Abba_S

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 801 through 850 (of 995 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157143
    Abba_S
    Participant

    In Bloomingburg NY while Shalom Lamm is the builder and the front man the Satmars are the ones financing and the power behind him. Do you really think he would attempted this project unless Satmar was backing him to the hilt.

    The point being made is just as over there the Sullivan County agreed to a monitor in NJ if it’s found that the state took over the district merely to deny Jewish students school busing they may also be subject to a monitor. The key thing is what was the monitors intent. Does he really believe that poor hardworking public school parents will take off time from their work to take their children to school. Or that public school students as young as 5 years old will have to walk less than 2 miles each way to school, no matter what the weather is, through busy intersections without traffic lights or crossing guards and in some places not even sidewalks. The district is paid based on the number of students who attend each school day. Lower attendance means less state aid, which in turn increases the deficit.

    You say the election board members didn’t do due diligence what about the school monitor? Does the monitor have the student’s best interest in mind when he wants them walking through dangerous intersection without traffic lights or even crossing guards? What will the deficit be at the end of the school year? The way things are going the deficit maybe $25 million because it keeps on doubling.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157142
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Current law in both NY & NJ is no increase in property tax of greater than 2% and if a district wants more than a 2% increase a referendum is required. The county can institute a lower cap rate if they want to.

    If the budget is voted down in NJ by the public the monitor may decide to set a budget increase below the budget cap of 2% in NJ, assuming the county doesn’t have a lower cap and then he doesn’t need voter approval. In NJ in order to reduce the election expenses if a school budget increase approved by the board of education is less than 2%, no election is required an it is automatically approved. A less than 2% will give the district at most another $2 million which wouldn’t solve the problem and that’s assuming the board or the public doesn’t challenge the budget increase in court.

    in reply to: Photoshoped shidduch pictures #1136676
    Abba_S
    Participant

    I am not surprised, the photo is one of the first things you see so you need to impress. Otherwise it’s on to the next resume. I assume they are also getting the resume done professionally so why not the picture also.

    in reply to: False sale prices. #1136968
    Abba_S
    Participant

    If this is a non-Jewish store and in NYC you can report it to the Department of Consumer Affairs. If they are Jewish I would just shop elsewhere. If you are just looking for an inexpensive pair of glasses maybe you should shop online. I am assuming you already have the prescription. There are glasses that look nice that are priced under $10.00 online.

    in reply to: Sending Shidduch Pictures? #1136022
    Abba_S
    Participant

    I am happily married but I think pictures should only be given upon request. Not attached to the resume as it’s done now. This way after reading the resume and they think there is a possibility then if they want a picture they should get it. Right now the first thing they see is the picture and a decision is made based on that alone

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157136
    Abba_S
    Participant

    This is the first year that the school monitor runs the board of education. He wanted a 7% increase he got it. He wanted savings from the yeshivas for courtesy busing he got that also. He even got a million dollars from Lakewood but he can’t balance the budget. Two months ago the deficit was $6.2 million and a referendum was planed to fund it. Last month the deficit was $9.5 million. This week it’s $12.4 million. When the board was in charge they would balance the budget by cutting public school expenses so at least the budget was balanced. The monitor thinks he can count on the taxpayer to bail him out. Neither the state nor local taxpayer want to increase the budget so unless he cuts the public school budget by 10% I don’t see how he will fund this deficit.

    The public school parents are just realizing that courtesy busing will stop in less then 3 weeks and they will have to bring their children to school. At a meeting last week many complained that they have to get to work and can’t do it. Lakewood Township said they have no plans as to how these additional children are going to make it to school. This is an accident waiting to happen. There are many busy intersection without traffic lights and in many places there are no sidewalks. The school district is paid based on the number of students attending public school each day. If enough students miss school it can cause the district million in lost aid. What will the deficit be at the end of the school year?

    in reply to: Rechnitz Speech in Lakewood #1137944
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The problem is that that the student enrollment far exceeds the number of slots available in yeshivas in Lakewood. Yeshivas are relying on tuition rather than fundraising to meet their budget. Limiting the power that a donor can exert to get a student in and likewise, limiting future donations by that family and it’s close relatives to that yeshiva. This in turn limits the yeshiva’s ability to grow and increase their student body.

    This is happening wherever the Jewish community is growing. Yeshivas need to be built and they need to be open to all Orthodox Jews not just one segment, and must be supported by the community. The problem is that you really can’t tax the community anymore. People are barely getting by. Relying on the rich donor is not a solution, as they want to donate for a classroom building etc… something you can put a plaque on not teacher payroll expense. I don’t have the solution perhaps you do.

    in reply to: People who can't shut up #1136592
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Just walk away, that will end the conversation. If enough people would do this they would stop talking.

    in reply to: Uber vs. car service (or taxi) #1134994
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Yellow cabs can pick up in Manhattan below 96th St. otherwise yellow and green are the same as far as picking up off the street. Livery cabs must be called and can’t be hailed from the street.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157134
    Abba_S
    Participant

    In Bloomingberg NY where the Satmars are building a community and the county denied many Hasidim the right to vote in the last election. A Federal lawsuit was brought and Sullivan County agreed to pay over $550,000, plus all voter information and ballots must be provided in Yiddish and the county will be under a Federal Monitor for the next five years. The Monitor not the election board decides who can or can’t vote during that period.

    in reply to: What if landlord insists on showing the house on shabbos? #1134765
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Legally the tenant MUST PROVIDE ACCESS for repairs, however, if the tenant refuses (changes the lock), the landlord can break the door down and run the risk of being arrested by the police or going to court which can take weeks or months.

    About 32 years ago in my first apartment I was burglarized, I suspected it was the s kids or their friends. I changed the lock and for the next 10 years never had another burglary although others on my floor did. Likewise, I never had a problem with either the landlord or the super about access.

    The Tenant should weigh his options but if he want to deny the landlord or anyone else access to his apartment changing the locks maybe the best option in the short term although in theory the tenant runs the risk of either the door being broken or eviction.

    in reply to: How do I sell 600 + Jewish books cheap? #1134670
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Bookstores are going out of business because people are not reading books as they use to. Now many people read via e-books which they download. The books you have religious and have a small market. The Reform prayer books are only good for another Reform synagogue and they as a movement are dying out with their synagogues closing or merging. The reason you got them in the first place is because the Reform synagogue couldn’t find a buyer.

    In Brooklyn, NY Jewish Orthodox used books such as the Talmud are sold in the back of stores and on the street for between $1-5 per volume just to give you an idea of the marketability of used religious.

    in reply to: How do I sell 600 + Jewish books cheap? #1134666
    Abba_S
    Participant

    You need to find someone who will sell them for you on ebay or other internet websites, on commission. Anyone who buys used books in volume is looking to sell them and make a profit so all he will offer you is pennies on the dollar.

    in reply to: What if landlord insists on showing the house on shabbos? #1134761
    Abba_S
    Participant

    I am not a lawyer and you are correct, the tenant should contact an attorney licensed in his state before using any of this advice provided here. I am assuming the tenant plans on vacating the apartment soon so the threat of eviction does not apply as at least in NYC you need to give the tenant 30 days notice plus the month of the court hearing the landlord can’t accept rent for that month. As far as the landlord getting tools to break down the door, the burden of proof is on the landlord a) to proof there was a leak that started prior to the Sabbath, b) proof that tenant replaced the lock c) proof that breaking the door down was the most efficient way. While the landlord is holding the tenant’s security deposit, the tenant can sue the landlord in housing or small claims court to get back the deposit and that is when the burden of proof is on the landlord. Unless the landlord repairs the door immediately he is going to get a building code violation for the broken door and will be liable for the tenants losses should anyone steal anything, also he can be arrested if the police don’t believe him (that he is the landlord)so breaking the door down may not be the best way resolve the matter. If the landlord or his agent has the keys to the tenants apartment and there is a rash of robberies the landlord maybe liable. There was a college who misplaced the master keys to the dorms and and it’s costing the school $500 thousand to replace all the locks.

    The way the question was posed was does the landlord have the right to show the apartment not does the landlord have the right to access the apartment for repairs? Usually if there is a leak the tenant and or landlord will knock on the door say there is a leak in the apartment below and under the sinks and the bath tub to see that they are working properly. I tend to doubt he will call a plumber to work on the weekend when labor is time and a half. If there is a leak he may just shut off the water to that fixture and have them come during the.

    There is a difference if the landlord want to see if there is a leak or showing the apartment. I don’t think the landlord would break the door in front of a prospective tenant as it may give the tenant the wrong impression as to what type of landlord he is.

    in reply to: What if landlord insists on showing the house on shabbos? #1134755
    Abba_S
    Participant

    A lot depends on where the apartment is. For example if it’s in NYC the tenant is in the right to deny access if he wants. If the apartment is illegal the landlord can’t even go to court.( this should apply everywhere. If the apartment is illegal the tenant may not have to pay rent and the landlord can’t evict them either.

    My advice is change the lock on the deadbolt so no one can come in without the tenants permission. A new deadbolt cost under $20.00 and you can look on U tube if you don’t know how to replace one.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157133
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Private placement is governed by federal law unless there are more stringent state laws, so unless these laws are changed no moratorium can be made.

    As far as auditing the process, the way the system works is that every year the board allocates funding for each special ed. student both public and private in the district and funds are allocated to pay for the service. In order for the private provider to be paid he must submit a bill on a monthly or quarterly basis depending on the contract. The bill must include supporting documentation showing that the child received the service plus payroll documentation for the teaching staff which is then reviewed by the Board of Education, by at least two of their staff prior to payment. Every year the Board of Education of every district in the state, in both NY & NJ are audited by their Attorney General’s office. Prior audits for example, found that students that were suppose to be receiving one teacher and one paraprofessional per student had the same teacher for two students at the same time, this type of error has since been corrected by tightening internal controls. I also assume that the Attorney General’s auditors also compares payroll documentation with actual tax returns to insure the teacher actually received payment, which is why they can’t find any criminal action. These types of errors have been found in both public & private school paper work. Forensic Auditing is needed when you missing documentation and are tracing the money which is not the case in this situation. As part of the audit the auditor makes recommendation as to efficiency so if there was saving to be gained they would have reported it.

    in reply to: What if landlord insists on showing the house on shabbos? #1134736
    Abba_S
    Participant

    You don’t have to show the apartment if you don’t want to. The landlord must give you notice as to when he wants to show the apartment. You can make a counter offer to show it on Sunday. Even if this is verbal follow up with a certified letter saying as per our conversation … this way you have written proof that you were trying to give him access to the apartment on your terms. As a general rule the landlord will not sue you as it will cost thousands of dollars in legal fees and as you are a renter chances are he will have trouble collecting the judgement. All he may do is hold your security, but then you can sue him in small claim court. You don’t need a lawyer to fight your case. The landlord may decide to return the security especially if he has to hire a lawyer, or doesn’t want to waste his time in court.

    This is all assuming that you are pay your rent on time. In NYC this would be called harassment and you could report him to the city,

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157131
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The problem is NJ is broke and will not increase aid to the district and even though the STATE Monitor agreed to provide courtesy busing if the yeshivas agreed to a staggering starting and ending schedule, midyear since he didn’t get the projected saving he is cancelling the deal. If he didn’t get the projected saving in this case why do you think that co-ed busing will save the district money, especially if the yeshivas get together to insure that their the boy and girl yeshivas and public schools don’t start at the same time requiring separate buses.

    As Far as a moratorium on Special Education, the problem is the board is time bound so if the public school district does respond to a request for special ed the district forfeits it’s right to fight the private placement.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157110
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Unless the state changes the formula for calculating school aid this problem will not be resolved no matter who is in charge. What will happen is that class size will grow to 50 or more students per class. No one will get a good public education but they will have all mandatory courses.

    As far as merging the school district is concerned, you would need to combine at least 5 other school districts in order to dilute the percentage of private school students in the school district and the public school parents in those districts wouldn’t want to lose the control they have over their district . What the state may do is split the district so that the Jews have their district and the public school supports have their district. The only problem is the public school district will not have a viable tax base to support it and they may have to merge with surrounding a school district this would similar to Kiryas Joel.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157106
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Cutting Courtesy Busing will save the district at most $4.5 million ($450 {assuming $900 per year there are 4 months to the end of the school year} per student for 10,000 student) leaving a $5 million deficit for this year.

    The question is how many mandated school bus yeshiva students will there be next school year. The more mandated students the less funds there are for public school students and with no budget increases and lawsuits from both the board of education and the yeshiva parents, the school maybe in a worse financial position then they were at the beginning of the year.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157098
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Lesschumras:

    I don’t live in Lakewood NJ nor do I have children that use school buses.

    The district has a deficit of $9.5 million and the monitor is going to cut courtesy busing the yeshivas and or the parents should sue him for breach of contract. If the public schools parents are mostly immigrants and over 40% are courtesy busing recipients. Will they know that they don’t get busing anymore? Will it effect attendance? As district revenue is based on public school attendance every day a student misses school is less money for the district.

    As far as Roosevelt & Hempstead if the state could just takeover a school district why in East Ramapo does the state require a school monitor veto bill before doing? I think in the cases you cited the district and or city invited the state to takeover. While in East Ramapo the state is trying to force itself on the district.

    As far as getting a budget increase this year it is highly unlikely as the both the seniors and the Orthodox Jews will be against as the budget must be voted and approved by May so soon after the courtesy busing cut. Any saving they may get by cutting courtesy busing will be offset by addition cost for mandatory busing in future years and the loss of budget increases in the future.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157091
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The Referendum failed with 99% voting against it.

    Less Chumras: While Courtesy Busing is not a major issue outside of Lakewood, the major issue is the effectiveness of state monitor in resolving the district’s problems. The issue is can the state deny school busing based on religion.

    The underlining issue is that the states (both NY & NJ) in both communities wants a school monitor with veto power over the school board. This country was founded under the principle of No Taxation Without Representation and if they have a state monitor with veto power the state not the board decides how to spend or mismanage the budget. In the 1870 south there were many Blacks in elected office by the 1900 there was none. Why because the blacks were intimidated from voting.

    So the underlining issue is not busing but the Voter’s Act and are School Monitors with Veto Power, Constitutional?

    in reply to: East Ramapo School Monitor with Veto Power Bill #1133297
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Karlbenmarx

    This has nothing to do with Agudath Israel & FJCC being well respected, a few public school parents are suing the state demanding action. East Ramapo is in Rockland County which is run by the Democratic Party, the assembly is run by the Democratic Party, the Governor is a Democrat so there is a good chance that the school monitor bill will pass. The only thing stopping it’s passage is the NY Senate which is run by the Republicans and must also pass the bill in order for it to become law. Simicha Felder a Senate Democrat who is also an Orthodox Jew votes with the Republican and is against the bill,so it’s not in the parties best interest to approve the bill. Likewise, the Republicans gain nothing by approving the bill.

    in reply to: East Ramapo School Monitor with Veto Power Bill #1133295
    Abba_S
    Participant

    If a seller keeps refusing legitimate offers realtors will stop trying to sell the house. I assume that if he is selling he either needs the money or he needs to move. As a rule the longer a house is on the market the lower the price is.

    in reply to: Older Shidduchim $10K Initiative – CLOSED? #1132360
    Abba_S
    Participant

    I assume it is because they ran out of money. I assume you are also not a professional Shadchan, if you know of people that you think would be a match than contact their parents, they will probably pay if it works out probably not as much but at least it something (which is better than nothing).

    in reply to: Lakewood versus Monsey #1132935
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Theprof1:

    Where are all the rich people who sold their house in Flatbush for $2 million and bought a new one in Lakewood for $500,000.00. Unless they bought the house over 20 years ago they cashed out with at most $900,000, with $500,000 for the new house and the balance for new furniture and taxes. You will be surprised how quick you can $400,000.00. Especially if charity and or savings is a low priority. Or they used their equity in the house for their business which is not doing good. In any case most of this money is gone.

    Every area has it problems while Brooklyn has a lot of yeshivas at reasonable tuition and lots of shuls, houses are very expensive and even apartments are expensive. Most young couples move out of NYC as soon as they marry or upon having a child because it’s so expensive which is why Monsey & Lakewood are growing so rapidly. So in a few years, the neighborhood changes people die or move away to be with family and there wouldn’t be enough people for all these Brooklyn shuls. The same thing will apply to yeshiva at least elementary school with fewer local people starting families in Brooklyn the yeshivas will find it harder to fill their classes.

    in reply to: Lakewood versus Monsey #1132931
    Abba_S
    Participant

    It would seem that both communities need new yeshivas. It shouldn’t be to hard to put down a prefabricated classroom for kindergarten students on vacant land. The setup cost will be minimal especially if they lease the land and the classroom. Then every year add another grade it is doable. The problem is paying the staff, will tuition cover it? Unless you have enough parent paying tuition you are going to have problem covering payroll. I have heard that even wealthy people have trouble getting their kids into yeshivas in Lakewood.

    According to the East Ramapo School Monitor’s report estimates that by 2024 there will be 48,000, double what it was in 2014, yeshiva student in Monsey. Where are you going to find the seats for all these students. You will also need to find another funding source other than tuition and fundraising to support it.

    in reply to: East Ramapo School Monitor with Veto Power Bill #1133291
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Correction to my prior post as it was posted before Shabbos and I didn’t proof read it properly:

    1) That Being said the buyer… should read the seller doesn’t have to accept the offer.

    2) likewise there are houses in for closure should be foreclosure.

    As far as sellers not wanting to sell to Jews in order to prevent the takeover of the town by Jews. This is what happened in Bloomingburg NY. The same judge who ruled that Hasidic votes were not to be counted presided on the case when the county admitted that they were wrong in denying the Hasidim the right to vote. The judge that revoked the building permit was the same one that approved the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

    If they don’t want to sell to Jews, Jews may not want to buy their house period. I know someone who bought a house that was a bargain but when he tried to sell it or even rent it he couldn’t.

    in reply to: East Ramapo School Monitor with Veto Power Bill #1133290
    Abba_S
    Participant

    In this day and age unless it’s a private sale it is listed by a realtor and is usually on the internet. Who by law must show the house to all qualified buyers. If it’s found that the realtor discriminated against anyone because of race or religion they can be sued and lose their license.

    That being said the buyer doesn’t have to accept the offer and can take a lower offer. In the Catskills where Satmar wanted to buy an abandon school house and went to contract. When the community found out about the sale they voted down the sale. Now there stuck with a building they have no use for but have to maintain.

    Many of the homeowner around Lakewood are seniors who will need to get the best price or may need to sell because they can no longer stay in the house or they may have past away and the heirs want a quick sale. These houses were bought when they were cheap, likewise there are houses in for closure so you can find bargains in this area. Even if a owner wouldn’t sell to a Jew if it’s cheap enough an investor will buy it and flip it.

    in reply to: And then he shouted menuval !! #1133124
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Was it during Davening? If so you are a zealot.

    You were probably right but you damaged his phone and should pay.

    Although if he was going to kill you, you wouldn’t have to pay.

    in reply to: East Ramapo School Monitor with Veto Power Bill #1133285
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Gavra

    You think this bill wouldn’t be brought up in the Assembly, I do.

    Right now in Lakewood the monitor has asked for another $6.2 million for courtesy busing even though he negotiated a deal where by if the yeshiva staggered their starting and ending times courtesy busing would be approved for those living .6 miles from their school for the school year.

    As far as public school parents moving out of the district, I think most of them are renters.

    As far as other areas refusing to allow religious Jews in, you do know that that it is against the law.

    in reply to: Who gets more Schar? #1125457
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The one who worked hard to earn it

    in reply to: What Can We Argue About After Tuesday? #1123124
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The Lakewood School Budget Referendum is on 1/26 which is Tuesday also. Will the monitor get the $6.2 million increase? The Lakewood Board of Education had a board meeting about what they will do if they don’t get the budget increase.

    in reply to: No Dorms on Logan road #1171300
    Abba_S
    Participant

    All that is going to happen is the judge will give the zoning board another 120 days to justify why they denied the variance. The current excuse is they didn’t have enough time. In the end the zoning board will have to give them the variance.

    in reply to: Government programs are not tzedakah #1125894
    Abba_S
    Participant

    My comment was that if you do not give charity you will have a higher tax bill at the end of the year. I do not know anyone who willingly wants to pay more income tax than they have to. Even Clinton when their tax return was revealed deducted used clothing donations on their tax return.

    Maybe the reason the school monitor in Lakewood NJ is trying to STRONG ARM the community into increasing real estate taxes by $6.5 million is because of this. I assume the Jews in Lakewood give charity but who knows. I never had to go on a program but I have read that to qualify for these programs your income has to be below 130% of the poverty line based on family size and you are restricted as to what assets you can have.

    As far as someone on programs having a new minivan, it may not be theirs or a relative pays the lease for them and that is why they have a new car. Or even if they are paying the lease themselves it may not be counted as an asset for govt. program purposes and may shelter some of their income. Why don’t you give them the benefit of the doubt?

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157088
    Abba_S
    Participant

    In Lakewood the monitor threaten to cancel courtesy busing if he doesn’t get a referendum for an additional $6.5 million but I haven’t heard anything about it. It is suppose to take place Jan. 26, 2016 so why isn’t it in the news. Will the monitor actually cancel the busing mid year? What will the judge say when the the monitor is sued?

    In East Ramapo how will the the board treat the school monitors? Will they invite them to board meetings or will they sit with the public? The Board must prepare a budget which must be voted in May by the voters. Will there be a Tax Increase?

    I am not computer savvy but what about a video on say U TUBE about the state denying Jews the right to vote or denying Jewish students school busing. Maybe having a contest who can produce the best video is the best way to go.

    in reply to: Government programs are not tzedakah #1125846
    Abba_S
    Participant

    who is ??????? ??????

    If you have taxes deducted from your paycheck that is what it is.

    Government programs are for everyone who is a legal resident, if they qualify.

    in reply to: Digging His Own Grave #1119758
    Abba_S
    Participant

    With the cost of living few people are concerned with life and burial insurance. Cemeteries are rarely visited outside of a funeral and are therefor not supported as much as say a yeshiva and when the comunity moves away they are forgotten and abandoned.

    in reply to: Digging His Own Grave #1119756
    Abba_S
    Participant

    I don’t know how small Jewish communities or funeral directors can afford to maintain these cemeteries. Many of these are abandoned and are taken over by the state. An investor takes it over the property, paves it and uses it as a parking lot, although he is not suppose do that. Or kids use it to hang out and vandalize the tombstones.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157087
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Joseph: This year the monitor overruled the board and pushed through over a 6% increase to $129 million and although he made a deal with the yeshiva to allow courtesy busing for those living more than .6 miles he is breaking the deal unless he gets a $6.5 million budget increase. If he can’t stay on budget this year when it’s mid year and he already has a $9.5 deficit why do you expect next year to be any different.

    I thought that the boy’s, girl’s and public schools school have different starting and ending times so they can’t be combined. If the judge does not issue a stay, then the parents will have to bring their children to school. The yeshivas should get together so that all students are mandated. The parent should get class action status on behalf of the 30,000 yeshiva students for theft or denial of service because of religion and at $3,000.00 per student that $90 million before punitive damages. There will be lawyer banging on door to get the business

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157084
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Joseph: The parents must file a claim with the NJ Department of Education if they want to be reimbursed, not the district. Many parents are unaware of it.

    ZD: Can the state take over the district and abolish Courtesy Busing? The answer is yes the state can. Is it Legal? The answer MAYBE NO. If the school district at their discretion authorizes policies to provides courtesy busing it has the same rules at regular busing until the district votes to no longer provide the service. The state has never taken over a school district whose board have not been convicted of a crime. If the reason for taking over the district is to deny yeshiva student bus service they are violating both the Voting Right & Civil Rights laws.

    “Also School Taxes are local taxes not State Taxes”. Yes The Board of Education is suppose to be local residents not a monitor appointed by the state. Once the states in charge it’s no longer a local tax it’s a state tax they just can’t increase without a local election.

    The problem is that if he cuts courtesy busing as he is promising to do if he doesn’t get a budget increase and it goes to court, we will find out once and for all if the state has the right to takeover of a school district without due process is legal. You will note that the state did not remove the Board.

    in reply to: Digging His Own Grave #1119752
    Abba_S
    Participant

    There are Chevra Kadishas that you can pay a nominal fee under $50.00 per year and the whole family is covered and not have to be a member of the shul. The funeral alone without the plot or use of the chapel cost at least about $8,000. Most Chevras Kadishaas bought plots years ago when the plots were cheap. Funeral Directors do not own cemeteries, they may have bought plots cheap or know people who are looking to get rid of an unused plot. Shuls also may own a section of the cemetery but unless they have it in the backyard they don’t own the whole cemetery.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157081
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Gavra: I like my idea better. The state has the responsibility to provide public schooling. As the district seems unable to do so (due to lack of tax funding and no fault of their own), that responsibility should be taken away from the district.

    Only problem is then the state has to forgo real estate taxes in the district which they wouldn’t do. They can’t take the taxes and not provide the services. As far as the State taking over the district they can’t unless the Board is criminally convicted which is not the case. NJ is the only state with a monitor with veto power over the board and his only accomplishments is denial of busing, a $9.5 deficit and breaking an agreement he made with the community to provide courtesy busing for the school year.

    The question that the courts must address are is the monitor violating rights under the voting act and is he endangering the welfare of a minor by denying school bus services. Because an agreement for busing wasn’t made until August the monitor could not find buses for some yeshiva routes resulting in MANDATED Students being denied bus service. The State is on the hook if the parent get together and sue.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157080
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Mrs. Plony it seems has a speech impediment, this is common. This is NOT the Special Ed that I am talking about. This is Title I special ed. If you will fill out the papers, you will be contacted by the Board of Education of your district asking you to bring the child down for an evaluation to see if and what types of services she is entitled to. As a general rule if the teacher says she has a problem the school district’s evaluation will agree and you will be entitled to 1-3 hours of speech therapy per week. After the evaluation you will get in writing what services will be recommended. If you agree then there is nothing more you have to do. You will be notified when they will make the final determination as to what service you will get . If you disagree with evaluation you should attend this meeting. Otherwise it’s just a waste of time This service many times is provided at the school during school hours. Not using this service can result in the child not having friend as they can’t understand her and other emotional problems later in life. Also, it’s free so you really have nothing to lose except the time it takes you to fill out the paper and take your child for the evaluation

    The Special Ed. I am talking about is for the developmental disable which requires one teacher/ paraprofessional per student for the whole school day and is VERY EXPENSIVE.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Tuitions #1118779
    Abba_S
    Participant

    As far as tuitions go East Ramapo School District has been getting between $24,390.00 – $26,853.00 for years and the public school parents are complaining they are being underfunded.

    As far as yeshivas throwing out students whose parents don’t pay full tuition I think it shows money is the most important thing. All the students and their friends will know that this yeshiva considers money first. Who knows if this child who was denied a Jewish education would have become the next R’ Moshe (Great Rosh Yeshiva).

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157076
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Many people fault the board for not fighting the special ed. parents who want private placement for their child. The reason the board doesn’t is because they don’t think it’s cost effective. Public school special ed cost between $30K – 35K while private placement cost between $60K-$75K. It cost $15K – $30K to fight the parent and if the board loses it must pay the parent’s legal expense. So in order, to fight private placement, It will cost the board $45K if they win $30K for the public school special ed and $15K. If the board loses it cost $90K $60K for private placement and $15K for both their legal expenses and the parents. Please note that these law suits will have to be fought every year until the student ages out at 22 or the parent gives up.

    The Board’s philosophy is to design a public school special ed program that the frum community would want to use. This way you have the saving of the public school special ed without the legal expense. The board has been successful in convincing parent to use the program. The problem is that the public school supporters want the program to be integrated with the rest of the public school which the frum parent don’t want. Which is a change which the parent can appeal to a judge and until the case is resolved they can’t integrate especially since it’s going to be a class action suit for private placement.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157073
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Could someone explain to me if the East Ramapo School Budget in 2010 was $187 million and there were no tax increases. Why was the current school budget voted and approved in May 2015 $218 million? Also by NY state law the budget can’t be increased by more than 2% per year without a special referendum.

    AS you can see the taxpayers have exceeded the cap in the last 5 years. Now as far as cutting busing this is a very small percentage of the budget. But if you cut it will effect a greater percentage of public school students and if they miss enough days they have to repeat the year. Likewise, every day a student is absent from school the prorated amount is deducted from the school budget. So if the district is getting $18,000 per student and the school year is 180 days, each school day is worth $100.00 per student. If your forcing the parent to bring the student some times they just can’t which will result in higher absenteeism and costing the district $100 per student per day.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Tuitions #1118754
    Abba_S
    Participant

    The solution maybe to move to Rochester where tuition is only $1,000.00 for all year kids. They advertise on Yeshiva World. The commute is a killer but at least you can afford the tuition. You may need to learn how to fly a small plane if you need to work in NYC.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157062
    Abba_S
    Participant

    In order for the school monitor to be granted veto power over the board it requires a bill to be passed by both the NY State Assembly & Senate and signed by the Governor. Last year it was stalled in the senate and the current Senate Majority Leader feels the bill is Anti Semitic so even if it passes the Assembly it is not going to be put to a vote in the senate and will not become law.

    As far as not inviting the monitor to school board meetings all that it means is that instead of sitting on the dias with the board members they are seated with the general public. As far as reallocating funds from the classroom to the legal defense fund, this would only be a tit for tat to annoy the public school supporters and no criminal action would be taken against the board.

    As far as I know there is no state law as to teacher student ratio so in theory you could have 100 students per class and still be providing mandatory education. If every class had 100 student besides special ed., there would be surplus school buildings which can be sold. Just another crazy idea.

    As far as eliminating or changing the distance a student has to reside in order to be entitled to school busing this would require a new law and affect the whole state. If the school monitor’s veto bill can’t be passed why do you think this bill which will effect students in every district in the state will?

    A new school district budget must be drafted in both Lakewood And East Ramapo for the new school year 2016-2017 now and voted by the public by May. Will they allocate funds for the board’s legal defense? Will there be an increase? In Lakewood they need another $9.5 million in the current year due to mismanagement by the school monitor. Who knows what he has planned for the next school year?

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157045
    Abba_S
    Participant

    Joseph: I agree with your concept but I think using yeshiva students as pawns in the war with Public School Supporters is a bad idea.

    As far as removing the School board due to reallocating funds from the classroom to legal defense. In order to remove the board the state must prove criminal intent and misuse of public funds. This is not the case as defending the board even against the state is considered a valid school expense. All it does is force the state to sue the board. The judge may order that the funds be returned to the classroom but will also have the plaintiff post a surety bond guaranteeing payment of legal expenses.

    As far as not suing the school board or State. Federal law mandates that for special education the parent may sue in order to get legally entitled Special Ed. It also states if the parent wins the school board must pay the parent’s legal expenses. Also in East Ramapo it was the Public School Supports that sued the board. If you don’t want these law suits: “Don’t take Federal Funds” . The problem is that this means NY STATE can’t take federal funds for special ed. which will save the federal gov. billions. Where will the state find the funds?

Viewing 50 posts - 801 through 850 (of 995 total)