Nikki Haley on Trump Mideast Peace Plan: Palestinians Would Benefit More, Israelis Would Risk More

6

U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley gave a hint, but no details, of the Trump administration’s peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians on Tuesday, saying it’s long, takes advantage of new technology, and has a lot both sides will like and things they won’t like.

Haley said Israelis and Palestinians as well as countries around the world have a choice: focus on the parts they dislike, which she said means returning “to the failed status quo of the last 50 years,” or focus on parts they like and encourage peace negotiations to move forward.

The U.S. ambassador, who said she has read the plan, told the U.N. Security Council that “both sides would benefit greatly from a peace agreement, but the Palestinians would benefit more, and the Israelis would risk more.”

Haley, who is stepping down at the end of the month, said moving forward to negotiations and peace “will need leaders with real vision to do it.” She declared: “The world will be watching.”

Immediately before the meeting, eight European Union members stood outside the Security Council chamber and read a joint statement emphasizing the EU’s “strong and continued commitment” to the internationally agreed requirements for Israeli-Palestinian peace — an apparent message to the Trump administration.

“The EU is truly convinced that the achievement of a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as the capital of both states, that meets Israeli and Palestinian security needs, and Palestinian aspirations for statehood and sovereignty, ends the occupation and resolves all final status issues … is the only viable and realistic way to end the conflict and achieve just and lasting peace,” the statement said.

Haley made no mention of any of these issues in her last speech at the council’s monthly Mideast meeting, stressing instead the “unshakeable bond” between the United States and Israel, which she has reflected in her nearly two years as U.S. ambassador.

“Given my record, some might mistakenly conclude that I am unsympathetic to the Palestinian people,” she said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.”

Haley said neither Israelis nor Palestinians should make peace at “any price” but she highlighted the differences between the two sides.

“Israel wants a peace agreement but it does not need one,” she said.

On the other hand, Haley said, the Palestinian people “are suffering terribly, while their leadership clings to 50-yar-old demands that have only become less and less realistic,” and a peace agreement holds the prospects “of a massive improvement in the quality of their lives and far greater control over their political future.”

She said “it is with this backdrop in mind that the Trump administration has crafted its plan for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.”

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said late last month that U.S. officials have told Israel’s government they expects to release the long-awaited Israeli-Palestinian peace plan in the beginning of 2019.

U.S. President Donald Trump calls the plan — drafted by a team headed by his son-in-law Jared Kushner and adviser Jason Greenblatt — the “Deal of the Century.”

Nikolay Mladenov, the U.N. Mideast envoy, told the council he “remains concerned by the weakening of international consensus and the absence of collective efforts to achieve an end to the (Israeli) occupation and the realization of a negotiated two-state resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

“At the end of 2018, we are nowhere closer to reviving efforts for a negotiated solution,” he said. “Without a political horizon, all our collective and individual efforts merely contribute to managing the conflict rather than resolving it.”

Mladenov also reported to the council on Israel’s compliance with a December 2016 resolution that condemned Israeli settlements in lands the Palestinians want to include in their future state and said the settlements have “no legal validity.” The resolution demanded a halt to such activities for the sake of “salvaging the two-state solution.”

The U.N. Mideast coordinator said Israel has taken “no steps” to comply with the resolution and has continued expanding settlements and constructing new ones.

Over the past year, he said that “although Gaza has been the most volatile, the risk of an explosion in the West Bank has also grown.”

Mladenov warned that “the dangerous escalation of terrorist attacks, clashes and violence in the West Bank” in the past days and weeks have led to deaths of Israeli and Palestinian civilians and Israeli soldiers.

Israeli security measures following these incidents, its search operations in the West Bank city of Ramallah, as well as clashes and protests that turned violent “are adding to an already tense atmosphere,” he said.

Mladenov echoed Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in calling on Israeli and Palestinian security services “to work together to restore calm and avoid escalation.”

(AP)




6 COMMENTS

  1. It is not the US’s business to meddle in Israeli interests and Israel is stupid for letting them do so. No country would risk their security and Israel shouldn’t do so either.

  2. Moving the embassy to Yerushalayim was a ruse to gain leverage over Israel in the peace plan, trump said himself long ago that Israel owes him because of that.

  3. “The EU is truly convinced that the achievement of a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as the capital of both states, that meets Israeli and Palestinian security needs, and Palestinian aspirations for statehood and sovereignty, ends the occupation and resolves all final status issues … is the only viable and realistic way to end the conflict and achieve just and lasting peace”

    This statement by the EU is exactly why these “negotiations” continue to fail – namely, they are already declaring their demands for the outcome without actual negotiations. They continue to feed the Palestinians lies and a false sense of hope, based almost entirely on a true anti-semitic agenda. But what can one expect from the Left, which believes that negotiating with “the other side” is giving in.

  4. Not to worry. The Palinazis will reject the plan without even reading it.

    “The Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” – Abba Eban

  5. Ambassador Haley did not announce the terms of the Trump plan for peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. She only announced her opinions of the plan, without actually revealing the plan. This looks like an attempt to create some buzz without providing any meaningful information.

  6. This AP headline is incorrect. If you watch Ambassador Haleys UN farewell speech you will see that she made this comment BEFORE she even mentioned Trumps peace plan. It was a generic statement meant to say that the Palestinians have more to gain and the Israelis more to lose in ANY peace plan. Then afterwards she went on to describe how Trumps peace plan would be different than all others before (though she didnt get into any specifics) and at no point did she intimate that the plan would favor one side over the other which really undermines the whole idea of this “news article”. Just really shoddy reporting by the AP.