
More chicken than the guy who refuses to back up his claim with the court case he claims happened? And besides Im offering something better than 2 million dollars, namely 2 unicorns (each is worth 5 million dollars which in the land of make believe equals $64 million)
“Why does the truth bother you so much?!?”
What truth are you talking about?
“I know because you can never be wrong!”
Haven’t we been over this?
Incidently, that was one of the dozens of questions you have yet to answer. Namely, why do you keep repeating that when I amoved occasionally (though rarely) wrong?
“And for the umteenth time, my case went to the Supreme Court!”
Got it, sorry I thought you meant the US Supreme Court, I didn’t realize you meant the supreme Court of the land of make believe.
” And I’m not giving it to you for free!”
OK sold! I’ll give you 2 unicorns for the fake info
Dearest health,
“I’m not going to explain to you how they post their decisions!”
Thanks for sparing me. If I wanted wrong information I can make it up on my own
“I already told you how you can get my case and how much it will cost you!”
And I already told you I dont pay for fake information. Especially not to someone who claims he doesnt charge in the first place
“You can stop asking me questions – I’m not going to respond anymore”
Lol, you haveent been responding to dozens of my questions. But I get they where hard questions. Like getting you to reconcile all your dozens of contradictory opinions
“you can’t find it because you only asked a student!”
And like all your comments this too is wrong.
As I said earlier I asked 2 lawyers too. Besides, student are better at searching (arguably) , since that what he does all the time.
All agreed you were a liar (and not a good one at that)
“Almost all the SCOTUS case numbers that you just posted start with either 04 or 05, not with 06!
Mister – Stop with your lying – it’s Elul!!!”
Easy with the ignorance, this isnt basic science that we know you know nothing about. This is basic checking dates You said the case was decided in 06′ those are the cases I posted.
As an aside I checked all cases argued in 06 too even if decisions delivered later (which isnt what you said). None of them are about the topic at hand either.
Are you sure it was the Supreme court, Are you sure it wasnt imaginary?
“I thought you understand English?!?”
I do this : “If you want the court case from me, it will cost you 2 mil” is called chargine. When you said “I dont charge” that was yet another of many many lies you have told.
“Post your email if you’re interested and we’ll do the deal!
If not, so long!”
I’m not I wouldnt spend money for a real court case and certainly not for a fake one. goodbye.
As 2scents put it so well “”As proven numerous times, you would be paid NOT to teach or share your thoughts.” Your thought are nonsensical, illogical and often contradictory, and your “facts” are wrong and/or made up. No wonder you like trump.
“I don’t charge here on YWN! Do you have a problem understanding English?!?”
I guess so. I understand this : “Mister it’s not my thoughts that I’m charging for, but my court case or my medical knowledge!” as charging.
and no neither are worth anything.
“We talking about triage & MVA’s in the other topic, not here!”
what other EMS protocol where we ever talking about?
“This includes protocols about allergies!”
what? that isnt an EMS protocol. If it is then yes I guess I do no some EMS protocols. Im ACLS certified too, that wasnt what we were talkign about either. Sorry if that wasnt clear.
“No clown! Where did you get this list from?”
Everywhere I looked. Sadly I dont have access to secret supreme court cases
BTW here all all the SCOTUS cases from 2006.
Is your case on this list?
BP America Production Co. v. Burton No. 05-669 December 11, 2006
Carey v. Musladin No. 05-785 December 11, 2006
Toledo-Flores v. US No. 05-7664 December 5, 2006
Lopez v. Gonzales No. 05-547 December 5, 2006
Ayers v. Belmontes No. 05-5966 November 13, 2006
Purcell v. Gonzales No. 06A375 October 20, 2006
Clark v. Arizona No. 05-5966 June 29, 2006
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld No. 05-184 June 29, 2006
Beard v. Banks No. 04-1739 June 28, 2006
League Of United Latin American Citizens Et al. v. Perry, Governor Of Texas, Et al. No. 05-204 June 28, 2006
Sanchez-llamas v. Oregon No. 4-10566 June 28, 2006
Arlington Central School District Board Of Education v. Murphy Et Vir. No. 05-18 June 26, 2006
Kansas v. Marsh No. 04-1170 June 26, 2006
Randall v. Sorrell No. 04-1528 June 26, 2006
United States v. Gonzalez-lopez No. 05-352 June 26, 2006
Washington v. Recuenco No. 05-83 June 26, 2006
Burlington N. & S. F. r. co. v. White No. 05-259 June 22, 2006
Dixon v. United States No. 05-7053 June 22, 2006
Fernandez-vargas v. Gonzales No. 04-1376 June 22, 2006
Laboratory Corporation Of America Hold-ings, Dba Labcorp, Petitioner v. Metabo-lite Laboratories, Inc., Et al. No. 04-607 June 22, 2006
Woodford v. Ngo No. 05-416 June 22, 2006
Davis v. Washington No. 05-5224 June 19, 2006
Rapanos v. United States No. 04-1034 June 19, 2006
Samson v. California No. 04-9728 June 19, 2006
Youngblood v. West Virginia No. 05-6997 June 19, 2006
Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. Mcveigh No. 05-200 June 15, 2006
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co. No. 05-128 June 15, 2006
Hudson v. Michigan No. 04-1360 June 15, 2006
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust No. 05-409 June 15, 2006
Hill v. Mcdonough No. 05-8794 June 12, 2006
House v. Bell No. 04-8990 June 12, 2006
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. No. 04-433 June 5, 2006
Mohawk Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Shirley Williams Et al. No. 05-465 June 5, 2006
Whitman v. Department Of Transportation No. 04-1131 June 5, 2006
Zedner v. United States No. 05-5992 June 5, 2006
Northern Ins. Co. Of N. y. v. Chatham County No. 04-1618 May 30, 2006
Garcetti v. Ceballos No. 04-473 May 30, 2006
Brigham City v. Stuart No. 05-502 May 22, 2006
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno No. 04-1704 May 15, 2006
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. Of Environmental Protection No. 04-1527 May 15, 2006
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. No. 05-260 May 15, 2006
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L. L. C. No. 05-130 May 15, 2006
Arkansas Department Of Health And Human Services Et al. v. Ahlborn No. 04-1506 May 1, 2006
Holmes v. South Carolina No. 04-1327 May 1, 2006
Marshall v. Marshall No. 04-1544 May 1, 2006
Hartman v. Moore No. 04-1495 April 26, 2006
Jones v. Flowers No. 04-1477 April 26, 2006
Day v. Mcdonough No. 04-1324 April 25, 2006
Jeffrey Jerome Salinas v. United States No. 05-8400 April 25, 2006
Gonzales v. Thomas No. 05-552 April 17, 2006
Georgia v. Randolph No. 04-1067 March 22, 2006
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit No. 04-1371 March 21, 2006
United States v. Grubbs No. 04-1414 March 21, 2006
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. No. 04-1329 March 1, 2006
Scheidler v. National Organization For Women,inc. No. 04-1244 February 28, 2006
Texaco Inc. v. Dagher No. 04-805 February 28, 2006
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. No. 04-944 February 22, 2006
Dolan v. Postal Service No. 04-848 February 22, 2006
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. Mcdonald No. 04-593 February 22, 2006
Oregon v. Guzek No. 04-928 February 22, 2006
Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc. No. 05-379 February 21, 2006
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna No. 04-1264 February 21, 2006
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficenteuniao Do Vegetal No. 04-1084 February 21, 2006
Lance v. Dennis No. 05-555 February 21, 2006
Ministry Of Defense And Support For Armedforces Of Islamic Republic Of Iran v. Elahi No. 04-1095 February 21, 2006
Central Va. Community College v. Katz No. 04-885 January 23, 2006
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-eckrich, Inc. No. 04-597 January 23, 2006
Rice v. Collins No. 04-52 January 18, 2006
Will v. Hallock No. 04-1332 January 18, 2006
Gonzales v. Oregon No. 04-623 January 17, 2006
Brown v. Sanders No. 04-980 January 11, 2006
Evans v. Chavis No. 04-721 January 10, 2006
United States v. Georgia No. 04-1203 January 10, 2006
first off, thanks for renaming the thread. aseems more appropriate for the subject matter and warns those who may have expected a semi normla-conversation about Trump v. hillary to stay away.
