Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 120 total)
  • Author
  • in reply to: Joining Chabad #1701577

    Also very respected in lubavitch – btw hes a genius
    As far as I know He Doesn’t trim he’s beard
    But who am I to know

    Vos epes enemy? All jews are a part of g-d!

    Btw this is way off topic

    in reply to: Chabad? Most non religious Jews are not halachikly Jewish. #1700456

    Heimy maybe find out if you are takeh jewish maybe one of ur great grandparents were not jewish and only thought they were jewish for whatever reason so ur not jewish.
    (All on ur mothers side ๐Ÿ™‚ )

    That’s what i understand from your question

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1700339

    Not sure what u mean but sounds good

    Hilchos chometz umatza perek 7 halacha 2:
    A father should teach his son according to the son’s knowledge: How is this applied? If the son is young or foolish, he should tell him: “My son, in Egypt, we were all slaves like this maidservant or this slave. On this night, the Holy One, Blessed be He, redeemed us and took us out to freedom.”

    If the son is older and wise, he should inform him what happened to us in Egypt and the miracles wrought for us byย Moses, our teacher; everything according to the son’s knowledge.

    You decide

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1700084

    @lmt you’re mixing kashe mit borsht
    99.9% of “gedolim” that have a prob. with chabad. say very clearly it’s only those that say lo meis.
    None of them have a problem with the moshiach stuff
    Just to name a few
    R Herschel Schachter
    R Nissin Kaplan
    R Shmuel Kamenetsky
    (so get your facts straight – btw in no way am I saying that i need them for proof, its just for u)

    Now regarding the lo meis


    Second of all we are on a totally diff topic as mentioned previously on this thread and was answered before

    now you have a bunch of questions to answer from @chossid
    You still didnt explain the 13 ikrim to say how we go against it – you just wrote that we go against it.

    Btw according to you… You shouldn’t eat any food that have a major hechsher cuz allot of the mashgichim in the big hechsherim (especially when the plants are in random places) are lubavitcher which according to u is avoda zara and mistama chshash treif…

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1699182

    Before, u may have been talking logic now it’s just utter nonsense

    in reply to: How to become a Gadol (not the bar mitzva kind)? #1698969

    “Problem difference with rebbes that doesnโ€™t apply to Gedolim is that some chassidim push it too far and treat their Rebbe like a g-d. We wonโ€™t mention which kinds of chassidusis you can think about it and maybe you can figure it out on your own”

    Where’d this come from?

    It’s funny how every single thread end up with the same things and it comes from right field (rebitzen might argue and say left:)) .
    did you really have to make this comment?

    I was asking something totally diff. Which u happened to answer nicely in the first paragraph

    in reply to: How to become a Gadol (not the bar mitzva kind)? #1698931

    pls explain the dif between a rebbe and a gadol
    Why is one a middleman and one goes Directly to Hashem

    Unless I misunderstood what you wrote


    Assuming your allowed.
    what if you your walking down the st and find $100 and a piece of lettuce are you allowed to pick it up and bring it home so that you can have it just in case you get a nosebleed next week? Which one should you take?
    (Obviously taking into consideration the carrying problem)

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1698867

    Regarding Shanghai
    When the Rebbe Rayatz came to America, he launched his own Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah to save Chabad Yeshiva Bochurim, and after being approached by the Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah and promised that the Chabad Bochurim will be recipients of the funds, the Rebbe Rayatz closed his own Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah and told his donors to donate to the main Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah.

    However, unbeknownst to the Rebbe Rayatz, the Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah, which was controlled by Rabbi Aharon Kotler and Rabbi Avraham Kalmanowitz (Rosh Yeshiva of Mir), made a policy to only help Bochurim of Litvische Yeshivos. They sent the money to Shanghai, addressed to Rabbi Meir Ashkenazi, with orders that the money be given to everyone aside for Chabad Rabbi Meir Ashkenazi did not heed their directions, and used part of the funds for the Chabad Yeshiva students, knowing that the funds were given by donors who wished that Chabad students enjoy it too.

