Search
Close this search box.

Merck Says Experimental Pill Cuts Worst Effects Of COVID-19

This undated image provided by Merck & Co. shows their new antiviral medication. Pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. said Friday, Oct. 1, 2021, that its experimental COVID-19 pill reduced hospitalizations and deaths by half in people recently infected with the coronavirus and that it would soon ask health officials in the U.S. and around the world to authorize its use. (Merck & Co. via AP)

Drugmaker Merck said Friday that its experimental COVID-19 pill reduced hospitalizations and deaths by half in people recently infected with the coronavirus and that it would soon ask health officials in the U.S. and around the world to authorize its use.

If cleared, the drug would be the first pill shown to treat COVID-19, a potentially major step forward in global efforts to control the pandemic. All COVID-19 therapies now authorized in the U.S. require an IV or injection.

A pill that could be taken at home, by contrast, could keep many patients out of the hospital, easing the workload on strained health care professionals. It could also help curb outbreaks in lower-income countries that don’t have access to the more expensive infusion therapies.

Merck and its partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics said early results showed patients who received the drug, called molnupiravir, within five days of COVID-19 symptoms had about half the rate of hospitalization and death as patients who received a dummy pill. The study tracked 775 adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were considered higher risk for severe disease due to health problems such as obesity, diabetes or heart disease. The results have not been peer reviewed by outside experts, the usual procedure for vetting new medical research.

Among patients taking molnupiravir, 7.3% were either hospitalized or died at the end of 30 days, compared with 14.1% of those getting the dummy pill. There were no deaths in the drug group after that time period compared with eight deaths in the placebo group, according to Merck.

An independent group of medical experts monitoring the trial recommended stopping it early because the interim results were so strong. That is typical when early results show so clearly that a treatment works that there is no need for further testing before applying for authorization. Company executives said they plan to submit the data for review by the Food and Drug Administration in coming days.

Once the submission is complete, the FDA could make a decision within weeks — and, if OK’d, the drug could be on the market soon after. Merck only studied its drug in people who were not vaccinated. But FDA regulators may consider authorizing it for broader use in vaccinated patients who get COVID-19 symptoms.

“It exceeded what I thought the drug might be able to do in this clinical trial,” said Dr. Dean Li, vice president of Merck Research Laboratories. “When you see a 50% reduction in hospitalization or death that’s a substantial clinical impact.”

Patients take the pill twice a day for five days. Side effects were reported by both groups in the Merck trial, but they were slightly more common among the group that received a dummy pill. The company did not specify the problems.

Earlier study results showed the drug did not benefit patients who were already hospitalized with severe disease.

The U.S. has approved one antiviral drug, remdesivir, specifically for COVID-19, and allowed emergency use of three antibody therapies that help the immune system fight the virus. But all the drugs have to given by IV or injection at hospitals or medical clinics, and supplies have been stretched by the latest surge of the delta variant.

Health experts including the top U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci have long called for a convenient pill that patients could take when COVID-19 symptoms first appear, much the way the standard flu medication Tamiflu helps fight influenza. Such medications are seen as key to controlling future waves of infection and reducing the impact of the pandemic.

Vaccines remain the most effective way of protecting against COVID-19, but effective drugs are critical given that billions of people around the world remain unvaccinated.

Merck’s pill works by interfering with the coronavirus’s ability to copy its genetic code and reproduce itself. It has shown similar activity against other viruses.

The U.S. government has committed to purchase 1.7 million doses of the drug if it is authorized by the FDA. Merck has said it can produce 10 million doses by the end of the year and has contracts with governments worldwide. The company has not announced prices.

Several other companies, including Pfizer and Roche, are studying similar drugs that could report results in the coming weeks and months.

Merck had planned to enroll more than 1,500 patients in its late-stage trial before the independent board stopped it early. The results reported Friday included patients enrolled across Latin America, Europe and Africa. Executives estimated about 10% of patients studied were from the U.S.

(AP)



5 Responses

  1. Use your favorite search engine (hopefully that doesn’t start with a “G”) and search molnupiravir vs ivermectin

    You will find numerous sources noting that Merck was selling ivermectin but it is off patent and so they make very little money off it and that this drug is similar in chemical process but just different enough to qualify for a new (presumably revenue enhancing) patent.

    You will also note that African countries who were treating millions of people with Ivermectin for parasites for many years were showing very low rates of Covid.

    Notwithstanding all the useless “news” from the media (that takes in over $6 billion a year a in pharmaceutical advertising) about not using the horse version of Ivermectin on humans (dosing issues), Ivermectin is also being used by millions in India and their covid rates are plummeting.

    Doesn’t this corporate bait and switch fall under lifnei iver. not putting a stumbling block in front of the blind?

    Good Shabbos, and remember, Hydroxychloroquine, zinc and antibiotics also DO WORK as an outpatient treatment, but only if you start them if within days of infection, so line up a local or online Board Certified doctor who will prescribe them before you get sick, so you don’t waste days searching. and then getting the RX filled.

  2. Amazing!
    If i hadn’t seen the name of this new drug, i could have sworn this is describing Dr. Zelenko’s protocol.
    Same directions.
    Same effect in halting the virus’ reproduction.

    Everything is the same except one thing;

    The studies of HCQ+Zinc that were properly conducted (combined with Zinc and administered within 5 days) have resulted in anywhere between 84% and 95% effectiveness. (Some doctors claimed 99% success.)
    Check it out online. You can also see that ALL the Hydroxy studies that ended in failure have omitted the Zinc and/or were conducted “Late stage”. (way after the first 5 days.)

    p.s.
    One other likely difference:
    The HCQ therapy comes out to around 25 bucks for the entire regimen.
    Whereas this new drug will probably cost many times that price…

    It’s really a Meshugeneh Velt out there.

  3. The first pill?
    Interesting. I recovered from the delta variant by using ivermectin. It worked so efficiently that I didn’t bother to finish the course. But ivermectin is dirt cheap. Merck wouldn’t earn anything from it, so the FDA launched a campaign against it. Why not? They’ve done the same thing before.

  4. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/10/01/when-will-we-have-a-pill-to-treat-covid-here-are-three-antiviral-drugs-being-tested/

    Sorry guys read the article if YWN lets it through.
    Does NOT contain ivermectin.

    In case the mods don’t allow the link. Here’s the gist of it.

    From Forbes:
    Announcements from Pfizer and Merck this week have sparked a flurry of conspiratorial misinformation linking oral antivirals with ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug falsely touted as a Covid-19 cure. The term “pfizermectin” trended on social media following Pfizer’s announcement it was testing the antiviral, with many users baselessly alleging the drug was ivermectin in disguise. There is no evidence ivermectin is effective in treating or preventing Covid-19 and the few studies that do support its use have been found to contain evidence of data manipulation or major methodological flaws. The conspiracies continued Friday after Merck’s announcement, baselessly accusing the firm of burying ivermectin (which it developed and no longer has patent protection on) in order to profit from molnupiravir.

  5. Sorry guys but Forbes (which takes in a fortune from pharmaceutical ads) LIES.

    (They also turned over much of their reporting staff to “woke” fools who promote all flavors of bolshivicker narishkeit. Malcolm Forbes must be turning over in his grave.).

    Again, search on molnupiravir vs ivermectin and see for yourself the similarities in process, and look up “Uttar Pradesh ivermectin” to confirm in the Indian press the success that they have with it.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts