Search
Close this search box.

Alabama Can Execute Inmate With Nitrogen Gas, State’s Highest Court Says


A divided Alabama Supreme Court said the state can execute an inmate with nitrogen gas, a method that has not previously been used carry out a death sentence.

The all-Republican court made its 6-2 decision without comment on Wednesday. The justices granted the state attorney general’s request for an execution warrant for Kenneth Eugene Smith, one of two men convicted in the 1988 murder-for-hire slaying of Elizabeth Sennett in northwestern Alabama.

The order did not specify the execution method, but the attorney general indicated in court filings that it intends to use nitrogen to put Smith to death. The exact date of the execution will be set later by Gov. Kay Ivey.

The decision moves Alabama closer to being the first state to attempt an execution with nitrogen gas, although there is likely to be additional litigation over the proposed new execution method. Three states — Alabama, Oklahoma and Mississippi — have authorized nitrogen hypoxia for executions but none have tried to use it.

Under the proposed method, an inmate would be forced to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen needed to maintain bodily functions and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents have theorized it would be painless, opponents liken it to human experimentation.

“There are still too many unanswered questions for Alabama officials to responsibly move forward with this protocol,” said Robin Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall praised Wednesday’s ruling, writing that it “cleared the way for Kenneth Eugene Smith to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia,” although he said it was “unconscionable” the family had to wait decades for justice.

Lawyers for Smith had urged the court to reject the execution request, saying he should not be the “test subject” for the new execution method. After the ruling, attorney Robert Grass vowed to keep up the judicial fight, noting in a statement that two justices — Chief Justice Tom Parker and Justice Greg Cook — dissented in Wednesday’s decision.

The state unsuccessfully attempted to put Smith to death by lethal injection last year. The Alabama Department of Corrections called off the execution when the execution team could not get the required two intravenous lines connected to Smith.

Smith’s attorneys have previously accused the state of trying to move him to “the front of the line” for a nitrogen execution in order to moot Smith’s lawsuit challenging lethal injection procedures.

The jury in Smith’s case recommended a life sentence by a vote of 11-1, but a judge overrode the recommendation and sentenced him to death. Alabama no longer allows judges override a jury’s sentencing recommendation in death penalty cases.

Prosecutors said Smith was one of two men who were each paid $1,000 to kill Sennett on behalf of her pastor husband, who was deeply in debt and wanted to collect on insurance. The slaying, and the revelations over who was behind it, rocked the small community. Her husband killed himself a week later. The other man convicted in the slaying was executed in 2010.

(AP)



3 Responses

  1. Why bother with all these new methods? Bring back hanging. It’s clearly constitutional, because it was used for well over a century after the constitution was adopted.

  2. The most humane and certain method is shooting squad. This may be a close second. Lethal injection is ridiculous and is cruel and unusual IMO

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts