Forum Replies Created

Viewing 34 posts - 251 through 284 (of 284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966098
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    The Mechaber continues in Seif Beis: A woman should not wear all of her jewelry at once. [There are some who learn that a part should be missing from the actual piece(s)]. On this too the Chayei Adam wonders why people are lenient. One can debate whether it is permissible to wear all weekday jewelry at once while not wearing Shabbos/special-occasion jewelry or vice-versa.

    [gold]

    in reply to: Suicide vs. Murder #691978
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    There are two other reasons (cited in the Poskim) on why a person who commits suicide than a murderer.

    One reason is that death is the ultimate atonement for one’s sins. If it is through that method however, that he sins, it cannot serve as a Kaparah.

    The second reason is quite an interesting one. The Shiva etc. is only so that the family should be bereaved. A family that a loved one committed suicide cannot be deprived from their pain therefore the customs do not apply.

    in reply to: Questions on Yoreh Deah, Choshen Mishpat #931090
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Lol. I was thinking to make it even tougher. Look in Shulchan Aruch 333;2, Taz and Sma. Also see Ktzos (316;1), Teshuvas HaRashba (1;987).

    in reply to: Suicide vs. Murder #691974
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Max, I’d love to agree, however they don’t say that. The Chasam Sofer (YD 326) states that we look away completely. His examples are methods that lead to instant death. Also look in Parashas Mordechai (25) and Besamim Rosh (345). The Gilyon Maharsha 348 (Reb Shlomo Eiger) says that someone that drowns himself has a couple of seconds to do Teshuva. The Maharam Shik (YD 346) however says that the Halacha (in Masechet Smachos) is only where one dies instantly.

    in reply to: Suicide vs. Murder #691972
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    The answer is simple. It is known that a Ganev is worse than a Gazlen. Common sense dictates that a shoplifter should be less-severely punished than an armed bank robber. However, the Torah doesn’t [always] work with emotions. A Ganev demonstrates that he isn’t G-d fearing – he hides from people but not from Hakadosh Baruch Hu. A Gazlen is a desperate individual who simply needs money. He places his pressing needs before anxiety, therefore being better off.

    Same here. Doing harm to oneself is equal to harming someone else. One has no right to do damage to his body. Therefore one who murders someone out of temper or panic is better off than someone who kills himself to ‘get off the hook’. A murderer simply forgets what he is doing at the moment and isn’t necessarily doing so in defiance of G-d , whereas a suicidal person displays his ignorance and disbelief in the world-to-come. This makes the latter a Kofer in Hakadosh Baruch Hu and loses the benefit of forgiveness in the world to come. The Kevura and Shiva cleans the Neshama from stains gathered over the years and enable it access to the world-to-come. A non-believer doesn’t deserve that benefit.

    It should be noted that many Achronim (including the Chasam Sofer) basically scrap this Halacha (and claim that it doesn’t apply nowadays) given that one usually regrets his actions before dying.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966096
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    BP Totty, I missed your post. I’d appreciate if you’d share with us what your Rav said. You know, as the Kinyan Torah (above) writes, he cannot Pasken on this particular Halacha, for he too has yet to leave a square.

    I, for one, live in a rented apartment (built by a non-Jew) with the landlord in objection, so my Rav said it was permissible to leave it as is (painted).

    in reply to: Questions on Yoreh Deah, Choshen Mishpat #931087
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    I will present my question. This question is very applicable in many different ways.

    Does he owe him anything? If yes, how much?

    What is if he does find a last-minute job for less pay?

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966095
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    In Sief Beis (2), the Mechaber says that at meals (rather feasts and dinners) one should be reminiscent to the destruction of the Beis HaMikdash by leaving over some space on the table and omitting a course (that is visible). The Taz adds that the Din is the same at a Seudas Mitzvah, such as a Bris and wedding). The Mor Uktzua however, states that on Shabbos and Yom Tov nothing should be missing (Magen Avraham). The Levush (as understood by the Mishne Berurah) claims that leaving a space on the table is unnecessary.

    in reply to: Beard #1206606
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Missme, seems like you read only half of my post (or pretended to). The Tur at the begining of Hilchos Rosh Hashana says that one should shave before Rosh Hashana. Many Poskim use this Tur to permit shaving.

    As to Roshei Yeshivos, many Yeshivos (in the United States) DEMAND that the Bocherim shave, so your theory isn’t correct.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966094
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Now to the next topic:

    I’d appreciate to hear more from you. A Psak Halacha you once received, a story, or an addition or source.

    in reply to: Beard #1206593
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    The Pele Yoetz is very against shaving/trimming, saying that is will cause harm. However, I doubt it was meant to be L’Halacha (rather Kaballah — the Zohar is very intolerant). In Machne Yisroel, the Chofetz Chaim too is very Machmir. However, many Poskim permitted shaving as is stated in Tur (Hichos Rosh Hashana 582). Of course with a Hechsher.

    It should be noted that there is a dispute on the Nusach HaTur (Mechaber skips it). Look in Ohr Zarua (2;257), Shut Rivash (513), Biur HaGr”a (582), Tashbeitz (1;157), Shut Minchas Elazar (2;48).

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966093
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Right on, Derech Hamelech. Sorry for not explaining it better, topic is about Zecher LaChurban after all.

    Just another few aspects and interesting things on this Halacha.

    The Yaavetz in Sheilas Yaavetz (169), discusses this Halacha and states that one is obligated to leave the square even in a one-room home (that is livable, unlike a barn etc.). According to this, a garage or storage room also needs an Amoh al Amoh. The Chazon Ish however, argues and says it is exempt.

    There is a discussion whether a Sukkah is Mechuyav in a Zecher. The Kaf HaChaim cites a Sefer Tosfos Chaim (on the Chayei Adam 137;2) that says that just like a Beis Midrash (according to most Poskim) is exempt, so too is a Sukkah that isn’t used throughout the year.

    The Michle D’Asvasa, (a grandson of the Tosafos Yom Tov) says (37) that one should cover the square on Shabbos (he brings down other references that show not to mourn on Shabbos). However in Maharam Brisk (2;8) he contends that this isn’t mourning on Shabbos (Bkum V’Aseh) and one shouldn’t cover it. (He cites the saying of Shir Hamaalos).

    Although most Poskim say that this Halacha is applicable for all types of wall decorations, the Aderes is lenient when the walls are covered with wallpaper (saying that it is only paint mentioned in the Gemarah).

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966088
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Charlie, if your home’s interior isn’t painted, then you are good according to all Shitos (there is a Tzad that one shouldn’t paint at all). As to your brick exterior, we will IYH discuss it tomorrow.

    Philosopher, these Halachos don’t technically help one connect with the Golus HaShechina and Moshiach (it is a sign of mourning and bereavement ‘Im Lo Aaleh Es Yerushalaim…’). However, it is my humble opinion that one who mourns the Churban will get the feeling and longing for Moshiach. This may be the Pshat in ‘one who doesn’t mourn the Churban won’t see the Beis Hamikdash in its glory’. On a side note: I think the Sefer HaTanya says that a connection can be forged through Limud HaTorah.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966086
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Reb Hillel Kolomayer Zt”l, was widely known for reprimanding people and giving lots of Mussar. While traveling, he once passed by the city of Sanz. He decided to stop by for a visit at the home of the Rav, the Divrei Chaim. When the Sanzer Rav asked him to rebuke him on anything he sees wrong, Rav Hillel criticized him for not leaving an Amoh by Amoh. The Sanzer Rav immediately stood up on a ladder and peeled the paint. The Kinyan Torah 1:117(from Harav Horowitz Zt”l, Rav in Strasbourg and then Eida) actually uses this story as an excuse for those (including him) that don’t have a Zecher. He maintains that the Divrei Chaim did it merely due to the kavod of Rav Hillel Kolomayer, as if it would be necessary he would’ve done it on his own. But, Rabbi Binyomin ‘Hatzadik’ Silber (in Oz Nidberu 7:63) and Rabbi Menashe Klein (in Mishne Halachos 5:71) use this story to support the obligation of this Mitzvah.

    Another story is said on Reb Meir Shapiro Zt”l when he was building the Yeshiva ‘Chachmei Lublin’. He was debating where to leave the unpainted Amoh al amoh (although most Poskim agree that a Beis Midrash is exempt), whether on the side of the entrance or across. He then went into the Sanzer Rav’s home and asked his daughter who made the Zecher (which was across the entrance) and she related the above story.

    Reb Yechiel Michel Tukchinski (Reb Shmuel Salant’s grandson and author of Gesher HaChaim among others) in his Sefer Ir Hakodesh Vhamikdash 3:17:6 states that among all Achronim no substantial Heter was found.

    If you have anything to add, you’re more than welcome. Tomorrow IY”H I will talk about building new homes in general.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966084
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Thank you BP Totty for your inspiring post. You raised a good point. Almost all Jewish homes (with Bli Ayin Horah large families) have more than one Zecher LaChurban. However, other than your case (where it is extra credit) I don’t think it is enough to be Yotze. All Poskim say it must be visible and recognizable for the Churban (hence why many claim that even black paint isn’t enough). Here are the words from the Levush for example:

    ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ????.

    I forgot to post a Marei Makom where is states that a renter/tenant isn’t obligated to do so (when the landlord objects). It is in a rare but Choshuv Teshuva Sefer Migdal Hashein (61). He also writes that if a house is built/renovated for real estate purposes it is exempt.

    I will share with you two great stories (from Seforim) about the Sanzer Rav Zt”l (the Divrei Chaim) about the Amoh al Amoh.

    in reply to: The 9 days have started so what? #689567
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    This topic is an extremely important topic, as we know it is for the Shechina we mourn. We all know how stringent the Halachos of mourning is, to alleviate pain from the Neshama. Thousands of Minhagim are done to pertain to the Kavod of the Niftar. Kal Vachomer when we mourn for the Schechina’s home, how we should mourn. I dedicated a thread for the Halachos and Minhagim of mourning for the Beis Hamikdash year-round (http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/zecher-lachurban). It would be appropriate to discuss (and do) these Halachos on such sad days.

    in reply to: Mourning During the 3 Weeks, Do we Really Mean it? #882624
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    This topic is an extremely important topic, as we know it is for the Shechina we mourn. We all know how stringent the Halachos of mourning is, to alleviate pain from the Neshama. Thousands of Minhagim are done to pertain to the Kavod of the Niftar. Kal Vachomer when we mourn for the Schechina’s home, how we should mourn. I dedicated a thread for the Halachos and Minhagim of mourning for the Beis Hamikdash year-round (http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/zecher-lachurban). It would be appropriate to discuss (and do) these Halachos on such sad days.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966082
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Seems like no one here is familiar with these Halachos. Unfortunately, it is a neglected Halacha but quite an important one. The Maharsha (Bava Basra 60B) writes that this square shows that we live here in Chutz LaAretz only temporarily. He says that in essence we shouldn’t eat meat and drink wine since the Churban, but since it is a ‘Gezeira Shein Hatzibur Yochol Laamod’ we do a minor Aveilus. It should be noted, that even if a house was bought (from a Jew) fully painted, one must peel it. The only time it is permitted to leave it painted is when it was bought from a non-Jew and was never renovated. Reb Moshe Feinstein (Ibid) says that one can be lenient in the details of this Halacha, given that it is Drabanan. According to that, one me rely on the smallest shiur of an Amoh (which is 18 x 18 inches).

    I’d really appreciate to hear from someone that heard something on this from a Posek or more on this Halacha in general.

    in reply to: Zecher LaChurban #966081
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    In the first Seif, the Mechaber says that one should not build himself a home like the kings (and many Achronim including the Chasam Sofer apply this in building new homes in general – I will elaborate later on IY”H). The Mechaber says that one should leave an Amoh over an Amoh unpainted. This perfect square (look in Pri Megadim and Shaarei Teshuva) should be across from the main entrance to the home (there is a dispute; with some saying all rooms need it) so you see it upon entering. There are some that say that it should be done over the door (Minhagei Chasam Sofer) and the Mishne Berura defends this view. The Mishne Berura also defends those who don’t do it (among other Achronim), however most reasons cited do not apply nowadays. Someone that rents and the landlord objects to him peeling the paint, does not have the right to do it against his will.

    There are many who put paintings of the Kosel or Yerushalayim and the Mishne Berura says one should not protest (Igros Moshe, Chelek Gimel Siman Pey Vav). However, many (including the Shlah, Pri Megadim, and Kaf Hachaim) say it defeats the purpose.

    Let’s hear what you have to say on this Halacha.

    in reply to: What is the biggest Chesed that anyone has ever done for you? #1021647
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Hashem! Shebchol Eis, Erev Uboker Vtzaharayim… Hatov Ki Lo Chalu Rachmecha…

    His many Shluchim were my parents, my wife and children. My Rabbeim, Roshei Yeshivos etc.

    Doctors………….. Phenomenal organizations such as Hatzolah and Misaskim, for being there in trying times. And all others that I don’t remember off-hand.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025664
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    msseeker, I believe that miniskirts are classified as Bigdei Pritzus. I don’t think Rav Wosner drew the line somewhere. He didn’t mean a dress that is questionable according to some, he meant miniskirts etc. And only one reason he cited was wearing it in a Tznius fashion (which you can do by adding a panel).

    On the questionable clothing, there is a Teshuva from the Kloisenburg Rebbe ZT”L (who maintained that wigs are an Ervah just like hair) that permits selling Sheitels because there are those who are lenient (I’ll try to get you the M”M ASAP.

    I saw an important question raised here about a new phenomenon going on in the Frum community. Women go to male hairdressers to style their wigs. There are issues besides Tznius (such as a MUST to support a fellow Jew, if it isn’t significantly more in price, although the service or quality is somewhat better and so forth) but in a Tznius thread we’ll stay on topic. The Debrecen’er Rav discusses this (sorry for the exact again, you know there’s no web in Beis Midrash) and rules it explicitly Assur. Reb Moshe has a similar case which he says is not accepted and claims that although the man may be doing it for business, it might lead to unwanted situations, willingly or forcibly… He goes on saying that men should forbade their wives from doing so. You might want to differentiate between the situations, whereas in that case (swimming) a woman’s body would be exposed. However, I see it being similar or even worse, this case has direct contact, touching and beautifying a woman.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025660
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    I’m sorry for not getting back to you with the Marei Mekomos, I got busy and by the time I got back you’ve done the homework on your own. I’m sorry for writing 72, it was supposed to be 75 was just an innocent typo.

    I just realized that there was another discussion I missed, where I hope I can also shed some light. Of course simply citing Seforim can’t lead us to a Psak, one must confer with his Rav. However, this may help one portray his Halachic question in a correct way, and can guide us what can be problematic and what not.

    Regarding dealing with Bigdei Pritzus (that some even called to protest): Harav Wosner Shlit”a in his responsa Shevet Halevi (Chelek 2 Siman 62) rules that it is essentially permitted to sell such clothing due to various reasons (including, being worn in a Tznius fasion – under or with another dress etc.), however, one shall refrain from doing so.

    …??? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?????, ?”? ???? ???? ???? ???…

    I would assume that according to this, protesting wouldn’t be the right thing to do , especially when our Torah is branded as kind and sweet (????? ???? ????).

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025603
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    I’m very sorry, but as indicated in my previous post I don’t have access to those Seforim right now. I will post them as soon as I have a chance.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025601
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Sounds like a Bais Midrash here.

    In regards to a woman uncovering her hair at home. If I remember correctly, the Magen Avrohom states that one shouldn’t uncover her hair even at home. He cites either Kimchis or a Zohar (maybe even both). I believe that it is in Orach Chaim 72, however I’ll try to bring an exact when I get my hands on a Shulchan Aruch. There might also be a Darkei Moshe (possibly in Even HEzer) that rules the same.

    In the Gemara (the way most Rishonim explain) it isn’t really an issue. The question of a ‘Kalsa’ (net) is only in public. However, the Chasam Sofer does maintain that even in the privacy of her home it is considered ‘Overes Al Das Yehudis’ (here too you’ll excuse me for forgetting the exact – I’ll get it all in a later post IY”H). Reb Moshe argues on the Chasam Sofer in the Igros Moshe (I believe E”E Chelek 1 Siman 58, I’ll give you this too), but still says that one should refrain after a Psak has come out of the holy mouth of the Chasam Sofer.

    in reply to: Inexpensive Family Vacations #769300
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    There’s an Orthodox Shul in Old Orchard Beach, Maine (near Portland) on East Grand Ave.

