It is Time for Truth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 1,052 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207256

    “{There’s no question that all streams are different than Jews were in the past, the difference between each of today’s streams is how they have adapted to today’s reality.

    Everyone thinks that they have adapted in the manner that our gedolim from the past (going back to Chazal and even earlier) would have wanted, and therefore “default” Judaism, and the others are movements. “

    FALSE

    for all their shrill claims and endless number of articles printed and typed,

    No Centrist honestly believes that they are the real McCoy

    .

    For one , they spend so much of their time with shrill endless number of articles printed and/or typed, pointing out the flaws and faults of Chareidim or yeshivish and preaching how they are the divergence from the past that the proof is in the pudding.

    “When you’re weak on Defense, Stay on Offense”

    The irony is when they wish to rely on some dubious kula, you’ll/they’ll invariably pull up some chareidi/chassidic group as proof that it could be acceptable.

    Furthermore.. if a gadol from an earlier generation would come back today and in the higly unlikely scenario instruct myself that my derech hachaim is somehow mistaken, I would be delighted

    The Modox (and most Chassidim for that matter) would be so miserable as to send him back where he came from!

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207255

    “It was very difficult to move to Palestine before 1917. The Turks who controlled it allowed very few jews to move there and the ones who were able had trouble because it was difficult to make a parnassah there .”

    As late as 1927 ,with all the money raised and propaganda, and the net emigration rate from Palestine was greater than the immigration

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207254

    Avi K,

    Had you read earlier posts from myself, your claims would be preempted

    Gavra, etc.

    Supporting any movement that publicly disapproves of any of the 3 chamuros makes other than a charedi or Frum ( irresepective of your garb)

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207203

    Zahavasdad,etc.,

    You’ll welcome to keep throwing

    What’s will be next after agricultural societies, and now zionism?

    Seems the stakes are awfully high for you and yours

    “The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with …”

    The Frum Jew “saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always..” …

    And To borrow from Rudyard Kipling

    If you can keep your head when all about you

    Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,

    If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,

    But make allowance for their doubting too;

    If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,

    If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster

    And treat those two impostors just the same;

    If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken

    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

    Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,

    If you can make one heap of all your winnings

    And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,

    And lose, and start again at your beginnings

    And never breathe a word about your loss;

    If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew

    To serve your turn long after they are gone,

    And so hold on when there is nothing in you

    in reply to: Psak of Rav Kook on Chazal vs Scientists #1208799

    When it comes to Hashkapha ,We have traditonally stayed away from Rambam

    Rav Joseph Ber Soloveitchik

    is on record for that as well

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207185

    To Sum Up

    Some so badly desire to emphasize the differences between past present ,and glorious future , in order rationalize a lower national common denominator

    ….They’ll have to try selling their wares somewhere else

    a

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207184

    ‘do you really believe a shift from life revolving around beis hamikdash and karbanos to today is merely “minor sociological details” ‘?

    It depends for whom

    As the old saying would go “You are where your head is”

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207183

    zahavasdad,ubiquitin,etc.

    So you wish to sell us that for our ancestors Shavuos was primarily a Wheat Festival,Tu B’Av a Festival Of Love, Succos a Harvest Festival,etc., [just like the old kibbutzim]?

    Sorry

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207178

    typo ancestors

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207177

    ubiquitin,

    Ludicrous

    All that would’ve concerned our anscestors would be

    Once more,

    Do haredim today have the Same Goals,

    Destiny,and Purpose, as the past or Not?

    If this is satisfactory

    everything else are minor sociological details

    Obviously however Nevuah is no longer

    Our religion experienced extraordinary change between the era of Nevuah, the twilight era of the 2nd Beis Hamikdosh, and the Post Nevuah era

    But

    everything else are minors sociological details

    in reply to: Is Dating Tznius? #1212102

    lilmod ulelamaid,

    Same here

    “There is something I have been wondering about. When I first started dating, I was super-uncomfortable, having basically” rarely spoken to a girl

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207172

    There has however been one movement that burst onto the scene which snowballed and whose aftershocks are still rattling us today and that was/is the chassidic movement

    It was surely a seismic revolution/rebellion to the previous established yahadus

    The Satmar Rav profoundly understood that

    every populist movement since,even irreligious ones could and often would conceivably claim a commonality and kindred spirit with the early chassidim

    and the combustion needed to somehow be reigned in

    It is with reason and great sagacity

    that the Satmar Rav wrote in a letter” ???? ???? ??????? “

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207171

    For all those who like pointing out innovations that brought into “flowing current” during recent centuries

    ‘there have been adjustments in Jewish practice over the centuries. Hillel’s prozbul comes to mind, as does Cherem Rabbeinu Gershon on marriage and divorce, and other such modifications. There were promulgated by the great sages of the day in order to preserve the integrity and the spirit of the Torah, in fulfillment of the mishmarti in Vayikra 8:35: “you shall protect that which protects [My Torah].” (see Yevamot 21a and Moed Katan 5a)

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207121

    ,

    Do haredim and/or ‘others’ have the Same Goals,

    Destiny,and Purpose, as the past or Not?

    Some insist incessantly here and elsewhere on rehashing over little details

    in reply to: Psak of Rav Kook on Chazal vs Scientists #1208756

    A doctor once told myself and others “netain reshus l’ropheh l’raph’os”

    How come doctors need permission derived from the passuk to practice more than other fields?

    Because in Medicine every 10 years or so you need to throw out all the textbooks and start almost from scratch

    So we need explicit permission for us to “go To the Doctors of your days”

    do they have to be in complete contradiction?

    in reply to: Moshiach #1205142

    DaasYochid,

    What else is Moshiach about?!

    On A COLLECTIVE Level

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207103

    “Charedi is just the term people use to describe Yeshivish or Chassidim as opposed to the prejorative Ultra-Orthodox”

    Maybe for some

    More likely the term Charedi was originally imported by modox writers as a sleight of hand in order to segregrate traditional Yeshivish from mainstream thereby dimishing their impact.

    It also then adopted by the chassidish inclined to give themselves a sort of continuity

    For most of us in North America it’s the opposite probably

    We may be Ultra-Orthodox

    But Charedi is a black cloistered medieval prejorative

    in reply to: Moshiach #1205135

    We are in this world for the purpose of bringing moshiach

    That is all .

    (There are many mouthing piousness whose goals are ..very different)

    We have way too few working(in whatever endeavor) towards that goal

    Possibly the saddest accomplishment of Lubavitch is/was they pushed the mainstream to be wary of everyone who emphasized Moshiach

    in reply to: Halacha for the masses #1205873

    In short , absolutely

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207091

    Is it amazing how haredi , whether as a postive or more often as pejorative, has ever moving goalposts?

    in reply to: Is "Haredism" a Movement? #1207090

    simcha613,etc.,etc.,

    Did Conservatism start with Sir Walter Scott and the Romanticists?

    Some would say it did ,which is ridiculous

    It was obviously always there, they just overtly ,due to world developments, cultivated a consciousness

    Same with Charediism

    You’ve imbibed too many modox propaganda articles

    in reply to: The Upsherin – What are the Origins? #1207967

    In Telz it

    appears the “Custom” was ignored entirely

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205851

    81 Percent Of Israelis Living In Poverty Believe They Will Always Be Poor

    Bituach Leumi Report Shows More Working Poor in Israel

    Person1,

    while joseph is prone to exaggeration ,you ought to spend some days in a row in Kiryat Malachi or Afula

    While it is getting gradually better,

    Are you in a lala land of your own?

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205848

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205844

    “then university act as an equalizer”

    Who controls who gets accepted?

    Have the stats?

    ‘ But once they integrated, gave up their “antiquated” customs and behaviors, and became “Israeli”, ‘

    In a word, they would have to give give away their culture ,conform to whatever yours’ is for this decade

    Talk about a pot calling a kettle black

    Do you only accept african americans who wear slacks and vests,and say”yes m’am” and “sir”?

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205828

    Joseph,

    until it comes to shidduchim

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205821

    To Be Candid

    Above all,

    The Earlier Zionists desired assiduously a european state placed unfortunately [ as the arabs have contended] in the mid east

    Anyone who happened to be in the way…

    in reply to: The Sephardim's Relationship to Ashkenazim in Israel? #1205819

    Israel inherited a English School System

    Rather than A Country has Schools

    it’s almost

    Schools have a Country

    Plus, In smaller countries where people live near/on top of each other , unless you’re righteous, you’re bound to incessantly search for things to put you [ plural] above the hoi polloi

    For this ,In America it’s more similar then we would admit ,they just find other many other things

    in reply to: Is Dating Tznius? #1212065

    Was Tu B’Av (Girls going out) Tznius?

    in reply to: Is Dating Tznius? #1212063

    “I actually heard that there was a Rav who said that people should go out at least 8 times

    Rav M Bick said it ,over 4+ decades ago

    in reply to: Women on a higher level #1198188

    Lu,Your comment was crucial

    in reply to: Pearl Harbor Day #1197424

    lesschumras,

    Once upon a ..

    it could’ve been merit to what you contend.

    Today however ,orthodox have become so hasty to adopt american norms because”Being Jewish and American are not mutually exclusive” after all, that we must reestablish

    Chukos ha’goyim

    Second, Goyim invariably come to despise yidden who wish to prove they are more

    American than the americans

    or more Dutch than the dutch

    in reply to: Return to 1803 borders #1197396

    The International Community and The Hague side with my definition

    And yourself.. The frum media?

    in reply to: Women on a higher level #1198184

    LU,

    You really hit the proverbial nail on the head with your

    ” but I’ve always wondered if there’s any real source for it… It does seem to fly in the face of the concept of ??? ????? ???????,

    ……”

    It should become the go-to on the subject

    Everything added is superfluous

    in reply to: Return to 1803 borders #1197394

    You chose a very narrow definition of terrorism

    in reply to: A gadol on his own #1197953

    ???? ??? ?????? ??? ????

    is brought down in a few places

    in reply to: A gadol on his own #1197952

    typo Lower East Side

    in reply to: A gadol on his own #1197951

    “You don’t think I know how to cook eggs”?

    Once while spending a weekend on the Lowere east side several years ago

    Rav Dovid .

    made for myself grilled cheese for melava malka

    He had a most unusual way of doing it.

    He put it on an open pan on the stove .Put a piece of Cheese on a piece of challah ,and then pressed down on them both with a pot and presto..

    in reply to: Women on a higher level #1198181

    Females were some of the ardent,passionate supporters of nazism ,

    more than the men overall were

    The bolsheviks relied on hundreds and hundreds of ardent [jewish]women

    in reply to: Women on a higher level #1198179

    Women have a certain spirit

    It could lofty

    or it could be for evil

    in reply to: Is the right to bear arms all about guns? #1197100

    “swords became totally obsolete (some armies still use them”

    For esprit d’corps

    There was a british commando who always went into battle with a sword on his side

    Because ” a gentleman wears a sword”

    in reply to: Is the right to bear arms all about guns? #1197099

    It is also about Cannon

    They were forbidden

    So should automatic weapons and probably semi automatics

    in reply to: Return to 1803 borders #1197392

    You would agree there’s a commonality between piracy and terrorism?

    What’s the difference between piracy and privateering ?

    Because one is state sanctioned?

    What about religious jews who financed and even served as pirates as revenge against Spain?

    Is this above your paygrade?

    in reply to: Who was the worst President of your lifetime? #1197247

    benignuman,

    Well said

    Watergate and Congress

    in reply to: Who was the worst President of your lifetime? #1197224

    Geordie613,

    South African yidden constantly reminisce with nostalgia for the “good old, peaceful” days prior to the breakup of Apartheid

    Back then,however, they were the biggest fighters and activists against Apartheid!?

    in reply to: Who was the worst President of your lifetime? #1197223

    WinnieThePooh, fair enough

    Hit ’em Hard Harry

    With a name like Harry probably it would have unnecessary

    Unlike Franklin Delano

    John Fitzgerald

    in reply to: Who was the worst President of your lifetime? #1197222

    Pardon,

    Marshal Smuts

    was Prime Minister. That was before South Africa became a Republic

    in reply to: Return to 1803 borders #1197390

    RebYidd23,

    ” one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist”

    used to be a famous dictum. It’s on the internet presumably

    in reply to: Halacha #1196911

    lightbrite,

    For

    hashkafa

    Or

    Halacha

    ??

    Of Course there ought to be

    and there is overlap

    Somethings are assur , some mutar ,some bide’avad.

    Some would be

    kosher aval assur

    in reply to: Who was the worst President of your lifetime? #1197220

    We ignore that Apartheid South Africans were the bulwark against communism for virtually the whole southern half of the African Continent

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 1,052 total)