A bipartisan group of senators is pushing compromise legislation to restore abortion access in the wake of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a long shot effort to put a majority of the Senate on the record opposing the decision.
While the bill is not expected to pass — and is unlikely to even get a vote — the legislation introduced by two Republicans and two Democrats on Monday is intended to send a signal to state legislatures and the public that a majority of the Senate supports codifying Roe, even if they can’t get the necessary 60 votes to pass it in the 50-50 Senate.
“We still think there is utility in showing there is a bipartisan majority that would want to codify Roe,” even though the bill doesn’t have enough votes, said Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, who introduced the legislation with Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
The legislation would prohibit most state regulations that prevent abortion access before fetal viability, generally considered to be around 24 weeks. It would allow state restrictions after that point, as long as the mother’s life is protected. It would also protect access to contraception, an issue after Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a concurring opinion to the decision overturning Roe that decisions guaranteeing access to contraception and other rights may need to be revisited.
The bipartisan bill is narrower than legislation preferred by most Democrats — passed by the House but blocked by Senate Republicans — that would have protected abortion rights and expanded them beyond what was allowed in the landmark 1972 Roe v. Wade decision. Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Collins and Murkowski all voted against that bill despite opposition to the overturning of Roe.
Kaine said he felt like Democrats “left votes on the table” after that effort. He said he was encouraged by a new law designed to reduce gun violence that passed the House and Senate after horrific shootings in Texas and New York.
“There were not 60 votes either” for that legislation until members decided that inaction was no longer an option, he said.
Democrats would need 10 Republican votes to overcome a filibuster and get a bill through the 50-50 Senate, but only Collins and Murkowski have publicly backed abortion rights.
By overturning Roe, the court has allowed states to enact strict abortion limits, including many that had previously been deemed unconstitutional. The ruling is expected to lead to abortion bans in roughly half of the states.
Already, a number of GOP-controlled states have moved quickly to curtail or outlaw abortion, while states controlled by Democrats have sought to champion access. Voters now rank abortion as among the most pressing issues facing the country, a shift in priorities that Democrats hope will reshape the political landscape in their favor for the midterm elections.
The support of Kaine and Sinema, a moderate, comes as some activists have accused President Joe Biden and other top Democrats of failing to respond forcefully enough to the decision.
Kaine said there is an increased sense of urgency since the June decision, and suggested he or others may go to the floor at some point and request a vote, an effort that is unlikely to succeed but could call attention to the bill as majorities of Americans say they disagree with the Supreme Court decision.
“People are paying attention to it,” Kaine said.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
3 Responses
Except the Supreme Court said very clearly that abortion rights are governed by the 10th amendment, not the 14th, meaning that to either prohibit or legalize abortion on a federal level requires a constitutional amendment (2/3 of both houses, and approval by 3/4 of the state legislatures).
Also, polling shows that in fact American support for abortion declines radically if the child is viable, when the mother’s life is not in danger, or if the abortion is for what is considered an improper reasons (such as for gender selection), so the blanket legalization the Democrats want will backfire (similarly an absolute ban on all abortions from conception without exceptions for rape or to save the mother’s life, will backfire on the Republicans).
Both parties should worry about less about abortion and peoples’ private matters, and concern themselves with a seriously worsening situation involving the economy and national security.
Wrong, akuperma. So long as the current doctrine on the interstate commerce clause is not overturned, Congress clearly does have the authority to impose a national regulation scheme for abortion, simply because there is an interstate market for it.
Congress could also impose a national ban on abortion, under the 14th amendment. Contrary to your claim, the supreme court did not rule that out. All the court said was that the previously controlling doctrine, that there is a right to abortion hiding inside the 9th amendment and extended to the states by the 14th, was wrong.
Please Hashem, abort this bill.