Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Ooooh, if we’re just gonna make stuff up about other Jews, can I join too
Yes.
I’m anxiously awaiting
He seems pretty bitter. Nebach
It’s fun to blame whatever hashkafa we already don’t like, but I think it fails us when trying to understand the root causes.
Hit the nail on the head.
Examples in this thread of anti-Torah bias:
Blaming the community approach in a community which doesn’t have a higher prevalence
The ludicrous assumption that the troubled kids who haven’t connected with Torah would have connected with secular studies
The lack of recognition that there are definitely programs inside and outside of Lakewood which deal with boys who haven’t connected with Torah
Avirah, you are conflating teaching a woman Torah shebaal peh with her learning it on her own.
Bottom line is that if she’s learning it properly, it’s a mitzvah, but not a chiyuv.
@daas-yochid Getting a job or education is called “twiddling thumbs” now? Are bachurim sitting in the freezer or Eretz Yisroel just being mevatel Torah until they get married?
Of course not. Hence my question to Ari.
Ari, are you implying that girls are sitting around twiddling their thumbs until they get married?
Daas, that’s only chumash, and it’s bedieved; the rambam says it’s better not to do it, but if she does, she gets schar. For anything else, the rambam doesn’t say that she gets schar at all in the context of limud hatorah, and it’s in fact assur to teach Torah shrle baal peh.
If she gets schar, it’s obviously a mitzvah. She’s eina metzuvah v’osah, but regardless, it’s a mitzvah (like mitzvah aseh shehazman grama). The Ranbam is not mechalel between Torah shvaal peh and Torah shebichsav in this regard.
The fact that we shouldn’t be teaching them is a separate point which doesn’t negate the first point. The chiluk between Torah shebichsav and Torah shbaal peh is said regarding this din of teaching her.
Chananya Weissman is an extremist. Not just on shidduchim, but in many other topics as well.
The OP is too outlandish to bother responding to.
Avirah, there is a mitzvah, just not a chiyuv (except for learning practical halacha).
Apparently the most important issue of 2022 is why people like to discuss certain topics on the CR.
Saying something negative about someone for the sole purpose of not keeping everything pent up may be muttar if all of the conditions of lashon hora l’toeles are present.
Of course there’s room to exist and be human, but part of being human is controlling yourself and not “expressing yourself freely” when the purpose is to put someone else down.
Again, though, if the purpose is really for emotional health, speak to a rav about the circumstances and conditions undir which it is permitted (and proper) to say what you need to say.
My point was that you unfairly jumped on someone because you misunderstood his point.
You wrote, “I stand corrected”. You should have left it at that.
The Chazal he brought actually did support his point.
It just doesn’t support your exaggerated version of his point.
Syag, no bitterness.
You certainly come across as bitter.
Which siman in S”A talks about kosher vs. unkosher water?
יו”ד פ”ד
He’s making a simple point that we shouldn’t raise expectations unnecessarily. Not sure what you are reading into his statements that is bothering you so much.
I’m opposed to shidduch pictures because, although someone needs to find their spouse attractive, I think putting pictures on the resume puts the focus on the wrong thing.
He didn’t say the guy would be shattered. He said his expectations would be shattered.
Just because someone wouldn’t or didn’t take the high road doesn’t mean we shouldn’t.
@Dr. Pepper
I do remember your taking “early retirement”, although I don’t remember the cause (I have a vague recollection of your mentioning that your wife only allowed the annual cameo appearance).
Please be דן לכף זכות that he realized his mistake and did תשובה.
Who, jackk, or Rabbi Reisman?
Also, I didn’t realize it was April 1st.
Of course he was. From his hentalach to his feesalach. It’s a b’eirushe sing.
Bump (for nostalgia’ sake)
Not my type?
Its really not a serious question. Without having minimal language, math and science skills, young men and women coming out of yeshivos and BY’s will be functionally illiterate, unable to perform basic functions of paying bills, booking travel arrangements, communicating with medical and service providers, etc. You cannot keep the next generation in a cave forever.
That’s your theory coming from your very closeminded view that education has to take the form you are accustomed to.
But it’s demonstrably untrue, as chassidim who receive a very poor secular education (which I’m not agreeing with, but it’s none of mine or anybody else’s business) make more money than the average, and are able to communicate just fine, even if their grammar isn’t perfect.