Health
“You just proved that I didn’t charge anyone!”
how is this not charging “it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
Granted, the other examples you diditn actually charge, but the insinuation that you deserve money for sharing your thoughts is absurd.
“I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN!”
no it must not be true because after spending an embarrasing amoutn of time looking for it, it doesnt come up. There are a finite number of SCOTUS cases that took place in 2006. none of them are about the subject at hand. Thus you lied. Seems logical to me.
“then I’d have to charge you!”
Wait, I thought you dont charge?
“How do you treat anaphylaxis? Allergists give Epi.”
by EMS protocols we were talking about triage and managing accident citims based on the number of cars involved. Of course there are some things All physicians know.
I assume you have a driver license, does that make you profecient in EMS protocols because they also know how to drive? (hint: no it doesnt)
All Physicians were at soem point in their careers ACLS certified, that doesnt mean they know EMS protocols
“I’d have to charge you to teach you medicine! “
no thanks, i’m good. Id rather get a degree from Trump University. At least there they probably wouldnt utter the silly sentence “Its a molecule not a macromolecule”
“I never said I wanted payment for any of my comments on YWN.”
amazing stuff!
Here are some examples
“Tutoring costs money! Here’s one freebie:”
“Also I would have given you the information about my court case for free, but now that I’ve experienced your posts about me – it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
“I was nice enough to get you started. If you show me that you’re trying, I’ll help you out. Even if I don’t get any money from you!”
“I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN! Your thought processes are illogical!”
thats quite logical to me. you made an amazing comment, and cant back it up seems logical to doubt you. Especially given your track record.
The rest of your post is yet again repeating my silliness. Dotn do that if you cant reply I get that just leave it out and ignore as you usually do. Reposting it w/ no reply is distracting.
feel fre to answer though
At what point does that physician encounter EMS protocols?”
“If I do it will cost you 2 million dollars!”
I get that your access-a-ride job doesnt pay much. But getting paid for commenting on YWN sadly isnt a thing (unfortunatly, otherwise based on this absurd thread alone, we’d both be rich!)
Comment for conversations’ sake. Have a discussion like a mentch you made an assertion. either back it up, say its private and you dont want to discuss it furtheror admit you made it up. Charging money isnt a thing
“LOL! Btw, What protocol did I make up?”
this one :
“In any car crash, even though there’s the possibility of a medical cause, it’s Not probable!
But in 1 car crash, it has to be treated as a medical call, along with trauma.”
from this classic thread: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/treatment
“That is a line from somebody who doesnt know anything on the subject.
The subject of medicine!”
Ok, I’ll bite. How so? I’d love to here how a say allergist who spends two years basic sciences (NO EMS protocols there), followed by 2 years of basic roations w/ electives where s/he may not choose to do EM (No EMS protocols there. Follwoed by 3 years Int med in a program (like most) that fudges the EM requirement or has a bare minimum of 2 weeks (No EMS protocols there) followed by 2 years fellowship in aLLErgy (NO EMS protocols yet again. At what point does that physician encounter EMS protocols?
“I’m not surprised that you didn’t find it! You’re incompetent”
Youre alos not suurprised, since you knew you made it up.
Also its not just me who cant find it its 2 lawyers and a student who looked
“just like you don’t know medicine, ie. EMS protocols!”
At least Im upfront about that… You make up protocols and pass yourself as being “in healthcare” let me guess you drive an access a ride ferrying people to dialysis. Make no mistake you serve a vital role, but saying you are in halthcare is a bit of a stretch
“Btw, EMS protocols all come from the practice of emergency medicine!
So you don’t know medicine and your the one that’s always calling me not truthful!”
Busted! I dont practice emergency medicine!
“Btw, you think I’m fooled by your posts?!?”
Nah youre way to smart
” I believe that you went to college “
chas veshalom! college is tuma!
“and maybe became an OD (eye doc) nothing more! “
LEts say that were true do i give out medical advice? Pretending im something else, who cares?
“Also I would have given you the information about my court case for free, “
Lol you where just waiting for over 200 comments befroe you offered free info. Seriously why do you think youll get paid for ywn comments? that sint a thing especially not with your track record
spare me.
If I feel like, I’ll answer the rest of of your Nonsensical post!
“From your previous post: “no fake dates,””
Fair enough. Though I meant fake as in irrelevant dates because we werent discussing District courts so those dates were irrelevant. Perhaps “Fake” was poor choice of words. I was wrong to phrase it that way. (Of course the dates may be literally fake too, but I dont know that to be the case)
“You’re right! But in your case, I’ll make an exception!”
thats terrible, work on yourself be nice to ALL senile people
“I don’t care about your Moshol,”
You dont have to, its still the truth. The physician who forgot the heart pumops blood never really studies medicine, much as the online poster who “forgot” a macromolecule is still a molecule never knew what he was talking about either
Sadly the rest of your post was just my nonsense without your erudite commentary.
This question in particular I was hoping to have answered:
you said: “Why do you keep posting your lies?!? Is it because you can never be wrong?!?”
you also said “I didn’t say never!!!(” in response to “Can you now admit that when you said I dont admit to being wrong, you were in fact wrong?”)
I dont see how you can reconcile these too staments.
Do I sometimes admit when wrong yes or no?
Oh and as for the original task…
my search is complete I have exhausted all known search engines and your supreme court case simply never took place not in 2006 nor withing 5 years before or after. (There isnt a single case regarding Shabbos observence at all in the 2000’s)
As I suspected you have been lying aS usual
“Yawn. Wake me when Health and Ubiquitin kiss and make up.”
See PBA’s rule of the Coffee room.
“You’re right! There isn’t a single lie, there’s many lies!”
Care to identify one?
“Only in your case! And again I was talking about you!!!”
thats still not nice. You should work on being nice to senile people.
“I’m not sure! But I’m sure that you talked about your residency. That I assumed that it was a residency for a physician.”
ah never assume…
(though your’e not wrong this time)
“That’s because I hold a person can forget, but you hold you can’t forget! It’s got to be you didn’t know it in the first place, according to your post to me on knowing Biology!”
Not quite. ITs just that this sentence “ITs a macromolecule not a molecule” is such gibberish that it indicates you didnt know the first thing. Say you were talking to a physician who mentioned that the heart filters the blood, when you remind him dont you mean kidneys? he says no I googled it and im right. Onve a few people point it out he says oops I forgot. You can be fairly certain he isnt a real physcian.
“So how could you claim you did or you do know medicine?!?
According to you, you must not have known medicine in the first place!!!”
I’m not sure what you mean. I assure you in medical school, residency and fellowship they dont teach EMS protocols, perhaps they should that sint the point. But other than ACLS how to triage 1 accident vs 2 accidents is simply something that has never come up
“Since you can’t have ever known medicine,”
What?
” according to your logic, I’d have to charge you to teach you medicine!”
Whast with you and charging for your (wrong) opinions? Remember when you wanted to charge Sparkly for the wrong answer to her question, or when you wanted to charge us for your made up EMS protocol. ITs weird. YWN is free.
“Again that whole post is full of lies!”
again care to point one out?
“Don’t you understand basic English?!?”
Yes
“There’s a difference between each post, some I said never, and some I didn’t say never!!!”
what? you said: “Why do you keep posting your lies?!? Is it because you can never be wrong?!?”
you also said “I didn’t say never!!!(” in response to “Can you now admit that when you said I dont admit to being wrong, you were in fact wrong?”)
I dont see how you can reconcile these too staments.
Do I sometimes admit when wrong yes or no?
“You’re wrong in the above post! And not only did you not admit it – it’s full of lies!!!”
In that post there isnt a single lie.
“It’s not my fault if you’re going senile!” No it may not be your fault, though is that really what you say to senile people who ask you for help remembering?
Note how in classic health fasion you didint answer the question. Here it is again: “Did I make that claim?”
“No, but they wouldn’t have the Chutzpah to argue with s/o who does!”
I wasnt arguing whether your made up protocol existed. I was asking you for a source which you were unable to provide. first you used your favorite nonsensical copyright excuse. Then you made up an absurd gezeira shava.
At any rate you seem to indicate that a physiscian wouldnt necceasirly know EMS protocols and thus “knowing nothing about EMS protocol” could in fact be made by ” s/o who practices or did practice medicine”
which was EXACTLY my point.
Care to admit you were wrong yet again. Dont worry I wont hold my breath.
“Maybe I was saying that this should be the protocol”
Lol that is not what you said. Ill dig up the post later. You said everybody should go look it up becasue there was a difference between 1 and 2 cars but you wouldnt tell us until we looked it up.
Do you really not remember?
“Perhaps they closed it because of your illogical posts?!?”
🙂
“Why do you keep posting your lies?!?”
Again what is a lie in my post?
“Is it because you can never be wrong?!?”
Hahah!
Do you even read your own posts?
In the very opening to this post you said “I didn’t say never!!!”
Here it is in context:
“Can you now admit that when you said I dont admit to being wrong, you were in fact wrong?”
“I didn’t say never!!!”
“You’re wrong in the above post! And not only did you not admit it – it’s full of lies!!!”
My dearest Health, here is the link where I admit to being wrong http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/frum-people-voting-for-hillary-clinton-yimach-shimam/page/3#post-621876 (it is a link to a link)
For a brainteaser though: Can you now admit that when you said I dont admit to being wrong, you were in fact wrong?
“The above post isn’t from s/o who practices or did practice medicine!!!”
Which post? The one about EMS protocols?
a. Did I claim to practice medicine? (I may have, but I dont recall making that claim)
b. Do you think All physicians know Specific eMS protocols. Do you think an Allergist or Radiation oncologist knows the first thing about EMS protocols? (No I’m neither of those)
c. You know less about EMS protocols, but claim you do. You were caught making up protocols and pretending they were established.
Did you forget that incident?
I dont want to revisit that here since the mods had to bail you out by closing that thread and I dont want this thread to be closed before I conclusively determine, that which I already strongly suspect, namely that you made up this supreme court case of yours.
“I wasn’t talking about myself, but you!
Why can’t you get that in your head?!?”
Because As ive illustrated with examples, (in this very thread) when I’m wrong I admit it.
“Sparkly -“Health – you were insisting that you were correct.”
So what? It’s common place for posters to never admit that they’re wrong!
Eg. Look at the posters in this topic:
“Frum people who are unfortunately voting for Hillary Clinton.””
From here http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/organic-chemistry-and-or-a-and-p/page/3#post-625758
Just because it is common doesn’t make it right. You are right. This thread provides several examples of you failing to admit you were wrong.
That dioesnt make it right
But you are more interesting than mere not admitting you are wrong. You insist with such vigor and google all sorts of silliness in order not to admit.
On that thread you actually posted this meaningless sentence “It says molecule, Not Macromolecule!” This isnt a line from somebody who “forgot something in biology”
That is a line from somebody who doesnt know anything on the subject.
Which is fine, of course, many people dont. But you insist and misinterpret sources over and over to back up your factually incorrect information
(I moved it here because I dont want to hijack more than one thread with your complete silliness)
Dont worry I’ll get back to you at the end of the week regarding the case. IT is still being searched for…
Health
“It says molecule, Not Macromolecule!”
All macromolecules are molecules (It is in the name macro is greek for large a macro molecule is a large molecule. RNA which is a string of smaller ribonucleotide bases (i.e. smaller molecules) is a macromolecule. IT is of course a molecule too)
Please let me know which point you disagree with:
(ive restated it since there is arguable in inaccuracy in my first iteration)
a) mRNA is string of nucleic acids.
b) a string of Nucleic acids is a macromolecules.
Therfore:
c) mRNA is a macromolecule.
(I changed this because A monomer for example Glucose is arguably not a macromolecule. However the polymer sucrose (Glucose+fructose) is without question a macromolecule, though of course it is a molecule as well.
Similarly an isolated nucleotide like Uracil might not be a Macromolecule. But a polymer like mRNA is without question a macromolecule (again, in addition to being a molecule).
Health
allow me to help
You quoted accuratly from the university of Utah “There are three major types of biological macromolecules in mammalian systems.
Carbohydrates
Nucleic acids
Proteins”
One hundered percent correct, As I said : “There are three macromolecules: Carbohydrates, Proteins and nucleic acids… “
I am not sure why you think this is a contradiction?
Please let me know which point confuses you:
a) mRNA is a nucleic acid.
b) Nucleic acids are macromolecules. (As you correctly quoted from both me and the University of Utah)
Therfore:
c) mRNA is a macromolecule.
This is basic logic, here is a a classic example:
a) all men are mortal
b) Socrates is a man
therefore
C) Socrates is mortal
“You’re posts are getting funnier & funnier!”
I’m glad youre starting to enjoy! (dont worry I havent forgotten about our other fun thread, Im searching for your court case)
IT should go without saying that as always Health is simply wrong.
There are three macromolecules: Carbohydrates, Proteins and nucleic acids (some include lipids as well).
Nucleic acids include DNA, mRNA, rRNA and tRNA.
Now if nucleic acids are macromolecules, and mRNA is a nucleic acid (both true) then obviously mRNA is a macromolecule.
Both are arguably correct in the question. But mRNA is more specific and perhaps more correct
This statment “Because mRNA is not a (macromolecule)!” is gibberish.
Sparkly
“you CANT become a doctor if you havent taken organic chemistry thats one of the weed out classes for doctors.”
there are a few schools that dont require organic chem (at least this was true 15 years ago), however it is on the MCAT so skipping it and narrowing yourself to a few medical schools and studying it on your own for the MCAT, while possible, isnt a good idea.
BTW
Your question about constitutional isomers made me smile. I remember well how on the final we were hoping there would be a lot of questions regarding structures and naming that that is by far the easiest part of the course.
good luck
“That’s because you only asked a student & an ambulance chaser lawyer!”
a student is pretty good at research and has access to his law schools search engines. And the other isnt an ambulance chaser, as Ive already told you. Easy with the lying, im not saying NO lying but just tone it down lekavod Elul.
Besides, that still not a lie. The truth is after spending some time searching I cant find it.
“For the 3rd time – I’ll repeat my previous post – “I won’t give you the name of the other party because like you wrote – “(google is your friend)”, not just you, but anybody that reads YWN will know my name!”
So you want only me to find it, but nobody else?
At any rate. thanks a ton for the year
“This case -“But like I said, I dont know how to find secret court cases””
How am I wrong? I cant find it.
“Yes it has; but it doesn’t have anything to do with me!”
We are both equally invested at this point.
“It wasn’t a fake date, no matter what you write!”
I meant fake related to the subject at hand.
Ok lets keep this simple
you said “I’ll repeat it, because you are having problems understanding my posts! I don’t care if you and a few others know my SN or my court case, but I don’t want it to be public knowledge!!!”
you are right about that, I cant understand you
Are you ok with me finindg out your case?
If yes, please provide year supreme court handed down decision or ideally the other party.
If no, Im sorry for having waster our time. but please state clearly that you do not want me knowing your case
“Calling the whole thread a lie is based on what?!?”
based on the number of lies you have told I can count several ID be happy to list if youd like (I mean real lies)
Is this the way you deal with your interpersonal relationships?
No, in real life I ahvent encountered such stubborn liars
“If you don’t like something they did or said, you call them liars?!?”
not if I dont like somehing, but if it is a lie, sure Icall it a lie
“So I want to you to admit that you’re wrong in this case!”
which case?
“but I really don’t want it to be public knowledge.”
Dont worry nobody is reading this thread anymore, IT has gotten quite silly.
and agian, I respect your privacy, just dotn pretend your giving me hints. yo dont want me to know gezunterheit and that is why you wont say. finished, no fake dates, no need to post useless extraneous information and no need to pretend you dont mind if I find out you said on several occasions “Like I wrote previously, I’m not going to post my name. If you figure it out, I really don’t care!”
This, like most of what youve written in this thread, is also a lie. You DO care which is why you not only wont give your name, or the other party’s name or event the date. Again and I cant stress this enough, if you dont want me to know what case you are referring to, fine I am not even asking you to give information you arent comfortabel revealing. All I ask is you own up to this that, dont pretend you dont care.
“Is this because you think that you can never be wrong?!? LOL”
not only can I be wrong. In this thread I have provided real examples of where I was wrong . So yes while rare it does happen and I readily admit when it does.
“not just you, but anybody that reads YWN will know my name! I’m not going to be the first guy that e/o knows my name!”
As I said many times, that is without question your right.
However you have stated
“Btw, I personally don’t care about my privacy, but YWN does!
If they changed the rules and e/o posted their real name, I would too!”
you made several other comments indicating you dont mind if I figure the case.
I recvieved some well placed mussar from a non-jewish coworker who asked me why I wouldnt be in the following Monday
I replied Along the lines of” Oh its one of our minor holidays, you probably never heard of it” she asked for deatils saying “well if IVe never heard of it, all the more reason for you to tell me about it”
so I said “Its the day God gave us the bible”
she was astonished “thats not minor at all!”
(To be clear I didnt mean to down play Shavuous ch”v I meant minor in the sense that it wasnt as well known as some of our others like Pesach, Chanukah, rosh Hashanah, yom Kippur which most quasi educated people ahve heard of.)
“Just because you and your law buddies can’t find it, doesn’t mean it’s not there!!!”
True. But like I said, I dont know how to find secret courtcases. Just becasue nobody can find the loch ness monster doesnt mean it isnt there either.
” I’ll try again to help you & don’t ask me why!”
I wont ask you, becasue I already know! ITs becasue you are so nice (A quick google search turned uo this “I’m way too nice!” No need to ask what I already know.)
But wait I missed where you tried again to help me, all i’m asking for is the year the supreme corut decision allegedly was handed down. Not for a crash course in civil procedure.
If you dont want to help, thats fine but dont pretend you are trying to
“I’ve have not made anything up!!!
Maybe you do?!?”
Maybe I do what?
“Your hypocrisy is astounding!
You keep trying to ask me what the name of my court case was & I repeatedly told you it has my name in the title! “
I dont think you know what hypocrasy means (google is your friend) I stopped asking you for the name of the case a while ago. Ive been asking for the other party’s name, the year, a phrase to ehlp me find it. Ive said repeatedly if you dont want to share it thats fine. However you have said on several occasions you dont mind if I find out you just dotn want to post the name. Which while that makes exactly zero sense, I repect it nonethless and havent asked you for the case’s name in quite a while
Look if from the get go, you had said the supreme court is antisemtiic because in a court decision they ruled agaisnt you, but you dont want to share the decision to protect your privacy.
Id have left it alone (though probably not beleived you).
however if you are using it to bolster tyour argument, and expect other sto accept what you say, you have to be willing to prove you assertions. Especially when you claim to be willing to
“Why don’t you ask your buddy lawyers – how the system works?!?”
Lol because I only ask things I dont know. Like how to find secret court cases
“I’ll tell you a little bit! First you go to district court, then appeals court, then SCOTUS!”
This entire thread we were talking about SCOTUS. when I asked what year the decision was, that is what I was asking. Again, if you dont want to say that is your right. But why answer soem other question that doesnt help
“Well your persona is Not entertaining!!!!!!!!!!!”
sorry you feel that way. You are welcome to just admit you made it all up
“Obviously a student doesn’t know much!”
Yeah yeah bo one knows anything but you, He couldnt even find it.
” And what kind of lawyer helped you? An accident chaser one?!?”
no. why?
“OK. What will you do in return for me?”
what can I do for you?
“The judge gave the decision in 2005.”
What do you mean “the Judge” and district court”. Earlier you said the supreme court?
“And why do you say you love me? You don’t even know me!!!”
I know the persona of Health that you created online. and I love him! He is very funny and entertaining
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“You probably used Google or Yahoo. Try a legal site, like LII or others!”
nope Ive tried legal sites, SCOTUS’s website I had a lawyer and law student help me. None of them can find it. See how far I go to be dan lekaf zechus?
Can you tell me what year it took place?
“Isnt that better than bankrupting the country like Trump did 4 times?”
