Ex-CTLawyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,701 through 1,750 (of 3,304 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1473760
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @funnybone
    It is highly unusual for a client to have to wait for me. Unlike a physician, most of my client contact is by phone, email, fax, etc.
    Should a client have a short wait before being shown into my office (generally caused by my doing something to facilitate the meeting) the client would be offered coffee, cake, a cold drink or snack. I can’t remember the last time a client was made to wait more than 10 minutes for an office appointment with me.
    BUT, unlike Mentsch1, I see less clients in the office in a week than he does in a typical afternoon. I’m far more likely to meet with associates, paralegals, investigators, accountants or other attorneys on my clients’ behalf than with the client during representation. There are many clients who I never see from retainer to resolution.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1473447
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Joseph
    B”H I am not in need of assistance. My posts were merely there to illustrate to Mentsch1 that doctors are not the only professionals to be forced to accept reimbursement rates set by government.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1473448
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Mentsch1
    Thank you.
    This discussion was important so that readers can see that we are operating businesses, even though we are deemed to be ‘professionals’ and that it is not a free market. Government can and does set rates.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1473446
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DovidBT
    I could not refuse in this case. I was obligated to be in the court for the entire day for Jury Duty (and longer if empaneled on a jury). One does not have to be let go by the judge. but can be sent back to the prospective juror waiting room to be on call for other cases.
    I am not a dues paying member of our county Bar Association (but am of the State association), however they set their standard as every member shall provide a minimum of 2 days pro bono work per year. That can cost anywhere from $1500 to $9000 depending on billing rates of the attorney.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A non-solo practice attorney, such as myself can ask the judge to allow a different attorney from the firm to serve if there is a scheduling conflict, but as owner of the firm I’d still bear the cost.
    In general, one does not refuse the legal requests made by a judge.
    The good thing is that we don’t elect trial court judges in CT and never are on the hook for political contributions, etc.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1473336
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Mentsch1
    Just a quick mention of what happened to me today (apropos of my last post).
    Today I had jury duty at the local Superior Court. In CT, attorneys are not exempt and I am called every three years for the obligatory one day service, then if not chosen for a jury and free for the next 3 years.
    I was sent as part of a group of 40 to be interviewed for selection to serve on a murder trial.
    After discussing the case, the judge called us into the courtroom one by one for questioning (Voir Dire). Most prospective jurors were questioned for about 3 minutes. I was on the stand for over half an hour. The judge wanted me to serve, the prosecutor wanted me to serve, the defense attorney was forced to use a peremptory challenge to get rid of me.
    As the judge thanked me for my time and dismissed me from jury service, he informed me that I could not leaver the courthouse, but had been assigned to represent an indigent minor child whose parents were in the family division in the final stages of a divorce.
    So, I spent the entire afternoon providing free legal counsel…with the state determining I should work at a rate of ZERO dollars per hour.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1472548
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @mentsch1
    “What other field allows the government to insist on a person (doctor) to provide services and doesn’t allow the provider to set his own fees.”

    Unfortunately your representation is flawed.
    You only have to treat this group of patients and accept the fixed fees if you CHOOSE to accept Medicaid, Medicare and/or specific insurance company covered patients.
    Many of my doctors have signs at their windows stating they do not accept Medicaid, do not take Medicare assignment (patient is responsible for difference between Medicare reimbursement and full fee) or Insurance company X.

    BTW, I’m a family law attorney. If I take cases in Probate Court (Surrogate’s Court in NY) The percentage of the estate that I can charge for being executor is set for me. If I represent youth in Juvenile Court who are DCF (CPS elsewhere) wards, my hourly rate is set by the court (about 1/3 of what I charge on the open market). I can make the decision whether to do this work or not, I’m not a slave.

    BUT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    At any moment that I am in the courthouse, a judge can snag me and order me to represent an indigent criminal defendant at NO CHARGE (pro bono) where I not only don’t get paid for my time, but must bear the cost of many expenses from my own pocket. Attorneys are expected to take on X number of pro bono case hours per year. Here in CT we don’t have a Government Legal Aid department, so we become indentured servants at times.

    in reply to: Name Game #1471444
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    הגר Hagar

    BTW, if it’s not in the four coprners of the document, it doesn’t exist………………….

    in reply to: Name Game #1471373
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I guess you’ll also go last. Posting a name with a Mem Sofeet, means no new name can be posted (That’s the lawyer in me, looking at everything that’s in print).

