Search
Close this search box.

OECD Sets Conditions for Israel’s Entry to Organization


As Israel continues efforts to gain entry to the (OECD) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which will be voting in the spring, the organization is making demands of Israel, which will become the organization’s poorest member if accepted.

Jose Angel Gurria, OECD chairman submitted his report to the Finance Ministry calling for increased implementation and enforcement of laws such as minimum wage, cutting sales tax on private vehicles,

Much of the report appeared to echo the annual Bituach Leumi report on poverty, citing the unacceptable fact that 20% of the country lives under the poverty line and only about one-half of the population earns a wage deemed acceptable for a developed country.

“Israel’s economy has shown resilience during the global recession, but more active education and employment policies – particularly targeted at minority groups – are needed to bolster its economic performance and bridge deep divisions within its society, according to the OECD.” Over 50% of Israelis earn less than NIS 4,000 monthly and 20% are within the OECD parameters defining poverty. The gaps in earnings are a major matter addressed in the report, focusing on two sectors, non-Jews (Arabs) and chareidim.

Following are excerpts from the report:

But there are weaknesses in the Israeli economy, particularly on the social welfare side. One in five Israelis lives in poverty, a higher ratio than in any OECD country, according to the OECD Review of Israel’s Labor Market and Social Policies. Poverty is highest among the youngest and fastest growing population groups: just over half of Arab Israelis and 60% of chareidim, or ultra-Orthodox Jews, have disposable income that is less than half the national median – the standard OECD measure of poverty — compared with just over 10% of the rest of the population.

This reflects low employment levels, particularly among Arab women and chareidi men, and low basic support for pensioners. Overall, about 40% of Israelis aged between 15 and 64 are not working, compared to an OECD average of 33%. Most low-paid jobs with little security are filled by Arabs, chareidim and foreign workers.

At the equivalent of 16% of gross domestic product, public spending on social policies in Israel is low by comparison with the average for OECD countries of 21%., and getting more people from under-represented groups into employment will require increased public spending.

But it will be money well spent, Mr. Gurria made clear. “Real progress on social issues requires a more inclusive society and better chances for all citizens to share the fruits of economic growth,” he said.

To achieve these objectives, the OECD recommends investing more in active labor market policies and in making it worthwhile for low-skilled workers to take jobs rather than stay on the dole. It calls for action to promote fair employment opportunities for minorities in both the public and private sectors and to enforce labor laws and minimum employment conditions more effectively. It also recommends action taken to stamp out illegal hiring and employment practices for temporary foreign workers.

On the education front, the OECD urges action to reduce the inequalities faced by Arab Israelis. It also calls for efforts to encourage the chareidim to strengthen their vocational skills as part of a drive for a more self-sufficient — and less poverty-ridden — balance between religious worship and work.

More generally, the OECD recommends efforts to improve the performance of Israeli secondary-school students in mathematics, reading and science. These could include extending to the upper-secondary sector measures such as extra classes for small groups of pupils that are already in force in primary and lower-secondary schools, it suggests. In tertiary education, it recommends revival of efforts to combine greater resources for universities and colleges with commitments for reform, in particular increased and differentiated student tuition fees and academic pay.

While broadly praising the Israeli authorities’ response to the global downturn, the OECD Economic Survey also points to a range of other weaknesses in economic policy. In particular, it is critical of the continued intervention in foreign-currency markets by the Bank of Israel. The Ministry of Finance’s direct supervision of some financial markets is also regarded as undesirable.

The Economic Survey also emphasizes that while there are legitimate calls for increased spending—such as in social policy—the Israeli authorities should nevertheless reduce the burden of public debt on a sustainable basis. Squaring this with calls for increased spending will be tough: the report stresses the need to cut back on areas of public spending that are the least effective and it makes several recommendations on taxation. Caution in pursuing further corporate and personal income tax cuts is advised, along with the elimination of low-priority tax expenditures. 

Israel is one of five countries, along with Chile, Estonia, the Russian Federation and Slovenia, that were invited in May 2007 to open negotiations for membership of the OECD. Chile has successfully concluded the negotiations and recently signed an accession agreement to become the organization’s 31st member.

(YWN Israel Desk – Jerusalem)



4 Responses

  1. Israel really doesn’t belong in OECD. OECD is a group of developed countries. Like most underdeveloped countries, Israel has a middle class concentrated in the good neighborhoods of the big cities that is clearly “first world”. But most Israelis including (almost by definition, all Hareidim), live in the “third world” part of Israel. While there are some “borderline” cases included in OECD (Turkey, Poland, and Mexico), Israel is at best a borderline candidate to join.

  2. Once again akuperma you feel the need to make your ridiculous comments. Israel is fare more developed than turkey, poland or mexico.

    Israel is being upgraded to the MSCI developed countries index in May. Although, I would not be surprised if you do not know what that is.

  3. #2 – Tel Aviv certainly is a world class city, and far more “advanced” than Mexico City or Warsaw.

    But how do Kitiyat Shmoneh and Mea Shearim rate?

    And then you have the percentage of people with job skills capable of supporting themselves in a modern economy. While Israel is a leader in high tech, the people behind that are almost all from the hiloni minority (i.e. from the “elite” ruling class). If you remove the hiloni minority from Israel, what’s left is hardly in a class with the industrialized country.

    Remember that Turkey, Poland and Mexico are more like “associate” members of OECD (admitted, but with a qualification that they aren’t really there yet).

  4. you miss the point

    Israel is much more advanced as a whole than any of those countries.

    Sometimes its like you just like hearing yourself talking even if it doesnt make sense

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts