Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
popa_bar_abbaParticipant
Not maskim at all.
March 23, 2014 11:08 pm at 11:08 pm in reply to: Random Q on Bedikas Chometz – Blind People #1008806popa_bar_abbaParticipantGood question.
How do quadriplegics do bedikas chometz
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAZ? Any response?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAh yes. The old odom and chava argument.
Well, if you want to have your kids fighting like kayin and hevel, then do like them.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantWell, the problem is that the NASI people perpetuate the crisis by having boys marry older girls!
popa_bar_abbaParticipantDY:
In your example you have in year 5 all the boys deciding to marry 19 year olds. Ok, so the the next year the boys can do the same thing with the new 19 year olds.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantPut a numerical example
popa_bar_abbaParticipantNo, why? The 100 boys keep marrying only 100 out of the pool of 19-24, and every year some girls turn 25 who weren’t chapped yet.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantNope, your math is wrong. Sorry.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantah, such nachas they must be getting
But not as much as me seeing you call them maharat
popa_bar_abbaParticipantYou get the type of marriage you ask for.
If you want to have a marriage where you both keep secrets from each other because you’re afraid the other won’t love you if they know–go for it. You won’t be tricking him, because he’ll be tricking you also. It goes both ways: if you aren’t open with him, he’ll pick up on it, and not be open with you.
And don’t think it won’t continue after you’re married. If you aren’t secure enough in the relationship to tell him about what happened two years ago, you also won’t tell him what happened at the grocery store, in fear of rejection. And he won’t tell you what happened in yeshiva or at work.
But you will be tricking yourself, because you’ll think you actually have a marriage when really all you are is roommates.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantIs there a high bar to entry?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantum what?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantPickup truck with a rifle rack, a rifle, and a case of fine scotch.
March 18, 2014 10:05 pm at 10:05 pm in reply to: A Startlingly Simple Theory About the Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet #1009395popa_bar_abbaParticipantIs this copied and pasted in copyright violation?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAnd now I also installed a new blower motor.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantMaybe you need a new blower motor in your car?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantYes!
Thanks! For that, I owe you a troll thread.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantDidn’t anyone else here attach schedules to their kesuba disclosing all the items otherwise covered by the representations?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAh, this reminds me of the story of my dumb friend. http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/my-dumb-friend
Remember him?
So against my advice he married that girl. And they had a great marriage for 15 years, and had lots of really dumb kids who they both thought were really smart, and they were great parents to them.
Well, one day he comes home in a bad mood, and he yells at the kids, and is mean to his wife, and slams the door, and drinks beer after supper while doing YWN on the computer.
And then for like two weeks he’s coming home every night in a bad mood and yelling at the kids and being mean to his wife and slamming the door, and sometimes drinking beer but always doing YWN and posting dumb things because he’s dumb.
So she goes to the rav, and says she wants a divorce because her husband always is mean to her and yells at the kids and slams doors and does YWN and sometimes drinks beer.
So the rav asks, ok, but what is he normally like? So she says, I just told you! He yells at the kids and is mean to me and slams the door and sometimes drinks beer but always does YWN on his computer.
So the rav says, ok, but what was he like 2 weeks ago? Oh! 2 weeks ago? Why didn’t you ask? He was a great husband 2 weeks ago, and for the past 15 years.
So the rav says if has been a great husband for 15 years, maybe she shouldn’t be so fast to divorce him, because maybe this last 2 weeks is not really him.
But she says, no. I’m not married to who he was 2 weeks ago, or 2 years ago. I’m married to who he is right now, and I don’t want to be married to who he is right now, so I want a divorce.
(And of course you remember he is a kohen, and boy was that get mekushar expensive! (Kidding, there was no get; she wouldn’t accept a get unless he agreed to never see the kids; boy were you gullible and thought there really was a get. What do you think this is? Hollywood? Megilas Lester?))
popa_bar_abbaParticipantlol
Alternatively: Even when they’re being mored bashem, they do so with mitzvos!
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI say to err on the side of disclosure. If it isn’t a big deal, then it won’t be a big deal.
If you went to a casino just a few times and played the slots, she won’t mind.
FTR: I have gone to a casino, less than 10 times, I usually played roulette using “progressive gambling”.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAh, mi keamcha yisroel!
Even when they leave leining to eat and drink whiskey, they still wear a tallis!
popa_bar_abbaParticipantHe’s an idiot. He should have concluded that the kohen in his shul was not really m’zera aharon, or was a chalal.
If his scientific theory is as logically sound as that…
popa_bar_abbaParticipantExactly WHAT part of Shabbos morning in Shul is irrelevant at which to be present?
The sermon. in some shuls.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantIf you go yourself to the mikva and also tovel keilim at the same time, can you make one bracha for both?
Al hatevilos?
Al hatevila v’al tevilas keilim?
Al tevilas keilim v’gufim?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAnother question:
Did Mordechai speak Parseltongue? Did he really overhear Bigsan and Seresh, or was he told by the snake?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThe shittos regarding tevilah of aluminum range from patur, chayav mid’rabbonon, to chayav mid’Oraisa.
I’ve actually heard some say it is pattur aval assur.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantyes, but where I come from, “doesn’t have to be toveled” is code for “tovel without a bracha”.
lol
Interesting, I didn’t know aluminum was different than other metals. But honestly, in the time I would have spent figuring out whether to tovel it, I just dumped it in the bath.
Goes back to http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/annoying-too-many-people-care-about-halacha
popa_bar_abbaParticipantActually, forget it. I don’t trust your kashrus, even to feed it to you
popa_bar_abbaParticipantIt just says you’ll be sad. Post partum depression.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI’ve opined before, that women really ride on the fact that men don’t give birth to try to claim that it’s very hard. I don’t believe it. If men gave birth, they’d just do so in the handicapped stall and then be back at their desk after changing into smaller clothes.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantYes, that is my understanding.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI have not. And that is a fair point.
OTOH, I know some kids.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis story is bizarre.
The father’s lawyer says he never wanted to be in the delivery room; he just wanted to see the baby in the hospital as soon as possible.
My guess is the judge wanted to be in the news, and wanted to write a landmark opinion that would be cited. So he just went off on a rampage instead of addressing the actual dispute.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI think the right for the father to bond with the baby is only once the baby can be without the mother… before that it’s up to the mother whether she wants to be with him. If he wants to bond with the baby before, he should make sure to be nice to the mother :).
And for this reason, I never take care of my kids at all until they are old enough to be without their mother.
(Real response: Maybe the mother was at fault in the relationship. And why should it be different based on the parents’ relationship? Cannot the father hold the baby for 20 minutes even if the mother hates him?)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI seriously doubt children or adults of ANY age or intelligence will conclude that the “purim story” as portrayed in the video is based on anything other than the imagination of the videos creators. sure some ideas are based on midrashim, and actual pesukim as described in the megilla, that is to be expected. If anyone walks away from the video thinking that the reason achashverosh was awake at night was due to an upset stomache or that he wore fluffy bunny rabbit slippers or that mrs haman and vashti went to get their hair done at the mall I would worry about him/her. Of course it “distorts” the purim story, thats why it is a work of fiction. Is it any worse then “purim torah”?
Disagree. I think a kid might be confused and no longer know what parts of the actual purim story to consider true.
That is, even if you don’t think this is true, you might also no longer know what the morah in nursery told you is true.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI once asked one out on a date to get her to stop selling me raffle tickets. She agreed. Now we’re married.
(Turns out the raffle tickets would have been cheaper.)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantFurther information for those who might want it the fathers attorney claims he didn’t want to be in the delivery room but wanted to see the baby soon after the birth so he could begin to bond with the child right away just as the mother does.
See, now that makes more sense, and it is obvious the father should be allowed to see the kid on the first day, and even change its diaper.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThe result in this case should be obvious that he doesn’t get to be in the delivery room.
It should also be obvious that it doesn’t mean anything about the general rights of the father.
March 14, 2014 1:46 am at 1:46 am in reply to: The mechanics and provisions of the new Chareidi draft law #1008522popa_bar_abbaParticipantAlso, the khappers were other jews, I’m sorry to say. The Russian government required a quota of jews for the army, and the khappers would fill it.
March 14, 2014 1:06 am at 1:06 am in reply to: The mechanics and provisions of the new Chareidi draft law #1008519popa_bar_abbaParticipantI assume the khappers will choose.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAnd nobody thinks you should follow rabbis on medicine. Just when there’s a halachic or hashkafic aspect to it. And then you cannot say, oh, they don’t understand medicine so I’ll do what I want.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantBecause Hashem isn’t out to get us. He isn’t arbitrary and capricious. He isn’t going to give us tasks and then not give us a way of determining what those tasks are.
How do we know Hashem isn’t, k’ilu, looking down at us and saying, “Look at all those mitzvos Reuven is doing– look how diligent he is– but why isn’t he focusing on helping Shimon do more mitzvos?”
Yes, I think He is. Which is why you need to have a rav.
How do we know which rabbonim to follow
You choose one, in good faith. Hashem isn’t out to get us.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI’d assume somebody watched it and told them. I don’t assume they watched it.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantNo, we do know how our actions are received in shomayim. If we follow the rabbonim of our time.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantApparently the Lakewood Roshei Yeshiva have said not to watch it. They say it is “mechalell u’mevazeh es hakodesh”, “u’mehapech kedushas hamegila b’shinuyim mar’idim”.
Well, there went that.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantJF: If Hashem expects us to act in a certain way, certainly He gave us to the tools to know how He wants to act. And in fact, He said the way we should find out is by asking the “shoftim”.
Saying “it’s impossible to know what G-d wants” is a cop out that just lets everyone do what THEY want.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantsimcha:
So then what is the dividing line?
Is it not “things that Hashem wants us to conform our actions in a certain way?”
Is it “things that I think I might know better than the rabbis?” Well, that applies to halacha as well. Like suppose I’ve decided I understand electricity better than the rabbis. Or that I understand medicine better than the rabbis, as relevant to halachic aspects of medicine.
I don’t see what you’re saying.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantwriter: Maybe you have a good tayna against that article, and maybe you don’t. And we can discuss it; but it doesn’t belong juxtaposed with this. You can’t equate every wrong article.
-
AuthorPosts