Sam2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,051 through 1,100 (of 7,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hataras Nedarim Author #1144706
    Sam2
    Participant

    Hopefully no one relies on that Hataras Nedarim. Most assume that it’s symbolic. If they need a real Hatarah, they do it at the right time.

    in reply to: Kashas on the Parsha #1169414
    Sam2
    Participant

    ca: Maybe they went in to check and make sure there were no mice near the body. They went in 7 days before instead of 8 because they thought that was enough. They miscalculated.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086899
    Sam2
    Participant

    The difference between a legitimate Halachic opinion and holding by a very minor Daas Yachid is that it is wrong. So yes, if Chalav Stam was an incredibly minority opinion that no one held like, then it would be wrong to force people to hold like it and probably Assur to do so. Since it’s a relatively mainstream opinion, that’s fine.

    This is not Davening, or Tznius, or Chalav Stam. This is an incredibly Mechudash Shittah that doesn’t make any sense in practical Halachic terms. R’ Vosner was entitled to an opinion. Random Rabbonim of communities are not, especially in an area such as this.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090745
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: The Rishonim talk about why those few cases in the Gemara weren’t suicide. Well, sort of. There are a few Rishonim that comment though most don’t.

    I don’t have a chance to look at the Shvus Yaakov here, but if I recall correctly he’s one of the ones who quotes the Besamim Rosh, no?

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090740
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: Try 19a, I think.

    Do you at least admit that the suicide thing is from a non-source?

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086885
    Sam2
    Participant

    GAW: But they are claiming that this is Halachah, not social construct.

    a mamin: There are plenty of Chassiduses that don’t let you leave, too. The antisemitic sections of the media love telling the stories where people have trouble leaving. They exaggerate them, certainly. But not everyone can leave if they want.

    a jew who cares and others: I have seen many people, some of whom are from very Yeshivish communities, who see a community-wide ban on women driving as abusive.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086860
    Sam2
    Participant

    apushatayid: Did you see my analogy? Would that also be none of anyone’s business?

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086856
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: Elaborate, please? I have never claimed that everyone agrees with all that everyone does. Only defended people from improperly-placed attacks. Also, it’s a lot easier to say “Yeish Al Mi Lismoch” in Bein Adam LaMakoms than Bein Adam LaChaveiros.

    in reply to: My 3 question about the concepts of Basheret! #1086395
    Sam2
    Participant

    1. There is no way to ever know, hence it is foolish to assume that you missed it.

    2 and 3. Every couple is different. No couple never fights.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090738
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Fasting is something separate from physically hurting oneself. We completely reject self-damaging just as we completely reject those Rishonim who were corporealists. We minimize fasting because of your Sevara. That’s not why we don’t beat ourselves.

    newbee: It’s a “Tshuvah” in the Besamim Rosh. It’s a Gemara at the beginning of Nazir. It calls unnecessary fasting a Chotei. Fasting to fix a bad dream is not unnecessary. It’s the only way to fix that bad dream. And then, as a Middah K’negged Middah Kaparah, you need to fast again.

    in reply to: Kashas on the Parsha #1169411
    Sam2
    Participant

    ca: It could be they messed up the Din and thought that if they became Tahor on Shvi’i they could bring the Korban because they would be Tahor the night after.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086853
    Sam2
    Participant

    a mamin and apushatayid: I’m not saying it’s relevant in this case, but “it’s none of your business” isn’t an option. If people believe this is an actually untenable Shittah, they have a right to call out. If a major Posek of a tiny Chassidish community advocated beating wives to enforce Tznius, it would be wrong of us to not be up in arms. That’s obviously an extreme case. But if people view a ban on driving as abusive, they have a moral imperative to mention it.

    in reply to: American Pharoah: Kiddush Hashem or Not #1093353
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: I was told he got around the prize money by selling it to a Goy somehow.

    And I think GAW is right on the Amira L’Akum issue. The jockey’s name will go down in history for winning the Triple Crown. He wants this as much as the owner does. It’s not like he’s being hired to do a job. He was selected for a privilege that he was ecstatic to be given.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086830
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Among the major Poskim in Klal Yisrael, R’ Vosner stands alone on this.

    And the T’shuvah is very bare and difficult to understand. I would have loved to have asked him about this while he was alive, but if I had to guess he was told stories of inappropriate activities between driving instructors and students (which presumably happened) and that was where the Issur came from.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090734
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: It’s a real concept for when it happens to someone, not doing it to themselves. Sure, you might dig that up in some Rishonim. But there are tons of completely rejected Shittos in Yiddishkeit that we assume have no validity. This is one of them.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090732
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: By self-inflicted suffering I meant physical suffering, such as those who used to flagellate themselves. And the Gemara does call one who fasts a Chotei.

    DY: What’s this Tshuvas HaMishkal?

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086779
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: We should not teach women to walk because that also is important for them to leave the house.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090725
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: My source is that there is no source. That’s kinda the whole point. We all know the source is fake.

    in reply to: date of an upsherin #1086075
    Sam2
    Participant

    The way I always heard it, which doesn’t make sense either, is that it’s Chinuch on the Mitzvah of Peiyos.

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085870
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: There are also Poskim who hold that Chavalah B’Atzmo is Muttar for financial gain. They qupte the Gemara in Bava Metzia, “Lama Tala B’ilan” or whatever the phrase is (it’s something like that).

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121819
    Sam2
    Participant

    Brisker Rov: Without digressing further (because I really don’t think we should get into this), those who hold he’s Assur to listen to hold that way because they think he wasn’t so holy or the deepest of the deep.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090720
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: newbee was.

    And self-inflicted suffering isn’t Mechaper. It’s Mechayev. You don’t atone for Issurim by doing additional Issurim.

    in reply to: is morality relative? #1086576
    Sam2
    Participant

    Brisker Rov: It’s a Machlokes Rishonim whether “Natural Law” exists and why that may or may not be relevant.

    in reply to: Music in supermarkets #1206986
    Sam2
    Participant

    Brisker Rov: You will not find any source Assering music during Sefirah or the 3 weeks before the Pri Chadash. The Mishnah Berurah quotes this Pri Chadash. The general Mehalach in Rov Poskim is to treat Sefirah and the 3 weeks the same. Contemporary Chassidish Halachah Seforim make some Chilukim. The reason this is very Sasum in the Poskim is because they are all working under the assumption of OC 560:3. When people started listening to music all year round, Minhagim developed as to how to treat music during Sefirah and the 3 weeks. This point is all Talui on Minhag. There is no “Halachah” about it because, on a simple level, Halachah says all music is Assur all year round.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090715
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: The Poskim came out very strongly against those who tortured themselves.

    Anyone who “Mattired” suicide as a form of Teshuvah did so out of the mistaken assumption that the Rosh said it first. The Rosh never said that.

    in reply to: Music in supermarkets #1206983
    Sam2
    Participant

    Brisker Rov: It’s so nice that you are able to make Halachic distinctions between Minhagim.

    in reply to: Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet #1090711
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: Yes it is so Pashut. The Makor for such a Shittah was a “Sefer” written with the intention of destroying the Halachic process and has no Halachic weight whatosever.

    in reply to: Dreams #1085893
    Sam2
    Participant

    I don’t like dafbiyun’s story, though Yasher Koach on quitting smoking. (That’s not how Halachah works; we should never assume when we can actually learn what the right thing. To quote R’ Schachter (from another context), not learning the Halachah and just deciding to be Machmir is making a man-made religion. We have a God-given religion, that sometimes tells us to be Meikil and sometimes to be Machmir. Zil Gmor.)

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085865
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: I’m sorry that the Shittah of many Rishonim and Achronim “bothers” you.

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121815
    Sam2
    Participant

    See Yabiya Omer 9 108:43.

    Also, when you see OC 1:6, it’s entirely possible that R’ Ovadia did not hold that recorded Kol Isha (so long as there are no Hirhurim) is Assur outside of Devarim Shebikdushah.

    I have heard from Talmidim of R’ Ovadiah (who I will keep nameless, because as far as I know they have never stated these things publicly) that of course R’ Ovadia knew what she looked like–her picture was on every street corner in Egypt when he lived there.

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121811
    Sam2
    Participant

    Mentsch: I already pointed out that you are probably incorrect in your citation of Acher.

    And I think you need to understand confirmation bias. If you define listening as a relapse, then of course it hurts your Yiddishkeit. But if you don’t view it as bad for Yiddishkeit in and of itself, it probably won’t.

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085857
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: I do not agree that anything Assur is inherently immoral.

    And the Tzitz Eliezer’s Heter to abort a Tay-Sachs baby is the obvious case. No one is a Rodef there.

    DY: I don’t know what the Hagdarah is, but I lean to say that something has to be both Assur for Jews and non-Jews for it to be inherently immoral. Chavalah B’Atzmo should be Muttar by a Goy, hence it’s not immoral. Murder is Assur, and hence it is.

    I have a Chiddush, but I think it’s Pshat. Until she goes into labor, the fetus is considered part of her body. Hence, it’s just Nezek to abort. Once she goes into labor it’s Gufa Achrini and now we need the baby’s status as a Rodef to allow killing the fetus. Once it’s Yatza Rosho, we say Ein Dochin Nefesh Bifnei Nefesh because now no one is a Rodef. Sure, killing one might save the other. But that’s never Muttar. The baby is no longer directly killing the mother. It just happens to be a side point that killing the baby can save the mother.

    Look at the Rambam quoted above in Rotzeach Ushmiras Nefesh, the Gemara in Sanhedrin, Arachin 7a, and I think this answers all of the questions.

    in reply to: Music in supermarkets #1206972
    Sam2
    Participant

    There are many studies that show that workers work better with background music. And it’s B’feirush in Poskim that if the music is to help you work, it is Muttar.

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085840
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: According to many, Pshat in the Rambam is the exact opposite. The whole point is that a baby can never be a Rodef during labor because that’s Tivo Shel Olam and Ain Dochin Nefesh Bifnei Nefesh. Thus, before Hotzi Rosho, the fetus isn’t a Nefesh.

    in reply to: is morality relative? #1086567
    Sam2
    Participant

    Really, mods? If you didn’t let the link through, fine. But what’s wrong with the post?

    R’ Aharon Lichtenstein wrote a classic article on this issue titled, “Does Jewish Tradition Recognize an Ethic Independent of Halakha?”

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085836
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: According to many Poskim the only issue of aborting a fetus is that it is “damaging” the mother’s body and the father’s money. That’s it. And if someone is hurting themselves for good reason (meaning they feel they gain much from it) I would hopefully not stop them. Would you stop someone from exercising even though it’s painful?

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085830
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: Because we have other concerns like Chavalah. But I would never call it immoral to believe one can self-inflict pain. Stupid, but not immoral.

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085827
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram in MD: As far as I know, very few states allow late-term abortion. It’s second trimester or earlier.

    And there are Poskim who are pretty Meikil about terminating a pregnancy. Not carte blanche, no. But there are Poskim who will allow it for relatively minor reasons.

    And the Halachic Tzdadim are important. Again, they might not prove the doctor’s intentions, but they should have strong bearing on the relative morality of the case.

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121787
    Sam2
    Participant

    sushi: Disagree. Punk rock, rap, R&B, and similar are violent and lewd because of the society that created them. There’s plenty of emotional R&B. It’s just less common because the community that likes R&B best prefers its “gangsta” culture in its music right now.

    in reply to: For Avram in MD #1085823
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: There’s a reason I couched it in Halachic terms. Not every cultural norm is valid. Putting elders on ice throes is murder. Post-birth abortion is murder. But saying that Ubbar Yerech Imo Hu and that there might be situations where one can harm himself for his own good isn’t beyond the pale. Those that hold like R’ Moshe won’t apply it. But others will. And secular people who hold that the difference between personhood and not is birth certainly have a leg to stand on.

    in reply to: Hospital Horror Stories? #1085267
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avram: Only because you characterize terminating the pregnancy as “killing an unborn baby”. He clearly doesn’t.

    in reply to: Hospital Horror Stories? #1085232
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Well, I believe that is one of the Tzitz Eliezer’s Taanos on R’ Moshe.

    And frankly, life isn’t cheap. General society values life more now than ever before in history.

    in reply to: Hospital Horror Stories? #1085230
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: R’ Moshe is certainly a minority opinion in this. He’s how every Posek in America holds, but most Poskim agreed with the Tzitz Eliezer.

    And your claim isn’t fair. They don’t hold it’s okay to kill babies. They hold fetuses aren’t babies.

    in reply to: Did any of you ever have a broken engagement? #1086008
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: I would have commented that the Gra only matters if you did Tannaim already, which no one does (and which wouldn’t matter anyway because our Tannaim are totally meaningless) had you not preceded me with your comment.

    in reply to: Did any of you ever have a broken engagement? #1086006
    Sam2
    Participant

    I didn’t say actually do it. It’s not relevant nowadays anyway. I was just responding to what I perceived as an insult to the Gra,

    42: I would assume your assumption is correct. Well, not the Gra per se, But the Cherem he’s referring to.

    in reply to: Did any of you ever have a broken engagement? #1086000
    Sam2
    Participant

    newbee: Well, the Gra really did hold that way.

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121771
    Sam2
    Participant

    Or we should only listen to uplifting music at all, whether Jewish or not.

    Why did you start this thread asking for suggestions if you were going to drive home your opinion a day later anyway?

    in reply to: Jews listening to non Jewish music #1121768
    Sam2
    Participant

    Daniell: Everything you do in life rubs off on you. That’s how we exist as people. So if a song is inappropriate it will have a negative effect. If a song is Minus it will have a negative effect. If a song is uplifting and thoughtful it will have that effect, whether written by a Jew or non-Jew.

    in reply to: Difference between doing teshuva in old age vs youth #1084958
    Sam2
    Participant

    You are asking two different questions. The first is answered by a Gemara (yes, there is a difference). The second is a classical philosophical/theological conundrum that would take a very long time to answer.

    in reply to: Getting Wealthy from Mechalel Shabbos- What Happens? #1087862
    Sam2
    Participant

    I love it. Stam people dictating extreme recourses for T’shuvah. I mean, I happen to agree in this example. But at least I know that my opinion on this issue is worthless.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,051 through 1,100 (of 7,493 total)