Close this search box.

WATCH: Dismantling Execution Chamber After California Halts Death Penalty: “Gas Chamber CLOSED Per Executive Order”

Gov. Gavin Newsom not only put a moratorium on executions in California on Wednesday, he said he also may commute death sentences and is pushing to repeal capital punishment.

Newsom signed an executive order granting reprieves to all 737 condemned inmates on the nation’s largest death row. That means no executions while he’s governor.

He was backed by fellow Democratic lawmakers who introduced a ballot measure that would repeal the death penalty next year by putting the politically perilous issue before voters for the third time in eight years. Voters supported capital punishment in 2012 and 2016, when they voted to speed up executions by shortening appeals.

“I cannot sign off on executing hundreds and hundreds of human beings, knowing — knowing — that among them will be innocent human beings,” Newsom said, citing examples of condemned inmates who were ultimately exonerated. California would have to execute one inmate each day for more than two years to empty death row, he noted.

Critics accused Newsom of usurping voters’ will. One Republican lawmaker said Newsom broke the trust of those who elected him in November, and a prominent victims’ rights law firm suggested a court challenge and possible competing ballot measure that would restrict governors’ rights to grant reprieves.

“Friends and families of the always forgotten VICTIMS are not thrilled, and neither am I!” tweeted President Donald Trump.

Although California has executed no one since 2006, Newsom said he acted as executions potentially neared for 25 inmates who have exhausted their appeals and as court challenges to the state’s new lethal injection process potentially neared their end.

He rescinded those execution regulations and shuttered the state’s never-used $853,000 execution chamber. Prison officials symbolically removed execution equipment from the chamber on Wednesday, releasing photos and video as proof it was dismantled.

Newsom defended his decision in intensely personal terms.

“It’s a very emotional place that I stand,” he said. “This is about who I am as a human being, this is about what I can or cannot do. To me this is the right thing to do.”

He said he’s considering commuting death sentences as “a next step” once state Supreme Court justices explain why they blocked 10 non-death commutations sought by former Gov. Jerry Brown last year.

A California governor needs Supreme Court approval to pardon or commute the sentence of anyone twice convicted of a felony, a restriction that applies to more than half of condemned inmates.

Democratic Assemblyman Marc Levine is counting on Newsom to transform voters’ long-running support for the death penalty.

Levine said he drove by San Quentin State Prison’s death row on his way to Sacramento Wednesday, thinking “This is a new day for California, a new day for justice.”

But while six senators and 17 assembly members are supporting Levine’s proposed constitutional ban on executions, that’s a long way from the 27 Senate and 54 Assembly votes required to put the measure on the 2020 ballot.

Democrats control the necessary votes in both chambers, but are not monolithic on the topic. Democratic Assemblyman Thomas Umberg of Santa Ana, a former federal prosecutor, said Newsom’s decision ignores victims in favor of “some criminals who are so depraved, who have committed such heinous crimes … that they deserve the ultimate punishment.”

Lawmakers have until June 2020 to put the measure on the fall ballot and will take that time to build support among voters and lawmakers, said Levine spokesman Terry Schanz.

The California Correctional Peace Officers Association supported Newsom’s election last year, but is among law enforcement organizations and victims’ rights groups that oppose repeal. The death penalty is the final deterrent keeping murderers serving life sentences from killing again behind bars, said union president Kurt Stoetzl.

Stanislaus County District Attorney Birgit Fladager, president of the California District Attorneys Association, said the association will also fight the proposed constitutional amendment banning a punishment she said is used “only against the very worst murderers.”

Newsom has the constitutional power to unilaterally grant reprieves, as he did Wednesday, said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which has been fighting in court to force the state to resume executions.

But he said opponents could propose a constitutional amendment adding the Supreme Court oversight of reprieves.

Opponents could also mount a legal challenge to Newsom’s rescinding of the lethal injection regulations and closing the death chamber, which he said violates a state law requiring corrections officials to be ready to carry out executions.

Republican Assemblyman Tom Lackey, a former highway patrolman, accused Newsom of going back on his word to voters not to interfere with executions.

But Newsom said his opposition has long been well known.

He said he’s had tough meetings with dozens of victims’ families, including a dozen or so in the last week.

“To the victims all I can say is we owe you, and we need to do more and do better,” he said. “But we cannot advance the death penalty in effort to try to soften the blow of what happened.”


8 Responses

  1. Richard Allen Davies with malice aforethought kidnapped and then murdered a six year old child from her home in California about 20 ears ago. He was and is on death row and has managed to delay his execution all these years—mostly due to infractions in the ligation—not on evidence—-(he led police to the crime scene after confessing to the heinous murder)—now he escaped his justified execution and may soon be released due to overcrowding or a court order or, etc., etc.,

    Justice Ca;California style !!!
    Gerry Mullen

  2. Given that Trump supported the death penalty for the Central Park Five even after they were exonerated, his reaction is not too surprising.

  3. He is distorting his quoting the “eye for eye”. This refers to monetary payment, not that we take the eye of someone who takes out an eye. His acting on “feelings,” and his feelings are wrongly directed and is creating a twisted result. One of the mitzvos of benei Noach is to establish courts to uphold the mitzvos of benei Noaj, among which are not to murder, whose punishment is that the murderer is killed. (I’m not suggesting the courts in their way of implementing the death penalty are following the way it’s taught for the mitzvas bene Noaj, rather I’m saying that the Torah teaches that the punishment for murder is that the murderer is killed; for when that applies ayin sham).

  4. Apparently Gavin Newsom thinks that Killing Convicted Murders is wrong but Tiny little Baby’s who have done no harm to anyone and are innocent and pure can be killed for no reason at all!!!!

  5. 613NewUser001:
    I understand,
    BUT, was there never a case that eventually it was learnt that the wrong person was accused/killed?

  6. yehudayona, Central Park Five where “exonerated” by the same type of racists mob who “exonerated” Yankel Rosenbaum’s murderer Lemrick Nelson, (yamach shmo) and also “exonerated” OJ Simpson.

  7. “Although California has executed no one since 2006”
    I wonder how much money that “sign” costs and the press conference costed for something that hasn’t happned in 13 years. Feels like another Stimulus project where the cost of the sheet of laser printed paper was worth big money.

Leave a Reply

Popular Posts