Search
Close this search box.

State Of NJ To Offer Low-Cost Health Plan To Every Child


corzine12.jpgGovernor Jon S. Corzine today announced a new initiative that provides universal, affordable access to health insurance for New Jersey children. Through the existing FamilyCare program, children whose family income currently exceeds eligibility guidelines will now be able to enroll in the program for a monthly fee, in early 2008. It is estimated that as many as 15,000 uninsured children may qualify to enroll in this program.

“Ensuring that children have access to quality medical care is a top priority of my administration,” said Governor Corzine. “We have enrolled more than 100,000 children in the NJ FamilyCare program since I took office and today we are expanding access to this critical and successful health insurance program with a new ‘buy-in’ program that will provide every family in New Jersey with an affordable health care option for their children. Healthier children will mean a healthier New Jersey.”

Under the new “buy-in” provision of the NJ FamilyCare program, children in families whose annual family income exceeds current eligibility limits – $72, 275 annual income for a family of four (350 percent of the federal poverty guidelines) can enroll in the program. These children will receive the same services available to NJ FamilyCare recipients, such as coverage for doctor visits, prescription drugs, and hospitalization.

The program is budget neutral for the state and is not dependent upon the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) funding. Families must pay the following monthly premiums: $137 for a family with one child; $274 for a family with two children, and $411 for a family with three or more children. Thanks to the state’s purchasing power with insurers, the costs are significantly lower than private health insurance premiums.

There are few restrictions to the buy-in program: families with more than one child must enroll all children and families must demonstrate that their children did not have health care coverage for the previous six months. This is to prevent individuals who currently have insurance from dropping their coverage to enroll in the program.

“There are simply too many children in New Jersey without health care insurance,” said Department of Human Services Commissioner Jennifer Velez. “Today, thanks to the leadership of Governor Corzine and the Legislature we have one more way to enroll them.”

“When I wrote the law creating this new program, I believed then, as I do now, that affordable universal healthcare access for all children is a fundamental right, and an example of how as a state we can move toward a similar program for our 700,000 uninsured adults,” said Senator Joseph F. Vitale (D-Woodbridge), the prime sponsor of the legislation.

“Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey is delighted to play a part in covering additional uninsured children through the expansion of New Jersey FamilyCare, a program the company has participated in since its inception,” said Karen Clark, President and Chief Operating Officer of Horizon NJ Health, a Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey company.

Beginning January 2008, Horizon Health Care of New Jersey will begin offering the buy-in program.

“I want to commend Horizon for its admirable display of citizenship and civic responsibility demonstrated by its willingness to be the provider for this new program,” said Banking and Insurance Commissioner Steven M. Goldman. “This is an important additional step in reducing the ranks of New Jersey’s uninsured children. We hope this is the first of many such steps moving toward the reduction of New Jersey’s uninsured.”



6 Responses

  1. GREAT IDEA!

    Since Corzine just mandated additional harmful vaccinations for small children, there will be many more cases of expensive brain injury, ADD, and G-D knows what else.

    So, it’s only fair that the State should pick up the tab, since most parents can’t afford to pay for these Iatrogenic (doctor-caused) diseases.

  2. Beautiful move. So all the “wealthy people” with income over $72, 275 for a family of four, who were dumb enough to squeeze out last penny to pay for their children’s health insurance “over the past 6 months”, won’t even qualify.
    Just like subprime mortgagees that will now be bailed out, with their rates frozen — compared to those who were dumb enough to pay higher fixed rate to be responsible borrowers…
    Government always punishes those that play by the rules, it seems. AND then raises their taxes to subsidize those that break the rules.

  3. I love it!

    Corzine’s Liberal agenda supports so many people with low income… This includes hundreds if not thousands of Yeshiva-leit.

    Yet those very yeshiva-leit have the chutzpa to bash him for being liberal, such as his repeal of the death penalty.

    Don’t you get it… Conservatives don’t give nearly as much to the social programs as liberals. Many frum people live off of tehse programs.

  4. charliehall:

    it is beautiful that previously uninsurable kids will be now insured.

    what is not so beautiful is that majority of middle class (and their kids) get penalized yet again — for the reason that the parents made sure to keep their kids insured no matter what cost. to do that, they belong to a group plan and remain insured throughout — via timely payments of premiums.

    so please explain to me why make limitations like this? when this is specifically designed to make sure ALL children have healthcare?

  5. BaltimoreObserver:

    It is Corzine’s agenda, not the pocket, that is supporting so many people with low income. Conservatives also dont pay out of THEIR pockets. Everything is being paid by everyone’s income tax. The “everyone” who it makes difference to on a monthly basis is, of course, the middle class.

    So perhaps majority of Yeshivaleit realizes that it is going to be one day THEM in the future (hopefully), or their parents (presently), etc, who eventually will be footing these programs, and therefore they hope that social programs will be … how should we put it… more responsible, fiscally and otherwise?

    AND, since anyway they will be the ones paying for it one day (or someone in their family is doing it now), what is wrong with having negative opinion of all the liberal practices the Dems do?

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts