Amazon Wants To Question Trump Over Losing $10B Contract Bid

In this July 27, 2018 file photo, the logo for Amazon is displayed on a screen at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York. Amazon wants to depose President Donald Trump over the tech company's losing bid for a $10 billion military contract. The Pentagon awarded the cloud computing project to Microsoft in October. Amazon later sued, arguing that Trump's interference and bias against the company harmed Amazon's chances of winning the contract. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

Amazon wants President Donald Trump to submit to questioning over the tech company’s losing bid for a $10 billion military contract.

The Pentagon awarded the cloud computing project to Microsoft in October. Amazon later sued, arguing that Trump’s interference and bias against the company harmed Amazon’s chances.

Amazon was considered an early front-runner for a project that Pentagon officials have described as critical to advancing the U.S. military’s technological advantage over adversaries. The project, known as Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI, will store and process vast amounts of classified data, allowing the U.S. military to improve communications with soldiers on the battlefield and use artificial intelligence to speed up its war planning and fighting capabilities.

The Pentagon was preparing to announce its decision between finalists Amazon and Microsoft when Trump publicly waded into the fray in July. Trump said then that other companies told him the contract “wasn’t competitively bid,” and he said the administration would “take a very long look.” Oracle had also protested after it and IBM were eliminated from an earlier round of bidding.

Amazon is looking for more information about what happened before and after Trump ordered the review. Amazon’s court filing cites an alleged comment that surfaced in a recent book that said Trump in 2018 privately told then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to “screw Amazon” out of the contract.

George Washington University procurement law expert Steve Schooner said a deposition of Trump would be “clearly relevant to the primary allegations underlying their lawsuit,” but that doesn’t mean it will happen.

“I can’t imagine this president sitting for that deposition,” Schooner said in an email Monday.

Besides seeking Trump’s deposition, Amazon is also asking to depose Mattis, current Defense Secretary Mark Esper and other government officials. Amazon said it wants more information about the “unusual timing” of Esper recusing himself from the decision-making process because of his son’s work for IBM. That came in October, long after IBM was no longer in the running for the contract.

In a filing with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims unsealed Monday, Amazon said Trump has a “well-documented personal animus towards” Amazon, its CEO Jeff Bezos and The Washington Post, which Bezos owns. Amazon said Trump is the only one who can testify about the “totality of his conversations and the overall message he conveyed” about the bidding process.

Trump has accused Amazon of not paying its fair share of taxes and of putting brick-and-mortar stores out of business. Trump has also gone after Bezos personally and accused the Post of being Amazon’s “chief lobbyist.”

The Justice Department said it does not comment on ongoing litigation. The White House and the Pentagon didn’t immediately return requests for comment Monday.

Amazon said in a statement Monday that it’s important to discover what happened to preserve public confidence in the procurement process because Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to interfere with government processes to advance his personal interests.

“The question is whether the President of the United States should be allowed to use the budget of the DoD to pursue his own personal and political ends,” the company said.

A judge is expected to decide as early as this week on whether Microsoft can start working with the Pentagon on the cloud computing project. Amazon has asked for work to be halted as its lawsuit proceeds.



  1. Ridiculous. Nobody is even suggesting that Trump did anything for his personal gain. Absent that, he’s entitled to “interfere”. He’s not the head of the executive branch; he *is* the executive branch. So if he doesn’t like Amazon he doesn’t have to do business with it. That’s how it’s been since George Washington.

  2. Trump does not trust Amazon. That is his right. It is also his right to to act in accordance with that position. He has no personal gains no matter who gets the contract, but with at least a 3-to1 complaint against Amazon’s behaviour (IBM, Oracle and Microsoft vs. Amazon) seems like there is much reason to suspect something. As example, did IBM and Oracle make similar complaints against Microsoft for getting the contract that they did against Amazon?

  3. And I should add, seeing the recent debacle that nepotism caused in the Democrat Iowa caucus, one really has strong reason to be suspicious of what seems to be have been similar nepotism with Amazon. Seems clear that when a contractor has political bias, the services it provides should be highly suspect.

  4. “Screw Amazon”, is the right decision for the safety of the US

    I use Amazon a lot, BUT we cannot trust them as they are the KING of LEAKS that HARM AMERICA.

    You cannot separate Amazon from the fact that the owner also owns the EVIL anti-America Washington Post