lessmoderorthodox

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chumros = Kids Off The Derech? #629455

    i used to be more modern orthodox but became closer to Hashem and follow the mitzvos more closely so now i am less mordern orthodox. when i became less modern orthodox i started dressing more appropriately for a jewish person, being more careful in my kashrus, etc.

    in reply to: Dating: Parents or Girl? #652070

    while getting married young is a good thing, you definitely need a parents input on any shidduch.

    in reply to: Tznius Support Group #626827

    tzippi thats true for some people 4″ is enuf. i think the bigger problem is with ppl who dont even have 4, and it clearly is erva when she is in certain positions, like those mentioned here be4. i c so many ppl these days who dont even have 4 (some it covers the knew only when they stand erect like a status, anything else & its exposed.)

    in reply to: Tznius Support Group #626814

    tzippi, thanx 4 that. I know what u mean. When getting into or out of a car- or especially a minivan- even 4 inches is not enuf. And it really hurts me when i c some ppl sitting down and pulling their skirt to keep themselves properly covered. It is soo wrong. It should be covered w/out having to strain it. Because eventually you will find yourself in a position where u wont strain the skirt and it will leave u exposed. But getting into/out of a car/minivan is really (i think) the big test if a skirt is long enuf.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #662927

    Talking w/members of the opposite gender can quickly lead to many sins be4 any1 even realizes that bad stuff is going on. This has happened 2 many time already, as so many of us have been unfortunate to witness ourselves…

    in reply to: Tznius Support Group #626808

    Bais Yaakov: I had a question…

    Does the hemline need 2 b 4″ below the knee when standing? Cuz I c a lot of ppl that if they sit down it goes above.

    in reply to: The Jewish National Anthem #622616

    mariner, I can’t disabuse you of such amaratzus. Nachlei charedi was not created by any of the gedolim you mentioned. And the Agudah is anti-zionists, but participates in the state organs to the extent its in its financial benefit.

    in reply to: The Jewish National Anthem #622608

    PashutehYid, wrong. What the Gedolim said about zionism before the war is as applicable today as it was then.

    And even more important, the Gedolim still today remind us what reshoyim they are. So its not like it changed.

    in reply to: Working on Chol Hamoe’d #847019

    You can work on chal hamoed if you will be fired otherwise.

    in reply to: A Humorous Item #1171573

    rotfl

    in reply to: The Big Event 2 #622141

    Who cares about the big event?

    in reply to: Whats wrong with a convert?!?!?! #622351

    cherry: Which unknown Godol Hador that for obvious reasons you can’t name did you personally witness this time backing up your point?

    It seems every time your out of arguments you remember some tzaddik, who of course you can’t name, that you just happened personally be at when it came up (but of course you can’t tell us the specifics about).

    in reply to: Should pro-freikeit commentors be given a voice? #626053

    Pashuteh, Its a maaila if he doesn’t post very much, rather than posting much krumkeit.

    in reply to: The Jewish National Anthem #622600

    Everyone knows that the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s were extremely anti-zionists all the way back to the time the zionists first came around.

    in reply to: Respect for other posters comments #624353

    lesschumras,

    I totally sympathize with you. I too feel to each his own. You wanna be modern, you be modern. You wanna be reform? What can I do to stop you? But personally, don’t blame me for wanting to be less modern. Same feeling as you.

    Formerly ujm

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)