Clearly, Dr. Berman’s statement is not merely supporting individuals who are struggling with their yitzrei hora. It is supporting the LGBTQ agenda, just saying they don’t want to be forced to do so.
It’s sickening.
(and 3)
Can we use non-Jewish public assistance in general.
You made up the issue. It’s not really one.
Even as Lakewood Vaad tries to use Rambam.
Strawman. I didn’t ch”v say we never pasken like the Ramba”m. But, the halacha from the Ramba”m you keep citing in your anti kollel diatribes is one we don’t pasken like. Happens to be that it’s an apparrent stirah in the Ramba”m anyhow.
BTW, Avirah, in NYS they are trying l”a to destroy the yeshivos.
I can’t figure out why AAQ keeps pretending that we pasken like that Rambam.
Plain and simple, we don’t. See all meforshim, and I’ll just repeat one more time that R’ Moshe writes that one who can learn but doesn’t because he wants to be “machmir” like the Rambam is following the advice of the yetzer hora.Bravo, Syag, for your valiant attempts to get AAQ to see his hypocrisy and blatant bias, but I’m afraid (just as this post) that it won’t make a dent.
BD”E
MY point is that unless able to earn a living a couple has no business getting married.
תורה מה תהא עליה
There you go again, taking the Rambam out of context, and even more so out of historical and halachic context.
AAQ, it’s not Syag who lost the respect of other posters, it’s ujm.
RK: Doesn’t follow.
The opposite – since we can’t know HKB”H’ specific ratzon, the “discoverable principles” may not be what we think they are.The biggest scientest cannot predict the course of events in human history, on a micro or macro level.
AAQ, are you drunk again (still?)?
R’ Moshe was very much in favor of taking money for learning or teaching.
Why the assumption that it’s a general parenting style rather than one specific case?
Ubiquitin, thank you, but I don’t think I deserve any “credit” for the level of entertainment (or lack thereof) in the cr.
Please respond to the rest of my comment
That’s the part which is interesting.
Ideally, abortion should be legal when halachically appropriate, but not when assur.
We are unlikely to have the law written that way, so what the appropriate position for a Torah Yid to take (and the public position of our institutions) is something for our gedolim to decide.
Didn’t see Bored_teen disputing any points
@yserbius, we are still waiting for a specific source.
I noticed that when challenged, you changed from “Rav Moshe ZT”L said in his teshuvos that we should not fight RvW” to “I believe he also did not like the so called “Pro Life” movement”
I don’t know if he did or didn’t, but that’s the kind of statement you need to back up.
It passed the Senate but is still unlikely to become law.
Everyone is a big tzadik relative to someone under
themExcept for the last one.
His heter was robust, but it was not on his list of shitos that made him not hold of a person who argues (the eruv and worms in the fish are on that list)
Not robust at all. (They are visible without a black background).
Famously, when asked about the water, he responded that he held it was muttar, but others (referring to R’ Dovid Feinstein zt”l) asserted. Interesting that you say that the fish issue was a passeling issue since R’ Dovid was machmir… The eruv issue is based on a machlokes acharonim, so on the actual shaila you can’t passel someone for being meikil, but perhaps since in NYC R’ Moshe’s psak was accepted, he felt it’s מקום שנהגו בו איסור.
If everything you wrote was repeated in this thread, why are you all bent out of shape that they deleted it once?
I think you’re running wild with the conspiracy theories if you think the moderators on Yeshiva World sell NYC tap water.
I’m curious to know what you wrote, but if it was inappropriate, the fact that’s it was “btw” doesn’t kasher it.
Who says there’s a difference between the bugs in NYC water and broccoli? They’re both assur.
From JAMA:
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 and Comorbidities (The I-TECH Study)
Key Points
Question
Does adding ivermectin, an inexpensive and widely available antiparasitic drug, to the standard of care reduce the risk of severe disease in patients with COVID-19 and comorbidities?
Findings
In this open-label randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with COVID-19 in Malaysia, a 5-day course of oral ivermectin administered during the first week of illness did not reduce the risk of developing severe disease compared with standard of care alone.
Meaning
The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.
kohen? Meno. levi?
I didn’t know Meno was its own category
in the olden times הגולל נוטל שכר כולן, Megilla 32, gelilah was greater than everything.
That’s because the person who did Hagbah rolled the Torah.
I am more concerned with my own, and our collective community, human/Jewish obligations and what should we do.
So forget mandates. From a human/Jewish obligation standpoint we should not travel in cars or planes.