Search
Close this search box.

TROUBLE FOR KAVANAUGH: Woman’s Allegations Throw Confirmation Into Turmoil


Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation for the Supreme Court is taking an uncertain turn as Republican senators express concern over a woman’s private-turned-public allegation when they were teenagers.

The White House and other Kavanaugh supporters had dismissed the allegation of misconduct when it was initially conveyed in a private letter. With a name and disturbing details, the accusation raised the prospect of congressional Republicans defending President Donald Trump’s nominee ahead of midterm elections featuring an unprecedented number of female candidates and informed in part by the #MeToo movement.

Kavanaugh, 53, said Monday he was willing to speak to the Senate Judiciary Committee to “refute” the charge that he sexually assaulted a woman while in high school, as the woman making the accusation said via her attorney that she was ready to tell her story to the panel in public. Christine Blasey Ford published her account in The Washington Post this week – of the 1980’s incident.

Kavanaugh released a new statement calling the allegation “completely false” and saying he “had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself” on Sunday to The Washington Post.

“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity,” Kavanaugh said.

Kavanaugh, meanwhile, was seen arriving at the White House late Monday morning. There was no immediate explanation of the reason for his visit.

The GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee has previously scheduled a Thursday vote on whether to recommend approval of Kavanaugh’s nomination in the full Senate.

Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, called for a delay in the vote, and two committee Republicans — all 11 on the GOP side are men — Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said they wanted to hear more from Ford. Flake went as far as to say he was “not comfortable” voting for Kavanaugh for the time being.

A potential “no” vote from Flake would complicate the judge’s prospects. A Republican not on the committee, Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, said the vote should be postponed until the committee heard from Ford. Contacted Sunday by CNN, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, wouldn’t say if the vote should be postponed.

A committee spokesman said late Sunday that its chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, was trying to arrange separate, follow-up calls with Kavanaugh and Ford, but just for aides to Grassley and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., before Thursday’s scheduled vote. Critics have already accused the GOP of fast-tracking the process to get Kavanaugh on the court by Oct. 1, the first day of the fall term.

The allegation against Kavanaugh first came to light late last week in the form of a letter that had been for some time in the possession of Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee and one of its four female members. On Sunday, The Washington Post published an interview with Ford, who after months of soul-searching decided to go public.

Debra S. Katz, the attorney for the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, said her client considered the incident to be an attempted rape.

“She believes that if were not for the severe intoxication of Brett Kavanaugh, she would have been raped,” Katz told NBC’s “Today.” Kavanaugh attended a private school for boys in Maryland while Ford attended a nearby school.

“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, 51, a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California. “He was trying to attack me.” She told the Post that she was able to escape after a friend of Kavanaugh’s who was in the room jumped on top of them and everyone tumbled.

Through the White House, Kavanaugh, 53, a federal appeals judge in Washington, said Sunday: “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

“This has not changed,” said White House spokesman Kerri Kupec on Monday. “Judge Kavanaugh and the White House both stand by that statement.”

Still, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway said of Ford: “She should not be insulted. She should not be ignored. She should testify under oath and she should do it on Capitol Hill.”

Conway, who said she had discussed the situation with President Donald Trump, said that both Ford and Kavanaugh should testify, but made clear it was up to the Judiciary Committee. She said Sen. Lindsey Graham had told her it could happen as soon as Tuesday and the White House will “respect the process.”

Stressing that Kavanaugh had already testified and undergone FBI background checks, Conway said: “I think you have to weigh this testimonial evidence from Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh along with the considerable body of evidence that is already there about the judge’s temperament and qualifications and character.”

Senate Republicans, along with the White House, see no need to postpone voting over what they consider uncorroborated and unverifiable accusations, according to a person familiar with the situation but not authorized to speak publicly.

In considering their options Sunday, Republicans largely settled on the view that Ford’s story alone was not enough to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Grassley could invite Ford to testify, likely in closed session before Thursday. Kavanaugh would also probably be asked to appear before senators. The panel would also likely seek testimony from Mark Judge, Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate who Ford says jumped on top of her and Kavanaugh. Judge has denied that the incident happened.

Republicans have not settled on the strategy, the person familiar with the situation said, but were weighing options, including doing nothing.

Republicans say the allegations have already cast a shadow over Kavanaugh but that it does not appear to be enough to change the votes in the narrowly divided 51-49 Senate. Key will be the views of Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

The White House has accused Feinstein of mounting an “11th hour attempt to delay his confirmation.” The White House has also sought to cast doubt about Ford’s allegation by noting that the FBI has repeatedly investigated Kavanaugh since the 1990s for highly sensitive positions he has held, including in the office of independent counsel Ken Starr, at the White House and his current post on the federal appeals court in Washington.

Kavanaugh’s nomination had already sharply divided the Senate along party lines. But the allegations of sexual misconduct, particularly coming amid the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment, coupled with Ford’s emergence could complicate matters, especially as key Republican senators, including Collins and Murkowski, are under enormous pressure from outside groups who want them to oppose Kavanaugh on grounds that as a justice he could vote to undercut the Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion in the U.S.

Ford told the Post that Kavanaugh was 17 and she was 15 at the time of the incident.

Kavanaugh attended a private school for boys in Maryland while Ford attended a nearby school.

In the interview, Ford says she never revealed what had happened to her until 2012, when she and her husband sought couples therapy. Ford’s husband, Russell Ford, said he recalled his wife using Kavanaugh’s last name and expressing concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might someday be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Sixty-five women who knew Kavanagh in high school defended him in a separate letter, circulated by Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, as someone who “always treated women with decency and respect.”

(AP)



7 Responses

  1. The republicans arein such a desperate rush to get this guy through, yet a year before an election they couldn’t consider Merick Garland.
    Kavanagh seems a perfect fit if he’s a sleaze like the degenerate adulterer who nominated him.

  2. Straight out of the liberal playbook. When they realised that they can’t find any dirt on him and he’s about to become a supreme Court Court Justice they come up with the same garbage. Where was she untill now? The liberals are sick and demented losers.

  3. “a woman’s private-turned-public allegation”

    What “public”? It is all anonymous. Yet a reported 65 named females who knew him (many attending the same school at the same time) from the same era banded together to debunk the anonymous canard.

    Moderators Note: You must have missed the name of the woman in the article. She has been interviewed by the Washington Post, and may testify to Congress.

  4. rt-= you are nuts. Countless dems and libs have testified to his character and integrity. This is a classic lib move, invent dirt where there is none. I’m honestly surprised that this would be a problem, even if true. He was 17, and his actions then should in no way reflect on who he is today.

  5. rt, right. So as a frum Jew it’s better to bring in Supreme Court nominees who will push for LGBT marriages (including potentially making it illegal for a frum bakery to refuse to make a cake with images or wording on it for a gay marriage, as was for a Catholic bakery in CO), push for even fewer restrictions for abortions because it’s “women’s rights” to choose to abort even at possibly 9 months, push to restrict zoning laws (prohibiting places of worship/shuls in residential neighborhoods). Absolutely! All because you say there is an adulterer in the House. I hope you get everything you ever wanted and then some. Join Pro-Palestinian Democrats Keith Ellison, Mark Pocan, and Earl Blumenauer and take back what is rightfully yours (Palestinians, LGBT,late term abortions).

  6. This is all crazy. A liberal professor from California writes a letter which although of “dire importance” was not released until days before a vote. She gives no details except “it happened… um here-ish and it was him”. She has no witnesses or proof, and somehow this major story was never turned up despite the fact that Kavanaugh has had pretty thorough investigations into his background for previous jobs. It is a bunch of garbage written to try to derail the vote.

  7. so he acted funky as a teenager many decades ago? and that is if you believe her. She offers no documentation or other witnesses. It is a charge designed so it can never be proven or disproved. And she apparently has a political and economic motive to make the charge.

    Don’t be shocked if future Democrats nominees are routinely accused of absurd charges that can never be proven or disproven. It will eventually lead to both parties being discredited.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts