Judge Refuses To Block New York COVID-19 Restrictions

4

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A federal judge has refused to block Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order limiting worship to as few as 10 congregants in communities seeing spikes in coronavirus infections.

Ruling in a lawsuit brought by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas Garaufis said in an order Friday that even though the rules harm religious groups, it is not in the public interest to block them if they are helping prevent a wave of new infections.

“In fact, if the court issues an injunction and the state is correct about the acuteness of the threat currently posed by hotspot neighborhoods, the result could be avoidable death on a massive scale like New Yorkers experienced in the spring,” Garaufis wrote.

The ruling doesn’t end the lawsuit, but denied the church’s request for a temporary injunction.

Garaufis said it was conceivable the diocese could end up ultimately winning the case, but that the worst that could happen in the meantime to the diocese’s churches is that 26 of them would have to curtail in-person ceremonies for several weeks.

“That is not meant, in any way, to downplay the seriousness of that constitutional harm,” the judge said. But he said the potential to save lives outweighed the damage the church would suffer.

Cuomo on Oct. 6 announced that he was limiting attendance at houses of worship, closing schools and shuttering nonessential businesses in six parts of New York City, Binghamton and Rockland and Orange counties where COVID-19 infections have spiked.

Most of the affected areas are home to large communities of Orthodox Jews, which has prompted protests from Jewish leaders who say they are being unfairly targeted.

Garaufis wrote in his decision that it was clear the state’s restrictions had been “guided by science, not a desire to target religious practice.”

The Brooklyn diocese had argued that its congregations hadn’t seen a big increase coronavirus cases, and that it had implemented successful social-distancing measures for religious services, including placing communion wafers in congregants’ hands rather than on their tongues.

Despite that, the governor “continues to run roughshod over the diocese’s right to worship, without any basis—not a rational one, not a narrowly tailored one, simply none,” the church’s lawyers said in court papers filed Friday.

Similar lawsuits have been filed by Jewish groups.

In their filings, state lawyers said that within the state’s so-called “red zones,” just under 5% of all people who took a COVID-19 test were testing positive, down from nearly 8% in late September. They said that shows the restrictions are working, but said things had not improved enough to lift restrictions.

State lawyers also noted that the rules let houses of worship remain open, while nonessential businesses in “red zone” areas were required to close entirely.

“This response respects the rights of worshipers while curtailing the spread of the virus and protecting the public health from this deadly disease,” Assistant Attorney General Seth Farber said in a Friday filing.

The Cuomo administration hasn’t said exactly when the restrictions might be lifted, but the initial plan was to have them in place for at least two weeks.

A group of priests and Orthodox congregants sued in a different federal court in June over Cuomo’s previous limits on religious gatherings, and a judge ruled that New York can’t have stricter limits for houses of worship than nonessential businesses.

The group is now in court arguing Cuomo’s new cluster zone plan violates that court order. A federal judge Friday gave Cuomo and New York City until Oct. 20 to respond.

JOIN THE TENS OF THOUSANDS WHO ALREADY ARE ALERTED OF BREAKING NEWS LIKE THIS IN LIVE TIME:

YWN WHATSAPP STATUS UPDATES: CLICK HERE to join the YWN WhatsApp Status.

YWN WHATSAPP GROUPS: CLICK HERE to be dded to an official YWN WhatsApp Group.

(AP)




4 COMMENTS

  1. Its similar to free speech. Do we want free speech in this country? Unequivocally? If yes, even hate speech must be allowed. Even so called “violent” speech should be allowed. If we want free speech the holocaust deniers should be allowed to deny the holocaust on Facebook.

    Regarding the current situation, freedom of religion is also important. So if you want to have freedom of religion, unequivocally, you can’t ban 95 percent of jews from our area from davening with a minyan. Yes, the virus is a major danger, but if you want freedom of religion, you cannot get rid of religion under any circumstances.

    Leave it to us to factor in that saving lives is more important. That is not for a judge to do. We can and must come to that conclusion on our own.

  2. I’m so happy that Coumo keeps on winning, and I hope he will even make a stronger lockdown. Besides all the jewish lives that he his saving, picture the amount of anti semitism that he’s preventin, If we we were to spread to the jews as well? If I were to be a logical non jew that would totally cause me to become an anti semite. go coumo go!