Letter from Ari Fleischer to Jimmy Carter

3

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

arifleischer1.jpg[This is a must-read!–YW Editor.]

The Honorable Jimmy Carter
The Carter Center
453 Freedom Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30307

Dear Mr. President:

I just read the transcript of your interview with the German magazine, Der Spiegel, in which you accuse Israel of launching an “unjustified attack on Lebanon.”

Even after the interviewer reminded you that Israel was the first to get attacked, you charged Israel with lacking “any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon.”

As someone who served in the White House as a spokesman for a President, I am reluctant to criticize another President, but in this instance my conscience compels me to do so.

Mr. President, your words are music to Hezbollah’s ears and your message is a blow to long-term peace.

Just as you underestimated the threat of the Soviet Union in the 1970s, you underestimate the threat of radical Islam today. Your condemnation of Israel, the victim, only encourages Hezbollah, the attacker, to bide its time and attack again.

Ahmed Barakat, a member of Hezbollah’s central council, last week told the Qatari newspaper as-Watan that “Today Arab and Muslim society is reasonably certain that the defeat of Israel is possible and that the countdown to the disappearance of the Zionist entity in the region has begun. The triumph of the resistance is the beginning of the death of the Israeli enemy.”

I was raised a Democrat but I changed parties in 1982 because I believed your policies and the nuclear freeze movement invited increased Soviet militarism and adventurism. President Reagan’s military build-up and credible threat of the use of force helped bring about the demise of Communism and brought freedom and a better life to hundreds of millions in Central and Eastern Europe. It also secured a lasting peace.

I’m sorry to see you articulate about Hezbollah and its aggression the same weak world-view that encouraged Soviet aggression. As Ronald Reagan showed us, peace through strength is the only formulation understood by those bent on destruction.

I understand your longing for peace and your fond hope that Hezbollah can be reasoned with. However, when you call Israel’s defense “an attack”, when you call what is justified “unjustified”, and when you call morality immoral, I conclude that the pro-defense, strong foreign policy lessons of the 70s and 80s remain unacceptable to you. Also, when you criticize Israel for targeting so-called “civilian” areas in Beirut and other areas where Hezbollah hides its operations, the result would be – if Israel listened to you – the creation of safe havens from which more violence and rocket attacks would be planned and launched.

Sadly, Hezbollah today is planning its next war. For the sake of peace, Israel deserves your praise, not your condemnation.

Sincerely,

L. Ari Fleischer


3 COMMENTS

  1. Pretty good but why didn’t he rather write about him underestimating “Iran’s” threat with Khomeini at its head. Which did lead to the terror regime and the kidnapping of the US embassy. (There is proof now that his cowardly approach led to the crisis.)

  2. “why didn’t he rather write about him underestimating “Iran’s” threat..”

    When the Shah was deposed and Khomeini took over, the Islamic radicals in Iran were a MAHN DOCHAR SH’MEI. The perception at the time was that these guys were the Moslem version of the NETUREI KARTA, and few took them seriously. Radical Islam was not yet on the scene, and nobody CHOLOM’D that these guys would one day evolve into the threat that they are today.

    As such, you can’t fault Carter for not perceiving Iran as a threat, and you can’t fault Fleischer for not calling him on this.

  3. I love it. Let’s focus on Mr. Carter’s recent interview. What we know of the past is as President, J. Carter brokered peace with Egypt. For this we love him. Yes, he was “On Watch” during the Soviet Buildup, and during the Iran crisis. This proves, that as people we show many sides. We can be right or wrong, or right but for the wrong reasons, etc.

    Mr. Fleischer addresses the interview and it’s attack and misinformation as regards to Israel and the current situation.

    I always thought of Mr. Carter as an honest and decent fellow, very intelligent, but too trusting of all players on the stage, what I believe is his major flaw.

    I did NOT vote for him. I think it reprehensible that he makes such views public. He no longer represents the American people. During these trying times, both here and abroard, he should offer his insights and help to the current administration and not assist in any way to divide this country today.