popa_bar_abba

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,401 through 2,450 (of 12,397 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: shidduch crisis #1009053
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Not maskim at all.

    in reply to: Random Q on Bedikas Chometz – Blind People #1008806
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Good question.

    How do quadriplegics do bedikas chometz

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008825
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    AZ? Any response?

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008824
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Ah yes. The old odom and chava argument.

    Well, if you want to have your kids fighting like kayin and hevel, then do like them.

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008820
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Well, the problem is that the NASI people perpetuate the crisis by having boys marry older girls!

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008817
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    DY:

    In your example you have in year 5 all the boys deciding to marry 19 year olds. Ok, so the the next year the boys can do the same thing with the new 19 year olds.

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008814
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Put a numerical example

    in reply to: Shidduch crisis without population growth #1008812
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    No, why? The 100 boys keep marrying only 100 out of the pool of 19-24, and every year some girls turn 25 who weren’t chapped yet.

    in reply to: shidduch crisis #1009041
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Nope, your math is wrong. Sorry.

    in reply to: A talmid outshining his rebbe #1011189
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    ah, such nachas they must be getting

    But not as much as me seeing you call them maharat

    in reply to: skeletons #1008701
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    You get the type of marriage you ask for.

    If you want to have a marriage where you both keep secrets from each other because you’re afraid the other won’t love you if they know–go for it. You won’t be tricking him, because he’ll be tricking you also. It goes both ways: if you aren’t open with him, he’ll pick up on it, and not be open with you.

    And don’t think it won’t continue after you’re married. If you aren’t secure enough in the relationship to tell him about what happened two years ago, you also won’t tell him what happened at the grocery store, in fear of rejection. And he won’t tell you what happened in yeshiva or at work.

    But you will be tricking yourself, because you’ll think you actually have a marriage when really all you are is roommates.

    in reply to: HIGHWAY ROBBERY: Cost Of Shmura Matzah #1009073
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Is there a high bar to entry?

    in reply to: growing for a guy #1009366
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    um what?

    in reply to: Best Birthday Present #1008746
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Pickup truck with a rifle rack, a rifle, and a case of fine scotch.

    in reply to: A Startlingly Simple Theory About the Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet #1009395
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Is this copied and pasted in copyright violation?

    in reply to: I love my car #1113650
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    And now I also installed a new blower motor.

    in reply to: Poor sound design in story CDs #1008555
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Maybe you need a new blower motor in your car?

    in reply to: Index thread #1118523
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Yes!

    Thanks! For that, I owe you a troll thread.

    in reply to: skeletons #1008693
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Didn’t anyone else here attach schedules to their kesuba disclosing all the items otherwise covered by the representations?

    in reply to: skeletons #1008684
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Ah, this reminds me of the story of my dumb friend. http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/my-dumb-friend

    Remember him?

    So against my advice he married that girl. And they had a great marriage for 15 years, and had lots of really dumb kids who they both thought were really smart, and they were great parents to them.

    Well, one day he comes home in a bad mood, and he yells at the kids, and is mean to his wife, and slams the door, and drinks beer after supper while doing YWN on the computer.

    And then for like two weeks he’s coming home every night in a bad mood and yelling at the kids and being mean to his wife and slamming the door, and sometimes drinking beer but always doing YWN and posting dumb things because he’s dumb.

    So she goes to the rav, and says she wants a divorce because her husband always is mean to her and yells at the kids and slams doors and does YWN and sometimes drinks beer.

    So the rav asks, ok, but what is he normally like? So she says, I just told you! He yells at the kids and is mean to me and slams the door and sometimes drinks beer but always does YWN on his computer.

    So the rav says, ok, but what was he like 2 weeks ago? Oh! 2 weeks ago? Why didn’t you ask? He was a great husband 2 weeks ago, and for the past 15 years.

    So the rav says if has been a great husband for 15 years, maybe she shouldn’t be so fast to divorce him, because maybe this last 2 weeks is not really him.

    But she says, no. I’m not married to who he was 2 weeks ago, or 2 years ago. I’m married to who he is right now, and I don’t want to be married to who he is right now, so I want a divorce.

    (And of course you remember he is a kohen, and boy was that get mekushar expensive! (Kidding, there was no get; she wouldn’t accept a get unless he agreed to never see the kids; boy were you gullible and thought there really was a get. What do you think this is? Hollywood? Megilas Lester?))

    in reply to: Overheard at kiddush club #1008615
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    lol

    Alternatively: Even when they’re being mored bashem, they do so with mitzvos!

    in reply to: skeletons #1008672
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I say to err on the side of disclosure. If it isn’t a big deal, then it won’t be a big deal.

    If you went to a casino just a few times and played the slots, she won’t mind.

    FTR: I have gone to a casino, less than 10 times, I usually played roulette using “progressive gambling”.

    in reply to: Overheard at kiddush club #1008611
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Ah, mi keamcha yisroel!

    Even when they leave leining to eat and drink whiskey, they still wear a tallis!

    in reply to: Believing A Rejected Opinion #1049630
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    He’s an idiot. He should have concluded that the kohen in his shul was not really m’zera aharon, or was a chalal.

    If his scientific theory is as logically sound as that…

    in reply to: Overheard at kiddush club #1008607
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Exactly WHAT part of Shabbos morning in Shul is irrelevant at which to be present?

    The sermon. in some shuls.

    in reply to: Mikva #1008591
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    If you go yourself to the mikva and also tovel keilim at the same time, can you make one bracha for both?

    Al hatevilos?

    Al hatevila v’al tevilas keilim?

    Al tevilas keilim v’gufim?

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060702
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Another question:

    Did Mordechai speak Parseltongue? Did he really overhear Bigsan and Seresh, or was he told by the snake?

    in reply to: Mikva #1008587
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    The shittos regarding tevilah of aluminum range from patur, chayav mid’rabbonon, to chayav mid’Oraisa.

    I’ve actually heard some say it is pattur aval assur.

    in reply to: Mikva #1008586
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    yes, but where I come from, “doesn’t have to be toveled” is code for “tovel without a bracha”.

    lol

    Interesting, I didn’t know aluminum was different than other metals. But honestly, in the time I would have spent figuring out whether to tovel it, I just dumped it in the bath.

    Goes back to http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/annoying-too-many-people-care-about-halacha

    in reply to: to all my CR friends #1143288
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Actually, forget it. I don’t trust your kashrus, even to feed it to you

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007999
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    It just says you’ll be sad. Post partum depression.

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007997
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I’ve opined before, that women really ride on the fact that men don’t give birth to try to claim that it’s very hard. I don’t believe it. If men gave birth, they’d just do so in the handicapped stall and then be back at their desk after changing into smaller clothes.

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007995
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Yes, that is my understanding.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060686
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I have not. And that is a fair point.

    OTOH, I know some kids.

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007993
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    This story is bizarre.

    The father’s lawyer says he never wanted to be in the delivery room; he just wanted to see the baby in the hospital as soon as possible.

    My guess is the judge wanted to be in the news, and wanted to write a landmark opinion that would be cited. So he just went off on a rampage instead of addressing the actual dispute.

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007992
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I think the right for the father to bond with the baby is only once the baby can be without the mother… before that it’s up to the mother whether she wants to be with him. If he wants to bond with the baby before, he should make sure to be nice to the mother :).

    And for this reason, I never take care of my kids at all until they are old enough to be without their mother.

    (Real response: Maybe the mother was at fault in the relationship. And why should it be different based on the parents’ relationship? Cannot the father hold the baby for 20 minutes even if the mother hates him?)

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060682
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I seriously doubt children or adults of ANY age or intelligence will conclude that the “purim story” as portrayed in the video is based on anything other than the imagination of the videos creators. sure some ideas are based on midrashim, and actual pesukim as described in the megilla, that is to be expected. If anyone walks away from the video thinking that the reason achashverosh was awake at night was due to an upset stomache or that he wore fluffy bunny rabbit slippers or that mrs haman and vashti went to get their hair done at the mall I would worry about him/her. Of course it “distorts” the purim story, thats why it is a work of fiction. Is it any worse then “purim torah”?

    Disagree. I think a kid might be confused and no longer know what parts of the actual purim story to consider true.

    That is, even if you don’t think this is true, you might also no longer know what the morah in nursery told you is true.

    in reply to: Having fun with Telemarketers #1009534
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I once asked one out on a date to get her to stop selling me raffle tickets. She agreed. Now we’re married.

    (Turns out the raffle tickets would have been cheaper.)

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007989
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Further information for those who might want it the fathers attorney claims he didn’t want to be in the delivery room but wanted to see the baby soon after the birth so he could begin to bond with the child right away just as the mother does.

    See, now that makes more sense, and it is obvious the father should be allowed to see the kid on the first day, and even change its diaper.

    in reply to: Labor Day #1007986
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    The result in this case should be obvious that he doesn’t get to be in the delivery room.

    It should also be obvious that it doesn’t mean anything about the general rights of the father.

    in reply to: The mechanics and provisions of the new Chareidi draft law #1008522
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Also, the khappers were other jews, I’m sorry to say. The Russian government required a quota of jews for the army, and the khappers would fill it.

    in reply to: The mechanics and provisions of the new Chareidi draft law #1008519
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I assume the khappers will choose.

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007741
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    And nobody thinks you should follow rabbis on medicine. Just when there’s a halachic or hashkafic aspect to it. And then you cannot say, oh, they don’t understand medicine so I’ll do what I want.

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007735
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Because Hashem isn’t out to get us. He isn’t arbitrary and capricious. He isn’t going to give us tasks and then not give us a way of determining what those tasks are.

    How do we know Hashem isn’t, k’ilu, looking down at us and saying, “Look at all those mitzvos Reuven is doing– look how diligent he is– but why isn’t he focusing on helping Shimon do more mitzvos?”

    Yes, I think He is. Which is why you need to have a rav.

    How do we know which rabbonim to follow

    You choose one, in good faith. Hashem isn’t out to get us.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060661
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I’d assume somebody watched it and told them. I don’t assume they watched it.

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007728
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    No, we do know how our actions are received in shomayim. If we follow the rabbonim of our time.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060659
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Apparently the Lakewood Roshei Yeshiva have said not to watch it. They say it is “mechalell u’mevazeh es hakodesh”, “u’mehapech kedushas hamegila b’shinuyim mar’idim”.

    Well, there went that.

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007721
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    JF: If Hashem expects us to act in a certain way, certainly He gave us to the tools to know how He wants to act. And in fact, He said the way we should find out is by asking the “shoftim”.

    Saying “it’s impossible to know what G-d wants” is a cop out that just lets everyone do what THEY want.

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007713
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    simcha:

    So then what is the dividing line?

    Is it not “things that Hashem wants us to conform our actions in a certain way?”

    Is it “things that I think I might know better than the rabbis?” Well, that applies to halacha as well. Like suppose I’ve decided I understand electricity better than the rabbis. Or that I understand medicine better than the rabbis, as relevant to halachic aspects of medicine.

    I don’t see what you’re saying.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007575
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    writer: Maybe you have a good tayna against that article, and maybe you don’t. And we can discuss it; but it doesn’t belong juxtaposed with this. You can’t equate every wrong article.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,401 through 2,450 (of 12,397 total)