Search
Close this search box.

New York Passes Landmark Voting Rights Legislation

FILE - Residents of the Flatbush neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York register to vote at a voter registration event on Sept. 29, 2021. New York's governor has signed a law intended to prevent local officials from enacting rules that might suppress people's voting rights because of their race. The law signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul, Monday, June 20, 2022, will make New York one of the first states to bring back a version of a process known as "preclearance." (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, File)

New York’s governor signed a law Monday intended to prevent local officials from enacting rules that might suppress people’s voting rights because of their race.

The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, named after the late civil rights activist who represented Georgia in the U.S. House, makes New York one of the first states to bring back a version of a process known as “preclearance” that was gutted by a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2013.

Under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, states and counites with a record of suppressing the rights of Black voters once had to seek U.S. Justice Department approval before changing voting rules.

The court’s ending of that practice, on the grounds that federal oversight was no longer needed, helped clear the way for multiple states to enact new rules around voting in recent years.

Now, local governments or school districts with a record of discrimination in New York must gain approval from state officials in order to pass certain voting policies.

“We’re going to change our election laws so we no longer hurt minority communities,” Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, said at a bill signing ceremony in Brooklyn.

“I’m so proud to be here to sign this landmark legislation. No state in the nation has stood up with the courage and conviction and the power we have by protecting these important rights,” she said.

The new state law will also expand language assistance for voters who don’t use English as a first language, and also provide legal tools to fight discriminatory voting provisions.

An effort in the U.S. Congress to revive parts of the Voting Rights Act failed to make it through the Senate.

Democrats who back the New York legislation said laws like it are still needed.

“Just last week, several important races around the country were won by people who deny the validity of elections and who will work to reduce access for voters,” said Sen. Zellnor Myrie.

Adam Lioz, a senior policy counsel for the Legal Defense Fund, said the organization has been working for years to push this legislation.

“We believe that this is a way for state leaders to step up and protect votes at a time where Black and brown voters are facing the biggest assault on voters rights since Jims Crow,” Lioz said.

The parts of New York required to get preclearance before changing voting laws will be determined by state officials based on a formula and list of conditions in the legislation.

(AP)



5 Responses

  1. We believe that this is a way for state leaders to step up and protect votes at a time where Black and brown voters are facing the biggest assault on voters rights since Jims Crow,” Lioz said.

    Oh, okay. Great. Kumbaya. Now all is good between whites and blacks. Hochul is a hero.

  2. Any legitimate eligible citizen that wants to Vote can Vote you dont need a new law for any reason other than to CHEAT

  3. Would love an explanation how laws that apply to people of every color and race are suddenly discriminatory.
    Are there not places to vote for many days for many hours in many locations , open to all who live in NY and are registered to vote?
    Are there certain rules that make it hard for me to do so if my skin is darker than someone else’s?
    Because I spent a Lot of time in the sun recently and now that I’m darker I’m worried about my voting rights

  4. John Lewis was a piece of garbage, a liar and hatemonger, but for some reason all the yidden flattered him and called him a hero. Even if a bill was 100% correct, I’d still vote against it just because it was named after him. And this bill is the exact opposite of correct; it discriminates between areas of the state, based entirely on whether the people who live there agree with the state bureaucracy’s far-left political opinions.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts