Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced that his Religious Zionism party will vote against the Gaza ceasefire deal, which includes the release of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a temporary halt to fighting in Gaza.
Smotrich expressed “mixed emotions,” saying that while he feels “immense joy” at the pending return of the hostages, he also feels “tremendous fear of the consequences of emptying the prisons and releasing the next generation of terrorist leaders, who will do everything to continue spilling rivers of Jewish blood, God forbid.”
“As such,” he said, “we cannot join in the short-sighted celebrations or vote in favor of the deal.”
The security cabinet is scheduled to meet this afternoon to be briefed on the Gaza ceasefire deal, followed by a full government meeting to vote on the agreement. A substantial majority in favor of the deal is expected.
Smotrich argued that Israel must continue the war after the hostages are freed.
“It is a huge responsibility to ensure that this is not, God forbid, a deal of ‘hostages in exchange for stopping the war,’ as Hamas thinks and brags about,” Smotrich declared, insisting that immediately after the return of the hostages, Israel should “continue to strive with all its might for the real eradication of Hamas and the real demilitarization of Gaza so that it no longer poses a threat to Israel.”
He also warned against any political process leading toward Palestinian statehood or the deployment of an international force in Gaza — both elements included in the U.S. 20-point plan for the enclave.
“It is a huge obligation to ensure that we do not return to the Oslo path, God forbid, and that we do not abandon our security to the hands of foreigners,” he said, noting that his opposition to previous deals “led to progress in the occupation of Gaza and the application of military pressure that brought Hamas to its knees.”
(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
3 Responses
Rav Ovadia Yossef quoted the following psak:
“ומכיוון שחיי השבויים בסכנה ודאית, ואילו החשש שמא יחזרו המחבלים המשוחררים וירצחו יהודים הוא רק ספק,
הוי ליה ספק וודאי — ואין ספק מוציא מידי ודאי.
לפיכך, יש להעדיף הצלת השבויים הנתונים בסכנה ודאית,
אף שיש מקום לחשוש לנזקים עתידיים שאינם ודאיים.”
(יביע אומר, חלק י’, חושן משפט, סימן ו’)
MK Smotrich is right! This is another Oslo! How can we free the very criminals who perpetrated the October 7th massacre? Where else in the world is this heard of?
Rav Ovadia was wrong, and thousands of Jews are dead because he was wrong.
If he were right then we could never go to war over a threat that was only potential. If a foreign armed force threatened a border city, claiming that all they wanted was a bit of loot, קש ותבן, then we would not be allowed to fight them, and thus guarantee that we would lose lives.
But the halacha is explicitly the opposite, and we are required to repulse such an incursion on our borders, not only during the week but even on Shabbos, lest the enemy be put in a position from which, IF AND ONLY IF they decide to invade us after all, they will be in a better position to do so.
That is the ultimate in safek. They say they have no intention of harming anyone. If we let them take some resources they will go away and our losses will be zero, while if we fight them it would take a miracle not to lose anyone. And if it’s not a border town then we may not fight them on Shabbos. But in a border town we must fight, on Shabbos, and incur almost-guaranteed losses, just because we’re worried about a hypothetical invasion that they say they do not intend.