Halachic Analysis: Why No Autopsies


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

a[By Rabbi Yair Hoffman]

Recent events in the Jewish community have brought up the concept of autopsies in Jewish law. Some question why Jewish law is opposed to autopsies. In this short essay, a brief overview of the “whys” is offered.

In almost every venue or endeavor, American citizens generally face three varying sets of laws. There are federal laws, state laws, and local laws. Mature, intelligent citizens view their laws with a sense of pride and duty. Observing them is not viewed as some onerous burden. No, meticulous observance of our nation or state’s laws is a matter and source of tremendous pride.

Jewish citizens have a fourth set of laws.

They are the laws of the Torah, a tradition of laws that has been observed since Sinai. When facing the tragedy involved in an intimely death of a family member, Jews are often requested that they submit their family member to an autopsy. The problem is that often, this request is diametrically opposed to one of their deepest values – the observance of Judaic tradition.

In this essay we will explore five Jewish legal beliefs and traditions. These traditions are, in fact, immutable laws.

We must keep in mind that observant Jews would feel as uncomfortable violating these laws as they would feel supporting an enemy combatant of the United States. It is wrong to undermine the laws of the United States, and it is wrong to undermine the laws of the Torah. Just as there exists patriotic fervor and feeling in US law – there is a patriotic fervor and deep feeling in regard to Jewish law. All citizens feel a duty to G-d, country, and family. G-d always comes first in this formula.

The first law deals with the obligation incumbent upon all Jews to bury the deceased body as expeditiously as possible. The book of Genesis tells us that Man was created in the Divine image. It is a matter of utmost import in Jewish law never to insult the Creator by leaving His Handiwork – unburied in a state of indignity and disgrace. Maimonides describes immediate burial as a sacred obligation incumbent upon all of Israel, at all times and in all places. An autopsy takes time and perforce delays the preparation of the body for burial. It is a delay which flies in the face of our duty toward G-d.

The second law deals with disgracing the body. The Talmud (Bava Basra 154a) deals with the prohibition of disgracing or defacing the human body. This is a separate issue from the obligation of immediate burial mentioned above.
The third law deals with a prohibition in ever benefiting from the deceased human body. The Talmud in numerous places (Sanhedrin 47b, Avodah Zarah 29b, as examples) describes how it is reprehensible to ever derive benefit from a deceased human body. The only time an exception to this can be made is to directly save a human life. However, to derive any physical benefit from a body is something that should be avoided at all costs.

The fourth law deals with the notion of theft. The human body is sacred and belongs to no one but G-d. We cannot deface, cut open, and or examine the body of a deceased family member any more than we can do so, heaven forbid, to the bodies of past presidents of this country buried in Arlington. Just as they are not ours to examine or cut open, so too are the bodies of our family members not ours to examine, cut open or explore even in an autopsy. The issue is one of out and out theft as explained in the Talmud (Gittin 20a, Kiddushin 17a – see also Ran Nedarim 47a).

Finally, the fifth issue deals with sensitivity. Jewish tradition tells us that the soul is in a state of anxiety and anguish until it is buried in the ground. The more it sees its body being explored, cut, etc. the more agitated the soul becomes. One of the most basic ideas in which a society can be judged lies in how that society treats the helpless. Does our society abuse the weak, the elderly, the children – in short, those who cannot speak up for themselves? If so, this does not bode well for us. By the same token we cannot abuse the soul in its most fragile state.

The ideas expressed in this article may seem new to the uninitiated. But these beliefs, customs and traditions lie at the core of the Jewish nation. Whenever they are violated they cause extreme stress and anguish to observant Jews.

The laws of Jewish tradition are every bit as important to observant Jews as the laws of this great nation. It is hoped that this short monograph enabled the reader to appreciate this perspective a bit deeper. The best way to do so is to appreciate the patriotism displayed here to G-d, and not just to country or family. Doing so will be the first step in understanding our fellow man.

The author can be reached at [email protected]



  1. We cannot deface, cut open, and or examine the body of a deceased family member any more than we can do so, heaven forbid, to the bodies of past presidents of this country buried in Arlington.

    Actually, only two presidents were buried at Arlington — Presidents Taft and Kennedy — and one of them (Kennedy) was autopsied.

    The Wolf

  2. You left out a very important point with regards to a murder. In such a case an autopsy is halachically REQUIRED if it will help bring the murderer to justice since a murdered person’s neshama does not rest until his killer is brought to justice.

  3. #6, If I say that you can’t drive a car on Shabbos, will you also ask if I’m a posek?
    Like 99.9999% of halacha, nothing is black or white. Autopsies are in general assur, in 99.999% of the cases, yet there are times when it’s not assur.

    Interestingly, there is the issue of pacemakers and other in body items that are removed after death. I’m surprised that wasn’t touched on since it’s an issue that many people are dealing with today.

  4. what about in murder? what about in sudden death where in there is a possibility of a genetic disease (idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis-congenital heart disease)?