    When this was discovered, the Vaโ€™ad Hatzalah stopped sending money through Rabbi Ashkenazi, and instead sent it directly to the Mir Yeshiva stationed in Shanghai. As a result, Bochurim from Chabad Yeshiva, Amshinov Yeshiva and Yeshivas Chachmei Lublin were left to starve, and some of them died.

    While this was going on, Rabbi Aharon Kotler called Rabbi Meir Ashkenazi to a Din Torah, asking for the funds that Rabbi Ashkenazi used for Chabad students during the war, and demanding he pay it back.

    When the Din Torah took place, Rabbi Ashkenazi presented his claims to the Beis Din, and the Beis Din found that Rabbi Aharon Kotler actually owes money to Rabbi Ashkenazi for risking his life to get the money from the embassy which was extremely dangerous cuz it was illegal to send money from the u.s. to Japan due to the fact that they were in war at the time.

    You can find letters online regarding what was happening at the time I will post a link in the next post

    you really never opened a gemora b4 cause ur arguing with even simple gemoro

    Obviously it’s a hergesh. nowhere in halacha it says “the lubavicher rebbe is moshiach”
    Rather based the criteria of moshiach we feel the rebbe fits this if you feel otherwise that’s ok (I think I said this a few times already and as long as no one is going against halacha I don’t see why anyone should care who we feel is moshiach)

    If you thought it was a halacha. I’m sorry

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1698222

    Wow I’m impressed with you

    You know how to distort history even better then Bryan Mark rigg
    He at least quotes a whole story you on the other hand took a line from his book that works for you
    Read page 168 in his book
    Where he total disagrees with you

    As I mentioned before if only you knew how much mesiras nefesh the 6th rebbe had you wouldn’t dare say such things

    You’ll bring me proof from historians. That didnt find anything. Does that mean it didnt happen??
    The making of a gadol has a very political agenda
    Your only proof may have been from bryan Mark rigg but as I said you took 1 line from what he said

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1698129

    Rebitzen I think I disagree with you pls lookup facts before you speak
    I dont think it can be any of your 2 candidates

    “Widely thought to be the largest funeral attendance in history, 15 million people took to the streets of Chennai in memory of the former chief minister of Tamil Nadu, a southern Indian state”

    ื ืคืจื™ื™ืœื™ื›ืขืŸ ื—ื ื•ื›ื”

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1698100

    This is not my opinion nor is it necessarily the chabad opinion but I thought I might share something to clarify this whole meshichist/yechi thing- if you like it – good. if not, not. But not for upshlog.

    If someone gets inspired to do any mitzvah from learning something which everyone else says, has nothing to do with what he got inspired to do (he may have even read the words wrong)
    I hope you get the moshol.

    We say the rebbe is nosi hador/moshiach shebidor

    And Al pi poshut pshat the gemora says “yaakov lo mais” -which on a simple level means kipshuto.

    From all this we get inspired to add in our observance of Torah and mitzvos.

    You say we learnt it wrong? that’s ok, everyone is entitled to an opinion. but as long as Its not taking away from Torah and mitzvos but rather it helps ppl add in Torah and mitzvos What do you care how we came to this inspiration.

    If you feel that RAK or someone else is the nosi hador/moshiach shebidor and it helps you add in Torah and mitzvos – gezunterheit.

    No need for arguments

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1698001

    “Not all, just the machmirim”

    About the book
    The cutting and growth of the beard in Jewish law is the subject of this encyclopedic work, over 1000 pages in length and the result of over 30 years of research.

    The author has compiled a phenomenal array of sources spanning the centuries, including opinions across the spectrum of Jewish law, the Kabbalistic view, and astonishing anecdotes of Jews self-sacrifice to keep their beards.

    The reader will unquestionably come away with a deepened appreciation for the beauty and significance of the Jewish beard.

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697984

    You have pretty random things to say nothing rellevent to this CR
    I think you should start a new thread for your apikorses

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697972

    on Rav Shach ztโ€l, who had 10 times the amount of people at his levaya than the Rebbe
    Who said that’s what defines a nosi??
    I feel bad if thats how you define one

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697969

    The Rebbeโ€™s father-in-law spoke very harshly of the Jews in Europe, saying they deserved to die in the holocaust,
    Where did you see such lies ??
    If you only knew how much mesiras nefesh to he had no normal person would ever say such a thing

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697736

    Once weโ€™re on the topic of Rav Shach ztโ€l, Rav Shach ztโ€l was rather clear in his denunciation of Lubavitch and called it avoda zara. In return for his kind-hearted efforts to save a large portion of klal yisroel from eveira, he was called โ€œShachโ€ and โ€œmibnei banav shel Haman limdu torah bebnei brakโ€. He was not denouncing Lubavitchers, which is a big difference

    several ponts to consider (i dont think any of us can say who is right or wrong)
    One was the Rebbe’s innovation of learning Rambam everyday to finish it in 1 years or 3 years. R. Shach mocked it saying that people already knew of the Rambam before the Rebbe came around, and he said that no one should follow the Rebbe’s Rambam learning cycle. (He supported daf yomi, and never rejected it saying that people knew of the gemoro before R. Shapiro). He gave two reasons: that people will pasken from the Rambam and it will disrupt seder. Neither of these points seem to be valid, as people who learn Rambam know that we don’t always pasken according to the Rambam; and the Rebbe was very adamant that chitas and Rambam should not be learned during seder.

    Another thing of contention was whether you can give land of Eretz Yisroel away. The Rebbe was very against giving away land, while R. Shach supported giving away land for “peace”.
    The Rebbe got very upset when R. Shach spoke really sharply against non religious Jews and kibbutznikim, saying that they forfeited their right to be called Jews. The Rebbe said that “every Jew is part of Godโ€ and that โ€œanyone who berates any Jew is touching the apple of Godโ€™s eye. (The Rebbe was always careful to only speak of other Jews favourably, similar to the derech of the berditchiver.)

    as we see slowly that more and more non lubavtichers relize this (E.g. aish hatora)
    and other kiruv

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697721

    @rso regarding #5
    are you gonna tell me that moshiach is only from the few ppl mentioned in the gemoro and it cant be anyone else (i mean it also says that moshiach is rabeinu hakadosh if its from those that are alive.
    will you tell me that only daniel or rabunu hakadosh are moshiach?????)

    have you ever learnt gemoro b4

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697703

    You really want people to bring sources to prove Chabad Meshichism is a thing
    i know its a thing. but im not sure which comment your referring to


    1 “There is no such thing as Nossi Hador nowadays, and there hasnโ€™t been for thousands of years”
    every generation has a nosi hador – it doesnt just stop ( if you KNOW what the definition of nosi hador is)

    We consider the Rebbe to be nosi hador based on our hergesh if you feel that your rov is the nosi hador -gezunterheit
    nosi hador is moshiach shebidor if you think your rov is nosi hador / moshiach shebidor we will find out – TODAY.
    i cant argue on that

    to 3, 4, and 5
    as @SH just mentioned (although we may not agree on everything but on the fact that you need to open a sefer again i think we both agree)
    open a sefer and learn the sugya – ill bring more detail soon unless someone else answers first

    on a side note based on the TRUE definition of a meshichist i hope every jew is one.

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697711

    “The Gemoro in Sanhedrin 98b DOES NOT say that the talmidim thought their rebbes were moshiach. Neither Rashi nor the Maharsho say so. Of course, you can interpret that thatโ€™s what the talmidim really meant (as a lubavicher you should be able to interpret anything to fit what you want it to mean, as that is what you are good at) but they donโ€™t say that at all.”

    Sanhedrin 98b
    ืžื” ืฉืžื• ื“ื‘ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ืฉื™ืœื ืืžืจื™ ืฉื™ืœื” ืฉืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ืžื˜, ื™) ืขื“ ื›ื™ ื™ื‘ื ืฉื™ืœื” ื“ื‘ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื ืื™ ืืžืจื™ ื™ื ื•ืŸ ืฉืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ืชื”ืœื™ื ืขื‘, ื™ื–) ื™ื”ื™ ืฉืžื• ืœืขื•ืœื ืœืคื ื™ ืฉืžืฉ ื™ื ื•ืŸ ืฉืžื• ื“ื‘ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื ื™ื ื” ืืžืจ ื—ื ื™ื ื” ืฉืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ื˜ื–, ื™ื’) ืืฉืจ ืœื ืืชืŸ ืœื›ื ื—ื ื™ื ื” ื•ื™ืฉ ืื•ืžืจื™ื ืžื ื—ื ื‘ืŸ ื—ื–ืงื™ื” ืฉืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ืื™ื›ื” ื, ื˜ื–) ื›ื™ ืจื—ืง ืžืžื ื™ ืžื ื—ื ืžืฉื™ื‘ ื ืคืฉื™ ื•ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืืžืจื™ ื—ื™ื•ื•ืจื ื“ื‘ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ืฉืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ื™ืฉืขื™ื”ื• ื ื’, ื“) ืื›ืŸ ื—ืœื™ื™ื ื• ื”ื•ื ื ืฉื ื•ืžื›ืื•ื‘ื™ื ื• ืกื‘ืœื ื•ืื ื—ื ื• ื—ืฉื‘ื ื•ื”ื• ื ื’ื•ืข ืžื•ื›ื” ืืœื”ื™ื ื•ืžืขื•ื ื”
    translation from sefarya .org
    the Gemara asks: What is his name? The school of Rabbi Sheila says: Shiloh is his name, as it is stated: โ€œUntil when Shiloh shall comeโ€ The school of Rabbi Yannai says: Yinnon is his name, as it is stated: โ€œMay his name endure forever; may his name continue [yinnon] as long as the sun; and may men bless themselves by himโ€ . The school of Rabbi แธคanina says: แธคanina is his name, as it is stated: โ€œFor I will show you no favor [แธฅanina]โ€. And some say that Menaแธฅem ben แธคizkiyya is his name, as it is stated: โ€œBecause the comforter [menaแธฅem] that should relieve my soul is far from meโ€. And the Rabbis say: The leper of the house of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi is his name, as it is stated: โ€œIndeed our illnesses he did bear and our pains he endured; yet we did esteem him injured, stricken by God, and afflictedโ€

    explain this – why were they trying to find names of their teachers as the name moshiach???

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697708

    ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื ื—ืžืŸ ืื™ ืžืŸ ื—ื™ื™ื ื”ื•ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืื ื ืฉื ืืžืจ (ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืœ, ื›ื) ื•ื”ื™ื” ืื“ื™ืจื• ืžืžื ื• ื•ืžื•ืฉืœื• ืžืงืจื‘ื• ื™ืฆื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ืื™ ืžืŸ ื—ื™ื™ื ื”ื•ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ืื™ ืžืŸ ืžืชื™ื ื”ื•ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ื“ื ื™ืืœ ืื™ืฉ ื—ืžื•ื“ื•ืช
    translation from sefarya .org
    Rav Naแธฅman says: If the Messiah is among the living in this generation, he is a person such as me, who already has dominion over the Jewish people, as it is stated: โ€œAnd their prince shall be of themselves, and their governor shall proceed from their midstโ€ (Jeremiah 30:21), indicating that the redeemer is already in power. Rav says: If the Messiah is among the living in this generation, he is a person such as our saintly Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, who was renowned for his sanctity, piety, and Torah knowledge. If the Messiah is among the dead he is a person such as Daniel, the beloved man.

    ืื™ ืžืŸ ื—ื™ื™ื ื”ื•ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ – ืื ืžืฉื™ื— ืžืื•ืชืŸ ืฉื—ื™ื™ื ืขื›ืฉื™ื• ื•ื“ืื™ ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื“ืกื•ื‘ืœ ืชื—ืœื•ืื™ื ื•ื—ืกื™ื“ ื’ืžื•ืจ ื”ื•ื” ื›ื“ืืžืจื™ื ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื‘ื ืžืฆื™ืขื (ื“ืฃ ืคื”.) ื•ืื ื”ื™ื” ืžืื•ืชืŸ ืฉืžืชื• ื›ื‘ืจ ื”ื™ื” ื“ื ื™ืืœ ืื™ืฉ ื—ืžื•ื“ื•ืช ืฉื ื“ื•ืŸ ื‘ื™ืกื•ืจื™ืŸ ื‘ื’ื•ื‘ ืืจื™ื•ืช ื•ื—ืกื™ื“ ื’ืžื•ืจ ื”ื™ื” ื•ื”ืื™ ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืœืื• ื“ื•ื•ืงื

    your saying according to the second opinion in rashi:
    ืœ”ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื›ืœื•ืžืจ ืื ื™ืฉ ื“ื•ื’ืžืชื• ื‘ื—ื™ื™ื ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื•ืื ื“ื•ื’ืžื ื”ื•ื ืœืžืชื™ื ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ื“ื ื™ืืœ ืื™ืฉ ื—ืžื•ื“ื•ืช:

    starting basic

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1697431

    “Very possibly Chazal”

    Obviously it’s mutar am pi halacha the question is when it came into a regular day-to-day thing

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1697377

    When did shaving beards come into the lifish mesorah as far as I know before the war everyone had beards

    I’m not asking from a halacha standpoint obviously that was figured out

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697329

    Who’s milhouse ?
    I remember hearing the opposite

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697128

    As far as rak and not reb ahron kotler it’s called roshei teivos
    As in rashi
    And anyone else
    But if if you want to accuse me of being mevaze talmidei chachomim. I’m ok with that

    Now that we cleared that points can you explain the other part that I mentioned regarding Shanghai??
    Or do you not know what I’m talking about?

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697120

    Regarding what you’re saying before 3 tamuz, no one ever said that it cant be someone who is dead.
    There was no need to go down that path

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697108

    Sorry I meant @sl

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697106

    I alreally brought my points regarding RAK regarding Shanghai you can search the web for the documents from those days

    That’s because no one has actually ever brought up any sources they only said things that they heard as I already mentioned before which you clearly didn’t read

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1697053

    The hater part has to do with people who are saying things without knowing facts or not having any sources what they’re saying as someone commented before that they never actually saw something happening they just heard about it
    Go explain

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696982

    What’s a connection with all this to moshiach sheker?
    Where do you see such a thing

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1696881

    There is a 15 page application form
    I thought that was only for chabad

    5. Bash chassidic groups, extra credit for bashing Chabad
    Now I understand!
    How many extra points do you get maybe I’ll switch sides

    6. Love your fellow Jew โ€“ who is Litvish
    And the rebbetzin

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696879

    Gedolim attend chabad weddings because chezkas kashrus that they donโ€™t fully believe the nonsense like โ€œatzmusโ€ and are fully aware the Rebbe died 25 years ago and isnโ€™t alive. But go around litvish yeshivos instead of going by what people say hear and you will quickly see that Chabad is very suspect, and that they are at least chochesh for the view of Rav aharon Kotler ztโ€l that Chabad is avoda zara. Considering some chabadsker sent Rav Shach ztโ€l a noose in the mail, I donโ€™t blame everyone for being silent in public. The talmidim know the truth.

    Read what you wrote again again you sound like an oxymoron

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696878

    All of the sudden your allowed to make fun of a talmid chochom – someone that learnt a bit more Torah then you??
    No need to go into any more details you get the point I’m being moche for on what your saying.
    And unless you have clear sources for what you say (not just repeating lashon hara) I think this conversation is not something YOU should deal with.

    And btw
    Who ever said gemora & shulchan aruch is not important
    You’re hearing a lot of things from places full of hate you didn’t bring one reliable source anything you claimed against Chabad
    Some of the comments that were posted recently even admitted they never saw what they claimed actually happening. They just heard about it

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1696728

    Make sure to learn ืฉืžื™ืจืช ื”ืœืฉื•ืŸ from the chofetz chaim.

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696657

    He also put out pamphlets saying the Litvish yeshivas were full of kefira. (This is in Making of a Gadol for those who need a source) .
    more lashon hara??????
    i learn new things every day
    i never realized how much lashon hara goes around in your circles

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696656

    “actually, the name Misnagdim came from you guys, ”
    incorrect. the misnagdim called themselves misnagdim (i know it sound funny) but thats a fact
    again you say thing without knowing facts.
    “As mentioned, Chabad believes that only learning chassidus can bring the geula”
    where’d you hear such a thing
    the Rebbe went further than most chassidim with violations of the 13 ikkarim.
    answerd by @chossid
    his skepticism of the 6 million number is the one that broke the camelโ€™s back
    i didnt mean specifically that but b”h you got the point.
    (i thought your leaving the CR:) )
    So here you are being mivazeh a Talmid Chochom
    just stating facts about the lashon hara – look it up
    you still never explained how its possible to moser on someone a false libel just because you disagree with him
    This led to the โ€œShangaiโ€ disputes over who is a ben Torah worthy of the chaluka from Rav Kalmanowitz ztโ€l and Rav Aharon Kotler ztโ€l and who should rely on the Joint Distribution Committee.
    could you explain why they wrote clearly “that the money from the joint is not for chabad” and not just a criteria of a ben torah?????

    Where you around for the last three threads on this subject the last of which was one of the longest on this site?
    yes – i know very well his position
    and all the lashon hara you guys hear – making things up without ever seeing or hearing

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696556

    Never said anything against him I was asking about his
    Ruach hakodesh
    And btw abt the cherem part it’s facts go look it up.

    Explain the 100 days thing please
    I never knew that’s how it work
    Y davka 100?

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696522

    Btw he was just banned from entering the UK because hes a radical… No proofs from him. – and he prob Holds your not jewish…. Look him up he claims only 1 million jews died in the holocust

    I’ll answer the other part later – that question was one of the first questions ever asked about chabad

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696510

    Another trivia question:
    Where did the name misnagdim come from?

    It came from the misnagdim themselves
    And btw they called the chassidim the freiliche.

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696509

    As I said he was told lashon hara
    Why should I assume he had ruach hakodesh if it’s written that the only reason why he made the charem was because of what he heard – which was a lot of lashon hara – look it up

    Dont you yourself say theres no ruach hakodesh these days?

    @ncb you’re really trying hard – good job – I admire ppl that fight for what they think is right.

    And btw you misunderstood the halacha/kabala thing which I didnt explain
    But it’s not againsthalacha or kabala what is done
    Achilas kava
    I think you were also told a lot of lashon hara abt chabad
    There may be a few that do eat but that you have in every group, nothing to do with chabad

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696395

    but rather that you have COMPLETELY done away with any Mussar whatsoever.

    Have you ever learnt chassidic to say such a thing?
    Chabad may not learn mussar as a subject but chassidus is full of mussar albeit a diff. Style then what your used to.

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696394

    Achilas kava ? Where’d you see or hear of such a thing.
    Lo sochlu al hadam
    Do you follow gemora or a clear psak shulchan aruch that its mutar?
    anyone who is Mevazeh Talmidei Chachamim.
    When did this happen

    Also did you ever hear why the vilna goan put the them in cherem? I’ll tell you a secret it had to do with him being told lashon horo

    Another point I’m sure you heard: that the misnagdim mosered on the Baal hatanya a false libel which ended up with the Baal hatanya being arrested – does this also have to do with claiming that someone was mevaze talmidei chachomim?
    Itโ€™s a Chabad chiddush that you should for some reason avoid bread like itโ€™s some kind of issur

    Are we talking abt halacha or kabala
    But don’t say that its ageinst halacha
    Again you guys really need to learn a bit more before you say something against someone else

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696358

    @lmt your funny I love how clueless you are abt chabad, your arguments date back to the times of the Baal hatanya all of which are answered at great length in seforim
    I think the chofetz chain disagrees with your halachos

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1696184

    eating before shachris
    Orach Chaim 89:3 and 4
    one whose hunger or thirst would affect his ability to concentrate on his prayers. the rambam explicitly states that one who is hungry and feels that he will not be able to concentrate should eat before praying

    So, eating before praying is not unique to Chabad โ€“ as demonstrated above, it is normative Jewish law. Nevertheless, it is more prevalent in Chabad because in Chabad it is traditional to study chassidic teachings before the morning prayers,

    seudas shlishis
    Minhag Chabad is to make sure to taste something for Shalosh Seudos, they donโ€™t wash for bread because of the Posuk โ€œHayom Loโ€.

    What this means is as follows: The Gemarah in Shabbos learns out the obligation to eat 3 meals of Shabbos from the following Posuk: โ€œAnd Moshe said, eat [the Monn] today (Hayom), because today (Hayom) is a Shabbos for Hashem, today you will not (Hayom Lo) find [the Monn] in the fieldโ€. Since the Pasuk says the word โ€œHayomโ€ 3 times (when speaking about the Monn which served them as bread), we learn that one must eat 3 meals on Shabbos.

    Based on the words of Rabbeinu Bechayei the Tzemach Tzedek rules (Piskei Dinim Chiddushim on Rabbeinu Yerucham p. 357) that since this meal is learned from the words โ€œHayom Loโ€, unlike the first two meals which are learned from the word โ€œHayomโ€, we donโ€™t need to eat bread for Shalosh Seudos, unlike the first two meals

    davening late
    nothing to do with chabad, sorry.

    not Learning Mussar- or ANYTHING that isnโ€™t Chassidus
    where did you got such nonsense from

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1695729

    I think that’s just blasphemous to say such thing about other jews

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1695665

    ncb could you elaborate?
    The different minhogim between other chassidim and chabad
    And why only chasam sofar or rama?

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1694813

    This Thread was quite funny until people took this personal

    Don’t worry about rebbetzingoldenpupik she(/he – so she claims) has a good sense of humer. Especially cuz she has no clue abt anything in chabad.

    – yes she may have been making fun but she definitely holds of ahavas yisroel so shes allowed to, no?

    in reply to: Joining Chabad #1694502

    Btw you forgot the 7 mitzvos drabanan


    Someone related that the word ื™ื™ืŸ (wine) has the same numerical value as the word ืœืงื— (cake). Someone asked โ€œhow is this possible, ื™ื™ืŸ has the numerical value of 70 and ืœืงื— has the numerical value of 138?
    He answered โ€œfor this problem there is a sim-
    ple solution, have more ื™ื™ืŸand if two times ื™ื™ืŸ
    comes out to be more than ย ืœืงื— , then take another piece of ืœืงื— .
    If two times ย ืœืงื— is more than two times ื™ื™ืŸ and even more than three times ื™ื™ืŸ . Then you have to have so much ื™ื™ืŸ and so much ย ืœืงื— that either one of the two occur: Either this problem will โ€œwork outโ€ mathematically, or you will fulfill the
    obligation of Purim to reach the limit of ืขื“ ืฉืœื ื™ื“ืข!
    Eventually he will not be able to tell the differ-
    ence between โ€œcursed is Haman and blessed is
    Mordechai.โ€ Certainly he will not be able to tell
    the difference if ื™ื™ืŸ is the numerical value of ย ืœืงื— !


    They might also have a chiyuv to drink midirabanan mitzad chinuch

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 120 total)