    Ronrsr, do you suggest that there are no good eating establishments in Boston or did you simply skip my post?

    in reply to: Inexpensive Family Vacations #769279
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    ronrsr, perhaps you can provide us with a great kosher restaurant in the Boston Metro area. You know, a nice place for a decent price, great food, and most importantly a reliable Hechsher.

    in reply to: Inexpensive Family Vacations #769278
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    As to vacationing, I’m thinking about Maine (Acadia National Park as well as Greater Portland area). One major issue is Minyan.

    in reply to: Inexpensive Family Vacations #769276
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Interesting. I was looking for a great vacation getaway when I eyed this forum. What I discovered is, that the best place is the Beis Midrash and Dalet Amos Shel Halacha.

    All of you seem to be correct on the issue of swimming with a spouse. The Debrecen’er Rav discusses this in his Responsa – Be’er Moshe (Chelek 4, Siman 122). This is his response:

    ?????, ???? ????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ???. A rough interpretation would be, although it is permitted Al Pi Halacha, one shoul refrain.

    in reply to: Any recommended Jewish novels? #1125563
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    I second d a’s picks. Eli Shekhter’s books are indeed amazing, dunno if it substitutes non-Jewish ones (especially the writing-style), but they’re good. However, it’s been a while since he wrote anything. If you want something different (and more on a professional level) you might wanna try Meir Uri Gottesman’s books. While I enjoyed The Will, I felt it was very immature and unrealistic and while I love Yair Weinstock’s way of writing, I think his plots are stupid and unrealistic.

    Bottom line: No Frum novel will replace a good non-Jewish book in all aspects. It will be missing something. Research is something that needs much improvement.

    in reply to: For Whom Did You Vote? #684300
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Is this a valid question for a YWN reader?

    Have you followed the news here the past two months?

    And to dispute the fact that YWN was biased, did you see the comments now on the truly biased sites? Suddenly all readers are pro-Greenfield… Oh wait, actually now their comments get posted!

    YWN was truly unbiased and fair. What can you do if a candidate led a deceiving and misleading campaign? YWN exposed the scams and dishonesty of those trying to fool us.

    Congratulations David!

    in reply to: Israel Trip Ideas? #671593
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Check out Rosh Hanikrah, it’s amazing. Now in the winter I would recommend the skiing on the Hermon. For some warm weather and beaches go to Eilat (depending on your religious preferences of course). You can go to MiniIsrael to see all of Israel in model. In the neighborhood you can check out the zoo of only monkeys. If I’ll come up with some more I’ll let you know. Jeeping you have some fantastic ones in and around Eilat, also in the Ramon crater. You have some good ones in the Susa-Amuka area. It really depends on your preferences however. Anyway, have a safe trip and enjoy!

    in reply to: Shtenders #1034406
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Wow. We got some major technicians here, have you by any chance grown up in Russia…Lol

    in reply to: Yeshiva World on Wikipedia #671494
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    Uhu. I heard that they even had that Rush Limbaugh died….

    in reply to: Who Would You Like To See In The Next Hasc Concert? #816761
    Dave Hirsch
    Participant

    I’d love to have a concept with a nostalgic theme. The setup: Cantorial medley- Have todays stars such as Cantors Helfgot, Stark, Schuloff, Miller sing Rosenblatt, Kousevitsky, Kvartin classics. And with todays technology you can even include duets or solos by the giants themselves. Next a Carlbach medley featuring Yehuda Green, Chaim David, the Katz Brothers. You can also feature Miami Boys Choir with their oldies (you can even have some alumni such as Shwekey and Stark join in). Finally MBD and Fried bringing back old memories singing their classics together…. Oh! What a sight…. I’m drooling at the concept…. though I know my excitement is in vain because this setup will never happen due to the high costs, however they can take this idea. Finish it off with am upbeat finale of todays hits (They can even make decade medleys e.g. the sixties medley). PS I know MBD doesn’t sing at mixed concerts however so does Lipa and they were able to accommodate him so can they do this for Mordche.

Viewing 34 posts - 251 through 284 (of 284 total)