Conservative commentator and Daily Wire host Ben Shapiro commented on Monday on the battle in Israel over the government’s judicial reform plan.
“The judicial reform fight in Israel is a proxy for the actual battle, which is really over the changing nature of Israel’s political landscape,” Shapiro wrote in the first of a series of tweets.
“The Right’s case is procedural. The current coalition is fighting to prevent the Israeli judiciary from acting as a de facto dictatorship, selecting its own successors and providing few or no limits to its authority. This has been the case since Aharon Barak’s ‘judicial revolution’ of 1995. And that was a result of the rising power of both Likud voters and religious voters. The Right is correct about the judiciary’s overweening power, and the insanity of an Attorney-General who can act without actual authority. Many in the center and even on the Left agree with these critiques.
“The Left’s case is consequentialist. They’re fighting against a loss of control in pure power terms. That’s what Barak’s judicial reform was about in 1995, and that’s what the current fight is about now. The Left sees the judiciary as a bulwark against a rising demographic tide that places a lot of power in the hands of groups that disagree with the secularism of the Left, as well as groups that disproportionately do not serve in the military and receive a lot of social welfare.
“This isn’t a fight between democracy versus authoritarianism. If anything, the Right is calling for more democracy and has an elected coalition, while the Left is using extra-legal measures like shutting down airports and highways to guarantee minority protections.
“In the end, this situation is really about Israel negotiating its future. The only way to move forward, as nearly everyone will agree in principle, is with more procedural power-sharing, including some judicial reform, combined with more compromise in terms of actual policy. The alternative is a pitched battle in which the Left-wing and secular-oriented try to hold back the rising tide using non-electoral means, and in which the Right tries to ram through its agenda via electoral means.
“That second option is what we’re seeing right now. And it’s untenable. It leads to a loss of trust in the value of electoral democracy from the coalition voters, and a belief that pressure from outside the system is the most effective tactic from opposition voters. If the first option is to be pursued, that means negotiation and talking and incrementalism. The question is whether any of the political leaders are willing to do it.”
Shapiro previously addressed the subject of the Israeli government’s judicial reform – in a more factually-based report – in January.
(YWN Israel Desk – Jerusalem)
Who would believe otherwise. It isn’t about some boring constitutional theory, it’s about control of the government and the state.
What an adverse vouce
Ben Shapiro is right
This coalition tried to do too many controversial things too fast. They made laws on chometz in hospitals and they tried making it illegal to dress immodest at the kotel with the punishment being thousands of NIS or jail time. The secular are terrified of this government and they think that this government is run by the chareidim who will jail the women if their hair is uncovered on allenby street in tel aviv.
They should’ve waited with the controversial laws and passed the judicial reform first. That wouldve protected them when they did pass these other laws. They tried to do everything too fast and it backfired and they probably won’t get to do any of it.
To those in charge of the tsniout laws, I will ask how kosher are the nylon tights? Nazis invented nylon, I’m sorry I will not let anyone forcing me to wear that polyesther, it has to be a choice , many clothes are now made of that fabric. Bad leadership, whatever “wing” it is leads to “i – rats” invasion, make a choice, choose carefully, I haven’t seen anything good in our lifes when IRAN started running the USA! They are trying to invade the EU now, and physically too!
To Zetruth: The invention of nylon is generally attributed to American chemists working for DuPont. They did build on work by some German chemists, though I don’t know whether they were Nazis.
Speaking of Nazis, I think one of the founders of Adidas was a Nazi, who made the track shoes for the German sprinters in the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin.
Ben Shapiro is never right. We don’t follow this head covering. Rabbi Miller Biderman yes. His voice like himself is cashable only in junk stores Shane