Search
Close this search box.

Trump Seizes On Small Election Issues To Spread Concern

FILE - In this March 23, 2020, file photo Attorney General William Barr speaks about the coronavirus in the James Brady Briefing Room in Washington. Barr is scheduled to appear for the first time before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, July 28. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Nine ballots discarded in Pennsylvania. A mail carrier who altered a handful of affidavit ballot applications. People being sent double ballots.

In the run up to Election Day, President Donald Trump is seizing on small, potentially routine voting issues to suggest the election is rigged. But there is no evidence there is any widespread voter fraud as the president has suggested.

Nevertheless, his comments have been amplified by his campaign, supporters and allies, including Attorney General William Barr, adding heft to the claims.

“Mail ballots, they cheat,” Trump said last month. During the presidential debate last week, he insisted the election had already been “rigged,” adding: “As far as the ballots are concerned, it’s a disaster.”

But voter fraud has proved exceedingly rare. And even a panel commissioned by the Trump administration to explore the issue uncovered no evidence to support claims of widespread voter fraud.

Five states routinely send ballots to all registered voters so they can choose to vote through the mail or in person, and four other states and the District of Columbia will be adopting that system in November, as will almost every county in Montana.

Even as the president rails against mail-in voting, he has acknowledged that he voted by absentee ballot in the past. But Trump’s decision to seize on the small number of issues — they occur in every election — exemplify the president’s monthslong effort to sow doubt about the integrity of the election before it’s even arrived and to preemptively call into question the results.

Particularly, the president has seized on an election worker’s decision to discard nine military ballots in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, which a state elections official said amounted to a mistake and not “intentional fraud.” Still, the president brought up the case, saying it was evidence of election fraud. He mentioned it twice during Tuesday night’s presidential debate.

The Justice Department has said seven of the nine ballots found discarded in a wastebasket in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, had Trump’s name. The Justice Department is still investigating the matter and it was Trump, after being briefed by Barr, who first mentioned the ballots during a radio show appearance, hours before the U.S. attorney in Harrisburg announced the investigation.

At the debate, Trump also pointed to another Justice Department in West Virginia, where a mail carrier admitted to changing parts of absentee ballot applications, including changing the party affiliation on five applications from Democratic to Republican. But the president misconstrued the facts in the case and said that there were “mailmen selling the ballots.”

The man, Thomas Cooper, held a postal contract to pick up mail in the three towns in which the voters live and delivered the forms in April to the Pendleton County clerk. He pleaded guilty in July to attempted election fraud and injury to the mail.

But there were no accusations that Cooper had ever been paid for that and he told investigators that he did it “as a joke.”

Barr has previously raised the possibility that a “foreign country could print up tens of thousands of counterfeit ballots” and has argued they would be hard to detect, but that’s been disputed by election experts. Multiple studies have debunked the notion of pervasive voter fraud in general and in the vote-by-mail process.

In an interview with CNN last month, Barr said he was basing his concerns on “logic,” though senior U.S. officials have said there is no intelligence to suggest that was happening.

The president has also pointed to an error in Fairfax County, Virginia, where about 1,000 voters were sent two ballots, claiming at the debate that it was evidence that “this is going to be a fraud like you’ve never seen.” But local officials have said it is not a situation that could lead to voter fraud because those who return a ballot will be marked as having voted, preventing them from voting twice.

(AP)



8 Responses

  1. YWN
    Please stop sharing the left’s garbage…

    If it can be done to 9 ballots it can be done to 9 million ballots. The point is clear, Mail in ballots are highly likely to cause cheating, and for the folks who were so worried about a few Russian ads on Facebook and now are pushing a method that can and will have corruption, makes us conclude they want cheating to go on. Because that’s the only way they feel they can win

  2. First of all there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud because like any crime it is hard to catch and people are convinced it doen’t exist so they dont look for it. So the reports of confirmed voter fraud are only the small percentage that were caught noone relly knows how much fraud there was and it may be only a little more than that which was proven or it may be extremely widespread. also there are frequent reports of fraud which are not investigated or reported. There are reports of people in states which do not require voting id who come to vote and are told they cannot vote because they already voted (meaning someone else voted in their name) also people received more than one mail-in ballot (i have heard personally from someone who’s close relative received 2 ballots) and if they got 2 there were probably a lot more people who also did and it was never reported. These ballots were probably counted. There numerous accounts of frau and errors the media just refuses to report them and the politicians refuse to investigate them. As far as Trump’s voter fraud panel saying that they didn’t find evidence of fraud is flagrant propaganda: it makes it sound like they did a full investigation and failed to find fraud which is FALSE they aborted the probe almost immediately when most states refused to cooperate! YWN STOP THE PROPAGANDA AND MISINFORMATION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. For every one of these silly “incidents” that prove nothing and aren’t part of any “grand conspiracty”, there are probably 10X that many voters who will be unable to vote this cycle, both Republicans and Dems, because of the efforts of Red state governors and legislators to make it as difficult as possible to vote remotely.

  4. Thank you Gadolhadorah for the only sane comment on this thread. The other comments are straight from the FoxPropagandaNetwork.

  5. > Gadolhadorah

    But it is equally true that the non-“Red state” remote voting will be so full of election problems that they will dilute the legitimate votes past the point of making all those legitimate votes meaningless.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts