Search
Close this search box.

RESOLUTE: Netanyahu Defends Contentious Judicial Overhaul Bill Ahead Of Key Vote

Photo Credit: Amos Ben-Gershom (GPO)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday vowed to press ahead with his contentious judicial overhaul, despite unprecedented mass protests at home, growing defections by military reservists and appeals from the U.S. president to put the plan on hold.

Netanyahu’s message, delivered in a prime time address on national television, set the stage for stepped-up street protests in the coming days leading up to a fateful vote expected Monday. Thousands of people marched through central Tel Aviv on Thursday night, while others continued a roughly 45 mile march from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Netanyahu was at times conciliatory during his address, saying he understands the differences of opinion that have bitterly divided the country and offering to seek a compromise with his political opponents.

But he was also defiant, saying his opponents were bent on toppling him and lashing out at the scores of military reservists who say they will stop reporting for duty if the plan is passed. Some have already quit.

“The refusal to serve threatens the security of every citizen of Israel,” he said.

The Knesset is expected to vote Monday on a bill that would curtail the Supreme Court’s oversight powers by limiting its ability to strike down decisions it deems “unreasonable.” The reasonability standard is, in theory, meant as a safeguard to protect against corruption and improper appointments of unqualified people.

The bill is one of several keystone pieces of the Netanyahu government’s judicial overhaul plan. Netanyahu and his allies say the plan is needed to curb excessive powers of unelected judges.

Critics say the legislation will concentrate power in the hands of Netanyahu and his allies and undermine the country’s system of checks and balance. They also say Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption charges, has a conflict of interest.

The proposal has bitterly divided the Israeli public and attracted appeals from U.S. President Joe Biden for Netanyahu to slow down and forge a broad national consensus before passing any legislation.

After Netanyahu’s speech, opposition leader Yair Lapid urged Netanyahu to defy his coalition allies and halt the legislation.

“This extremist group has no mandate to turn Israel into a messianic and non-democratic state,” Lapid said. “The Netanyahu government is waging a war of attrition against the citizens of Israel.”

Perhaps the biggest threat to the plan are growing calls by military reservists who say they will stop reporting for duty in key units. They include fighter pilots, commandos and cyberwar officers.

Israeli leaders and military commanders have expressed growing alarm, saying the refusals to serve could hurt the country’s security. Reservists, whose service is voluntary, make up the backbone of Israel’s military.

On Thursday, the former head of Israel’s Shin Bet internal security agency, Nadav Argaman, voiced support for the reservists.

“We need to stop this legislation by any means,” he told the Army Radio station, saying the reservists “are very concerned and fearful for the security of the state of Israel.”

Argaman was appointed head of the Shin Bet by Netanyahu in 2016 and stepped down in 2021.

Netanyahu said the refusals to serve undermined Israel’s democratic institutions, in which the army is subordinate to the government and not the other way around. “If they succeed in carrying out their threats, that is a blow to democracy,” he said.

Tens of thousands of Israelis have joined mass protests against the overhaul since it was proposed in January, and business leaders have said that a weaker judiciary will drive international investors away.

In Tel Aviv, movement leaders staged a “night of resistance,” marching through the city’s streets, beating drums and blaring horns. Police used water cannons to clear protesters from a major highway.

The movement has also begun to shift its focus from Tel Aviv, where weekly demonstrations draw tens of thousands, to Jerusalem, where the parliament is set to vote next week.

Hundreds of protesters packed up rows of small white tents and continued a march from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, where they plan to camp outside parliament ahead of the vote.

Protesters flocked outside the home of the chairman of the Histadrut, Israel’s national labor union. The Histadrut ordered a strike in March, leading Netanyahu to freeze the overhaul. Netanyahu revived the plan last month after talks seeking compromise with opposition lawmakers failed. But the union has yet to authorize another strike.

After Netanyahu’s statement, movement leaders vowed further escalation. “We call on all those who care about Israel’s future as a democracy to take to the streets,” said Josh Drill, a protest spokesman.

Presidents of major Israeli universities said they would hold a strike Sunday to protest the bill. Doctors held a two-hour “warning strike” Wednesday to protest the overhaul, which they said would wreak havoc on the healthcare system by granting politicians greater control over public health.

They vowed more severe measures if the bill is voted through.

The judicial overhaul plan was announced shortly after Netanyahu took office as prime minister following November’s parliamentary elections. It was Israel’s fifth election in under four years, with all of the votes serving as a referendum on his leadership while facing legal charges.

Critics say removing the reasonability standard would allow the government to appoint unqualified cronies to important positions without oversight. They also say that it could clear the way for Netanyahu to fire the current attorney general — seen by supporters as a bulwark against the overhaul plan — or appoint legal officials who could ease his way out of the corruption charges he is facing in an ongoing trial.

(YWN/AP)



10 Responses

  1. Resolute is a good adjective for how he should be.
    The Supreme Court of the state has usurped unprecedented levels of power.
    The fact that they had the ability to simply say we subjectively believe this law to be unreasonable and therefore invalid is horrific in its own right. Add to that the fact they were unilaterally vetoing Supreme Court nominees which allowed them to control political leanings of the court makes it borderline criminal.

  2. Israel went thru 5 elections to get to a somewhat stable government coalition. So, those who could not win elections are now protesting election results and “consequences”? Maybe Israeli leftists should be called to Congress to testify.

  3. “This extremist group has no mandate to turn Israel into a messianic and non-democratic state,” Lapid said.“

    😂😂😂

    Does he realize legislation made by unelected judges who can hire their replacement isn’t democratic?

    People just talk without knowing what they’re saying

  4. This is going to become a civil war till elections again cause you can’t cure a rot with more the normal people in the USA can not use the bomb against the Russians if the judicial office said no it’s a disaster

  5. I admit I’m no expert on Israeli politics but what checks and balances are there on the Supreme court? It seems they can strike down any law they don’t like, choose their own successors and the AG can do whatever s/he likes. So where are the checks and balances on these unelected people?

  6. A bit disappointing that YWN opted to copy/paste an AP article of this sort. Hopefully readers won’t get past the screeching remarks of the opposition against the coalition, because when the article starts providing an overview of the issue, things go from bad to worse.

    Once upon a time, a news operation like AP would’ve feigned some sort of balance. But here, they don’t even pretend. The protestors are portrayed in glowing terms as valiant champions of democracy, with narry a word about their very contentious and questionable means, methods and tactics.

    I went through the second half of the article, counting how many paragraphs sound sympathetic to the opponents to the judicial overhaul, and how many paragraphs sound sympathetic to the proponents of the judicial overhaul. According to my count, the score was 9 to 1.

  7. So the reservists refusal to serve because they believe there is a flaw in the system is to be admired by the left, but a ben Yeshiva’s refusal to serve due to his beliefs is not ok? 2

  8. The so called leaders of opposition are sore losers of a lost election and fear the rise of a predomanently religious populace – something founding zionists did their best to oppose and the soul of the jewish people icannot be stopped from basic ties to eretz yisrael

  9. “This extremist group has no mandate to turn Israel into a messianic and non-democratic state,” Lapid said. “The Netanyahu government is waging a war of attrition against the citizens of Israel.” and what mandate did the Bennet/Lapid government have when they waged a war of secularism and discrimination against anyone and anything religious?

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts