Search
Close this search box.

FOR SHAME: UN General Assembly Passes Palestinian Resolution Demanding Israel End “Unlawful Presence” In Gaza

Riyad Mansour, Palestinian Ambassador to the United Nations, arrives at the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024 at the United Nations. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura)

The U.N. General Assembly strongly supported a nonbinding Palestinian resolution Wednesday demanding that Israel end its “unlawful presence” in Gaza and the West Bank within a year.

The vote in the 193-member world body was 124-14, with 43 abstentions. Among those in opposition was the United States, Israel’s closest ally.

The resolution was adopted as Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza approaches its first anniversary and as violence in the West Bank reaches new highs. Troubled efforts to broker a cease-fire deal in Gaza and are pressing ahead, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken meeting fellow mediators Wednesday in Egypt, even as attacks elsewhere in the region raise fears of escalating conflict in the Middle East.

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian U.N. ambassador, called the vote a turning point “in our struggle for freedom and justice.”

“It sends a clear message that Israel’s occupation must end as soon as possible and that the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination must be realized,” he said.

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador, Danny Danon, slammed the vote as “a shameful decision that backs the Palestinian Authority’s diplomatic terrorism.”

“Instead of marking the anniversary of the Oct. 7 massacre by condemning Hamas and calling for the release of all 101 of the remaining hostages, the General Assembly continues to dance to the music of the Palestinian Authority, which backs the Hamas murderers,” Danon said.

While the resolution is not legally binding, the extent of its support reflects world opinion. There are no vetoes in the General Assembly, unlike in the 15-member Security Council.

The resolution also demands the withdrawal of all Israeli forces and the evacuation of settlers from Palestinian territories “without delay.” And it urges countries to impose sanctions on those responsible for maintaining Israel’s presence in the territories and halt arms exports to Israel if they’re suspected of being used there.

In addition, the resolution calls for Israel to pay reparations to Palestinians for the damage caused by its presence and urges countries to take steps to prevent trade or investments that maintain Israel’s presence in the territories.

It comes in response to a ruling by the top United Nations court in July that said Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories is unlawful and must end.

In the sweeping condemnation of Israel’s rule over the lands it captured during the 1967 war, the International Court of Justice said Israel had no right to sovereignty over the Palestinian territories and was violating international laws against acquiring the lands by force.

The court’s opinion also is not legally binding. Nonetheless, the Palestinians drafted the resolution to try to implement the ruling.

The General Assembly’s consideration of the resolution began Tuesday with Mansour stressing that any country that thinks the Palestinian people “will accept a life of servitude” — or that claims peace is possible without a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — is “not being realistic.”

The solution remains an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, living side by side in peace and security with Israel, he said – which Israel has previously offered, and was rejected by the Palestinians.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas Greenfield told reporters Tuesday that the resolution has “a significant number of flaws.”

She said it goes beyond the ICJ ruling and doesn’t recognize that “Hamas is a terrorist organization” in control of Gaza or that Israel has a right to defend itself, she said.

“In our view, the resolution does not bring about tangible benefits across the board for the Palestinian people,” Thomas-Greenfield said. “I think it could complicate the situation on the ground, complicate what we’re trying to do to end the conflict, and I think it impedes reinvigorating steps toward a two-state solution.”

The resolution asks U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to submit a report to the General Assembly within three months on putting the resolution in place, “including any actions taken by Israel, other states and international organizations, including the United Nations.”

“We fully abide by the decisions of the International Court of Justice,” Guterres told reporters. “I will implement any decision of the General Assembly in that regard.”

Mansour said most likely Israel won’t pay attention to the resolution and that the Palestinians will then follow up with a stronger one.

(AP)



8 Responses

  1. It can be assumed that in the future they will pass similar resolutions on Israelis withdrawal from the Galil, the Negev, Jerusalem and the coastal plain. And the UN will continue funding terrorists.

    Trump might be inclined to ignore the resolutions and /or withdraw (or suspend, or limit) American participation in UN activities, though one has reason to feat that Harris will not.

  2. Can we, as Americans, and as New Yorkers, demand that the UN leave the premises at once. They are, sitting on land that NY can place illegal residents into for living quarters.

  3. finely Israel came up with something that blows them up. the way they come to Israel and put bomb’s or being brain washed to blow themselves up and people getting killed.

  4. Just saying, the last article YWN wrote “for shame” was when some holy volunteers risked their lives to bring safety and deterrence in the west bank. I know the Agudas Yisroel Shita is a bit complicated, but don’t forget who the real Jewish heroes are.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts