We speak often, and rightly so, about the importance of paying vendors on time. We remind ourselves that withholding payment is wrong, that it causes hardship, and that it reflects poorly on our communal values. Yet there is a painful contradiction playing out quietly in our own mosdos.
I am a mechanech in a Lakewood school. Every month, my paycheck comes late — if it comes at all. I find myself having to ask, follow up, and, frankly, beg for money that I already earned. Conversations with colleagues in other schools reveal that this is not an isolated problem. While some mosdos do manage to pay on time, many are one, two, even three months behind.
How, exactly, are we expected to live like this?
Our salaries are already modest, especially when weighed against the hours, emotional investment, and responsibility involved in educating children. We chose chinuch, and we are proud of that choice. But chinuch is still a job. Dignity in employment includes one very basic standard: being paid, in full, and on time.
We have rent or mortgages to cover, groceries to buy, utilities, tuition of our own, and families who rely on us. Late payment is not an inconvenience; it is a source of ongoing stress and humiliation. It becomes harder each day to stand in front of a classroom and give our full hearts to our precious boys while worrying about how to pay our own bills.
This is not a private problem. It is a communal failure.
To school administrations: if you cannot meet payroll reliably, something is broken and must be addressed honestly. To parents: tuition payments matter, but so does advocacy. Ask questions. Demand accountability. To askanim and other community leaders: mechanchim are not a line item to be deferred. They are the backbone of our future.
Paying teachers on time is not a luxury. It is not a favor. It is a חובה.
And one final note: during these difficult times, a word of appreciation from parents would mean more than you may realize. Respect, gratitude, and basic financial integrity should never be too much to ask.
Signed,
Anonymous
The views expressed in this letter are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of YWN. Have an opinion you would like to share? Send it to us for review.
13 Responses
It’s an issur deoraissa to pay your workers late. What incredible cognitive dissonance must a school administration have in order to teach Torah and pay late.
I know a teacher, he taught secular subjects, but a very sincere and ehrlich.
The first time this happened he gently told the principal or whoever was in charge that they signed a contract and he kept his side for the entire month. He is very particular to be puctual at all costs and he expects them to do the same. He is ready to come the minute the check arrives, and he is waiting. He cannot afford to be nice and easygoing about this. He needs the parnosso and it is the governors responsibility to see to it that he gets paid. He gently but firmly held his ground and sure enough somehow they procurred the funds within an hour or so. He immediately traveled to the school and they never were late again (his, payment. not the entire staff).
Everybody works better under clear-cut deadlines.
If the rebbes and teachers show they mean business, and that no paycheck means no teachers – the governors would make sure to pay on time, and the parent body / nadvonim would realize that paying salaries is not a bonus – it is absolutely crucial for chinuch.
QUIT!
I know you don’t want to, but you need to feed your family… And if you’re actually a good teacher I bet suddenly they’d choke up your paycheck.
I smell corruption. Put the Rosh HaYeshivas back in charge and delete all administrators
לא תלין is a issur just like eating pork. You can’t pick and choose the Torah, you accept everything that it says including this prohibition
And make no mistake – the money is there.
It is there for $1000 Moosknuckel coats, for the $10,000 Shaitels, for the $75,000 Pesach Programs, for the $5,000,000 homes VeChooolooo………….
Then let it be there for the Yeshivas as well
This applies, even more so perhaps, to those stuck in the middle-class, who do not enjoy government programs and free healthcare and 2 months vacation, and who now, on top of everything, and also living paycheck-to-paycheck, need to shell out thousands more each month for health insurance in 2026.
It does not make sense why the tuition in Lakewood is artificially low. True, not everyone in Lakewood is rolling in money, but it has become the gashmius Jewish capital of the world. If they have the money to support every materialistic mishigas in the world, why can’t they charge enough tuition to pay the Rabbeim and Moros (yes, even the ones in elementary schools) enough for a living wage?
The mosdos will tell you- and techincally they are right- that there is no issur of bal tolin on mosdos. But the first commenter’s point is still spot on: how can a ‘Torah-dike’ mosad do this? If you can’t pay, don’t hire- or don’t open.
Unfortunately we don’t have the administrators from the 1960,70s,80s who lived very modest lifestyle and they worked leshem shumayim and struggled to pay our melamdem , Rebbe’s,teachers before their minimum paycheck. Today’s administrators live on a completely different lifestyle. Also parents ( not all but many) don’t pay their tuitions on time only after the school threatens to send their children home from school. This problem is deeply rooted within the Chasidishe, litvish, communities.
We need better oversight of yeshiva administrators to be held accountable by community accountants and askunim where and how the tuition dollars are being spent. As long administrative doesn’t have to answer to anyone this problem will continue until Rebbe’s and teachers will start striking and leave our kids without education.
Just be aware, if the employer legitimately doesn’t have the money, there is no issur of בל תלין. Of course, that doesn’t deligitimize all the other points that are being made.
I know a financial advisor that says tuition should be 10% of gross income
@coffee addict
I’m not sure if the intent of this statement was to help the Yeshivas (by having wealthy families pay more) or to help struggling families (by not forcing them to pay as much).
Either way- some families paying full tuition could easily be paying at least 25% of gross income.
Where’s the difference going to come from if schools are struggling as it is and those paying less than 10% probably can’t pay much more?
We need to elimitate these nepotist executive positions