Stop with the liberal lies! Trump had very few bankruptcies.”
Amazing stuff! you call my comment a lie while agreeing with it! Have I mentioned How much I love you?
“Why don’t you – Do a law search on employment discrimination due to non- accommodation for Saturday observance?!?”
I ve done that and dozens of variations several times already…
“Because she’ll continue to increase it, just like her idol – Obama!”
Isnt that better than bankrupting the country like Trump did 4 times?
CA
“I googled this claim and it brought me to polidiotic and your claim is false”
It is in fact true. you need to do abetter job googling. (though you could argue that it was the repblican congress that helpes balance the budget, but this stament ” Do you know the name of the last president who ran a budget surplus, rather than a deficit? (Hint: Bill
).” is without question true.)“but biochem and the krebs cycle is something you need to redo in med school and on the boards”
You don’t need it on the boards, but you do need it for step 1 (unless thats what you meant by boards) but your point stands, After Step 1 it never comes up again ever.
I do think you are right about the “we had to do it, so you do to” attitude
mentch1
“Can someone explain to me why every bio and bio chem course requires memorizing the Krebs cycle? What’s the point ?!”
three med school admissions officers all said the same thing “To separate the men from the boys”
“I don’t have the time or energy to teach you law!”
Lol youre funny
“Like I wrote previously, I’m not going to post my name. If you figure it out, I really don’t care!”
If that is true, can you provide search terms to help me find it? Or can you provide the other part’s name like this I can find it (which you say you really dont care) and you dont have to post your name?
“I thought you were an English professor! “
What on earth made you think that?
“I don’t have a problem the way they interpreted “undue hardship”. My problem is that they didn’t follow that interpretation in my court case!”
Have I mentioned how funny you are? So you DO have a problem with how they interpreted “undue hardship” albeit not in an earlier case (by a differently composed court?) but on your case
Don’t feed the troll.
I think the trolls are feeding each other in this thread
“You’ll never get any point conceded.”
both Health and myself have in fact conceded points
“Religious Jews know that Hillary is no true friend of the Jews, Israel, the Torah, or Hakodesh Boruchu. On the other hand, all of Trump’s kids are married to Jews”
so Are all of hillary’s I guess that no makes her a friend of the Torah and Hakodesh Barach hu. Seriously though, Trumop is “Like very very smart” and “really really rich” but a friedn of hakodosh baruch hu? you must have a funny hakadosh baruch hu. friends of mine dont support gambling and live openly adulterous lives
” and all the enemies of Israel are scared of him.”
the whole world and most of America is scared of him
” We all know it, too.”
i dont
CA
“Now I remember why I don’t come to this thread”
Sigh sometimes I wonder why I do
“That’s what I’m telling you – you don’t!”
So educate me. Please
“If was that simple, I’d definitely post it; it’s not!”
Ah so your example was flawed! Anyway give it a shot. Your a great explainer and I’m a pretty good understander. Dont sell your self short
“It does exist, despite your denial!”
Heres what confuses me, earlier you indicated you were ok with us finding it (you encouraged me and others to searhc for it) but didnt want to post the name. If it was a real case I would have found it (and known your name I guess) which you said you were ok with. So why play this game? Just provide the name of the case or search terms that will turn it up? OR say I dont want you to find the case because I wont to be private. Which is fine too. but why this weird middle game?
“This is what I posted – “I wrote they’re Antisemitic because they didn’t follow their own definition in my court case!””
Its been a long thread youve posted all sorts of contradictory staments
eg:
“I happen not to have a problem with that interpretation, but what I just posted was to make a point”
Health
Why cant you say “I dont like hot dogs because they come from a cow”
I’d say “oh I didnt realize they come from cows, now I know why you dont like them that isnt frivolous at all”
“Why don’t you ask your lawyer buddies to teach you the meaning?!?”
a. because I know the meaning
b. Im a great googler (only for things that exist though)I dont need them
c. IT doesnt really affect the conversation, as Ive explained above
d. They are being mean to me about how long this ridiculous conversation is 🙁
e. Ealier you said you dont have a problem with your court case. and it was just an example, though not sure of what