    But if I pretend it’s just a mem I’ll post Miryam.

    in reply to: Blue Money #1466880
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DovidBT
    As long as it does not violate state law (in Mass it would): If the restaurant or store posts that it does not accept cash and it is on the menu and/or the server lets you know before you place your order, it is legal.

    they are offering to serve you a meal on their terms and you accept by placing your order…forming a meeting of the minds and a contract for goods/services.

    in reply to: Blue Money #1466833
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DY
    I stated ion my post that the OP shouldn’t worry about an impression made by how he pays his bill.

    My comments about a time gone by (40+ years ago) was not about trying to make an impression, but an impression being made.

    in reply to: Blue Money #1466812
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @litvishechosid

    You can solve your problem by using a DEBIT card. Your date/dining associates won’t think you are living on credit and you don’t have to carry bulky cash.

    I don’t think one should be worried about ‘impressions’ made by how you pay the bill in an restaurant. Today, most legitimate business is done with plastic. In fact more and more goyische restaurants no longer accept cash. I read an article about this in the newspaper within the past month

    When I was young and maintained an office in Manhattan, I had house charge accounts at the restaurants I frequented the most. The check would arrive, I’d take out my pen sign my name and a two digit number. That often made an impression.

    in reply to: London Broil #1464357
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    No, you will not get the same results with a 20 minute wet seasoning as a full marinade session.
    Chicken pieces need only 20-30 minutes to marinate. Beef is much more dense and a 2″ thick piece of shoulder (which is wheat most kosher London Broil is) needs 6-8 hours in marinade in a ziploc bag, turning every half hour to break down the muscle tissue and tenderize the meat.

    BTW> oil is an important component in marinade, just using vinegar and spices will not perform the same chemical reaction as a cheap bottle of generic Italian dressing.

    in reply to: Ikea’s Nazi History #1462085
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    RebYidd23….
    I don’t have ‘fancy shmancy’ furniture. We buy the best we can afford and it lasts a lifetime or longer. That’s what I was taught by my great grandparents and grandparents, I sit typing this comment at my home office desk that my grandfather bought when he opened his Optometrist practice in 1926.
    We have many family pieces that have passed down through the family. We often buy quality used items and reupholster or refinish them. I do not see the value in cheaply made products that don’t last a long time.
    I recently reupholstered (me, not a shop) the seats on our dining room chairs. It’s probably the 4th time I’ve done so in 45 years of marriage. B”H I have the tools and ability. My father insisted that all his sons learn how to use hand tools and do basic, carpentry, plumbing, painting and electrical. We are not cliff dwellers, if you are going to own a house you should be able to do basic maintenance. Mrs. CTL was the granddaughter of a painter. He had only daughters and granddaughters..they all learned to paint, sheet rock and wallpaper.
    The CTL main house has doubled in size since we bought it decades ago. All work was done by us and siblings except for those items such as framing, installing an in-ground pool and plumbing and electrical required to be done by a licensed person in order to get permits and COs.
    B”H, I still get exercise mowing, my lawn , shoveling the snow and taking out the trash.
    The only 2 pieces of furniture I might think fancy are ‘Ebony and Ivory’ our Black and White Grand Pianos. The Black we bought for our children to learn and play on. The White belonged to my late MIL and moved in with us when she did. She taught our children all to play.

    in reply to: Ikea’s Nazi History #1461908
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    No bearing on my decision. I have never spent one cent at IKEA. Not the style or quality of merchandise I desire.

    Bilik iz tayer………ביליק איז טייַער
    Cheap is dear.
    I’m not interested in disposable furniture, etc.

    in reply to: Does the state really support Torah? #1461857
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ZD
    Your point about leaving rural areas for the cities is true among all European people, NOT just Jews. You write of the urban migration of the Industrial revolution of the 1800s.

    @WTP
    In the early 1900s Jewish farming colonies were established in NJ and CT for those Eastern European Jewish poor who managed to get to America. These were great failures because in general, except for keeping a few chickens for eggs and a kitchen garden, these village Jews were not farmers.

    in reply to: Late Weddings: why do they get so late? #1461847
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Takahmamash
    I was not implying that the wedding planner only works or is hired for the day f the wedding. Mrs. CTL and I just don’t require those services.,
    The CTL compound has been the site of over 10 family frum weddings in the past 15 years. I, as a.
    Justice of the Peace, perform civil weddings. The Wisteria covered pergola which forms the entry to our pool area is a desirable site for a wedding ceremony. I may perform civil ceremonies, but they are for non-Jews only. I don’t perform any ceremony involving a Jewish Groom or Bride, and I don’t bother checking into the halacha of their genealogy. If they say they are Jewish,go elsewhere.
    These couples often ask Mrs. CTL (who books my time) if she can recommend florist, photographer, music, and/or caterer who has worked here. She will do so. No sit down affairs or dancing takes place. Typically, the couples are dress in business attire with a daytime ceremony. No gowns with slits, low necks, etc. Chances are these are mature people who are either widowed or divorced and want a low key, private wedding.

    in reply to: Population of frum Yidden: Prewar versus Now #1461697
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Joseph…………..
    I don’t know that the vast majority of those killed in the Holocaust were ‘Frum’ Yidden. I believe the term Ero-traditional may be more appropriate. In most small town/village Eastern Europe there was only one style of shul/davening. People complied to a standard of religious living in public, but perhaps not in private or in thought.
    There were many Jews in big cities who were not ‘frum’ who were carted off and killed.

    in reply to: Does the state really support Torah? #1461696
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @MTAB
    Yes, the point that you made statements about 1700 in Eastern Europe and have absolutely no facts to bact it up is what I addressed.
    To be perfectly honest, I pay no taxes to the Israeli government and therefore have no opinion on how they spent their revenue. That is for the Israeli voters to decide by electing MKs who support what the voters want.

    Rav Miller may have been a brilliant man, but he visited Lithuania in the 1930s, that’s 203+ years after 1700.
    I don’t know what my ancestors were doing in 1700, but I do have full records from 1812 on in Suwalki Province (Poland/Lithuania/Russian Empire) and in the Shtetl of Sapotzske in what is now Belarus. The males worked in the horse, cattle and leather tanning business. They worked full time from Bar Mitzvah age on. They were typical observant poor Jews who did not have the luxury of learning all day, they worked dawn to dusk scratching out a living. It was only after arrival in NY in the 1860s and early 1870s that time for regular learning at night after work came about. No one learned full time until after WWI, when my father’s youngest uncle learned for 2 years after graduating public High School in Brownsville.
    As for my Yekke side, they were city people who arrived in NY in the 1860s. In Germany they had attended Gymnasium and medical school. Life in Big city Germany was far different from an Eastern European shtetl.

    in reply to: Does the state really support Torah? #1461600
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Posting about the year 1700 in Eastery Europe, and when challenged relating a story from 1930s Lithuania is nonsense. You can’t extrapolate from Vilna in 1936 to a village in Galicia in 1700.

    in reply to: Late Weddings: why do they get so late? #1461541
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Joseph
    Not Best Man in the goyische sense, but a trusted agent of the Chosson who handles little details and keeps him on track

    in reply to: Does the state really support Torah? #1461463
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I won’t address your comments about the economics of yeshiva students in current day EY.

    I do highly doubt your statement that hundreds of thousands of each million frum males in 1700s Eastern Europe were spending sizable portions of the day studying in stiebelach in their stetlach. I would suggest that most of them were toiling most of the day attempting to scratch out a living at their restricted means of employment.
    I would challenge you to produce factual evidence to support your claim.

    in reply to: Late Weddings: why do they get so late? #1461449
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    We married off two daughters within the past 22 months.
    Both weddings ran on time.
    I am a stickler for detail and punctuality (Yekke on maternal side).
    Time schedules for performance with monetary penalties were written into contacts for caterer, florist, photographer and band (yes, I’m an attorney and never accept a contract handed me by a supplier…it will be construed in their favor).
    Typically a wedding gets behind schedule in the photography session. Mrs. CTL and I went over the shots to be taken with daughters, SILS and photographer. NO additional shots, setups, locations were permitted. Photographer could take all the candids he desired during the meal, dancing, etc. but not delay the affair.
    My next door neighbor’s wife volunteered and was put in charge of making sure all those to be in a photo were in place at the proper time.
    The mesader kiddushin reviewed the Ketubot the night before with the Chason and both fathers. No time was wasted at the tisch for this.
    We were not at the mercy of the wedding hall for setup time and access as both weddings took place at the CTL compound. Only the first wedding was followed by a dinner affair that night in a Manhattan hotel. No delays for tisch, ceremony, etc. It was called for 7:30 cocktails and hors d’oeuvres and 8:15 sit down for formal dinner and dancing. 10:30 bentching, shevah berachot and speeches. Everyone out at 11:30.

    It was the best man’s job to keep the chason on a timetable. No delays by friends with sthick were to be tolerated. The kallah’s eldest sister was charged to keep her on schedule.

    We did not need/use a wedding planner..we’re good at this task. All vendors were set straight form the beginning that they ONLY took instructions from Mrs. CTL or myself. This avoids delays caused by meeting requests from guests or unauthorized relatives making changes.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1461368
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @mentsch1
    Here in the country things are different.
    No shows and cancellations with less than 24 hour notice are billed a fee (there are exceptions, such as being admitted to the hospital). Don’t pay the fee and chances are the doctor will drop you as a patient.

    Unlike, some of the Frum enclaves often mentioned in the CR, the doctors here are not seeing a large number of Medicaid patients.

    My time is money…that’s what attorney’s do, they bill time. I respect the doctor’s time as well. When booking an appointment I let the receptionist know if I need a brief or extended visit. The internist who is my primary care doctor does not see children. That speeds things up. Also, people who call and say they’ve just come down with a kronk are referred to the walk-in facility in the building, not told to come in and be squeezed in.

    As far as your statement about costs, in this areas almost 50% of MDs have sold their practices to the area hospitals and are employees, not business owners. Excluding my dentist. all of my doctors are in practices now owned by two hospitals. This includes the concierge practice owned by Yale.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1461131
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @mentsch1
    Contrary to your belief, lawyers also help people.
    Unlike doctors, the first consultation is generally free. My firm spends 20% of its time on pro bono cases…work done free for the public good.
    I can’t tell you how to run your practice and schedule your time. That’s your business. I know that you can charge different amounts for a brief office visit and a long one. The problem is that you are constricted by insurance payments, I am not.
    My internist has a concierge practice. I pay an annual fee that grants access and short wait times. Not every doctor offers that nor can every patient afford it.
    My dentist is in the same building as my office. I have his staff trained to phone me when the previous patient gets up from the chair in the procedure room. I am able to be in the room by the time the dentist is ready to see me.
    I dropped my eye doctor when I found he was making 6 ‘first’ appointments, sticking patients in exam rooms and wasting hours of me time.

    I went to my internist for vaccinations this week. He schedules a vaccine clinic each week for three hours. Patients are in and out. No other issues are discussed or treated. He only sees adults as patients. This leads to a much more orderly flow to the workday.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1460982
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @lesschrumras
    There are many occasions for ‘well doctor’ visits: Annual physical, Flu Shots, Eye Exam, every six month teeth cleaning, orthotic adjustment at the podiatrist.

    Not every doctor visit is because one is sick.
    In fact, I went on Monday to update certain vaccinations for travel to travel to southern Africa this month.

    in reply to: Wait time in Dr.’s office #1460837
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    After 30 minutes I get up and walk out. I also refuse to give the receptionist the co-pay before I see the doctor. Once they have your money, they don’t care how long you sit and wait.

    in reply to: Meeting the girl your son is dating #1460350
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I agree that the time to meet your child’s prospective mate is during the dating period.
    We met our children’s mates after the 2nd date and before the 4th. In all cases it was not a formal meeting of Mrs. CTL and I and the you young people in out living room…too stiff and uncomfortable for all involved.
    We arranged for couple to attend a Sunday late afternoon BBQ or meal at our home that included other relatives and friends of the couple. In fact, to make it more comfortable we had our child ask the date to bring a few friends as possibles for our other children or invitees. We watched the social interaction of the young people as a whole and had limited but satisfying interaction with the target bride/groom.
    This worked well for 4 of 5 children.
    The other son in law was the child of friends and we had watched him grow up and didn’t require such a meeting.

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Yes, Eminent Domain is a real threat in the USA ever since the Kelo v. New London case here in CT. It used to be that government could take your land for public use….a school, roads, etc.
    Now the Supreme Court found that government could take your land and transfer it to another private owner.
    Pfizer wanted the New London land to build a large facility. The city felt that employment and taxes were a better use of the land and benefited the citizenry. The courts agreed. All these years later the land is vacant, Pfizer never built.

    BTW> my town took 4 feet depth of my road frontage by eminent domain to put in waste sewers. Not only did they not pay for the land, as they argued home values go up when you have sewers, not septic systems, but I had to pay a $30,000 assessment for the cost of the sewers and $3000 to hook up.

    I have been a member of our town’s Board of Assessment Appeals and heard arguments as to value for eminent domain claims.

    in reply to: People with felony records voting: Ken ou Lo? #1457367
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yehudayona
    Should Rubashkin be allowed to vote?
    He would NOT qualify in Connecticut, as he still has to make restitution and is on supervised release.
    He may qualify in NY, the rules are a bit more lenient.

    What’s my opinion?
    I have lobbied my state legislators to change the law to forbid granting voting rights to convicted felons.
    I don’t care if they are Jews or Goyim

    in reply to: People with felony records voting: Ken ou Lo? #1457337
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Joseph
    Literacy Tests for voting rights were specifically made illegal in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, along with things such as the poll tax. These had been used to keep minorities from voting My father A”H used to keep his NYS Voter Registration Literacy Certificate (issued in the 1930s) framed on the wall in his office. I have it on display in my office now

    in reply to: People with felony records voting: Ken ou Lo? #1457338
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Voter registration requirements in the USA are left to the individual states as long as they do not violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as amended.

    Different states have different rules. Some allow felons to vote from prison, some =never restore voting rights. Some require an individual to petition for restoration. Some base re-enfranchisement on the crime.

    In Connecticut, as long as the felon has completed his/her sentence and parole requirements he/she may register to vote and paid all ordered fines and restitution.

    This means that the CONVICTED FELON Mayor Joseph Ganim of Bridgeport, who was sent to prison for stealing the taxpayers’ money and taking payoffs, was able to become an elector (registered voter) and then run for and win election as Mayor of Bridgeport.

    In the 1950s and 60s Mayor Rado of Naugatuck was convicted and jailed for voter fraud twice. Each time after release and satisfaction of terms of his conviction, he got his vote back and the voters returned this felon to office.

    If your states lets convicted felons vote and you oppose it, lobby your state legislators to change the law

    in reply to: Do you take your shoes off when at home? #1456446
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    When I come into our mudroom from outside, I remove my shoes and put on leather bedroom slippers.
    As Joseph said we don’t walk in only socks unless in a period of mourning.

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1456290
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @WTP
    Different laws in different states is exactly why we have separate Bar Exams for each state. One day National law is tested, day two, state law is tested.
    I am admitted in CT, MA (where I went to Law School), NY and FL. I am old enough that after practicing in CT for 5 years, all I had to do was pay my fee to NY, drive to Albany and be sworn in. Nowadays, I’d have to take and pass the NYS Bar Exam. I took and passed the other exams. I am also admitted to the Federal Bar for my District.

    That said, No one knows every law on the books in their state. Lawyers and Judges tend to keep up to speed on the areas of their practice. Otherwise they look things up or have clerks and paralegals research and report results. I was in court this morning with a Judge in Housing Session, Superior Court. He had just been transferred in after 5 years in the Family Law Division. In one 30 minute session, he stopped and referred to the Connecticut General Statutes (on line version) 4 times before rendering a decision.

    in reply to: Culturally sensitive Purim costumes #1456286
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I have twice submitted comments because Rebbyidd23 tagged me in the original post.
    Neither of my comments has posted. Thank you moderators for allowing my ‘probable’ opinion to be posted and my actual opinion to be deleted.

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1456143
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Shopping613
    Back through the early 1970s, all public school students took a class in Civics while in Junior High School which covered this subject. MY OOT Day School/High School also taught it. OOT schools are far more likely to have a full half day of secular subjects. We constantly read articles on YWN of Yeshivos NOT teaching the government required secular classes, turning out graduates who are ignorant of necessary information to live in the greater world.

    I have three Chinese Foreign Exchange students living in an apartment I own and attending private high school in the US. I mentor them. They all are taking a Government class which deals with the basics of the US legal system.

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1455253
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Joseph
    Not everything in law is reduced to what is in the statute books. Sometimes it is just by precedent. Most states recognize marriages performed by pulpit Rabbis, Ministers, Priests and Mullahs. They are permitted to sign the civil marriage licenses as the officiant. They do not recognize most of these people if they do not hold a pulpit or the pulpit is out of state.
    I’m a Justice of the Peace. When last Ms. CTL was married here at our home this August, the Mesader Kiddushin was from South Africa. He could not sign the CT marriage License, so I signed it.

    See my post about my parents who married in Manhattan with only a Rav as Mesader Kiddushin, not a marriage license. Their marriage was recognized as legal

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1455086
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ZD
    There are only 14 states that recognize Common Law Marriage and in some of them it had to be established in the last century.
    States That Recognize Common Law Marriage
    Only a few states recognize common law marriages, and each has specific stipulations as to what relationships are included:

    Alabama
    Colorado
    District of Columbia
    Georgia (if created before 1/1/97)
    Idaho (if created before 1/1/96)
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Montana
    New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only)
    Ohio (if created before 10/10/91)
    Oklahoma (possibly only if created before 11/1/98. Oklahoma’s laws and court decisions may be in conflict about whether common law marriages formed in that state after 11/1/98 will be recognized.)
    Pennsylvania (if created before 1/1/05)
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    Texas
    Utah

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1455088
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    BTW…from personal experience, Social Security accepts a Ketubah as proof of marriage for benefit purposes.
    My parents OBM, never got a civil marriage license. They were married in Manhattan in the early 1940s. When my mother went to collect a wife’s SS benefit on my father’s earnings she was asked for a copy of her marriage license. She replied, I don’t have one. She said I have a Jewish marriage contract, signed and witnessed. SS told her to bring it is to the office. She said it’s framed and hanging on my bedroom wall along with a wedding photo. SS said bring the frame in and we’ll photocopy it on a blueprint size copier.
    She shlepped the framed ketubah to the New Haven office, it was copied and she rec’d her checks for more than 30 years

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1454997
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @WTP
    The recipient of Social Security (and some pensions) has an obligation to notify SS of a change in marital status. The officiant of a Jewish Marriage marries them, having convinced them not to live in sin, telling them they don’t have to get a government issued marriage license (and record the completed document after the ceremony).
    The officiant knew they were marrying and keeping it a secret form the government to continue receiving finds for which they are no longer eligible.

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1454240
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @MalachofCholent
    Unfortunately yo are wrong about money not keeping people from remarrying, it happens regularly.
    Back in the 90s, my eldest BIL (who was a pulpit rabbi) also assumed the duties of Rabbi at a Jewish Senior Housing facility in the Boston area for a year to cover for the rabbi who was on sabbatical.

    He found quite a few widowed couples who were living together, but had not married. The standard answer was that they could not afford to live on the reduced Social Security or pension benefits.

    He then offered to perform ‘Jewish’ marriage ceremonies with ketubos without the couples obtaining marriage licenses from the government. After performing a few of these, he was told that he had exposure for helping these couples perpetrate a fraud on the pension payers and had to stop.

    in reply to: Golden Age Shiduchim #1454149
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Gadolhadorah
    Why don’t you hear more of this?
    In the USA, such a marriage might got total Social Security benefits received by the individuals, as well as cause the loss of other pension and insurance benefits.
    A wife collecting on her husband’s Social Security benefits gets 50% of his check amount. When he passes away, she then gets 100% of the amount of his check as long as she is a widow. If she remarries, that increase is gone.
    Many pensions have provisions to pay the surviving spouse as long as no remarriage occurs.
    My father’s plan paid my mother’s health costs (above Medicare) as long as she did not remarry.
    I’m a Family Law/Wills and Trust Attorney. Almost every trust we write had surviving spouse’s benefits end on remarriage so that the maker of the Trust can be sure his/her children/grandchildren get every penny set aside, not have any go to a second spouse or their children/grandchildren.

    When people had no or little money it was different. Widowed seniors were married off to keep each other company, save on the cost of maintaining two homes for a single person, and give relief to the children and grandchildren..knowing that the widow/widower was not alone.

    in reply to: Buying Chinese auction tickets with maaser money #1452827
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Thank you Goq,
    I have posted about this offensive term for years. Mrs. CTL and I are proud parents of a daughter who was born and adopted in China. The term is both false and offensive. These charities are NOT auctioning off Chinese….it is not a slave auction.
    I have refused to give one cent to any charity or organization that uses this term.

    in reply to: May a lawyer publicly state that his client is crazy? #1451937
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AviK
    #1 Depends on Jurisdiction
    In many jurisdictions the judge makes the defendant rise and questions whether he/she agrees to the guilty pleas and understands the ramifications. If the defendant says no, the judge may refuse the plea. Judge can order a court psychiatric evaluation

    #2 Morality is a set of beliefs, often personal or religion based. In US legal system Ethics are a set of rules that Attorneys and Judges must follow or be subject to sanctions.

    #3 A judge in charging the jury will remind them that the attorney’s summation is NOT evidence, and has not been given under oath, subject to cross examination and penalties of perjury

    in reply to: Trolls: Jewish or Gentile? #1451775
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AviK
    I did not say this thread should be ignored, I said trolls should be ignored…and it doesn’t matter what religion the troll is

    in reply to: May a lawyer publicly state that his client is crazy? #1451773
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Disclaimer Time:
    I’m an attorney, but don’t practice criminal law.
    That said there is much incorrect information in the above posts………………………..

    @AviK the attorney was wrong to say this to the jury in the death penalty phase. If the client was truly legally insane, the please should have been not guilty because of insanity. Expert testimony and evidence would be entered during the trial to prove insanity. The words of the attorney in summation hold no authority, they may influence the jury, but are not authoritative

    @yytz
    A client may not always fire his attorney, client needs judge’s permission during trial as it may cause delay. If the plea has been one of insanity then the judge may be loathe to allow client to make decisions like this.
    The client’s mental health as a mitigating factor is brought in by expert testimony, NOT simply by an attorney’s statement which is not part of the trial required to be considered by the jury.


    @Joseph

    Morality is a religious question, Ethical is a legal standards question in American Jurisprudence. An attorney can not cause a danger to society to be lefty free in society, the trier of fact (judge and/or jury) does that. The Defense Attorney has the ethical responsibility to advocate his best for his client. The Prosecuting Attorney should be trying to keep people whop are dangers to society off the streets.

    in reply to: Refusing to take a get. #1451278
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @David111
    Legally binding under what court system and subject to whose penalties?

    In the USA, due to First Amendment Considerations…secular courts would be loathe to enforce a religious contract and could not fine or imprison a party to such a contract for non-performance.

    In my area of CT, I am a Family Law Attorney and in the past 20+ years I have got Superior Court judges to approve divorce settlement language that states which party shall pay for the Beis Din/Get, but not language to require a Get be issued. They accepted my argument that the payment is merely contract law, not religious law. A party found in contempt is then subject to penalties as permitted by secular law.

    in reply to: Bar Mitzvah Cost #1451277
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @groissechuchum

    “bar mitzvah lessons (parsha and haftorah) are typically $65 for 35 min once a week for a year before the bar mitzvah = approx. $3k”

    Maybe in your neighborhood, not in ours.
    Bar Mitzvah lessons come along with synagogue dues, here in suburban CT. They are taught either by the shul Rabbi or Educational Director (the Talmud Torah principal who deals with the members who attend public or private non-Yeshiva schools). It is customary to give the teacher a $300-500 gift at the end of the teaching. Takes about 6 months twice a week for an hour. The initial Trop classes are held for all Bar Mitzvah boys in the shul as a group. Haftorah and leyning of the specific parsha is private.

    Our grandsons’ day schools teach the trop to all 6th grade boys as part of regular classes.
    In my day, one went to the local Hebrew Book Shop and bought a 78RPM record and the Parsha/Haftorah booklet for about $10 a set. The shul Shammos gave lessons Tuesday nights and Sunday afternoons for about $1 per lesson. My zeidy taught me and my sons. I have taught 2 of my grandsons , the others have been taught by my SILs’ fathers..they didn’t want a Litvak (Tayrah) pronunciation.

    in reply to: Trolls: Jewish or Gentile? #1451276
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Ignore

    in reply to: Are people who like blueberry pie headstrong and opinionated? #1449479
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I do not like Blueberry Pie
    I do not like berries in any shape or form
    No Blueberries, Strawberries, Blackberries, Raspberries, Gooseberries, Huckleberries
    I am an equal opportunity berry hater…no discrimination by color

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @iacissrmma

    The CDC is not wrong. They leave the decision to the states. Then some states such as CT, pass this to local health districts (some are one municipality, some multi)

    I still teach one course a semester as an adjunct in a Mass, Law School. When I teach either Local Government or Constitutional Law, I always make a point that the only government entities that exist under the constitution are the Federal and State levels. Local government is a creation of the individual states. CT did away with County Government in about 1960. Approx 6 years ago, a local town was uncooperative in building a regional Magnet High School. The Governor and State Legislature got upset with the local First Selectmen, so they simply took almost 50 acres of that town’s land and annexed it to the abutting municipality and built the school on it. The town had no standing to stop this, states can redraw boundaries at will.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,701 through 1,750 (of 3,304 total)